PDA

View Full Version : P. Kvitova new WTA glamour girl?


The Witch-king
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:30 AM
She is just stunning if you ask me. Her eyes, lips and bone struckture are :worship:

Shame about the Gollum teeth and gut but those can be worked on.

Step aside Pova and Anci.
ETA:
http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/7484/22959.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/855/22959.jpg/)

http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/6169/22963f.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/33/22963f.jpg/)

http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/1396/1087192.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/266/1087192.jpg/)

http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/4489/1087196.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/215/1087196.jpg/)

http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/9590/1087202.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/11/1087202.jpg/)

ElusiveChanteuse
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:31 AM
I'm warming to her, hopefully so.:)

toby345
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:33 AM
She is everything but beautiful IMHO :shrug:

Vlad Tepes
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:34 AM
VIP Ana is way more stunning than Petra, there's no comparing them, IMO.
Petra does have some nice features, but she looks like a jeune paysanne right now, the teeth, hair and earings are all :help:

Joelina
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:35 AM
no, she´s not even pretty.

saint2
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:36 AM
She looks OK :)

Those who are intends to trolling this theard and mocking Petra- your names, surames and photos, please. Stand up or shut up.

Setsuna.
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:39 AM
She is everything but beautiful as toby345 said.

Frontin
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:39 AM
I don't think she is pretty, but man she is good.

I hope she wins the whole thing!

The Witch-king
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:40 AM
VIP Ana is way more stunning than Petra, there's no comparing them, IMO.


Ana is pretty but she's not *stunning*.

Stunning to me is someone who catches your eye and you're like WOW (they don't necessarily have to be the most conventionally beautiful too). Petra has that factor with the eyes and her blank facial expressions.

Andy.
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:40 AM
How much alcohol have you had tonight?

In all seriousness I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I dont see it personally but whatever floats your boat.

saint2
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:41 AM
How much alcohol have you had tonight?

First troll. Neeext.

Young 8
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:41 AM
I just saw the light

Pops Maellard
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:42 AM
Kvitova's not model-gorgeous but she has appealing qualities nonetheless. Great eyes especially.
http://www.wtatour.com/namedImage/12781/player_314206.jpg

She'll look better once her braces come off.

The Witch-king
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:43 AM
^ It's only 12:45 :confused:

M.P
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:44 AM
i think she kinda look like a painting

nevetssllim
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:46 AM
I think she's really beautiful. It's really cute when she starts playing with her hair. :)

ZPv58EOFXh4

benbest
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:46 AM
I like her smile

L'Enfant Sauvage
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:54 AM
She's not photogenic, but she's definitely a pretty girl. Can she snatch Ivanovic? Not in the looks department, but Ana's not the norm as far as tennis players and looks go.

Jajaloo
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:55 AM
Who knows. She has a good as chance as anyone to win this Oz Open, she could be the new Sharaova :shrug:

it-girl
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:55 AM
Ana is pretty but she's not *stunning*.

Stunning to me is someone who catches your eye and you're like WOW (they don't necessarily have to be the most conventionally beautiful too). Petra has that factor with the eyes and her blank facial expressions.That's exactly what Ana does & she's beautiful that's why she is stunning. Kivitova has beautiful eyes that really stand out with her complexion. I still don't think she is beautiful but she is not ugly either. As for her teeth it appears that she has braces so they are a work in progress.

ZODIAC
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:55 AM
she will good if she lifts the title

moby
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:56 AM
She's stunningly beautiful, but in a cold and terrible way.
Like a medieval Queen. There's something antiquated and regal about her.

Mynarco
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:56 AM
Ivanovic is stunning. Kvitova's eyes are way too big

jefrilibra
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:59 AM
her looks are decent. But she can be very goofy sometimes and maybe that adds to her appeal.

Soliloque
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:00 AM
Who knows. She has a good as chance as anyone to win this Oz Open, she could be the new Sharaova :shrug:

Her chances are not that good. Her game usually turns into horrible ballbashing when she faces someone with good defense. She'll crash to Vera.

tommyk75
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:00 AM
It's tough to judge players' appearance from what they look like on court: sweaty, no make-up, hair tied back. (For example, I never thought Pironkova was pretty at all, but when I saw photos of her posted on this board from some party event, she looked absolutely stunning!)
I actually think Kvitova could look quite beautiful with the right make-up person, especially when the braces come off.

The Witch-king
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:03 AM
That's exactly what Ana does & she's beautiful that's why she is stunning. Kivitova has beautiful eyes that really stand out with her complexion. I still don't think she is beautiful but she is not ugly either. As for her teeth it appears that she has braces so they are a work in progress.

Well to me Ana is very plain and is that is the reason for her mass appeal.

BlameSerena
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:04 AM
She needs a few years to grow into her sexy as I like to say.

Chance
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:05 AM
I can see what Dama do Bling is saying even though I don't think she is beautiful, at least not right now. Right now you can tell Petra is still not comfortable with smiling and generally not comfortable with her looks, but i say in a couple of years she will grow into a very attractive woman.


Off topic, girl needs to buy herself a better sports bra;)

Nico_E
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:07 AM
she should really wear a bra, didnt need to see her nipples 3 time today

matthias
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:12 AM
she isn´t pretty and has no glamour at all
but she is playing great tennis this year so far.
will rise to top20 very soon

MB.
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:17 AM
Gollum teeth :lol:

Cleffa
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:18 AM
Her outfit does look very low cut. And I'm not sure if it's just angle or garment bumping out but it seems that her abs are ripped.

Don't think she's in the glamourous side but she's definitely fit and is in good shape for winning this slam.

shoparound
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:31 AM
she should really wear a bra, didnt need to see her nipples 3 time today

She's not the only one in the WTA that needs a bra...
I think she looks ok. Hair is too curly to be sexy. Looks too much like Kim :tape:

Chance
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:37 AM
She's not the only one in the WTA that needs a bra...
I think she looks ok. Hair is too curly to be sexy. Looks too much like Kim :tape:


what? hair too curly to be sexy?:rolleyes:

Monzanator
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:39 AM
Hell no... :o

Georgesson
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:40 AM
Kvitova's not model-gorgeous but she has appealing qualities nonetheless. Great eyes especially.
http://www.wtatour.com/namedImage/12781/player_314206.jpg

She'll look better once her braces come off.

http://www.popcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/dangerfield-rodney.jpg

Frappant resemblance to Rodney Dangerfield from Caddyshack:spit:

Serenus Christ
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:47 AM
she is very beautiful and defiantly high fashion.. http://multiply.com/mu/skyllo01/image/28/photos/187/500x500/21/cryra.gif?et=4nrAP30%2BUAfmd3v9SJHueA&nmid=50804473


for example lara stone: http://allaboutmodels.net/files/82660_15551fvo05fhddqz30j-sm.jpg
Walked for Shiatzy Chen, Louis Vuitton, Chanel, Lanvin, Miu Miu, Fendi, MaxMara, Pollini, Prada, Anna Sui, Marc Jacobs, Michael Kors, Stella McCartney, Zac Posen, Balmain, Celine, Hermès, Jean Paul Gaultier, Dolce & Gabbana, D&G, Givenchy, Karl Lagerfeld, Missoni, Emanuel Ungaro, and Victoria's Secret.

