PDA

View Full Version : Ranking points and Earnings


Darop.
Jun 17th, 2008, 02:41 PM
How about having a sticky in this section with rankings points and earnings for each round of every tier of tournaments?

Does anyone have this list?

hellas719
Jun 17th, 2008, 08:58 PM
Description W F SF QF R16 R32 R64 R128 QLFR Q3 Q2 Q1
Grand Slam (Singles) 1000 700 450 250 140 90 60 2 31 25 15 2
Grand Slam (Doubles) 1000 700 450 250 140 90 2 - 24 - - -
SE Champs (Singles) 750 525 335 185 105 - - - - - - -
SE Champs (Doubles) 750 525 335 185 - - - - - - - -
Tier I $3,000,000 (Singles) 500 350 225 125 70 45 30 1 20 - 10 1
Tier I $3,000,000 (Doubles) 500 350 225 125 70 1 - - 15 - 10 1
Tier I $2,000,000 (Singles) 465 325 210 115 65 40 25 1 15 - 10 1
Tier I $2,000,000 (Doubles) 465 325 210 115 65 1 - - - - - -
Tier I $1,340,000 (56S) 430 300 195 110 60 35 1 - 15 - 10 1
Tier I $1,340,000 (28S/32D) 430 300 195 110 60 1 - - 20 15 10 1
Tier I $1,340,000 (16D) 430 300 195 110 1 - - - - - - -
Tier II $650,000 (28S) 300 215 140 75 40 1 - - 15 10 5 1
Tier II $650,000 (16D) 300 215 140 75 1 - - - - - - -
Tier II $600,000 (56S) 275 190 125 70 35 20 1 - 10 - 5 1
Tier II $600,000 (28S) 275 190 125 70 35 1 - - 15 10 5 1
Tier II $600,000 (16D) 275 190 125 70 1 - - - - - - -
Tier III $225,000 (32S) 165 115 75 40 20 1 - - 5 - 3 1
Tier III $225,000 (16D) 165 115 75 40 1 - - - - - - -
Tier III $175,000 (56S) 140 100 65 35 20 10 1 - 4 - 3 1
Tier III $175,000 (30/32S, 32Q) 140 100 65 35 20 1 - - 8 4 3 1
Tier III $175,000 (30/32S, 16Q) 140 100 65 35 20 1 - - 4 - 3 1
Tier III $175,000 (16D) 140 100 65 35 1 - - - - - - -
Tier IV $145,000 (32S, 32Q) 115 80 50 30 15 1 - - 7 3 2 1
Tier IV $145,000 (32S, 16Q) 115 80 50 30 15 1 - - 3 - 2 1
Tier IV $145,000 (16S, 16D) 115 80 50 30 1 - - - - - - -
ITF $100,000 + H* (32) 75 55 40 20 10 1 - - 3 2 1 -
ITF $100,000 + H* (16) 75 55 40 20 1 - - - - - - -
ITF $100,000 (32) 70 50 35 18 9 1 - - 3 2 1 -
ITF $100,000 (16) 70 50 35 18 1 - - - - - - -
ITF $75,000 (32) + H* 65 45 29 16 8 1 - - 3 2 1 -
ITF $75,000 (16) + H* 65 45 29 16 1 - - - - - - -
ITF $75,000 (32) 55 39 25 15 7 1 - - 3 2 1 -
ITF $75,000 (16) 55 39 25 15 1 - - - - - - -
ITF $50,000 + H* (32) 45 32 20 12 6 1 - - 3 2 1 -
ITF $50,000 + H* (16) 45 32 20 12 1 - - - - - - -
ITF $50,000 (32) 35 25 16 9 5 1 - - 3 2 1 -
ITF $50,000 (16) 35 25 16 9 1 - - - - - - -
ITF $25,000 (32) 25 17 12 7 4 1 - - 1 - - -
ITF $25,000 (16) 25 17 12 7 1 - - - - - - -
ITF $10,000 (32) 6 4 3 2 1 - - - - - - -
ITF $10,000 (16) 6 4 3 1 1 - - - - - - -

(*) “+H” indicates that Hospitality is provided

Darop.
Jun 17th, 2008, 09:37 PM
Awesome, thanks ;)

coyets
Jan 14th, 2009, 01:15 PM
Please excuse my ignorance, but why do so few players have an odd number of ranking points? Checking the list (Jan 12, 2009) on the WTA Tour site, the lowest-ranking player I could find with an odd number of points was Kairangi Vano (number 695) with 35 points. Next lowest was Isabella Holland (number 580) with 51 points.

