PDA

View Full Version : how many Tier 1 and slams has Wozniacki won


BournemouthBoy
Mar 28th, 2010, 09:31 PM
in the past 12 months?

Im trying to workout how shes no.2 in the world

doni1212
Mar 28th, 2010, 09:35 PM
Believe me, I was trying to figure it out too after watching her play today. Disgusting!
But she obviously did the same thing Jankovic did...play everything and MM tournaments and voila, you're number 2! :rolleyes:

SIN DIOS NI LEY
Mar 28th, 2010, 09:36 PM
Eastbourne , New Haven and some International

This year The Woz will win the Pushniacki Invitational (Copenhaguen Open) . I bet my house on it

BournemouthBoy
Mar 28th, 2010, 09:39 PM
i guess if she wins the Pushniacki Invitational she will go no.1 ?

Beat
Mar 28th, 2010, 09:42 PM
amazing thread.

sportywoman
Mar 28th, 2010, 09:44 PM
She is number 2 by default. It's not her fault per se and she didn't stole that place.
She is number 2 because those who are intrinsecally better are not bringing their game consistantly while she consistantly and more often than them plays above average and bring her best game often.

homogenius
Mar 28th, 2010, 09:46 PM
Believe me, I was trying to figure it out too after watching her play today. Disgusting!
But she obviously did the same thing Jankovic did...play everything and MM tournaments and voila, you're number 2! :rolleyes:

ignorant

madmax
Mar 28th, 2010, 09:52 PM
who cares...it's not like anyone takes her seriously anyway:yawn:

RenaSlam.
Mar 28th, 2010, 09:53 PM
:tape:

She's a clown.

BournemouthBoy
Mar 28th, 2010, 09:53 PM
don't get me wrong shes a good player, a bit better than myself infact.

Potato
Mar 28th, 2010, 09:53 PM
Believe me, I was trying to figure it out too after watching her play today. Disgusting!
But she obviously did the same thing Jankovic did...play everything and MM tournaments and voila, you're number 2! :rolleyes:

Jankovic went deep in almost every tournament she entered and won a Tier-I tournament, Rome, to reach her number 3 ranking.

goldenlox
Mar 28th, 2010, 09:55 PM
She is a good competitor. It was clear when she beat Vera at the YEC and clear today.
I think she should cut back her schedule. She pushes her body too hard. That usually winds up with injuries.

CloudAtlas
Mar 28th, 2010, 09:56 PM
Jankovic went deep in almost every tournament she entered and won a Tier-I tournament, Rome, to reach her number 3 ranking.



Yeah but Jankovic got to #1 without even a Slam final to her name...at least Caro has that alongisde her #2 ranking.

Jorn
Mar 28th, 2010, 09:58 PM
2 Premire wins 1 MM win

US Open F
Madrid F
Charleston F
and more F's (I have forgot)

oleada
Mar 28th, 2010, 09:58 PM
well, at least Jelena can win tier I tournaments.

The Dawntreader
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:00 PM
Yeah but Jankovic got to #1 without even a Slam final to her name...at least Caro has that alongisde her #2 ranking.

:confused:

doni1212
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:01 PM
Yeah but Jankovic got to #1 without even a Slam final to her name...at least Caro has that alongisde her #2 ranking.

That is true...

Potato
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:01 PM
Yeah but Jankovic got to #1 without even a Slam final to her name...at least Caro has that alongisde her #2 ranking.

Which is exactly why Jelena didn't deserve her number 1 ranking when she first got it. The second time around, she earned it.

doni1212
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:02 PM
:confused:

How are you confused? She was number 1 BEFORE even reaching a grandslam final. Pathetic.

wayitis
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:03 PM
she took a stadium that was full and alive after the Nadal's match and managed to empty it out and lull the few remaining people, including Kirilenko, into deep sleep...

AnnaK_4ever
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:03 PM
2 Premire wins 1 MM win

US Open F
Madrid F
Charleston F
and more F's (I have forgot)

and pre-QF losses at 12 of 24 tournaments she played, including 3 of 4 slams.

Mikey.
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:04 PM
2 Premire wins 1 MM win

US Open F
Madrid F
Charleston F
and more F's (I have forgot)

Yep.


A USO Final. A YEC Semifinal. Mandatory finals in Indian Wells and Madrid. Premier titles in Eastbourne and New Haven. A Premier Final in Charleston. An International title in Ponte Vedra Beach. An International final in Bastad. Plus a few other lesser results.

The Dawntreader
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:05 PM
How are you confused? She was number 1 BEFORE even reaching a grandslam final. Pathetic.

So? She was number 1 AFTER reaching a Slam Final.

I think she absolved herself a bit.

Wtrain
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:05 PM
she took a stadium that was full and alive after the Nadal's match and managed to empty it out and lull the few remaining people, including Kirilenko, into deep sleep...

Awesome :lol:

doni1212
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:09 PM
So? She was number 1 AFTER reaching a Slam Final.

I think she absolved herself a bit.

If anyone absolved themselves it was Safina, NOT Jankovic.

doni1212
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:09 PM
she took a stadium that was full and alive after the Nadal's match and managed to empty it out and lull the few remaining people, including Kirilenko, into deep sleep...

:lol:

Roookie
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:10 PM
in the past 12 months?

Im trying to workout how shes no.2 in the world

drawing the likes of Wozniak and Kirilenko over and over again :shrug:

Hurley
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:11 PM
Im trying to workout how shes no.2 in the world

She has accumulated more total ranking points at various professional tennis tournaments in the last 12 months than anyone else, bar Serena Williams.

QED.

hugo2004
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:12 PM
How many threads people have made about Wozni in the past few weeks? How annoying.

Ellery
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:13 PM
Caro is so popular :worship:

The Dawntreader
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:13 PM
If anyone absolved themselves it was Safina, NOT Jankovic.

Maybe, but compared to Wozniacki, Jankovic had a string of GOAT achievments.

AnnaK_4ever
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:16 PM
If anyone absolved themselves it was Safina, NOT Jankovic.

Jankovic definitely "redeemed" herself with that USO final and consecutive titles at Beijing, Stuttgart and Moscow.

propi
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:16 PM
That's what happen when the rest of stars are not committed enough.
She is regular and she does her job, if she reaches number 1 good for her.

Chakvenus
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:19 PM
she is boring and consistent.
that is how she wins and that is how she got her ranking.

goldenlox
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:19 PM
She has a lot of strong results.
USO final
Madrid final
IW final
YEC sf
She is consistent and that is what gets you a good ranking.

AnnaK_4ever
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:25 PM
She has a lot of strong results.
USO final
Madrid final
IW final
YEC sf
She is consistent and that is what gets you a good ranking.

For the 32nd time, she lost BEFORE quarterfinal at 12 of 24 tournaments (50%) she played and at 3 of 4 slams (75%). She's NOT consistent.