Number one supermodel at the moment.
Bitches be hatin'

Nico_E
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:47 AM
:haha:

theFutureisNow
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:50 AM
I think she has spectacular eyes, and from some angles is beautiful.

http://d.yimg.com/i/ng/sp/ap_photo/20110107/all/l4939748.jpg

MB.
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:51 AM
she is very beautiful and defiantly high fashion..

for example lara stone

Number one supermodel at the moment.
Bitches be hatin'


There;s a difference between beautiful, fashion model with unique features (Stone, Kershaw, Kloss, etc), and not attractive.

Also, I don't think "defiantly" means what you think it means.

Polikarpov
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:54 AM
Kvitova's not model-gorgeous but she has appealing qualities nonetheless. Great eyes especially.
http://www.wtatour.com/namedImage/12781/player_314206.jpg

She'll look better once her braces come off.

I'm getting Kimberley vibes.

Serenus Christ
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:55 AM
There;s a difference between beautiful, fashion model with unique features (Stone, Kershaw, Kloss, etc), and not attractive.

Also, I don't think "defiantly" means what you think it means.

She has an amazing face and body, her eyes are amazing and she has great bone structure..Petra remind me of abbey-lee except she has bigger eyes.
people are so quick to judge. a shame really.

So Disrespectful
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:57 AM
Petra has that factor with the eyes and her blank facial expressions.

Blank facial expressions are such a turn-on...

http://i1014.photobucket.com/albums/af264/JamieOwen3/serena-gif.gif

Fuzzylogic
Jan 22nd, 2011, 10:16 AM
Does anyone have that pic of her in the offcourt/party thread(I think) where she had glasses and was in a restaurant or something. She was beautiful there.

homogenius
Jan 22nd, 2011, 10:18 AM
i think she kinda look like a painting

yes, like a Picasso

TennisFan66
Jan 22nd, 2011, 10:18 AM
Is this a joke thread or is the OP serious? ...

nevetssllim
Jan 22nd, 2011, 10:24 AM
Does anyone have that pic of her in the offcourt/party thread(I think) where she had glasses and was in a restaurant or something. She was beautiful there.

That might have been Pironkova, not Kvitova. :p

Fuzzylogic
Jan 22nd, 2011, 10:26 AM
That might have been Pironkova, not Kvitova. :p

*Facepalm*:tape: I knew there was something off, thanks for the correction.

MiiMo
Jan 22nd, 2011, 10:36 AM
Petra is quite ugly actually. So no :)

MHingisfan
Jan 22nd, 2011, 12:02 PM
Petra is stunningly beauitful so I say yes :smooch: but the Williams sisters are ugly.

http://d.yimg.com/i/ng/sp/ap_photo/20110107/all/l4939748.jpg

The 2nd Law
Jan 22nd, 2011, 12:03 PM
She's pretty :)

Spiritof42
Jan 22nd, 2011, 12:19 PM
I find Petra quite attractive overall. New WTA glamour girl? I very much doubt it, but I find most of them overrated anyway.
Curious to see what her smile will look like once the braces come off.

Her yelps turn me off, though. They sound like someone stepping on a puppy's tail. :o

She's stunningly beautiful, but in a cold and terrible way.
Like a medieval Queen. There's something antiquated and regal about her.
You mean like this? :)
Works for me.

http://twitchfilm.com/news/galadriel.jpg

tsmile789
Jan 22nd, 2011, 12:41 PM
She doesn't have the Ana/ Maria/ Daniella effect... In my mind no one can top these three.
Ana: beautiful stunning exotic looks and great personality
Maria: long lean model like feature
Daniella: the perfect face every women envy and the body every men desire...

toby345
Jan 22nd, 2011, 12:43 PM
She doesn't have the Ana/ Maria/ Daniella effect... In my mind no one can top these three.
Ana: beautiful stunning exotic looks and great personality
Maria: long lean model like feature
Daniella: the perfect face every women envy and the body every men desire...

This anorexic stick? :help:

Papillon.
Jan 22nd, 2011, 01:35 PM
Daniela's face is pretty awful.

JamieOwen3
Jan 22nd, 2011, 01:52 PM
glamour girl no - pretty in a less obvious waqy yes, her eyes are her best feature. im not sure about her having the IT factor though. Maria and Ana have that IT factor which is why they have done so well with sponsors, glamour girls AO final 2008 remember?

The Dawntreader
Jan 22nd, 2011, 02:12 PM
Beautiful puppy-dog eyes. The ungainly way in which she carries herself i think adds to her appeal.

smarties
Jan 22nd, 2011, 02:17 PM
Daniella: the perfect face every women envy and the body every men desire...

:haha:

her face looks like an old leather bag and don'tget me started on the body, or lack of...

The Witch-king
Jan 22nd, 2011, 02:31 PM
I think she has spectacular eyes, and from some angles is beautiful.

http://d.yimg.com/i/ng/sp/ap_photo/20110107/all/l4939748.jpg

Oh yes. That's what I'm talking about!

glamour girl no - pretty in a less obvious waqy yes, her eyes are her best feature. im not sure about her having the IT factor though. Maria and Ana have that IT factor which is why they have done so well with sponsors, glamour girls AO final 2008 remember?

I remember not watching it because it was so damn boring but anyway

JamieOwen3
Jan 22nd, 2011, 02:35 PM
one thing that's beautiful about her is the tastes in players :p Maria is her idol

The Witch-king
Jan 22nd, 2011, 02:38 PM
:haha:

her face looks like an old leather bag and don'tget me started on the body, or lack of...

Daniela's face is pretty awful.

This anorexic stick? :help:

Petra is quite ugly actually. So no :)

Just because certain peoples looks aren't to your own tastes doesn't give you a liberty to insult them and act immature. That's not whatthis thread is about!

Le Tenisse
Jan 22nd, 2011, 02:45 PM
Give her some time. In the early 2000s maybe not everyone thought that Elena D was going to be a glam girl, but she sure become one within the years

sweetpeas
Jan 22nd, 2011, 02:54 PM
I actually think Kvitova could look quite beautiful with the right make-up person, especially when the braces come off.

So true.

goldenlox
Jan 22nd, 2011, 03:04 PM
Petra has a strong fast court game. She should be a factor at a lot of majors.

JackFrost
Jan 22nd, 2011, 03:06 PM
Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder. Everybody has a different taste.
You will not convince somebody with arguments that a person is beautyful or "stunning".