Christinawww
Jan 17th, 2009, 07:20 PM
Right now it is because they just doubled the old points so it is an even number. As the year progresses I am sure more and more players will have an odd number of points

robb01
Jan 19th, 2009, 02:53 PM
Great job :yeah:

Darop.
Jan 20th, 2009, 10:38 AM
This grid is no longer valid, ranking points have changed this year... Anyone have the new one?

coyets
Jan 21st, 2009, 11:10 AM
Description W F SF QF R16 R32 R64 R128 QLFR Q3 Q2 Q1
Grand Slam (Singles) 2000 1400 900 500 280 160 100 5 60 50 40 2
Grand Slam (Doubles) 2000 1400 900 500 280 160 5 - 48 - - -
Premier Mandatory (96S) 1000 700 450 250 140 80 50 5 30 - 20 1
Premier Mandatory (64S) 1000 700 450 250 140 80 5 - 30 - 20 1
Premier Mandatory (28/32D) 1000 700 450 250 140 5 - - - - - -
Premier 5 (56S) 800 550 350 200 110 60 1 - 30 - 20 1
Premier 5 (28D) 800 550 350 200 110 1 - - - - - -
Premier (56S) 470 320 200 120 60 40 1 - 12 - 8 1
Premier (32S) 470 320 200 120 60 1 - - 20 12 8 1
Premier (16D) 470 320 200 120 1 - - - - - - -
International (56S) 280 200 130 70 30 15 1 - 10 - 6 1
International (32S) 280 200 130 70 30 1 - - 16 10 6 1
International (16D) 280 200 130 70 1 - - - - - - -
ITF $100,000 + H(32) 150 110 80 40 20 1 - - 6 4 1 -
ITF $100,000 + H(16) 150 110 80 40 1 - - - - - - -
ITF $100,000 (32) 140 100 70 36 18 1 - - 6 4 1 -
ITF $100,000 (16) 140 100 70 36 1 - - - - - - -
ITF $75,000 + H(32) 130 90 58 32 16 1 - - 6 4 1 -
ITF $75,000 + H(16) 130 90 58 32 1 - - - - - - -
ITF $75,000 (32) 110 78 50 30 14 1 - - 6 4 1 -
ITF $75,000 (16) 110 78 50 30 1 - - - - - - -
ITF $50,000 + H(32) 90 64 40 24 12 1 - - 6 4 1 -
ITF $50,000 + H(16) 90 64 40 24 1 - - - - - - -
ITF $50,000 (32) 70 50 32 18 10 1 - - 6 4 1 -
ITF $50,000 (16) 70 50 32 18 1 - - - - - - -
ITF $25,000 (32) 50 34 24 14 8 1 - - 1 - - -
ITF $25,000 (16) 50 34 24 14 1 - - - - - - -
ITF $10,000 (32) 12 8 6 4 1 - - - - - - -
ITF $10,000 (16) 12 8 6 1 0 - - - - - - -

darkangel23
Sep 6th, 2009, 02:53 PM
Do you get the system well???
I don't get it, I wanted to recreate the total of points of Wozniacki (there I could understand well which tournaments count and which ones don't though she played 28). If the points are only counting 16 tournaments I never get to 4730 points only up to 4415?! Does someone really understand it??? I really want to figure it out

darkangel23
Sep 6th, 2009, 03:01 PM
And points for SEC aren't on this list either...

