PDA

View Full Version : Who would the present day Anke Huber be?


Journeywoman
Sep 11th, 2009, 09:39 PM
:confused:

LeonHart
Sep 11th, 2009, 09:41 PM
Closest I can think of is Petrova.

DOUBLEFIST
Sep 11th, 2009, 09:46 PM
I don't recall Huber being as powerful as Petrova can be.

Maybe Chakvetadze(sp?)?

Michael!
Sep 11th, 2009, 09:47 PM
u cant compare Anke with Petrova!
She was and is unigue, no one is like her, she had special game and special character....

Sure, she also played that fh topspin, but her bh was much stronger than Nadia´s and her footwork much better, while her 2nd serve was always a problem, as she was never consistent enough!

Steffica Greles
Sep 11th, 2009, 11:12 PM
Anke and Petrova are very similar in character - I see the likeness. Mental midgets. Total head cases.

From the baseline, both hit with equal power. Petrova has the better serve by far. Anke was a much faster mover.

spartanfan
Sep 11th, 2009, 11:26 PM
Closest I can think of is Petrova.
I thought of Petrova as well. Not so much because their games are/were similar. Both they both were pretty good players, just not great players. Or maybe Patty Schnyder in the vain that all three ladies were consistently ranked 8-20 and usually had one or two tournaments a year that they performed really well at and typically makes a lot of 4th rounds at Grand Slams and an occasional quarterfinal. But were just never really big moment players or big title contenders.

Michael!
Sep 11th, 2009, 11:28 PM
:cuckoo:
I think you all havent seen Anke often?
Anke and Nadia are different, I dont think that they have much in common, beside the topspin fh, especially the character is totally different, I mean sure, they both have/had mental problems on court, but this has nothing to do with the character of someone....

davidmario
Sep 11th, 2009, 11:34 PM
game wise: errani?

Ryan
Sep 11th, 2009, 11:41 PM
:cuckoo:
I think you all havent seen Anke often?
Anke and Nadia are different, I dont think that they have much in common, beside the topspin fh, especially the character is totally different, I mean sure, they both have/had mental problems on court, but this has nothing to do with the character of someone....



Can you explain how they're different? From all the matches I've seen with Anke (downloaded matches of her against Hingis), she's a pretty standard aggressive baseliner. She's got a good backhand, above average mobility, loopy forehand, meh serve and decent net skills. I'd actually say she reminds me a lot of Zvonareva.

Michael!
Sep 11th, 2009, 11:47 PM
Can you explain how they're different? From all the matches I've seen with Anke (downloaded matches of her against Hingis), she's a pretty standard aggressive baseliner. She's got a good backhand, above average mobility, loopy forehand, meh serve and decent net skills. I'd actually say she reminds me a lot of Zvonareva.

well, I have seen all of her matches from the point on I could watch, and her fist serve was good, her 2nd serve as weak, yeah, as many DF´s, but she moved pretty well had a great bh and fh, cant say that her fh was loopy on a good day.
To make it short, she was able to beat anyone back then on a good day, sure she didnt show her best tennis often, but she was for sure more aggressive than Zvonareva and could hit the ball really hard.

Ryan
Sep 12th, 2009, 12:05 AM
well, I have seen all of her matches from the point on I could watch, and her fist serve was good, her 2nd serve as weak, yeah, as many DF´s, but she moved pretty well had a great bh and fh, cant say that her fh was loopy on a good day.
To make it short, she was able to beat anyone back then on a good day, sure she didnt show her best tennis often, but she was for sure more aggressive than Zvonareva and could hit the ball really hard.



Who would you compare her to then? She was good, but her game certainly wasn't unique.

Michael!
Sep 12th, 2009, 12:16 AM
Who would you compare her to then? She was good, but her game certainly wasn't unique.

well, unigue doenst mean that she was best of all, I jus think that it is not possible to compare her with others, as she had her on game...I think it is always difficult to compare players..

mr_burns
Sep 12th, 2009, 05:21 AM
My only thought on that...retired much too early...really much too early (she was 26)

good to see how she could trouble the belgians in her last fall

in a way she is close to kim...popular with fans and players and lack of motivation at an early age

JackFrost
Sep 12th, 2009, 06:35 AM
I think she had always the problem, that she never get enough credits for what she had done. GSfinal (Australian Open 96),Masters final (Graf won only in five sets), number 4 in the world and div. wins of wta tournaments.
But the german press had nearly all the time only Steffi Graf in their headlines. Steffi and her success, Steffi wipes the floor with her opponents in 30 minutes, Steffi and her father, Steffi and the attack at monica Seles in Hamburg, Steffi and her stalker, Steffi has no selfconfidence, reaches only the finals of grand slams, Steffi here, Steffi there...
Don´t get me wrong, I liked Graf a lot. But i think it can be pretty hard as second top ten player to be always in the mighty shadow of such a big star.

DOUBLEFIST
Sep 12th, 2009, 07:13 AM
Can you explain how they're different? From all the matches I've seen with Anke (downloaded matches of her against Hingis), she's a pretty standard aggressive baseliner. She's got a good backhand, above average mobility, loopy forehand, meh serve and decent net skills. I'd actually say she reminds me a lot of Zvonareva.

The Z' comparison isn't so bad, but, as I recall, Anke took the ball significantly earlier than Vera.

irma
Sep 12th, 2009, 09:27 AM
I think she had always the problem, that she never get enough credits for what she had done. GSfinal (Australian Open 96),Masters final (Graf won only in five sets), number 4 in the world and div. wins of wta tournaments.
But the german press had nearly all the time only Steffi Graf in their headlines. Steffi and her success, Steffi wipes the floor with her opponents in 30 minutes, Steffi and her father, Steffi and the attack at monica Seles in Hamburg, Steffi and her stalker, Steffi has no selfconfidence, reaches only the finals of grand slams, Steffi here, Steffi there...
Don´t get me wrong, I liked Graf a lot. But i think it can be pretty hard as second top ten player to be always in the mighty shadow of such a big star.

Steffi was simply to far ahead in tennisachievements. Sure Huber was a very good player but not a real rival to Steffi, one 5 set match would obvious not change that. Without Boris and Steffi tennis would have been less popular and she would also have had less sponsor money.
So she also benefitted from it!