Scola
Jan 22nd, 2011, 03:31 PM
She doesn't have the Ana/ Maria/ Daniella effect... In my mind no one can top these three.
Ana: beautiful stunning exotic looks and great personality
Maria: long lean model like feature
Daniella: the perfect face every women envy and the body every men desire...

:haha:

What exactly is exotic on Ivanovic? She's just an average brunette, every shopping centre is crowded of them.

BepaMaria
Jan 22nd, 2011, 03:33 PM
Petra is not even in the least bit beautiful:o

Her bulging eyes, pointy nose, braces and square face make her look hideous.

Yes she is better looking than players such as Pushniacki, Jankovic, Bartoli and Wickmayer, but I really don't know how anyone could say that she is beautiful or even stunning to that extent. Saying that is just an embarrassment to yourself as it shows that you have absolutely no taste when it comes to women. Masha, Bepa, Makiri, Anci, Daniela, even Schiavone are all better looking than her.

I think Jarmila Groth would be a more suitable candidate for the new glamour girl.

JJ all the way
Jan 22nd, 2011, 03:42 PM
Petra is not even in the least bit beautiful:o

Her bulging eyes, pointy nose, braces and square face make her look hideous.

Yes she is better looking than players such as Pushniacki, Jankovic, Bartoli and Wickmayer, but I really don't know how anyone could say that she is beautiful or even stunning to that extent. Saying that is just an embarrassment to yourself as it shows that you have absolutely no taste when it comes to women. Masha, Bepa, Makiri, Anci, Daniela, even Schiavone are all better looking better than her.

I think Jarmila Groth would be a more suitable candidate for the new glamour girl.

:help:

JamieOwen3
Jan 22nd, 2011, 03:45 PM
Vera is the one with the best eyes in women's tennis though!

LCS
Jan 22nd, 2011, 03:51 PM
Petra is not even in the least bit beautiful:o

Her bulging eyes, pointy nose, braces and square face make her look hideous.

Yes she is better looking than players such as Pushniacki, Jankovic, Bartoli and Wickmayer, but I really don't know how anyone could say that she is beautiful or even stunning to that extent. Saying that is just an embarrassment to yourself as it shows that you have absolutely no taste when it comes to women. Masha, Bepa, Makiri, Anci, Daniela, even Schiavone are all better looking better than her.

I think Jarmila Groth would be a more suitable candidate for the new glamour girl.

There are so many wrongs here I don't know where to start...:help:

Vikapower
Jan 22nd, 2011, 03:58 PM
she is very beautiful and defiantly high fashion..

for example lara stone:

[image]

Number one supermodel at the moment.
Bitches be hatin'

:lol: Useless thread but I really must answer that quote, seriously don't you have no shame comparing the unique Lara to a nobody (...) ? :o

Lara is certainly the most beautiful model to have ever lived, her walk is divine, she glides on the runway effortlessly (Prada SS08, Balmain FW09, Stella Mc Artney SS09 certainly her best walks with Chanel) she's fierce and innocent look, intimidating, at first sight you just can't believe, you dislike, then when you persistently keep going through her photos your heart beats stronger of fascination (...) she's a definition of a model : emotions.

On the runways she seems like someone high hearted and sure of herself, wrong, because backstage she's kind, lovely, down to earth so timid and reserved that you almost want to cuddle her, protect her perfection (...) her body is fit and breaks the modelling HF rules of near anorexia (Anja Rubik, Vlada Roslyakova season 2006/2007 :tape:).

Kvitova has nothing special neither on her face than maybe her eyes and again they are completely dead when I think of models like Constance Jablonski or Emily Didonato (...) the girl is emotionless and reminds me Sigrid Agren even better Snejana Onopka. Boring trio. :help:

Shall you never ever compare again a goddess to this :tape: Bye. :wavey:

leebeasy
Jan 22nd, 2011, 04:35 PM
I didn't use to think she was anything special but in the Stosur match she definitely sseemed more attractive.
I think it could've been the headband; I'm sucka though for a player who wears a headband:drool:
Wish Maria and Vika would wear them more often.

delicatecutter
Jan 22nd, 2011, 04:43 PM
NO NO NO. She is the least attractive Czech girl of the bunch.

Her game is to die for though. :drool:

it-girl
Jan 22nd, 2011, 04:51 PM
:haha:

What exactly is exotic on Ivanovic? She's just an average brunette, every shopping centre is crowded of them.:spit::haha:Yeah right.

There are several exotic girls on tour Jankovic has exotic features also. And as much as I've gone to the shopping center I've never seen anyone who looks like Ana. You may not care for Ana as a player which is fine but she is far from average.

Mistress of Evil
Jan 22nd, 2011, 05:02 PM
How much alcohol have you had tonight?

In all seriousness I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I dont see it personally but whatever floats your boat.

:yeah:

The Witch-king
Jan 22nd, 2011, 05:07 PM
:spit::haha:Yeah right.

There are several exotic girls on tour Jankovic has exotic features also. And as much as I've gone to the shopping center I've never seen anyone who looks like Ana. You may not care for Ana as a player which is fine but she is far from average.

I guess it depends were you live :shrug:

it-girl
Jan 22nd, 2011, 05:14 PM
I guess it depends were you live :shrug:To say Ana is average is rather funny. Ana is easily one of the most beautiful women in the world.

Curcubeu
Jan 22nd, 2011, 05:23 PM
Kvitova has punchy eyes and quite typical model's measurements, but she is very pale and has a bloated face. Everyone has its own associations about beauty. :shrug:

I think she is ok.

delicatecutter
Jan 22nd, 2011, 05:29 PM
Model measurements? :unsure:

Curcubeu
Jan 22nd, 2011, 05:46 PM
I would say she has the height! OK, she has some baby fat, but she's a sportswoman. :)

Vikapower
Jan 22nd, 2011, 06:01 PM
Kvitova has punchy eyes and quite typical model's measurements, but she is very pale and has a bloated face. Everyone has its own associations about beauty. :shrug:

I think she is ok.

She has a commercial body and face but definitively not HF to appear in Vogue US for example (...) the actual trend though for the designers is to bring non HF models to it e.g. Camilla Belle in Alberta Ferretti, Alessandra Ambrosio or Doutzen Kroes in Prada FW (...) but as all trends it'll die.

MakarovaFan
Jan 22nd, 2011, 06:02 PM
Err i can name about 10 players off the top of my head who could better fit"glamour girl" than Kvitova......Maybe that wasn't the word you were looking for. Looks are in the eyes of the beholder BUT to be labelled Glamour girl,she is not.

Belmont Lad
Jan 22nd, 2011, 06:04 PM
No.

HRHoliviasmith
Jan 22nd, 2011, 06:12 PM
I don't think she is pretty, but man she is good.

I hope she wins the whole thing!

...or at the very least beats pova and kim.

Corswandt
Jan 22nd, 2011, 06:14 PM
She's stunningly beautiful, but in a cold and terrible way.
Like a medieval Queen. There's something antiquated and regal about her.