This is the difference between her and Jankovic -- JJ had to play a lot and be consistent, Wozniacki just has to play a lot.

doni1212
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:25 PM
drawing the likes of Wozniak and Kirilenko over and over again :shrug:

Who seem to be chokers, :help:

madmax
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:31 PM
the first decent non-headcase player she meets always beats her...too bad we have a shortage of mentally strong players nowadays

JJPower
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:35 PM
Yeah but Jankovic got to #1 without even a Slam final to her name...at least Caro has that alongisde her #2 ranking.

How can that be better lol? Jelena still has better career-high ranking, no matter what and is automatically in better position. Your logic is a bit screwed.

égalité
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:37 PM
Believe me, I was trying to figure it out too after watching her play today. Disgusting!
But she obviously did the same thing Jankovic did...play everything and MM tournaments and voila, you're number 2! :rolleyes:

Why don't you check your facts? :weirdo:

(And by facts I mean the fact that Jelena has won 6 Tier I/Premier events)

goldenlox
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:37 PM
Caroline is a lot younger. She has to manage her career and stay healthy.
She already has strong results.

tenn_ace
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:41 PM
Just wasted over two hourrs of my life watching Wozniacki. If she ever wins something big with the game she has now ----> WTA is down in toilet

SIN DIOS NI LEY
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:42 PM
Caroline is a lot younger. She has to manage her career and stay healthy.
She already has strong results.

goldie , Caroline is not russian

Dont defend her

goldenlox
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:48 PM
I like her effort level. She plays smart and works hard. And is very successful.

slamchamp
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:49 PM
Caroline is a lot younger. She has to manage her career and stay healthy.
She already has strong results.
She'll probably avoid many injuries but will not win slams with that game

Slutiana
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:51 PM
and pre-QF losses at 12 of 24 tournaments she played, including 3 of 4 slams.
You're amazng when not talking about Tati. :kiss:

Joana
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:54 PM
In 2001 Davenport became #1 despite not having played a Slam final over the previous 12 months. They changed the ranking system.
In 2004 Mauresmo did the same. The ranking system was changed once again.
In 2008 Jankovic did it, the first time around. And now Wozniacki is #2 with a bunch of early round losses as AK4E says.

So, it's not the ranking system that's the problem. WTA is.

Hurley
Mar 28th, 2010, 10:54 PM
You're amazng when not talking about Tati. :kiss:

He is. But he, unlike the thread starter, is aware that that has NO correlation with rankings, because this is not an average system. This is a strict points accrual ranking system, with a cap on results at 17.

Should it be changed? Maybe. But right now...it's blatantly obvious why Wozniacki is ranked where she is.

Don't like it? Write your congressman, or start following professional hacky sack instead, I dunno.

Jorn
Mar 28th, 2010, 11:10 PM
Yes I forget the IW F , was thinking about last year. The 700 p got her onto the #2 spot. :)


She also has Baastad F.

AnnaK_4ever
Mar 28th, 2010, 11:13 PM
He is. But he, unlike the thread starter, is aware that that has NO correlation with rankings, because this is not an average system. This is a strict points accrual ranking system, with a cap on results at 17.

Should it be changed? Maybe. But right now...it's blatantly obvious why Wozniacki is ranked where she is.

Don't like it? Write your congressman, or start following professional hacky sack instead, I dunno.

The solution is very simple. WTA should just ban Wozniacki. :)

P.S.
And Radwanska too.

markdelaney
Mar 28th, 2010, 11:20 PM
Everybody knows the best 4 players in the world are Serena Williams, Venus Williams. Kim Clijsters and Justine Henin. For reasons of retirements and injuries they are not ranked that way (except Serena). Sharapova briefly challenged them but doesn't look capable anymore since her injury.
Taking that into account, players like Safina, Jankovic, Kuznetsova, Dementieva, Radwanska and Wozniacki are really just the players challenging for the ranking 6-10 along with others and often it's just the draws they get in major tournaments that decide their ranking.

Hurley
Mar 28th, 2010, 11:20 PM
The solution is very simple. WTA should just ban Wozniacki. :)

You could put HGH in her bag and see what develops!

AnnaK_4ever
Mar 28th, 2010, 11:24 PM
You could put HGH in her bag and see what develops!

I'll need Odesnik's phone number first.

Hurley
Mar 28th, 2010, 11:26 PM
I'll need Odesnik's phone number first.

Forewarning: neither you nor Wayne will ever receive a United States government National Security clearance after these shenanigans ensue. :sad:

slamchamp
Mar 28th, 2010, 11:27 PM
What is the biggest title pushniacki has won? Ponte Vedra?

AnnaK_4ever
Mar 28th, 2010, 11:31 PM
Forewarning: neither you nor Wayne will ever receive a United States government National Security clearance after these shenanigans ensue. :sad:

Well, soneone has to take the risk in order to save tennis from Wozniacki!

thrust
Mar 29th, 2010, 12:13 AM
According to the WTA ranking system, Wozniacki is ranked number 2 in the world. Live with it, and quit the stupid bitching!

Machi
Mar 29th, 2010, 12:22 AM
Pushniacki hasn't won a thing that's good.

Nicolás89
Mar 29th, 2010, 12:25 AM
I got a feeling she'll win Miami. :)

young_gunner913
Mar 29th, 2010, 12:27 AM
http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b241/FlamingoSpice/marshmellow.jpg

Watch out everyone, Caro is on the rise. :scared:

lestat111
Mar 29th, 2010, 12:32 AM
she took a stadium that was full and alive after the Nadal's match and managed to empty it out and lull the few remaining people, including Kirilenko, into deep sleep...

LOL :lol:

VishaalMaria
Mar 29th, 2010, 01:49 AM
I really really hate threads like this. People need to get some perspective:

HATE THE RANKING SYSTEM; NOT THE PLAYER

SerenaSlam
Mar 29th, 2010, 02:01 AM
its simple she is number 2 in the world because who was ahead of her has not come close to equalling her performance from a year ago. thus falling. CW on the other hand consistently loses in several tournies. in like quarters etc. that is how the WTA ranking system awards the players. therefore she has moved up to number 2. she is the number 1 best loser in high number tournie count. that makes her number 2 in the rankings.

Chakvenus
Mar 29th, 2010, 02:05 AM
im sorry, but while i totally accept that Caroline is number 2 in the world, i personally don't consider her to be a "top player" as of yet. A true top player will always have the match on his or her racket, like Serena, Venus, Justine, Kim, Svetlana, Maria and others. With Wozniacki, we all WELL know that the match is in her opponent's hands when most of the time she adamently refuses to do anything but rally. If her opponent's off or has up and down moments, good for her. If they don't, however, she is at their mercy.

moby
Mar 29th, 2010, 02:06 AM
As many as I have. :D

In 2001 Davenport became #1 despite not having played a Slam final over the previous 12 months. They changed the ranking system.
In 2004 Mauresmo did the same. The ranking system was changed once again.
In 2008 Jankovic did it, the first time around. And now Wozniacki is #2 with a bunch of early round losses as AK4E says.

