PDA

View Full Version : 2003-2005 Kim vs. 2009 Kim


Kworb
Sep 13th, 2009, 05:39 PM
Who is better?

I think 2009 Kim is very good, but still a few notches away from her 2003-2005 form.

BlameSerena
Sep 13th, 2009, 05:40 PM
Seems more aggressive to me.

Miss Amor
Sep 13th, 2009, 05:40 PM
2009 Kim is mentally stronger.

manu
Sep 13th, 2009, 05:41 PM
Seems more aggressive to me.
I second that. Yesterday's match was in every way a demonstration of Kim at her best level. IMO she's already back to her 2003-2005 level, with added agressivity and mental strength.

BlameSerena
Sep 13th, 2009, 05:42 PM
I second that. Yesterday's match was in every way a demonstration of Kim at her best level. IMO she's already back to her 2003-2005 level, with added agressivity and mental strength.

I see this as well. Kim tweeted that this was the best match of her career. I am sad for her that it's so controversial.

But that can't be helped.

moby
Sep 13th, 2009, 05:42 PM
What I said in another thread:
http://www.tennisforum.com/showpost.php?p=16483068&postcount=292

In terms of speed and stroke production, Kim is definitely not as good as she was in 05. She can't play defense the way she used to. But I don't think this is necessarily a bad thing. Kim used to be happy running around in the back and getting balls back with flashy splits even though she had the firepower. To make up for the decreased speed, she's developed a more positive court positioning, and she's not backing up that much even on the defense. Rather she takes the ball early. She can't do splits the way she did them, but this means that she's forced to be more efficient and smarter on the defense.

In short, I think Kim is still not at her peak, but I would not say she's "no where close", they way I would have just a few weeks ago. The improvements are her serve, court positioning, awareness and arguably her mental toughness. I expected her to collapse after failing to convert the break points at 4-3 (playing passively on the first 2 breakpoints, then with Serena serving some impressive aces), but she followed up with back to back love service games, capping each service game with an ace.

Her forehand is somewhat inconsistent when aggressing, and she took a more passive approach in the second set, but at least she understood her limitations and tried to maximise her strengths.

manu
Sep 13th, 2009, 05:46 PM
What I said in another thread:
http://www.tennisforum.com/showpost.php?p=16483068&postcount=292
Hmm, yes that's a good analysis as well. Maybe I haven't seen Kim defend enough to judge her defensive skills and speed. But if her more agressive mindset is the reason why this slight flaw is covered up, I can only encourage that! I do think however that, unlinke what you said, her stroke production is already right up there with her 2003-2005 level.

thelittlestelf
Sep 13th, 2009, 05:51 PM
Yeah, mentally she seems much tougher. I think that's the most important difference, regardless of whether or not she is able to defend or hit as well as she did in '05.

The Dawntreader
Sep 13th, 2009, 06:18 PM
Definitely being aggressive, really early in the rally. Her backhand CC has been a formidable shot this USO. She's been swiping everyone off the court with the width and heaviness of that shot.

Her aggressive nature was so much that she made Venus have to hit HUGE, just so she could contest equally. Venus really hits huge nowadays, but against Clijsters she had no choice.

Her forehand technique is still dubious though, but her serving has become a primary weapon, rather than secondary.

goldenslam888
Sep 13th, 2009, 06:24 PM
2003-05 physically better

2009 mentally better

TheBoiledEgg
Sep 13th, 2009, 06:25 PM
she's lucky there isnt Justine to deal with.

cellophane
Sep 13th, 2009, 06:33 PM
she's lucky there isnt Justine to deal with.

I hope Justine comes back just so that Kim can beat her in a slam.

disposablehero
Sep 13th, 2009, 06:38 PM
It's ridiculously early to compare. Let her get a few more tourneys in.