I know they have for Lindsay/Lisa's 1R match so I am sure it was just a mistake.
Feb 27th, 2008, 10:51 PM
I don't like all this no-ad in doubles - spoils the tensions of saving break points. Also I hate the super set tiebreak - just play a third set - cos sometimes players could win due to pure luck.
Feb 27th, 2008, 10:52 PM
good it they dont... i hate ti
Feb 27th, 2008, 11:03 PM
They are using no AD system as usual.
I am sure that was a mistake.
Feb 28th, 2008, 03:05 AM
I can't stand the super-tiebreak either (the no-ad thing is only slightly better). It's especially annoying when they play a second set tiebreak right before that, because it feels so repetitive. If they want to shorten the doubles matches so much, I say just go with single-set matches.
Feb 28th, 2008, 03:07 AM
It was just a mistake.
Feb 28th, 2008, 04:34 AM
They can't really show No-AD on the "live scoring" at some tournaments, it doesn't register in the computer correctly so it just goes to show deuce > advantage > game.
I should try playing no-AD doubles...so much pressure!
Feb 28th, 2008, 05:31 AM
I actually was a ball kid for that mtch and no AD scoring was used. :p
Feb 28th, 2008, 06:59 AM
I've played competitive doubles matches where we have had 'long deuce, short deuce' rules played, which means that the first deuce will go to an advantage. If after the advantage it returns to deuce, then it becomes sudden death. I like that rule better between No Ad or Long and Short Deuce.