So, it's not the ranking system that's the problem. WTA is.I wonder if the WTA will go back to the average system with mininum divisor. But they probably want to reward overplaying to some degree.

SerenaSlam
Mar 29th, 2010, 02:08 AM
im sorry, but while i totally accept that Caroline is number 2 in the world, i personally don't consider her to be a "top player" as of yet. A true top player will always have the match on his or her racket, like Serena, Venus, Justine, Kim, Svetlana, Maria and others. With Wozniacki, we all WELL know that the match is in her opponent's hands when most of the time she adamently refuses to do anything but rally. If her opponent's off or has up and down moments, good for her. If they don't, however, she is at their mercy.

i completely agree. she has the game that was effective 10 years ago. why venus and serena lindsay basically the big hitters would go down in matches. now consistent power is the game and to be honest against the current top 10 i feel like she is an easy 2 and 4 win 8 out of 10 times....JUST MY OPINOIN....

delicatecutter
Mar 29th, 2010, 02:12 AM
I really really hate threads like this. People need to get some perspective:

HATE THE RANKING SYSTEM; NOT THE PLAYER

I don't see what's wrong with hating both. :shrug:

Miracletennis
Mar 29th, 2010, 02:12 AM
Jelena won 6 TierI titles,where's WOZ’s first TierI title?

Miracletennis
Mar 29th, 2010, 02:15 AM
And before coming to be NO.1,JJ has been into several GS semifinals,so what about Wozniacki except 09USO Runner-up?
None of even a QUATERFINAL!

Jajaloo
Mar 29th, 2010, 02:18 AM
How are you confused? She was number 1 BEFORE even reaching a grandslam final. Pathetic.

She didn't ask for it. It's not stipulated you have to get to a Grand Slam final before you get to #1. Your issue should be with the rules of the tour.

Yeah but Jankovic got to #1 without even a Slam final to her name...at least Caro has that alongisde her #2 ranking.

Wozniacki has gotten past the QF's of a Grand Slam, only ONCE. And Woz has not won a Tier I/Premier Mandatory/Premier 5 title. JJ has won Charleston, Rome (x2), Moscow, Cincinatti and Indian Wells.

Jelena Jankovic was year end #1 with:

AO: SF
FO: SF
USO: F

IW: SF
MIAMI: F

ROME: W
3 IN A ROW -
MOSCOW: W
STUTTGART: W
CHINA OPEN: W

LA: SF
MONTREAL: QF
BERLIN: QF
TOKYO: QF
OLYMPICS: QF
CHARLESTON: QF
BERLIN: QF

YEC: SF

Maybe someone else should've been as consistent as JJ so they could've been #1 instead...

Jelena won 6 TierI titles,where's WOZ’s first TierI title?
And before coming to be NO.1,JJ has been into several GS semifinals,so what about Wozniacki except 09USO Runner-up?
None of even a QUATERFINAL!

PREACH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

monmonito
Mar 29th, 2010, 02:24 AM
meaning...a lot of people hate Pushniacki... :D
the reason is she get every ball even if its already in the crowd :tape:

Jajaloo
Mar 29th, 2010, 02:35 AM
meaning...a lot of people hate Pushniacki... :D
the reason is she get every ball even if its already in the crowd :tape:

I don't hate Wozniacki. I really like her. I just take issue with that little bitty trying to call JJ's ass out for being #1 without winning a grand slam. Haters to the left, check your wigs at the door.

NA-GOAT
Mar 29th, 2010, 02:35 AM
Caro is so popular :worship:

YVONNE-GOAT :bigwave:

you copied my signature :rolls:

darrinbaker00
Mar 29th, 2010, 02:45 AM
Everybody knows the best 4 players in the world are Serena Williams, Venus Williams. Kim Clijsters and Justine Henin. For reasons of retirements and injuries they are not ranked that way (except Serena). Sharapova briefly challenged them but doesn't look capable anymore since her injury.
Taking that into account, players like Safina, Jankovic, Kuznetsova, Dementieva, Radwanska and Wozniacki are really just the players challenging for the ranking 6-10 along with others and often it's just the draws they get in major tournaments that decide their ranking.
Referring to yourself as "everybody," eh?

Tenis Srbija
Mar 29th, 2010, 07:43 AM
The solution is very simple. WTA should just ban Wozniacki. :)

P.S.
And Radwanska too.

:lol::lol::lol:

tea
Mar 29th, 2010, 08:40 AM
how many Tier 1 and slams has Wozniacki won
As many as all the clowns experts posting on this board won combined.
I hope, hatas, whatever your occupation is, if you're doing your job as unpleasant as you think Caro plays, you're still earning millions of dollars.:baby:

Betten
Mar 29th, 2010, 08:49 AM
As many as all the clowns experts posting on this board won combined.:

Which is exactly the reason these posters pick on her. How can it be that someone who has accomplished so little can get to the number 2 spot? Back in 2003, Clijsters won nine tournaments (including the YEC), reached the semifinals at the Australian Open and Wimbledon, played the finals of the French and US Opens and she too ended the year at number 2. In contrast, Wozniacki reached the US Open final and won three small tournaments.

How the WTA has fallen...

Boreas
Mar 29th, 2010, 09:07 AM
13,37

Is the average age of those who posted in this thread so far

tea
Mar 29th, 2010, 09:11 AM
Which is exactly the reason these posters pick on her. How can it be that someone who has accomplished so little can get to the number 2 spot? Back in 2003, Clijsters won nine tournaments (including the YEC), reached the semifinals at the Australian Open and Wimbledon, played the finals of the French and US Opens and she too ended the year at number 2. In contrast, Wozniacki reached the US Open final and won three small tournaments.

How the WTA has fallen...
Not her fault. The system works so. We can't compare the competition that was in 2003 to the current. It's definitety not Caro's problem that since so long amount of time we haven't got a single player of Clijsters,Henin,Serena class.:help: How can Caroline help the situation?
Clijsters 2003 >>> Wozniacki 2010, because in general 2003 >>>> 2010. Let's cry about all good times and blame Woz is everything bad that is going on with tour nowadays.:p

Kworb
Mar 29th, 2010, 09:22 AM
She will never win a Tier 1 or a Slam. Her game is so boring and useless. Even my mom who has been watching tennis for many decades said Wozniacki is the most boring player she has ever seen.

Betten
Mar 29th, 2010, 09:22 AM
Personally, I don't really have an issue with Wozniacki taking advantage of a weak period. It has happened before (Jankovic, Safina) and she can't be blamed for that. I think it's the combination of opportunism, 'pushing' and her awful record against the other top players that makes her so easy pick on.