I suppose she gives off that vibe because she seems to have modelled her oncourt demeanour after her idol Sharapova's Haughty Ice Queen act, plus she doesn't smile much because of the braces. Anyway, IMO she's too goofy looking to pull it off.

I've already said that, if Kvitova indeed does glamour shoots, they'll either be LOLOLOL ghastly or they'll make her look like Amanda Seyfried.

KingCrimson88
Jan 22nd, 2011, 06:32 PM
for example lara stone: http://allaboutmodels.net/files/82660_15551fvo05fhddqz30j-sm.jpg

Number one supermodel at the moment.
Bitches be hatin'

Wow, she's hideous.

As for Kvitova, I think she looks ok. Not as bad as I remember.

Corswandt
Jan 22nd, 2011, 06:41 PM
Wow, she's hideous.

I wouldn't go that far.

But, creaky 33 y.o. that I am, I still remember how the first Supermodel generation of the early to mid 1990s was mostly meh and massively overrated (apart from the genuinely gorgeous Christy Turlington).

A'DAM
Jan 22nd, 2011, 07:00 PM
I dont want to be offensive but there are at least 70 more beautiful girls in the ranks top 100...

Derek.
Jan 22nd, 2011, 07:13 PM
She doesn't have the glamour factor. :shrug:

Bismarck.
Jan 22nd, 2011, 07:27 PM
I think she's pretty verging on oddly beautiful (obviously the braces do nothing for her) but she's too icy and impenetrable, as well as being quite ungainly, so the WTA won't exploit her as much as they do Ivanovic and Wozniacki.

bukaj
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:11 PM
Is this a joke thread or is the OP serious? ...
:worship::worship:

Mixal
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:40 PM
You can sense pure class just as she walks on the court, new Sharapova totally :lol:

She has an okay face, she looks pretty in some shots, weird/ugly in others.

Btw, she's been well-known for some time, and I never noticed someone calling her really pretty/beautiful. And then in this thread... :confused:

Corswandt
Jan 22nd, 2011, 08:53 PM
Btw, she's been well-known for some time, and I never noticed someone calling her really pretty/beautiful. And then in this thread... :confused:

I think we're seeing the first traces of a new phenomenon that we may christen "bandwagon goggles" (after beer goggles).

But I remember, back c. 2008, someone accusing me of only liking Kvitova because she was tall and blonde or something to that effect (I'm not making this up).

hectopascal
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:52 PM
Petra is HOT! I saw her live in Brisbane and she looks a lot better now than last year. Also, her demeanor kinda reminds me of Mary Pierce.

terceira
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:54 PM
http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/3284/petra.png (http://img526.imageshack.us/i/petra.png/)

She s beautiful

Sp!ffy
Jan 22nd, 2011, 09:56 PM
I remember Petra in her post-Wimbledon interviews..

She's definitely pretty. Cant wait for the braces to come off though. :p

JamieOwen3
Jan 22nd, 2011, 10:05 PM
she's so much fitter than she was in 2008 so maybe that's why some people are seeing IT.When i saw her back then i said if she would get fitter she'd be a big threat as she does have powerful strokes just ask Caro.

LightWarrior
Jan 22nd, 2011, 10:19 PM
No way plus she's totally obnoxious.

MaruSharapova
Jan 22nd, 2011, 10:24 PM
Make-up can make anyone look good :shrug:
I think she's pretty 'cause she's tall and blond, and if she loses some more weight she'll be really good looking, but her face is just not well-proportioned IMO

Trixie
Jan 22nd, 2011, 10:33 PM
With make-up I think she could be very striking. Photo- shop doesn't really matter, as it can change anybody into a beauty. Her eyes remind me of somebody, but Eric Stoltz (sp?) only comes to mind. WTA likes 'glamour girls', but there are plenty that fit the bill ahead of her. What really matters, is that when she's on, her game is quite impressive.

ZODIAC
Jan 22nd, 2011, 10:48 PM
does any of you trolls know the meaning of glamour,you all need to register for ESL classes as soon as possible.The year is still young ,I am sure they have a few open spaces for some of you.

jimmy_the_greek
Jan 22nd, 2011, 11:01 PM
I wouldn't call her ugly but appearance wise she isn't anything special. Can't even compare her to the likes of sharapova,kirilenko,ivanonic etc....they fit under the title "glamour"

ZODIAC
Jan 22nd, 2011, 11:13 PM
I wouldn't call her ugly but appearance wise she isn't anything special. Can't even compare her to the likes of sharapova,kirilenko,ivanonic etc....they fit under the title "glamour"dont confuse pretty and glamour....two different things.There are average looking girls that are ultra glamorous...Ana is very boring,Kirilenko has no personality and pova just screeches on court.

jimmy_the_greek
Jan 22nd, 2011, 11:16 PM
dont confuse pretty and glamour....two different things.There are average looking girls that are ultra glamorous...Ana is very boring,Kirilenko has no personality and pova just screeches on court.

i have meet kirilenko in person, and trust me she has a personality:) very down to earth and bubbly.

VeeJJ
Jan 22nd, 2011, 11:17 PM
caro was ugly when she was younger. She will grow into a swan I think.

Papillon.
Jan 23rd, 2011, 12:04 AM
Just because certain peoples looks aren't to your own tastes doesn't give you a liberty to insult them and act immature. That's not whatthis thread is about!

:hysteric: How is it not what this thread is about? This thread is the EPITOME of superficiality. I wasn't being "immature," I was expressing my dislike of Daniela's face. :help: Get a grip.

Wiggly
Jan 23rd, 2011, 12:09 AM
Petra is quite a pretty lady.
However, isn't a "glamour girl".

The likes of Sharapova, Hantuchova and Kirilenko are.

MB.
Jan 23rd, 2011, 12:45 AM
Wow, she's hideous.

As for Kvitova, I think she looks ok. Not as bad as I remember.

The person you called 'hideous' is one of the most successful models in the world (Stone).

Kvitova, I can only describe as 'homely'. At best.

KingCrimson88
Jan 23rd, 2011, 12:54 AM
The person you called 'hideous' is one of the most successful models in the world.



I guess being attractive is not a prerequisite for being one of the most successful models.

Spiritof42
Jan 23rd, 2011, 01:09 AM
Personally, I don't really give a sh*t about "glamour". When players I like get "fashion makeovers", they often end up looking less attractive than they were to start with.

Pops Maellard
Jan 23rd, 2011, 01:53 AM
Wow, she's hideous.


