PDA

View Full Version : equality: can anyone explain this?


Nico_E
Feb 15th, 2010, 10:14 PM
so if the men and woman had equal prize money at the Australian Open ( $2.1 million AUS dollars)

then why when converted into USD was Federer's prize at over US$1.9M (according to ATP) and Serena's was just over US$1.7M (according to WTA) ?

Sam L
Feb 16th, 2010, 07:37 AM
so if the men and woman had equal prize money at the Australian Open ( $2.1 million AUS dollars)

then why when converted into USD was Federer's prize at over US$1.9M (according to ATP) and Serena's was just over US$1.7M (according to WTA) ?

They probably used a different AUD-USD exchange rate.

OsloErik
Feb 16th, 2010, 09:43 AM
Sometimes, the tours use a different distribution system for prize money. For example, at one of the Spring US Hard Court Tier I events, the women's champion earned more than the men's champion because the women had a lesser proportion going to early-round losers. So while the overall prize money pot is the same (say, 4.5 million USD), they have independent control over how that is distributed among round-finishers.

In this case, I don't rightly know. But there's probably a good reason.

tennnisfannn
Feb 16th, 2010, 09:59 AM
where did you find this info?

OsloErik
Feb 16th, 2010, 10:07 AM
where did you find this info?

I just had the same thought :lol:

Also, might it be a function of the communal players-pot that they divide up at the end of the year? Maybe the ATP makes you put in at year-end whereas the WTA just deducts immediately?

At any rate, I wouldn't worry about it. Someone would make a bigger fuss if it were truly unequal.

Sam L
Feb 16th, 2010, 10:38 AM
Sometimes, the tours use a different distribution system for prize money. For example, at one of the Spring US Hard Court Tier I events, the women's champion earned more than the men's champion because the women had a lesser proportion going to early-round losers. So while the overall prize money pot is the same (say, 4.5 million USD), they have independent control over how that is distributed among round-finishers.

In this case, I don't rightly know. But there's probably a good reason.

No. This is a Grand Slam. Not a tour event. Grand slams have never worked that pool system as far as I know.

It clearly says here that the male and female winner's prizemoney is $AUD 2.1 million each. http://www.australianopen.com/en_AU/event_guide/prize_money.html