PDA

View Full Version : Supreme Court rules for anti-gay church over military funeral protests


pov
Mar 2nd, 2011, 04:09 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/03/02/scotus.westboro.church/?hpt=C1
Supreme Court rules for anti-gay church over military funeral protests
By Bill Mears, CNN Supreme Court Producer
March 2, 2011 11:57 a.m. EST

Washington (CNN) -- A Kansas church known for its angry, anti-gay protests at funerals of U.S. troops won an appeal Wednesday at the Supreme Court in a case testing the competing constitutional rights of free speech and privacy.

In an 8-1 ruling, the justices said that members of Westboro Baptist Church had a right to promote what they call a broad-based message on public matters such as wars. The father of a fallen Marine had sued the small church, saying those protests amounted to targeted harassment and an intentional infliction of emotional distress.

"Speech is powerful. It can stir people to action, move them to tears of both joy and sorrow, and -- as it did here -- inflict great pain. On the facts before us, we cannot react to that pain by punishing the speaker," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority.

At issue was a delicate test between the privacy rights of grieving families and the free speech rights of demonstrators, however disturbing and provocative their message. Several states have attempted to impose specific limits on when and where the church members can protest.

The church, led by pastor Fred Phelps, believes God is punishing the United States for "the sin of homosexuality" through events including soldiers' deaths. Members have traveled the country shouting at grieving families at funerals and displaying such signs as "Thank God for dead soldiers," "God blew up the troops" and "AIDS cures fags."

Westboro members appeared outside the 2006 funeral for Lance Cpl. Matthew Snyder in Westminster, Maryland, outside Baltimore.

Snyder's family sued the church in 2007, alleging invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress and civil conspiracy. A jury awarded the family $2.9 million in compensatory damages, plus $8 million in punitive damages, which were later reduced to $5 million.

The church appealed the case in 2008 to a federal appeals court, which reversed the judgments a year later, siding with the church's allegations that its First Amendment rights were violated.

Albert Snyder, Matthew's father, said his son was not gay and the protesters should not have been at the funeral.

"I was just shocked that any individual could do this to another human being," Snyder told CNN. "I mean, it was inhuman."

Church members said their broader message was aimed at the unspecified actions of the military and those who serve in it. They believe U.S. soldiers deserve to die because they fight for a country that tolerates homosexuality.

In his opinion, Roberts noted the Snyder family was not a "captive audience" to the protests conducted several hundred yards away.

"Westboro stayed well away from the memorial service," Roberts wrote. "Snyder could see no more than the tops of the signs when driving to the funeral. And there is no indication that the picketing itself in any way interfered with the funeral itself."

The court therefore concluded Snyder could not collect damages from Westboro.

But the chief justice showed little sympathy for the message Westboro promotes.

"Westboro believes that America is morally flawed; many Americans might feel the same about Westboro. Westboro's funeral picketing is certainly hurtful and its contribution to public discourse may be negligible," he said. However, "As a nation we have chosen a different course -- to protect even hurtful speech on public issues to ensure that we do not stifle public debate."

The ruling was a narrow one, dealing with the specific, unusual facts of this appeal. Such vocal protests at military funerals are almost entirely confined to this one small group. Roberts said on the free speech question, it was enough to rely on "limited principles that sweep no more broadly than the appropriate context of the instant case."

Only Justice Samuel Alito dissented. He said the church's "outrageous conduct caused petitioner great injury, and the court now compounds that injury by depriving petitioner of a judgment that acknowledges the wrong he suffered," he said. "In order to have a society in which public issues can be openly and vigorously debated, it is not necessary to allow the brutalization of innocent victims like petitioner."

The Supreme Court has never addressed the specific issue of laws designed to protect the "sanctity and dignity of memorial and funeral services" as well as the privacy of family and friends of the deceased. But the high court has recognized the state's interest in protecting people from unwanted protests or communications while in their homes.

The justices were being asked to address how far states and private entities such as cemeteries and churches can go to justify picket-free zones and the use of "floating buffers" to silence or restrict the speech or movements of demonstrators exercising their constitutional rights in a funeral setting.

A majority of states across the nation have responded to the protests with varying levels of control over the Westboro church protesters. In Wednesday's case, 48 states and dozens of members of Congress filed amicus briefs in support of the Snyders.

Church members told the court they have a duty to protest and picket at certain events, including funerals, to promote their religious message: "That God's promise of love and heaven for those who obey him in this life is counterbalanced by God's wrath and hell for those who do not obey him."

The congregation is made up mostly of Phelps and his family. The pastor has 13 children and at least 54 grandchildren and seven great-grandchildren.

He described himself as an "old-time" gospel preacher in a CNN interview in 2006, saying, "You can't preach the Bible without preaching the hatred of God."