I agree. :scared:

Now THIS is a model. :hearts:
http://hmtp.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/wormland0.jpg

SwissMiss19
Jan 23rd, 2011, 01:58 AM
The reason why the majority of professional tennis players are good looking is because when you play a sport like tennis, it's usually the alpha male and alpha females that are the best. They are the fastest, courageous, and determined. Of course, not everyone can be good looking and you can occasionally see not-so-good-looking-tennis-player, but I actually think Petra is cute when she has her hair down and dressed up :)I can't wait to see how she does in the rest of this season!

kman
Jan 23rd, 2011, 02:04 AM
Kvitova's not model-gorgeous but she has appealing qualities nonetheless. Great eyes especially.
http://www.wtatour.com/namedImage/12781/player_314206.jpg

She'll look better once her braces come off.

You gotta be fucking kidding me. She's not even mildly attractive. Much less stunning.

kman
Jan 23rd, 2011, 02:06 AM
Number one supermodel at the moment.
Bitches be hatin'

Not according to Forbes... still Bundchen, Lima, Moss and the likes at the top.

Serenus Christ
Jan 23rd, 2011, 02:25 AM
Not according to Forbes... still Bundchen, Lima, Moss and the likes at the top.

Oh sorry, the rankings I look at are up-to-date and count fashion shows, editorials and magazine covers.
Your two Victoria Secret girls aren't even in the top 10 and Kate Moss doesn't even model anymore :rolleyes:
so you can shove that forbes list up your ass.

Langers
Jan 23rd, 2011, 06:49 AM
She's interesting. She could be really pretty.

She has stunningly beautiful eyes. :)

The Witch-king
Jan 23rd, 2011, 07:37 AM
I agree. :scared:

Now THIS is a model. :hearts:
http://hmtp.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/wormland0.jpg

That's a guy.

scoobz
Jan 23rd, 2011, 07:40 AM
If so, "glamour" is taking some interesting new twists in 2011

Corswandt
Jan 23rd, 2011, 08:44 PM
She's stunningly beautiful, but in a cold and terrible way.
Like a medieval Queen. There's something antiquated and regal about her.

Quoting the same post twice. I suspected you were on to something, and then all of a sudden a Proustian memory came to me:

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4091/4835338038_e7f0fc9a6a.jpg

The Witch-king
Dec 2nd, 2011, 04:41 PM
I was wright! :inlove: as usual.

http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/7484/22959.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/855/22959.jpg/)

ElusiveChanteuse
Dec 2nd, 2011, 04:51 PM
She has a slam now and is taking beauty tips from good sources.:oh: Who knows.:oh:

atominside
Dec 2nd, 2011, 04:58 PM
there will only be one glamour queen, you know who she is :inlove:

Patrick345
Dec 2nd, 2011, 05:11 PM
Make-up can make anyone look good :shrug:


Not WTA make-up. Best case scenario is looking like a Walking Dead Transvestite.

JoPova
Dec 2nd, 2011, 05:16 PM
She is not exactly beautiful, but she has qualities, such as eyes and legs!

Excelscior
Dec 2nd, 2011, 05:20 PM
Originally Posted by MaruSharapova

Make-up can make anyone look good

Hmmmm. Sharapova should know. She looks like a ghost with uneven skin with out it, herself.

And that's not a diss or an attack against her (to start a Sharapova war). It's just a pedestrian observation.

Sharapova is certainly not Halle Berry-Like, as far as looking good (better or the same) with out make up. Not at all.

She looks different.

atominside
Dec 2nd, 2011, 05:44 PM
Originally Posted by MaruSharapova



Hmmmm. Sharapova should know. She looks like a ghost with uneven skin with out it, herself.

And that's not a diss or an attack against her (to start a Sharapova war). It's just a pedestrian observation.

Sharapova is certainly not Halle Berry-Like, as far as looking good (better or the same) with out make up. Not at all.

She looks different.

uncalled for :o

Maria w/o Makeup
http://www.ontennis.com/files/images/maria-sharapova-1601-3_0.jpg

Petra without, she probably actually had on here :help:
http://www.australianopen.com/images/players/wta314206.jpg

:wavey:

What If?
Dec 2nd, 2011, 05:50 PM
Dear God, please help us all, please enlighten these people about that Kvitova is not glamourous by any means.

Dear God, I've asked you so few things so far. You did some, some you didn't. But, please, make those people's minds straight.

dsanders06
Dec 2nd, 2011, 06:11 PM
How has no-one pointed out the typo in the title yet? :tape:

Inger67
Dec 2nd, 2011, 06:29 PM
uncalled for :o

Maria w/o Makeup
http://www.ontennis.com/files/images/maria-sharapova-1601-3_0.jpg

Petra without, she probably actually had on here :help:
http://www.australianopen.com/images/players/wta314206.jpg

:wavey:

I mean I can find bad pictures of Maria too without make up? :shrug: If you're trying to be objective about the situation, you clearly failed. There is no doubt that Maria is better looking than Petra but still. Maria is way overrated on this board, in both her tennis and looks :wavey:

danieln1
Dec 2nd, 2011, 06:42 PM
On this pic she remind me of Amanda Seyfried

Ivanovic is the glamour girl of WTA

Excelscior
Dec 2nd, 2011, 06:48 PM
On this pic she remind me of Amanda Seyfried

Ivanovic is the glamour girl of WTA

Yes.

Unless I'm mistaken, Ana Ivanovic has much more natural beauty than Sharapova (other can argue about their respective bodies though). From What I've seen, she normally looks better than Maria with out make up/on the court during close ups or interviews. She has better skin and no freckles, compared to Sharapova. Ana's skin also seems to have a natural sheen, that only make up could do for Sharapova.

This is not to reduce WTA players to beauty status, but a response to Atom's denial that Sharapova doesn't look different (or worse) with out make up. She does.

Ivanovic is closer to her made up beauty, than Sharapova is, when neither wear it.

And I'm sure they're others besides Ana that have "natural beauty" in tennis, we don't care to remember or mention at the moment.

$uricate
Dec 2nd, 2011, 06:49 PM
She is not exactly beautiful, but she has qualities, such as eyes and legs!

Girls are especially hot when they have eyes and legs :hearts:

Im willing to settle for one or the other though.

MB.
Dec 2nd, 2011, 07:04 PM
How much alcohol have you had tonight?

In all seriousness I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I dont see it personally but whatever floats your boat.

This.

She looks good at one event.

On court she looks like a literal gremlin.

MashaFan01
Dec 2nd, 2011, 07:26 PM
Petra Kvitova glamorous? - NO WAY! - :lol: - She'll never come close to the glamor Maria Sharapova brings on and off court - which all her endorsements and her income proof - Maybe Li Na will pass by Maria Sharapova in income next year - but hey - probably only rich Chinese companies supporting her

Bad skin? - Maria? - NO WAY!! :lol:

http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Maria+Sharapova+Toray+Pan+Pacific+Open+Day+GdUwhtX K6IRl.jpg
Maria @ Toray Pan Pacific Open 2011 - Day 1

Sammo
Dec 2nd, 2011, 07:28 PM
no, she´s not even pretty.

This, she's just OK and she hasn't even have the attitude or body to be the new WTA glamour girl a la Hantuchova, Sharapova, etc.