Matt01
Mar 29th, 2010, 10:09 AM
She will never win a Tier 1 or a Slam. Her game is so boring and useless. Even my mom who has been watching tennis for many decades said Wozniacki is the most boring player she has ever seen.


No, most boring would be Dementieva.

Boring thread by boring people :zzz:

goldenlox
Mar 29th, 2010, 10:10 AM
Personally, I don't really have an issue with Wozniacki taking advantage of a weak period. It has happened before (Jankovic, Safina) and she can't be blamed for that. I think it's the combination of opportunism, 'pushing' and her awful record against the other top players that makes her so easy pick on.How is this a weak period? The AO final had 19 majors and counting.
This is a stronger period than when Ana won a major in 2008, when ACHAK was top 5 in 2007, when Amelie won 2 majors in 2006. When Elena was in 2 slam finals in 2004

Right now is as strong as it gets and Caro and #2 and closing in

MaBaker
Mar 29th, 2010, 10:21 AM
The solution is very simple. WTA should just ban Wozniacki. :)

P.S.
And Radwanska too.
Definitely. And a brilliant one.

Betten
Mar 29th, 2010, 11:43 AM
How is this a weak period?

Lets look at the top 10:

(1) S. Williams - focuses mainly (only?) on the Slams. Rankings and most other tournaments are, especially at this stage of her career, of little interest to her.

(3) Safina - currently injured, but has a solid reputation of crashing and burning in major finals. Her 2009 season was littered with bad losses after the clay season (Shuai Zhang? Kai-Chen Chang?) and only three wins against players in the top 20.

(4) Kuznetsova - her best results since her win at the French Open are a quarterfinal at New Haven and a title at Beijing (big title, but only two of her opponents were ranked in the top 20 and none in the top 10 - pathetic considering this is the biggest tournament category of the WTA). Her feats of 2010 include losses to the likes of Cibulkova, Kulikova and Suarez Navarro.

(5) V. Williams - has been in great form this year, but her weak clay results and some awkward losses during the summer hardcourt season hurt her ranking.

(6) Dementieva - solid tournament player, but tends to fail in the big events. Also, every Slam seems to end in disappointment.

(7) Azarenka - definitely one of the more solid players, but some awkward losses at the mandatory events prevent her from achieving a higher ranking. Also has the bad luck of regularly meeting Serena in the Slams.

(8) Jankovic - one of the most inconsistent players on the tour. Plays (and loses) a lot, but every now and then she gets her act together and wins a big tournament to maintain her top 10 ranking. Hasn't reached a quarterfinal at a Slam since 2008.

(9) Radwanska - still waiting for a breakthrough here. She hasn't won a tournament in two years and she picked up the majority of her points in the weaker fall season, but her results have been improving lately. Definitely one to watch.

(10) Stosur - the Chanda Rubin of this generation. She's good enough to consistently beat the players ranked below her and, on a good day, the players ranked above her, but she's unlikely to ever be a real threat. She's more of a doubles player anyway.

If Henin, Clijsters and Sharapova could get their game together, then we would have a strong field of top players. The current field simply isn't strong enough.

goldenlox
Mar 29th, 2010, 11:49 AM
The only 2 of those 10 who are not true top 10 players are 9 and 10.
But you have Kim and Justine playing, so you have 10 very strong players

Jankovic, Safina, Wozniacki, Dementieva are top 10 players in any era.
So are Serena, Venus, Kim, Sveta and Justine all multiple slam winners.
Vika deserves her spot based on Miami last year and her AO and Dubai.

Slutiana
Mar 29th, 2010, 12:28 PM
The only 2 of those 10 who are not true top 10 players are 9 and 10.
But you have Kim and Justine playing, so you have 10 very strong players

Jankovic, Safina, Wozniacki, Dementieva are top 10 players in any era.
So are Serena, Venus, Kim, Sveta and Justine all multiple slam winners.
Vika deserves her spot based on Miami last year and her AO and Dubai.


YEAR END TOP 10 2008-1998

2008:

1 Jelena Jankovic SRB 4710
2 Serena Williams USA 3866
3 Dinara Safina RUS 3817
4 Elena Dementieva RUS 3663
5 Ana Ivanovic SRB 3457
6 Venus Williams USA 3272
7 Vera Zvonareva RUS 2952
8 Svetlana Kuznetsova RUS 2726
9 Maria Sharapova RUS 2515
10 Agnieszka Radwanska POL 2286


2007:

1 Justine Henin BEL 6155
2 Svetlana Kuznetsova RUS 3725
3 Jelena Jankovic SRB 3475
4 Ana Ivanovic SRB 3461
5 Maria Sharapova RUS 2956
6 Anna Chakvetadze RUS 2935
7 Serena Williams USA 2802
8 Venus Williams USA 2470
9 Daniela Hantuchova SVK 2367
10 Marion Bartoli FRA 2191


2006:

1 Justine Henin-Hardenne BEL 3998
2 Maria Sharapova RUS 3532
3 Amelie Mauresmo FRA 3391
4 Svetlana Kuznetsova RUS 2523
5 Kim Clijsters BEL 2215
6 Nadia Petrova RUS 2189
7 Martina Hingis SUI 2018
8 Elena Dementieva RUS 1875
9 Patty Schnyder SUI 1578
10 Nicole Vaidisova CZE 1391


2005:

1 Lindsay Davenport USA 4910
2 Kim Clijsters BEL 4829
3 Amelie Mauresmo FRA 4030
4 Maria Sharapova RUS 3958
5 Mary Pierce FRA 3797
6 Justine Henin-Hardenne BEL 2936
7 Patty Schnyder SUI 2774
8 Elena Dementieva RUS 2748
9 Nadia Petrova RUS 2638
10 Venus Williams USA 2628


2004:

1 Lindsay Davenport USA 4760
2 Amelie Mauresmo FRA 4546
3 Anastasia Myskina RUS 4012
4 Maria Sharapova RUS 3536
5 Svetlana Kuznetsova RUS 3533
6 Elena Dementieva RUS 3448
7 Serena Williams USA 3128
8 Justine Henin-Hardenne BEL 2884
9 Venus Williams USA 2400
10 Jennifer Capriati USA 2359


2003:

1 Justine Henin-Hardenne BEL 6628
2 Kim Clijsters BEL 6553
3 Serena Williams USA 3916
4 Amelie Mauresmo FRA 3194
5 Lindsay Davenport USA 2990
6 Jennifer Capriati USA 2766
7 Anastasia Myskina RUS 2581
8 Elena Dementieva RUS 2383
9 Chanda Rubin USA 2328
10 Ai Sugiyama JAP 2235


2002:

1 Serena Williams USA 6080
2 Venus Williams USA 5140
3 Jennifer Capriati USA 3796
4 Kim Clijsters BEL 3557
5 Justine Henin BEL 3218
6 Amelie Mauresmo FRA 3068
7 Monica Seles USA 2952
8 Daniela Hantuchova SVK 2667.75
9 Jelena Dokic YUG 2506
10 Martina Hingis SUI

2001:

1 Lindsay Davenport USA 4902
2 Jennifer Capriati USA 4892
3 Venus Williams USA 4128
4 Martina Hingis SUI 3944
5 Kim Clijsters BEL 3265
6 Serena Williams USA 3004
7 Justine Henin BEL 2989
8 Jelena Dokic YUG 2780
9 Amelie Mauresmo FRA 2765
10 Monica Seles USA 2306


2000:

1 Martina Hingis SUI 6044
2 Lindsay Davenport USA 5021
3 Venus Williams USA 3694
4 Monica Seles USA 3255
5 Conchita Martinez ESP 2752
6 Serena Williams USA 2306
7 Mary Pierce FRA 2162
8 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario ESP 2131
9 Anna Kournikova RUS 2098
10 Nathalie Tauziat FRA 1918


1999:

1 Martina Hingis SUI 6074
2 Lindsay Davenport USA 4841
3 Venus Williams USA 4378
4 Serena Williams USA 3021
5 Mary Pierce FRA 2658
6 Monica Seles USA 2310
7 Nathalie Tauziat FRA 2213
8 Barbara Schett AUT 2188
9 Julie Halard-Decugis FRA 1977
10 Amelie Mauresmo FRA 1906


1998:

1 Lindsay Davenport USA 5654
2 Martina Hingis SUI 5366
3 Jana Novotna CZE 3734
4 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario ESP 3417
5 Venus Williams USA 3262
6 Monica Seles USA 3226
7 Mary Pierce FRA 2414
8 Conchita Martinez ESP 2331
9 Steffi Graf GER 2261
10 Nathalie Tauziat FRA 2259
Really?

Slutiana
Mar 29th, 2010, 12:32 PM
YEAR END TOP 10 2008-1998

2008:

1 Jelena Jankovic SRB 4710
2 Serena Williams USA 3866
3 Dinara Safina RUS 3817
4 Elena Dementieva RUS 3663
5 Ana Ivanovic SRB 3457
6 Venus Williams USA 3272
7 Vera Zvonareva RUS 2952
8 Svetlana Kuznetsova RUS 2726
9 Maria Sharapova RUS 2515
10 Agnieszka Radwanska POL 2286


2007:

1 Justine Henin BEL 6155
2 Svetlana Kuznetsova RUS 3725
3 Jelena Jankovic SRB 3475
4 Ana Ivanovic SRB 3461
5 Maria Sharapova RUS 2956
6 Anna Chakvetadze RUS 2935
7 Serena Williams USA 2802
8 Venus Williams USA 2470
9 Daniela Hantuchova SVK 2367
10 Marion Bartoli FRA 2191


2006:

1 Justine Henin-Hardenne BEL 3998
2 Maria Sharapova RUS 3532
3 Amelie Mauresmo FRA 3391
4 Svetlana Kuznetsova RUS 2523
5 Kim Clijsters BEL 2215
6 Nadia Petrova RUS 2189
7 Martina Hingis SUI 2018
8 Elena Dementieva RUS 1875
9 Patty Schnyder SUI 1578
10 Nicole Vaidisova CZE 1391


2005:

1 Lindsay Davenport USA 4910
2 Kim Clijsters BEL 4829
3 Amelie Mauresmo FRA 4030
4 Maria Sharapova RUS 3958
5 Mary Pierce FRA 3797
6 Justine Henin-Hardenne BEL 2936
7 Patty Schnyder SUI 2774
8 Elena Dementieva RUS 2748
9 Nadia Petrova RUS 2638
10 Venus Williams USA 2628


2004:

1 Lindsay Davenport USA 4760
2 Amelie Mauresmo FRA 4546
3 Anastasia Myskina RUS 4012
4 Maria Sharapova RUS 3536
5 Svetlana Kuznetsova RUS 3533
6 Elena Dementieva RUS 3448
7 Serena Williams USA 3128
8 Justine Henin-Hardenne BEL 2884
9 Venus Williams USA 2400
10 Jennifer Capriati USA 2359


2003:

1 Justine Henin-Hardenne BEL 6628
2 Kim Clijsters BEL 6553
3 Serena Williams USA 3916
4 Amelie Mauresmo FRA 3194
5 Lindsay Davenport USA 2990
6 Jennifer Capriati USA 2766
7 Anastasia Myskina RUS 2581
8 Elena Dementieva RUS 2383
9 Chanda Rubin USA 2328
10 Ai Sugiyama JAP 2235


2002:

1 Serena Williams USA 6080
2 Venus Williams USA 5140
3 Jennifer Capriati USA 3796
4 Kim Clijsters BEL 3557
5 Justine Henin BEL 3218
6 Amelie Mauresmo FRA 3068
7 Monica Seles USA 2952
8 Daniela Hantuchova SVK 2667.75
9 Jelena Dokic YUG 2506
10 Martina Hingis SUI

2001:

1 Lindsay Davenport USA 4902
2 Jennifer Capriati USA 4892
3 Venus Williams USA 4128
4 Martina Hingis SUI 3944
5 Kim Clijsters BEL 3265
6 Serena Williams USA 3004
7 Justine Henin BEL 2989
8 Jelena Dokic YUG 2780
9 Amelie Mauresmo FRA 2765
10 Monica Seles USA 2306


2000:

1 Martina Hingis SUI 6044
2 Lindsay Davenport USA 5021
3 Venus Williams USA 3694
4 Monica Seles USA 3255
5 Conchita Martinez ESP 2752
6 Serena Williams USA 2306
7 Mary Pierce FRA 2162
8 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario ESP 2131
9 Anna Kournikova RUS 2098
10 Nathalie Tauziat FRA 1918


1999:

1 Martina Hingis SUI 6074
2 Lindsay Davenport USA 4841
3 Venus Williams USA 4378
4 Serena Williams USA 3021
5 Mary Pierce FRA 2658
6 Monica Seles USA 2310
7 Nathalie Tauziat FRA 2213
8 Barbara Schett AUT 2188
9 Julie Halard-Decugis FRA 1977
10 Amelie Mauresmo FRA 1906


1998:

1 Lindsay Davenport USA 5654
2 Martina Hingis SUI 5366
3 Jana Novotna CZE 3734
4 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario ESP 3417
5 Venus Williams USA 3262
6 Monica Seles USA 3226
7 Mary Pierce FRA 2414
8 Conchita Martinez ESP 2331
9 Steffi Graf GER 2261
10 Nathalie Tauziat FRA 2259
Really?

