PDA

View Full Version : Nemesis: If _______ hadn't existed, _____ would have so many slams


Volcana
Jan 8th, 2009, 02:39 AM
Venus lost six slam finals to Serena
Lindsay Davenport lost three slam finals to Venus
Kim Clijsters lost three slam finals to Justine Henin


Any other nemesis combinations you can think of?

iGOAT
Jan 8th, 2009, 02:40 AM
Capriati for Hingis, not sure how many though
Serena and Venus for each other :p

pwayne
Jan 8th, 2009, 02:59 AM
Martina Navratilova and Chris Evert
Steffi Graf and Monica Seles
Martina Navratilova and Steffi Graf

CJ07
Jan 8th, 2009, 03:08 AM
Martina Navratilova and Chris Evert
Steffi Graf and Monica Seles
Martina Navratilova and Steffi Graf
I think those are the biggest ones. Sanchez-Vicario and Graf.

Unfortuantely, Günther Parche and Seles probably is up there too.

Venus and Serena, Serena and Justine too.

homogenius
Jan 8th, 2009, 03:11 AM
Arantxa lost five finals against Graf

LeRoy.
Jan 8th, 2009, 03:43 AM
If Serena hadn't existed Venus would have ZERO slams. :D

Geisha
Jan 8th, 2009, 05:34 AM
Capriati for Hingis, not sure how many though
Serena and Venus for each other :p

Hingis lost to Capriati in three GS finals, and a SF.

OsloErik
Jan 8th, 2009, 05:42 AM
If Navratilova hadn't existed, Evert would have had 30 slams. And the record for the most slams everywhere but Australia.

homogenius
Jan 8th, 2009, 05:47 AM
Hingis lost to Capriati in three GS finals, and a SF.

I think it's only 2 at Ao.

Tennisstar86
Jan 8th, 2009, 06:05 AM
If Serena hadn't existed Venus would have ZERO slams. :D

I think it'd be the other way around buckerooo....

Venus was the one who was a prodigy when she was a child, and its not because "she had Serena" a 8 year old to hit with.......

Serena became the player she is, because SHE had a prodigy to hit with.