Holdsworth
Dec 2nd, 2011, 07:30 PM
Bad skin? - Maria? - NO WAY!! :lol:

Very bad.. Also bad hair

Excelscior
Dec 2nd, 2011, 07:33 PM
Petra Kvitova glamorous? - NO WAY! - :lol: - She'll never come close to the glamor Maria Sharapova brings on and off court - which all her endorsements and her income proof - Maybe Li Na will pass by Maria Sharapova in income next year - but hey - probably only rich Chinese companies supporting her

Bad skin? - Maria? - NO WAY!! :lol:

http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Maria+Sharapova+Toray+Pan+Pacific+Open+Day+GdUwhtX K6IRl.jpg
Maria @ Toray Pan Pacific Open 2011 - Day 1

Why don't you get another picture, a close up, or one where she's made up, for comparison. It's a selective picture. I've seen her look much worse with out make up.

Anyway, you can still see the uneven tone, freckles and blandness of her face, compared to a more natural beauty such as an Ivanovic. Sharapova is not pretty/as pretty here.

She's not a Halle Berry Type (looks good or almost the same most times, with out make up). Sorry!

But based off of your previous post, I don't think anyone could convince you otherwise.

MashaFan01
Dec 2nd, 2011, 07:33 PM
Yes.

Unless I'm mistaken, Ana Ivanovic has much more natural beauty than Sharapova (other can argue about their respective bodies though). From What I've seen, she normally looks better than Maria with out make up/on the court during close ups or interviews. She has better skin and no freckles, compared to Sharapova. Ana's skin also seems to have a natural sheen, that only make up could do for Sharapova.

This is not to reduce WTA players to beauty status, but a response to Atom's denial that Sharapova doesn't look different (or worse) with out make up. She does.

Ivanovic is closer to her made up beauty, than Sharapova is, when neither wear it.

And I'm sure they're others besides Ana that have "natural beauty" in tennis, we don't care to remember or mention at the moment.

Glamor isn't the same as beauty

also glam·or (glăm'ər)
n.
An air of compelling charm, romance, and excitement, especially when delusively alluring.
Archaic. A magic spell; enchantment.

One can probably argue that Ana Ivanovis is more beautiful than Maria - and I tend to agree - and there might even be other female tennis players who can be considered more beautiful - but none of them has the Maria Sharapova glamor
http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Maria+Sharapova+Showcases+Tiffany+Earrings+aiAGfYl pFbbl.jpg
Glamorous Maria Sharapova

Holdsworth
Dec 2nd, 2011, 07:34 PM
This, she's just OK and she hasn't even have the attitude or body to be the new WTA glamour girl Sharapova, etc.
Thank god she is not a Glamour girl, but she is very cute and has much more beautiful eyes and hair, than Sharapova

Excelscior
Dec 2nd, 2011, 07:39 PM
From MashaFan01Glamor isn't the same as beauty


I Agree!

Glamor is contrived and external. Beauty is more natural!! :help: :tape: :help:

s teddy
Dec 2nd, 2011, 07:39 PM
Why don't you get another picture, a close up, or one where she's made up. Anyway, I you can still see the uneven tone, freckles and blandness of her face, compared to a more natural beauty than and Ivanovic.

Sharapova is not pretty here.

But based off of your previous post, I don't think anyone could convince you otherwise.

I personally think she looks very good in that picture. I think she can look even better when she's wearing makeup. I think she's just as beautiful, if not more so, than Ivanovic.

Beauty is impossible to measure objectively, because everybody has a different opinion on how a woman "should" look. Both of our opinions are going to be biased, based on both our definitions of beauty and our feelings about the people in question.

With that said, many polls on both this and other websites suggests that your opinion is in the minority.

The Witch-king
Dec 2nd, 2011, 07:41 PM
Petra Kvitova glamorous? - NO WAY! - :lol: - She'll never come close to the glamor Maria Sharapova brings on and off court - which all her endorsements and her income proof - Maybe Li Na will pass by Maria Sharapova in income next year - but hey - probably only rich Chinese companies supporting her

Bad skin? - Maria? - NO WAY!! :lol:

http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Maria+Sharapova+Toray+Pan+Pacific+Open+Day+GdUwhtX K6IRl.jpg
Maria @ Toray Pan Pacific Open 2011 - Day 1

I like your font :wavey:

And I agree Li Na is also very glamorous lately :inlove: I should start a thread on her.

Sammo
Dec 2nd, 2011, 07:42 PM
Thank god she is a not Clamour girl, but she is very cute and has much more beautiful eyes and hair, than Sharapova

She's cute but... her eyes are way too big for me and for most of the people, but I like her attitude off court: shy, sophisticated, and elegant.

atominside
Dec 2nd, 2011, 07:47 PM
Ivanovic = natural beauty
Sharapova= glamour+sex appeal
Kvitova= gremlin.

Excelscior
Dec 2nd, 2011, 07:48 PM
I personally think she looks very good in that picture. I think she can look even better when she's wearing makeup. I think she's just as beautiful, if not more so, than Ivanovic.

Beauty is impossible to measure objectively, because everybody has a different opinion on how a woman "should" look. Both of our opinions are going to be biased, based on both our definitions of beauty and our feelings about the people in question.

With that said, many polls on both this and other websites suggests that your opinion is in the minority.

Agreed.

But Sharapova is not considered more beautiful than Ivanovic and other players, because she actual is. A lot of external factors such as fame, familiarity, perceived glamor, success, traditions, bias, etc., factor in these polls, you quote.

The tall, Nordic (though many believe Sharapova's not a natural blonde) Goddess archetype is coveted by many European and American males, irregardless of how beautiful the actual individual is, compared to another.

Is Sharapova more beautiful (and especially naturally more beautiful) than Pironkova? Does she even have a better body than her (or Olaru or anyone else for that matter)? Many will say no!

They're are tons of Tennis players, that look better than Sharapova, but it doesn't mean they'll be recognized for it, though.

I just don't think she's naturally drop dead gorgeous, as her image alludes. She's not. But she definitely looks better and more glamorous, when done up. But you could say that about many people.

On the tennis court she just looks average. A lot of you already know this.

I do applaud the fact, that she's a Glamor Queen, but has been successful in her career, compared to others who carry the same moniker.

atominside
Dec 2nd, 2011, 07:52 PM
Agreed.

But Sharapova is not considered more beautiful than Ivanovic and other players, because she actual is. AA lot of external factors such as fame, perceived glamour, success, traditions, bias, etc., factor in these polls, you quote.

The tall, Nordic (though many believe Sharapova's not a natural blonde) archetype is coveted by many European and American males, irregardless of how beautiful the actual individual, compared to another is.

Is Sharapova more beautiful (and especially naturally more beautiful) than Pironkova? Does she even have a better body than her (or Olaru or anyone else for that matter)?