Just have to say, 2001. :bowdown: Props to Jelena D for hanging with such a stellar group of names. The only non-slam champ! 2000 is great too, from 9 upwards.

goldenlox
Mar 29th, 2010, 12:42 PM
Dokic and Kournikova were top 10 around 2000-2002. Caro would thrive in any era. She forces her opponents to construct winning points. They cant do it.

Marionated
Mar 29th, 2010, 01:10 PM
Believe me, I was trying to figure it out too after watching her play today. Disgusting!
But she obviously did the same thing Jankovic did...play everything and MM tournaments and voila, you're number 2! :rolleyes:

Of course :hug:

BournemouthBoy
Mar 29th, 2010, 02:23 PM
if i was in charge of WTA..


I would make players prize money in Premier events and slams be based on how they do in previous premier/slam events in the previous 12 months and possibly how many of these events they enter. This way the top players who don't play often enough will lose out fininacially. Ranking points for the Winner and Runner-Up should be double what it is at the momment. Am i mad?

Slutiana
Mar 29th, 2010, 03:22 PM
Dokic and Kournikova were top 10 around 2000-2002. Caro would thrive in any era. She forces her opponents to construct winning points. They cant do it.
Who can't do it?

Practically every top 10 player on the list there could construct winning points at the time they were in the top 10. Kournikova was one of the best.

Dokic may be bad now, but in her heyday she was one of the best clean/consistent hitters and one of the closest things to Davenport.

Back in the day, the top 10 players got there by playing great tennis. The only player I would put her above on that list is radwanska but even Aga was much more resourceful and had much more variety when she first burst onto the tour.

goldenlox
Mar 29th, 2010, 03:22 PM
Kournikova was just the kind of player Caro beats. Doesnt finish matches
That wasnt a better era than now, the Dokic, Kournikova era.
Caro beats Dementieva, Lena cant even beat Aga

Sylvester
Mar 29th, 2010, 03:54 PM
13,37

Is the average age of those who posted in this thread so far

It was 15,11 before you posted. :sad:

Slutiana
Mar 29th, 2010, 04:05 PM
Kournikova was just the kind of player Caro beats. Doesnt finish matches
That wasnt a better era than now, the Dokic, Kournikova era.
Caro beats Dementieva, Lena cant even beat Aga
Did you watch the Wozniacki-Kirilenko match? Wozniacki sucks when her opponent uses variety and comes to the net a lot.

The Dementieva back then, serve or no serve, was arguably better from the ground than now. Her ground game was certainly much more feared and potent than it is now.

Aaric
Mar 29th, 2010, 04:06 PM
13,37

Is the average age of those who posted in this thread so far

:confused:

goldenlox
Mar 29th, 2010, 04:09 PM
I saw the Caro-Maria match at IW. One sided. Caro was ill this match. Caro just gave bagels to Maria and Nadia. I saw both

pwayne
Mar 29th, 2010, 04:27 PM
Under the old Tier I system, answer is 0. Eastbourne and New Haven are Tier II tournaments under the old system.

thrust
Mar 29th, 2010, 04:31 PM
if i was in charge of WTA..


I would make players prize money in Premier events and slams be based on how they do in previous premier/slam events in the previous 12 months and possibly how many of these events they enter. This way the top players who don't play often enough will lose out fininacially. Ranking points for the Winner and Runner-Up should be double what it is at the momment. Am i mad?

Yes, mad as in crazy! All these anti Caroline threads are SHAMEFUL! Where is the Thread Moderator?

changel
Mar 29th, 2010, 04:43 PM
I saw the Caro-Maria match at IW. One sided. Caro was ill this match. Caro just gave bagels to Maria and Nadia. I saw both

Who is Petrova seriously, she is a pathetic choker who is just giving matches away, I won't even argue about Kirilenko, WOzniacki is a lame player, face it, her record vs top 10 is horrible, noone is scared about her, she never took a set off over Venus, Sharapova, Clijsters(even though they played just one time) I'm sorry to tell you this but with this game Pushniacki isn't going anywhere, she is really lucky the tour is in bad shape cause I can't see her in top10 if all players are playing their real level.

TennisFan66
Mar 29th, 2010, 04:50 PM
Who is Petrova seriously, she is a pathetic choker who is just giving matches away, I won't even argue about Kirilenko, WOzniacki is a lame player, face it, her record vs top 10 is horrible, noone is scared about her, she never took a set off over Venus, Sharapova, Clijsters(even though they played just one time) I'm sorry to tell you this but with this game Pushniacki isn't going anywhere, she is really lucky the tour is in bad shape cause I can't see her in top10 if all players are playing their real level.

You don't know who Petrova is, but you talk about how great Kim Clijsters is? .. Here's a hit for you then: AO 2010 :lol:

Standards are good. Double standards are twice as good.

madmax
Mar 29th, 2010, 04:51 PM
Who is Petrova seriously, she is a pathetic choker who is just giving matches away, I won't even argue about Kirilenko, WOzniacki is a lame player, face it, her record vs top 10 is horrible, noone is scared about her, she never took a set off over Venus, Sharapova, Clijsters(even though they played just one time) I'm sorry to tell you this but with this game Pushniacki isn't going anywhere, she is really lucky the tour is in bad shape cause I can't see her in top10 if all players are playing their real level.

this goldenlox poster seems to have some kind of weird fetish with particular players, and likes to put down the others...He is pampering Wozniacki all the time, claiming how she's beating the TOP players ( although she still doesn't have a Tier I title to her name) and is good for the tour. How in the hell World. Nr.2 without ANY significant win is good for the tour? Pushniacki and her "adventures" make a joke out of the ranking system, if anything else...

goldenlox
Mar 29th, 2010, 04:53 PM
Nadia bageled Kim, Caro bageled Nadia
See, its very simple.

changel
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:10 PM
this goldenlox poster seems to have some kind of weird fetish with particular players, and likes to put down the others...He is pampering Wozniacki all the time, claiming how she's beating the TOP players ( although she still doesn't have a Tier I title to her name) and is good for the tour. How in the hell World. Nr.2 without ANY significant win is good for the tour? Pushniacki and her "adventures" make a joke out of the ranking system, if anything else...

Yeah I saw that, I know how he bring Sharapova down everytime she lose, here's the thing goldenlox, Sharapova has nothing to prove anymore, Wozniacki is just a terrible player, Clijsters may have lost to Petrova but Clijsters has 2 majors and importants win over WS, Sharapova and Henin.
I don't know why you are referring to the rankings because clearly sth is wrong, the girl didn't win any T1 and made just one GS final, everytime she plays a good/great player, she is OUT, how can you NOT see that, she is playing everyweek to reach the top, like I always said, she can STEAL the N1 spot, she won't STEAL Majors.

goldenlox
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:14 PM
Im am glad you explained to me that "Wozniacki is just a terrible player"

I didn't know that. I thought reaching a USO final is a decent accomplishment, along with IW final and Madrid final and YEC SF.
Sharapova has not beaten a top 40 player this year, so I dont think she is relevant to the conversation at the moment.