Meelis
Sep 6th, 2009, 05:56 PM
Do you get the system well???
I don't get it, I wanted to recreate the total of points of Wozniacki (there I could understand well which tournaments count and which ones don't though she played 28). If the points are only counting 16 tournaments I never get to 4730 points only up to 4415?! Does someone really understand it??? I really want to figure it out

Madrid PM 17.05.09 F 700
New Haven P 31.08.09 W 470
Eastbourne P 21.06.09 W 470
Charleston P 19.04.09 F 320
Wimbledon GS 05.07.09 4.R 280
Ponte Vedra Beach IS 12.04.09 W 280
Tokyo III 05.10.08 W 280
US Open GS 07.09.08 4.R 280
Miami PM 05.04.09 QF 250
Indian Wells PM 22.03.09 QF 250
Luxembourg III 26.10.08 F 230
Cincinnati P5 17.08.08 QF 200
Bastad IS 12.07.09 F 200
Memphis IS 22.02.09 F 200
Roland Garros GS 07.06.09 3.R 160
Australian Open GS 01.02.09 3.R 160

darkangel23
Sep 6th, 2009, 06:48 PM
I thought that Cinci was mandatory as well?! Although it's said on the website that it's a premier 5! Those are: Rome, Cinci, Tokyo, Toronto and what??? Moscow or Dubai? Why are her Bejing points from last year not included? I thought a mandatory event is always counted no matter on what stage you lose?!

darkangel23
Sep 6th, 2009, 06:51 PM
And in the How the ranking works sheet there's said that the two best Premier 5 tournaments count, so why is there not Rome? Is it just because 110 points are lower than her Bastad points???

darkangel23
Sep 6th, 2009, 06:52 PM
I tried it with Safina's points as well but all her results calculated together don't even give me over 9000 points! Or is the YEC just adjusted? It is nowhere said how many points you can earn there!

darkangel23
Sep 6th, 2009, 06:55 PM
@meelis

I'm so sorry. Forget about the Safina point thing, I realized I already took her 3r US Open points from this year not her semifinal points from 2008! :D So no wonder I don't get it right! But the other questions still remain :)

darkangel23
Sep 6th, 2009, 07:12 PM
Or maybe have the Olymics points dropped off or will they stay for 4 years?

Meelis
Sep 6th, 2009, 07:46 PM
Those are: Rome, Cinci, Tokyo, Toronto and what??? Moscow or Dubai? Why are her Bejing points from last year not included? I thought a mandatory event is always counted no matter on what stage you lose?!

Dubai is last premier 5.

Beijing was not mandatory last year.

And in the How the ranking works sheet there's said that the two best Premier 5 tournaments count, so why is there not Rome? Is it just because 110 points are lower than her Bastad points???

2 best results from Premier 5 Tournaments thing only applies for top-10 list players (Caroline did not finish 2008 in top-10)

Or maybe have the Olymics points dropped off or will they stay for 4 years?

Olympics points dropped off couple of weeks ago.

darkangel23
Sep 6th, 2009, 08:10 PM
Ah ok so a ranking system for a Top 10 player counts for one whole year?! So for Caroline it's likely next year that her premier 5 will count?! And for Ana it still counts as Top 10 player even though she isn't there anymore?! Maybe if you know, you could post here Safina's points, because I'm missing 150 points and I don't know why...

darkangel23
Sep 6th, 2009, 08:21 PM
Ah ok and because Caro was not in the Top 10 when she played Rome, it is not counted, because she only played one Premier 5 tournament as a member of the Top 10, right?! So her upcoming Tokyo points will count? No this cannot be because if it is like that how I said then Toronto should count in her rankings... Well it's complicated though... So the year end rankings decide if a player has one ranking system with the premier 5 or the normal?!

Meelis
Sep 6th, 2009, 08:45 PM
Yes. Year-end top-10 has different rules.

Safina:

Roland Garros GS 07.06.09 F 1400
Australian Open GS 01.02.09 F 1400
Wimbledon GS 05.07.09 SF 900
US Open GS 07.09.08 SF 900
Madrid PM 17.05.09 W 1000
Indian Wells PM 22.03.09 QF 250
Miami PM 05.04.09 3.R 80
Rome P5 10.05.09 W 800
Cincinnati P5 16.08.09 F 550
Tokyo I 21.09.08 W 860
Moscow I 12.10.08 SF 390
Stuttgart P 03.05.09 F 320
Sydney P 18.01.09 F 320
Portoroz IS 26.07.09 W 280
Doha WC 09.11.08 7. 210
Stuttgart II 05.10.08 QF 150

This (http://www.vlmark.szm.sk/) site is extremely helpful ;)