They're are tons of Tennis players, that look better than Sharapova, but it doesn't mean they'll be recognized for it, though.
http://www.womenstennisblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/sharapova-young-pic.jpg. throw that out:wavey::kiss:

Sammo
Dec 2nd, 2011, 07:54 PM
The tall Nordic archetype is ****ing perfection if you ask me :drool:

Fighterpova
Dec 2nd, 2011, 08:01 PM
'step aside Pova and Anci'
Seriously :spit:

s teddy
Dec 2nd, 2011, 08:03 PM
Agreed.

But Sharapova is not considered more beautiful than Ivanovic and other players, because she actual is. AA lot of external factors such as fame, perceived glamour, success, traditions, bias, etc., factor in these polls, you quote.

The tall, Nordic (though many believe Sharapova's not a natural blonde) archetype is coveted by many European and American males, irregardless of how beautiful the actual individual, compared to another is.

Is Sharapova more beautiful (and especially naturally more beautiful) than Pironkova? Does she even have a better body than her (or Olaru or anyone else for that matter)?

They're are tons of Tennis players, that look better than Sharapova, but it doesn't mean they'll be recognized for it, though.
Popularity certainly plays a huge part, but I don't think you can say that she wins "beauty contests" solely due to her popularity. As a Sharapova fan, I don't think she looks any less beautiful than any other player, but I know many people, including you, think differently. That just highlights how beauty is almost purely subjective.

As for Ivanovic and Pironkova, I do think that they are just as beautiful as Sharapova. However, I prefer Sharapova's more "conventional" ("Nordic," to use your term) beauty to the other two's more "exotic" beauty. Again, though, that's just a matter of opinion.
The tall Nordic archetype is ****ing perfection if you ask me :drool:

Couldn't have said it better. :bowdown: (Although I do think that height is somewhat overrated.)

Inger67
Dec 2nd, 2011, 08:05 PM
I'm sorry I just can't get past Maria's thin and stringy hair :tape: I mean she has a nice face and all but she gets way more attention for her looks than say Maria Kirilenko (who is clearly hotter than Sharapova). But of course, Sharapova fans would say otherwise.

Holdsworth
Dec 2nd, 2011, 08:08 PM
: I mean she has a nice face and all .
This.. Her body is far from perfect. She even never wears tight jeans, because of too big hips and bottom.
PS. Petra looks good in jeans

s teddy
Dec 2nd, 2011, 08:10 PM
This.. Her body is far from perfect. She even never wear tight jeans..

Are you saying that she's not very beautiful because she likes to dress modestly?

MashaFan01
Dec 2nd, 2011, 08:12 PM
Agreed.
On the tennis court she just looks average. A lot of you already know this.


And yet - the arenas are usually well filled when Sharapova is playing - People like her - not for her beauty - but for her charisma - she has something which appeals to the imagination - that something is also called glamor - That something the other WTA players - Kvitova included - lack! :)

Excelscior
Dec 2nd, 2011, 08:22 PM
Popularity certainly plays a huge part, but I don't think you can say that she wins "beauty contests" solely due to her popularity. As a Sharapova fan, I don't think she looks any less beautiful than any other player, but I know many people, including you, think differently. That just highlights how beauty is almost purely subjective.

As for Ivanovic and Pironkova, I do think that they are just as beautiful as Sharapova. However, I prefer Sharapova's more "conventional" ("Nordic," to use your term) beauty to the other two's more "exotic" beauty. Again, though, that's just a matter of opinion.


Couldn't have said it better. :bowdown:

That's the problem.

Most people can't exclude their bias and judge people strictly on their looks (skin, face, bone structure, hair, body, femininity, etc.).

It appears to me, that there are a lot of so called "exotic" looking women in tennis, that all have prettier faces, skin and bodies than Sharapova IMHO. But they'll get no play, because so many of you have your bias.

The irony is, someone like Kirilenko is (IMHO) more attractive than Sharapova, as Inger said earlier. But for various other external factors, Kirilenko gets no play or is not even considered, and she's a blonde (but a less pure definition of the tall Nordic Goddess type).

Go Figure!

I have no problem with all this, but Sharapova fans should just admit she's considered "attractive" for far more reasons than her actual (especially natural) looks.

Holdsworth
Dec 2nd, 2011, 08:24 PM
Are you saying that she's not very beautiful because she likes to dress modestly?
I bet, she is embarrassed to wear tight jeans

marineblue
Dec 2nd, 2011, 08:30 PM
Is this a joke?

s teddy
Dec 2nd, 2011, 08:40 PM
That's the problem.

Most people can't exclude their bias and judge people strictly on their looks (skin, face, bone structure, hair, body, femininity, etc.).

It appears to me, that there are a lot of so called "exotic" looking women in tennis, that all have prettier faces, skin and bodies than Sharapova IMHO. But they'll get no play, because so many of you have your bias.

The irony is, someone like Kirilenko is (IMHO) more attractive than Sharapova, as Inger said earlier. But for various other external factors, Kirilenko gets no play or is not even considered, and she's a blonde (but a less pure definition of the tall Nordic Goddess type).

Go Figure!

I have no problem with all this, but Sharapova fans should just admit she's considered "attractive" for far more reasons than her actual (especially natural) looks.

How is this a problem? You're saying that beauty is something that can be measured by a few, specific criteria. But why shouldn't we also consider things such as hair color and (to use your term) archetype? As you yourself said, many people consider them to be just as important as the criteria you mentioned.

This goes back to the simple fact that beauty is subjective; as the old saying goes, "beauty is in the eye of the beholder." One cannot state definitively that one person is more beautiful than another, because there will almost certainly be people who disagree.

Andy.
Dec 2nd, 2011, 09:06 PM
That statement was a joke right......

http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f289/movethestars/Gifs/finn%20gifs/laughing.gif

MashaFan01
Dec 2nd, 2011, 09:17 PM
I dunno why y'all arguing about who's the most beautiful or most attractive - That's not the point - The subject line asks "P.Kivitova new WTA glamour girl?" - and the response was - she'll never out glamor Maria Sharapova - There can only be ONE top glamor girl on the WTA tour :lol:

http://www4.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Maria+Sharapova+Championships+Wimbledon+2011+pRo6h 13ij5ul.jpg

The Witch-king
Dec 2nd, 2011, 09:33 PM
I'm sorry I just can't get past Maria's thin and stringy hair :tape: I mean she has a nice face and all but she gets way more attention for her looks than say Maria Kirilenko (who is clearly hotter than Sharapova). But of course, Sharapova fans would say otherwise.

If you ask me Sharapova has a better body than Kirilenko. Kirilenko is shaped like a 14 year old dude.

Excelscior
Dec 2nd, 2011, 10:11 PM
How is this a problem? You're saying that beauty is something that can be measured by a few, specific criteria. But why shouldn't we also consider things such as hair color and (to use your term) archetype? As you yourself said, many people consider them to be just as important as the criteria you mentioned.