WozLolz
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:14 PM
Im am glad you explained to me that "Wozniacki is just a terrible player"

I didn't know that. I thought reaching a USO final is a decent accomplishment, along with IW final and Madrid final and YEC SF.
Sharapova has not beaten a top 40 player this year, so I dont think she is relevant to the conversation at the moment.

Stop making sense!:lol:

changel
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:21 PM
Im am glad you explained to me that "Wozniacki is just a terrible player"

I didn't know that. I thought reaching a USO final is a decent accomplishment, along with IW final and Madrid final and YEC SF.
Sharapova has not beaten a top 40 player this year, so I dont think she is relevant to the conversation at the moment.

I agree about that, Sharapova's name shouldn't be alongside Pushniacki.
And again who did she beat on her way to the YEC SF, and USO final, I'm just waiting a perf against the best players(and you know which ones I'm talking about) but apparently I can wait.

madmax
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:23 PM
Im am glad you explained to me that "Wozniacki is just a terrible player"

I didn't know that. I thought reaching a USO final is a decent accomplishment, along with IW final and Madrid final and YEC SF.
Sharapova has not beaten a top 40 player this year, so I dont think she is relevant to the conversation at the moment.
Sharapova still has a Tier I title after her comeback - something one particular World Nr.2 is yet to accomplish...

changel
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:24 PM
Sharapova still has a Tier I title after her comeback - something one particular World Nr.2 is yet to accomplish...

OWNED.

Gdsimmons
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:25 PM
Got Em

goldenlox
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:27 PM
She beats Vera, Lena, Vika, Aga. pretty decent players.
She is still young. She will get her chances at the older players again.
Sharapova didnt have to play a final. She beat Aga, which Caro just did.
And I saw both of those Aga matches and I would bet out on Caro against Maria right now.
The only final Sharapova won since 2008 was against #108

Boreas
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:30 PM
OWNED.

You're such a great addition to the nice bunch of haters here, inspirationally innovative at accusations, superb at attacking a girl who at least plays a full schedule and not just 7 tournaments per year. You really are a stand-out in this forum. So, why exactly did you bother signing up?

madmax
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:31 PM
She beats Vera, Lena, Vika, Aga. pretty decent players.
She is still young. She will get her chances at the older players again.
Sharapova didnt have to play a final. She beat Aga, which Caro just did.
The only final Sharapova since 2008 was against #108

oh rly? So when it comes to Pushniacki you feel free to find excuses, but somehow Pova's title doesn't count now?:lol:C'mon now, I think you better than this...

goldenlox
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:32 PM
Maria got a walkover in a final. I wish Kournikova got one of those.
But I look more at the level of play.
I was pretty clear about Sharapova's 2009.
I dont think she did anything yet in 2010 that improved her.
Caro is a much better player now than Maria, imo, and I think she deserves a much better ranking.
Which Caro has.
Does not mean that will be for ever

Corswandt
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:39 PM
Maria got a walkover in a final. I wish Kournikova got one of those.
But I look more at the level of play.
I was pretty clear about Sharapova's 2009.
I dont think she did anything yet in 2010 that improved her.
Caro is a much better player now than Maria, imo, and I think she deserves a much better ranking.
Which Caro has.
Does not mean that will be for ever

Caro has suffered a few injuries.
Though probably nowhere near as serious as her father claimed.
But Sharapova has suffered many more.
And more serious.
Both have the ranking they deserve give their results over the past 12 months.
Like I said, this is only an issue because casual fans still see rankings as a gauge of ability.
As a measure of actual tennis skills.
And not of resilience or ability to play a full schedule withouth getting injured.
A #2 should be a top contender for any tournament she enters.
Something that Caro isn't.
Yet.

goldenlox
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:41 PM
She is holding 3 titles, was in a major final and 2 Super Tier I finals, a YEC SF and other solid results.

She cant avoid a good ranking, whether its 2, 3, 4 or 5, she is getting results that give anyone a good ranking.

And yeah, I LIKE her style of play. It exposes the mindless shit that I bitch about all the time.

changel
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:44 PM
You're such a great addition to the nice bunch of haters here, inspirationally innovative at accusations, superb at attacking a girl who at least plays a full schedule and not just 7 tournaments per year. You really are a stand-out in this forum. So, why exactly did you bother signing up?

Arguing, what I'm doing right now.

Yes, Maria got a walkover in the final but I'm pretty sure Jankovic retired because Sharapova was on the other side of the net, no need to tell you what she would have done if it was Pushniacki and you love talking about stats, so the stat is pretty clear, Maria got 1 T1, Wozniacki 0.
And I don't think Maria played that many tourneys in 2009, she came back in May, and was coming back from injury(don't tell me you didn't see her adjusting her service motion the whole year) but like I said there is no need to compare Pushniacki and Sharapova, it's an insult to Maria.

madmax
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:44 PM
Maria got a walkover in a final. I wish Kournikova got one of those.
But I look more at the level of play.
I was pretty clear about Sharapova's 2009.
I dont think she did anything yet in 2010 that improved her.
Caro is a much better player now than Maria, imo, and I think she deserves a much better ranking.
Which Caro has.
Does not mean that will be for ever

it's kinda sad to what extent some tennis fans are ready to go diminishing or pampering certain players...Sharapova is yet to lose a SET to Pushniacki, but somehow she's a worse player now. Now that is some interesting logic here, I give up then.

Gdsimmons
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:46 PM
I agree with what a poster said. That the #2 should be an automatic top contender in every tournament she enters. And I doubt that thats Caroline. She's usually not even in the top 5.

Mistress of Evil
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:47 PM
Please, do not involve Sharapova here. First, she does not have a shoulder and second Wozniacki will never come close to what Masha has achieved so end it already.

goldenlox
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:47 PM
The logic is that Sharapova hasn't played as well as Caro since she came back.
And if you want to say a walkover in Tokyo is better than making a USO final, then believe want you want.
Caro beat Oudin 2&2
I didnt bring Sharapova into this.

Boreas
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:48 PM
it's kinda sad to what extent some tennis fans are ready to go diminishing or pampering certain players...Sharapova is yet to lose a SET to Pushniacki, but somehow she's a worse player now. Now that is some interesting logic here, I give up then.

He said NOW.

It's hilarious how you're not able to interpret those light-structured posts

TennisFan66
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:52 PM
Two words to the Caro haters: Seek :help:

Your views, your opinions, your hate means NOTHING. NADA. ZILCH.

