PDA

View Full Version : Why exactly is women's tennis weak?


supergrunt
Jul 8th, 2008, 06:23 PM
Did women's tennis become "weak" with the loss of one player? People were saying the same thing when Henin was absent at last year's AO. Or was it simply that too many seeds went out before the quaters of the tournament? And wouldn't that prove the depth in the game?

Apoleb
Jul 8th, 2008, 06:24 PM
Troll.

Malva
Jul 8th, 2008, 08:44 PM
I believe its main weakness is that women try to emulate men but since that is not possible they put everything they have into how hard they can hit the ball, and very little is left for tactics, technique, finesse, variety.

pav
Jul 8th, 2008, 09:07 PM
When a one hundred and something ranked player beats or challenges a high ranked player on the men's side the media grab their collective organs and chirp on "What depth there is in the ATP!" But when this happens in a match involving the beautiful sex, it for some reason does a 360 degree and becomes a sign of lack of depth and weakness! The reason for this? There can only be one, deep, ingrained chauvinism

Maryamator
Jul 8th, 2008, 09:31 PM
considering in each grandslam there are about 6 contenders to win it, i dont call that weak. i call it competitive.

Thanx4nothin
Jul 8th, 2008, 09:32 PM
It is much more competitive and deep (at the very top) than the mens game atm IMHO

Max565
Jul 8th, 2008, 09:55 PM
I believe its main weakness is that women try to emulate men but since that is not possible they put everything they have into how hard they can hit the ball, and very little is left for tactics, technique, finesse, variety.

Oh - I think Hingis is missing... ;)

Malva
Jul 8th, 2008, 10:26 PM
Oh - I think Hingis is missing... ;)

I guess, she is...

LindsayRulz
Jul 8th, 2008, 10:31 PM
The women's game just don't have the same depth than the men's side. For example you can have some close matches between a top seed and a noname player in the first round of a slam in the men's side, while on the women's side the top seeds are rarely in trouble before the 4th round.

Matt01
Jul 8th, 2008, 10:47 PM
The women's game just don't have the same depth than the men's side. For example you can have some close matches between a top seed and a noname player in the first round of a slam in the men's side, while on the women's side the top seeds are rarely in trouble before the 4th round.


Err...Wimbledon? :p

Men: Nadal and Federer combined lost one single set until the final (I think). Women: #1 and #2 and #3 seeds all lost before the quarters...

Loot at the Top 12 or so of the ATP: Wawrinka, Gasquet, Murray, Almagro plus overrated and one-dimensional Roddick...I think the depth ot the ATP is a bit overrrated...even though I love watching men's tennis :drool:

slamchamp
Jul 8th, 2008, 10:48 PM
maybe because some top players are playing badly..who knows

Kworb
Jul 8th, 2008, 10:50 PM
It's weak now because Henin was such a league above everyone else. She lifted the women's to an unprecedented level and now it's like, who's gonna do that again? Who's gonna step up and play some of that phenomenal tennis? Henin's masterful tennis is still fresh in our memories and it's gonna take a while for people to accept that the current top women aren't as good.

Malva
Jul 8th, 2008, 11:02 PM
maybe because some top players are playing badly..who knows

A very refreshing thought. I suppose not far from the right answer to the question posed.