This goes back to the simple fact that beauty is subjective; as the old saying goes, "beauty is in the eye of the beholder." One cannot state definitively that one person is more beautiful than another, because there will almost certainly be people who disagree.

Because though we all have our bias, you couldn't hold something like a fair beauty contest, for example, if someone who prefers blondes only judged the contest on what they like. They'd have to be able to separate it. That's my point. And if they couldn't judge past their biases, they would be excluded from the contest, if it were a fair one. Correct?

A judge can say, that "this brunette is much more attractive than this blonde", even though in my own personal life I prefer blondes". That's okay. But most of us can't do this, we'll just like the blonde (if that's what we're attracted to), and not even know why (with out giving the other type a fair shake).

It happens all the time, and people don't even notice/know it.

Yes! Beauty is subjective, but there are some things that are not to a lesser degree (smooth skin, boobs, ass, legs, small waist, hour glass figure, strong hair etc.), that should have nothing to with a partiality to the Nordic type, for example; except the hair, maybe.

Of course, what type/size of boobs or legs, etc., you like are subjective. But if one has breast, and another gal doesn't for example, than that should be self explanatory and pretty clear cut.

RobinT83
Dec 2nd, 2011, 10:18 PM
lol
She's ugly as hell.

thegreendestiny
Dec 2nd, 2011, 10:41 PM
I like her and all, but NO.

ExtremespeedX
Dec 2nd, 2011, 11:34 PM
It's obvious Kvitova is being prepared as a new dominant #1 replacing Dullniacki. She has worthy sponsors in Nike and Wilson (not anti pimple cream or Turkish airlines :o), who are eager to make her the new face of their advertisment campaigns. She is young, talented and exciting. 2012 will be the new beginning of WTA. Goatra era :bowdown:

The Witch-king
Dec 3rd, 2011, 08:11 AM
It's obvious Kvitova is being prepared as a new dominant #1 replacing Dullniacki. She has worthy sponsors in Nike and Wilson (not anti pimple cream or Turkish airlines :o), who are eager to make her the new face of their advertisment campaigns. She is young, talented and exciting. 2012 will be the new beginning of WTA. Goatra era :bowdown:

:lol: What's wrong with Turkish Airlines?

Lachy
Dec 3rd, 2011, 09:29 AM
No, I don't think so :lol: But everyone has their own opinion :shrug:

L'Enfant Sauvage
Dec 3rd, 2011, 02:43 PM
Not really, but her Wimbledon Ball photos showed she can clean up rather nicely :shrug:

Sombrerero loco
Dec 3rd, 2011, 03:02 PM
she looks nice there!!
she is not really pretty though

Sammo
Dec 3rd, 2011, 03:12 PM
:lol: What's wrong with Turkish Airlines?

That everyone who has seen their same add more than 500 times hates them.

Apart from that :shrug:

cowsonice
Dec 3rd, 2011, 09:35 PM
And also their slogan doesn't rhyme/doesn't fit their music. :tape:

What If?
Dec 3rd, 2011, 09:39 PM
Turkish Airlines?
Their music does rhyme with the words perfectly. You mean "we are turkish airlines, we are globally yours"? I can sing it whatever time of the day of a night. So fitting and perfect it is.:p

cowsonice
Dec 3rd, 2011, 09:42 PM
I hate how it's "airlines" (two syllables + long vowel sound) with "yours" (monosyllabic, with an r dominating the sound at the end)

atominside
Dec 3rd, 2011, 10:08 PM
not every song has to rhyme :s It sounds nice.

Kairi
Dec 3rd, 2011, 10:21 PM
Turkish Airlines?
Their music does rhyme with the words perfectly. You mean "we are turkish airlines, we are globally yours"? I can sing it whatever time of the day of a night. So fitting and perfect it is.:p

i'd rather cut my ears off :o

What If?
Dec 3rd, 2011, 10:44 PM
i'd rather cut my ears off :o
youtube me examples of the ads you like:p

Sp!ffy
Dec 3rd, 2011, 11:31 PM
I like this commercial for some reason.
16QH0VmRbrE

AnomyBC
Dec 4th, 2011, 09:30 AM
Nope. She has neither the looks, nor the personality for that. :shrug:

MHingisfan
Dec 4th, 2011, 09:41 AM
She is everything and beautiful. :kiss: :hearts:

http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/7484/22959.jpg

PMBH
Dec 4th, 2011, 09:43 AM
No way! Kvitova is fat and has a weird face with fraggle eyes. Even Jana Novotna had more sex appeal than her...

Holdsworth
Dec 4th, 2011, 10:00 AM
No way! Kvitova is fat and has a weird face with fraggle eyes. .
Woz is fat

Raiden
Dec 4th, 2011, 11:18 AM
Funny how everyone seems to interprate "glamour girl" as "beautiful".

Anyways as to the topic, of course Petra can be a glamour girl if she wants to be. She doesn't even have to have a "model-like" figure like Pova or Hantuchova because Petra has more leeway or "wiggle room" in that department: there is an unwritten rule that the more a female athlete wins/leads/dominates as an athlete, the uglier she can afford to be in order to still be accepted into the world of glamour.

Mary Cherry.
Dec 4th, 2011, 11:38 AM
No way! Kvitova is fat and has a weird face with fraggle eyes. Even Jana Novotna had more sex appeal than her...

Woz is fat

I'm fat.

You're fat.

Everyone's fat.

The Witch-king
Jun 22nd, 2012, 09:36 AM
http://www4.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/WTA+Tour+Pre+Wimbledon+Party+Arrivals+adyz1GkdsPFx .jpg

http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lytt1jSyyc1qzkebko1_500.gif
WERQUE!!!:mad:

MHingisfan
Jun 22nd, 2012, 09:45 AM
Petra she is everything and beautiful. :hearts: :yeah:

http://www4.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/WTA+Tour+Pre+Wimbledon+Party+Arrivals+adyz1GkdsPFx .jpg

nealcaffrey
Jun 22nd, 2012, 09:52 AM
no i dont think so
good grass player and seems nice enough
but not glamorous or "beautiful" enough by the world's conventional standards

if she was ever going to be "wta's glamour girl", she would've blew up bigtime right after her wimbledon win
but sadly not a lot of people know who she is still and even her fellow players have a hard time placing her!

Vuvurenka
Jun 22nd, 2012, 10:37 AM
Petra has a gorgeous face IMO but..

CuteKoala
Jun 22nd, 2012, 10:57 AM
She's a very pretty girl. :)

NashaMasha
Jun 22nd, 2012, 11:45 AM
I like how she looks offcourt , really pretty , but on court it is a disaster.......

GoofyDuck
Jun 22nd, 2012, 12:00 PM
She looked great yesterday evening , no denying :)

pov
Jun 22nd, 2012, 01:23 PM
I like how Kvitova looks (a lot) in all respects but one.