Caro :hearts: :worship: :bounce:

Yet you are apparently so deluded about your own importance, you keep spamming TF with Caro hate messages. Saaaaaaaad. Paaaaaathetic.

madmax
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:53 PM
A "walkover" in Tokyo was Jankovic's tactic to ease humiliation she would face against one her nemesis, and US Open final was the biggest fluke run in the history of the game - this is also a FACT and cannot be denied, as Wozniacki took advantage of mentally fragile Kuznetsova in the semifinal before proceeding crashing down to Clijsters.

changel
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:55 PM
The logic is that Sharapova hasn't played as well as Caro since she came back.
And if you want to say a walkover in Tokyo is better than making a USO final, then believe want you want.
Caro beat Oudin 2&2
I didnt bring Sharapova into this.

That's not that easy, Maria may have lost to many players(pushers), Wozniacki still never took a set off Maria, clay, hard, exo, whatever you want, she even beat her at the beginning of the season in straights sets again.

goldenlox
Mar 29th, 2010, 05:56 PM
Okay the walkover was because a healthy Jankovic was afraid to lose a match.
That makes sense to me.

I hope and want Sharapova to play Wozniacki in Rome, Madrid and Paris.
Let that happen, and we all can enjoy.

changel
Mar 29th, 2010, 06:00 PM
Okay the walkover was because a healthy Jankovic was afraid to lose a match.
That makes sense to me.

What are you trying to say, Sharapova beat Jankovic 5 out of 6 meetings, all their match were in Maria's hands, even the one she lost at Birmingham. So yeah, Jankovic knew it wasn't gonna be easy so she retired, and didn't she play like two days after this match in Tokyo, drama queen.:rolleyes:

goldenlox
Mar 29th, 2010, 06:05 PM
Sharapova is a whole different situation than Wozniacki.
I dont believe Jankovic is afraid of her.
I dont think Kirilenko is afraid of Sharapova.

Corswandt
Mar 29th, 2010, 06:05 PM
I hope and want Sharapova to play Wozniacki in Rome, Madrid and Paris.
Let that happen, and we all can enjoy.

Aha - so that's what this is all about. I should have seen through this from the beginning. I assumed you were just having some fun baiting the Caroh8t0rz, but there was something else after all.

You're just like Volcana - it's always about Sharapova for you.

TennisFan66
Mar 29th, 2010, 06:07 PM
A "walkover" in Tokyo was Jankovic's tactic to ease humiliation she would face against one her nemesis, and US Open final was the biggest fluke run in the history of the game - this is also a FACT and cannot be denied, as Wozniacki took advantage of mentally fragile Kuznetsova in the semifinal before proceeding crashing down to Clijsters.

Isn't it just hilarious when someone needs to cook up some elaborate conspiracy theory to support his opinion?

PS. USO Kuzzy Vs Caro was R4. Caro's SF was against Wickmayer.

Caro :hearts: :worship: :bounce:

goldenlox
Mar 29th, 2010, 06:08 PM
I dont know if Sharapova will keep playing. Her arm might not be able to handle it anymore.

This is all about Wozniacki, who is holding 3 titles, and was in the finals of the USO, IW and Madrid, and YEC SF.

Those results are clear. And she seems in form, as long as she gets out of Miami healthy, and should thrive on clay.
Caro is #2. Sveta and Dinara wont be moving back to #2
So Caro will be a big topic for months, maybe years

madmax
Mar 29th, 2010, 06:08 PM
What are you trying to say, Sharapova beat Jankovic 5 out of 6 meetings, all their match were in Maria's hands, even the one she lost at Birmingham. So yeah, Jankovic knew it wasn't gonna be easy so she retired, and didn't she play like two days after this match in Tokyo, drama queen.:rolleyes:

:lol::lol:It was really a miraculous recovery from the "injury" she endured during that final match...anyone with a brain cell could see that she was faking it and would continue to play that final if Pova wouldn't start pummeling her:devil:

homogenius
Mar 29th, 2010, 06:11 PM
What are you trying to say, Sharapova beat Jankovic 5 out of 6 meetings, all their match were in Maria's hands, even the one she lost at Birmingham. So yeah, Jankovic knew it wasn't gonna be easy so she retired, and didn't she play like two days after this match in Tokyo, drama queen.:rolleyes:

:lol: :help:

Olórin
Mar 29th, 2010, 06:13 PM
OMG the Wozniacki hating is out of control with some of you. I am FAR from her biggest fan - I was rooting for her to lose the other day so Venus could be number two, but some of the hating is unjustified.

TennisFan66
Mar 29th, 2010, 06:14 PM
:lol::lol:It was really a miraculous recovery from the "injury" she endured during that final match...anyone with a brain cell could see that she was faking it and would continue to play that final if Pova wouldn't start pummeling her:devil:

Lets hope some of those people with a brain cell will donate one to you :lol:

Seek :help:

Caro :hearts: :worship: :bounce:

madmax
Mar 29th, 2010, 06:19 PM
Lets hope some of those people with a brain cell will donate one to you :lol:

Seek :help:

Caro :hearts: :worship: :bounce:

so now I'm the one in the need of a brain cell of them all?:lol: Ok then...just for your knowledge - I don't hate your favorite player, actually I could care less for her and her boring-ass game, I just like to put things into perspective sometimes

Monzanator
Mar 29th, 2010, 06:22 PM
I was going to skip this thread but then I glanced over and saw Sharapova being mentioned I was like :eek: :drink: As much as I don't have any negative feelings about Wozniacki, she is Sharapova's bitch (still not as bad as Chakvetadze) but then again if they met now, I suppose Maria would struggle to win a set :crying2: so it's better they won't :lol: :tape:

Apart from that, usual Wozniacki hating :bs:

CloudAtlas
Mar 29th, 2010, 06:23 PM
A "walkover" in Tokyo was Jankovic's tactic to ease humiliation she would face against one her nemesis, and US Open final was the biggest fluke run in the history of the game - this is also a FACT and cannot be denied, as Wozniacki took advantage of mentally fragile Kuznetsova in the semifinal before proceeding crashing down to Clijsters.


So much wrong with this I don't know where to begin.

TennisFan66
Mar 29th, 2010, 06:25 PM
so now I'm the one in the need of a brain cell of them all?:lol: Ok then...just for your knowledge - I don't hate your favorite player, actually I could care less for her and her boring-ass game, I just like to put things into perspective sometimes

Funny then how much time you spend typing Caro hate messages :lol:

Caro :hearts: :worship: :bounce:

changel
Mar 29th, 2010, 06:25 PM
I dont know if Sharapova will keep playing. Her arm might not be able to handle it anymore.

This is all about Wozniacki, who is holding 3 titles, and was in the finals of the USO, IW and Madrid, and YEC SF.

Those results are clear. And she seems in form, as long as she gets out of Miami healthy, and should thrive on clay.
Caro is #2. Sveta and Dinara wont be moving back to #2
So Caro will be a big topic for months, maybe years

Her tennis won't last many months, even less years, thank God.

shoparound
Mar 29th, 2010, 06:55 PM
Would you rather have Ivanovic there because of her one lucky slam?