Church members have participated in several hundred protests across the country.

In 2009, the high court blocked Missouri's effort to enforce a specific law aimed at the Westboro church. Phelps, daughter Shirley Phelps-Roper and other church members had protested near the August 2005 funeral of a soldier in St. Joseph, Missouri.

State lawmakers later passed the Spc. Edward Lee Myers Law, criminalizing picketing "in front of or about" a funeral location or procession.

wta_zuperfann
Mar 2nd, 2011, 07:48 PM
This ruling is what is called a ''legal absurdity''.

Payam
Mar 2nd, 2011, 07:55 PM
This ruling is what is called a ''legal absurdity''.

Yeah I think those two words are the best way to describe it. Those bastards in church can say whatever they want, but when someone talks against THEM, they become so pissed off that they forget freedom of speech and all the rest.

égalité
Mar 2nd, 2011, 09:04 PM
That's fine. We can't tread on their right to free speech. Let the world see what lunatics they are. :spit:

moby
Mar 2nd, 2011, 09:28 PM
Westboro has done more for gay rights than I have.

Should really be sending them a thank you note.

*JR*
Mar 3rd, 2011, 12:52 AM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/23/reverend-fred-phelps-lady_n_402286.html

Reverend Fred Phelps: 'God Hates Lady Gaga' :eek:
First Posted: 12-23-09 03:21 PM

The Reverend Fred Phelps hates fags (not to mention Jews), and Lady Gaga loves everything gay. So somehow by the transitive property, it makes sense that the Kansas pastor would declare that God hates Gaga.

Here's the Reverend's press release with info on where you can join him and the Wesboro Baptist Church to picket Gaga's concert on January 7: "Thou hadst a whore's forehead, thou refusedst to be ashamed...Will He reserve HIs anger forever? Will he keep it to the end? Behold, thou hast spoken and done evil things as thou couldest." Jer 3:3,5

"Art" and "fashion" are the euphemisms, the guise under which proud whore Lady Gaga teaches rebellion against God (incidentally, her claim to the title of "lady" is sound only if she tacks on "of the night," thereby alluding to another euphemism of what she is.) As much as she'd like to pretend otherwise, there's nothing new or different about this particular hussy's pretentious prancing. Does the simple slut truly think that she can change God's standards by seducing a generation of rebels into joining her in fist-raised, stiff-necked, hard-hearted rebellion against Him? Get real!

Even as she gives lip-service to "liberating" her young fans, Lady Gaga brings them into slavery to their own corruption, teaching them to glory in their shame. She hates you! "For when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness...While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption!" 2 Pet. 2:18-19

YOU'RE GOING TO HELL.

meyerpl
Mar 3rd, 2011, 01:36 AM
Inoffensive speech needs no protection.

Valanga
Mar 3rd, 2011, 01:39 AM
The church, led by pastor Fred Phelps, believes God is punishing the United States for "the sin of homosexuality" through events including soldiers' deaths. Members have traveled the country shouting at grieving families at funerals and displaying such signs as "Thank God for dead soldiers," "God blew up the troops" and "AIDS cures fags."

:o?

skanky~skanketta
Mar 3rd, 2011, 01:50 AM
Well, the world is progressing. Eventually, just like how black people finally got equal treatment, homosexuals will too. We're just living in a time where homos are fighting for their rights. The future generation will reap the rewards.

As for Fred Phelps and the lunatic fringe that listen to his drivel, eventually he will die and the world will become a better place.

Scotso
Mar 3rd, 2011, 01:51 AM
That's fine. We can't tread on their right to free speech. Let the world see what lunatics they are. :spit:

Westboro has done more for gay rights than I have.

Should really be sending them a thank you note.

Yep.

young_gunner913
Mar 3rd, 2011, 02:26 AM
These people make me ashamed to be an American. They're a disgrace to our country not to mention the human race.

meyerpl
Mar 3rd, 2011, 04:05 AM
Well, the world is progressing. Eventually, just like how black people finally got equal treatment, homosexuals will too. We're just living in a time where homos are fighting for their rights. The future generation will reap the rewards.

As for Fred Phelps and the lunatic fringe that listen to his drivel, eventually he will die and the world will become a better place.How right you are. There was a time, not so long ago, when publicly advocating for the right of gays to marry (and before that, interracial marriage) was considered by most to be offensive. When I was a boy, most of the videos shown on MTV today would have had people shouting 'obscenity' and demanding that the responsible parties belong in jail, while nobody batted an eye over the use of the 'n-word'.

People's ideas about what's offensive change, but freedom of speech must remain indelible. In a free nation, people must have the right to express themselves, even if their notions are considered course or vulger. There is no such thing as a 'right' to not be offended.