PDA

View Full Version : Weak era confirmed yet again.


mediter
Oct 14th, 2007, 01:43 PM
The manhandling of the William sisters confirms that it has always been a weak era where the best of the least talented won. They never had me jumping up and down with their shots. They were beasts plain and simple.

Screamapova tried to play them at their own game and got creamed. But against the more subtle skills of justine, they have come a cropper. Justine herself got double bagelled by screamapova in last year's USO and has a dubious reputation of losing crucial matches outside RG.

After painstaking research and flawless analysis, i can only come to the irrefutable fact this is an undeniably weak era of chokers and transitional champions.

Even in the men's game , the arrogant man from Switzerland just has to turn up on court and other players are willing to give him a salute at the first opportunity. His horrible backhand ,one dimensional talent and an inflexible wessrn grip does not prevent
GS wins. The epidemic of choking pioneered by Nalbandian and Ljubicic affects everyone and he wins sets he should have lost because of his name.

What a pathetic scene on both tours!

mankind
Oct 14th, 2007, 01:44 PM
Clown era.

supergrunt
Oct 14th, 2007, 01:45 PM
Clown era.

Are you agreeing with him?

Anyways the thread starter's assessment is worng in so many ways.

Poova
Oct 14th, 2007, 01:48 PM
Screamapova tried to play them at their own game and got creamed. But against the more subtle skills of justine, they have come a cropper. Justine herself got double bagelled by screamapova in last year's USO and has a dubious reputation of losing crucial matches outside RG.
Erm, no she didn't. :lol: :haha:

jawadde
Oct 14th, 2007, 01:48 PM
The manhandling of the William sisters confirms that it has always been a weak era where the best of the least talented won. They never had me jumping up and down with their shots. They were beasts plain and simple.

Screamapova tried to play them at their own game and got creamed. But against the more subtle skills of justine, they have come a cropper. Justine herself got double bagelled by screamapova in last year's USO and has a dubious reputation of losing crucial matches outside RG.

After painstaking research and flawless analysis, i can only come to the irrefutable fact this is an undeniably weak era of chokers and transitional champions.

Even in the men's game , the arrogant man from Switzerland just has to turn up on court and other players are willing to give him a salute at the first opportunity. His horrible backhand ,one dimensional talent and an inflexible wessrn grip does not prevent
GS wins. The epidemic of choking pioneered by Nalbandian and Ljubicic affects everyone and he wins sets he should have lost because of his name.

What a pathetic scene on both tours!

:bs:

DimaDinosaur
Oct 14th, 2007, 01:50 PM
Elena Dementieva has just defeated Serena and gave her two breadsticks 6-1 6-1 to go along with that defeat!!!!! I am in total shock!!!! I didn't know the bitch had it in her!!!!! DAMN!!! And she hits multiple aces!!! WHAT IS GOING ON!!!!!! I have to bow down to that Russian!!!! Heyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy :worship:

mediter
Oct 14th, 2007, 01:51 PM
Are you agreeing with him?

Anyways the thread starter's assessment is worng in so many ways.

They are irrefutable , substantiated by extensive evidence,flawless analysis and an impressive array of facts and figures.

mankind
Oct 14th, 2007, 01:51 PM
Are you agreeing with him?

Anyways the thread starter's assessment is worng in so many ways.

No.
It's the only discussion that ever seems to be going on in MTF.
That's what happens when one player kicks the shit out of everyone else.

jujufreak
Oct 14th, 2007, 01:52 PM
After painstaking research and flawless analysis

:lol: :lol: :lol:

to begin with, try to do some research on "double bagel"

mediter
Oct 14th, 2007, 01:53 PM
Erm, no she didn't. :lol: :haha:

64 64 is clearly a double bagel.

homogenius
Oct 14th, 2007, 01:53 PM
Another thread from bagelman...

jawadde
Oct 14th, 2007, 01:53 PM
64 64 is clearly a double bagel.

:confused:

mediter
Oct 14th, 2007, 01:54 PM
61 61 would have been a double bagel if she had won in straight sets.

LCS
Oct 14th, 2007, 01:56 PM
mediter you are so winning TWAT next year!

gentenaire
Oct 14th, 2007, 01:56 PM
It's a mathematical certainty that you're a fool.

dapxin
Oct 14th, 2007, 01:56 PM
This one is ridiculous.

Whatever you wan't to see, stay healthy till your 'strong' era comes.

I am loving the tennis of today and I won't accomodate any spoilers. Goodluck with your theory(ies)

jawadde
Oct 14th, 2007, 01:58 PM
How would you describe a 'bagel' then??

mediter
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:05 PM
I am loving the tennis of today and I won't accomodate any spoilers. Goodluck with your theory(ies)

Having to put with second/third rate quality is your problem , ROFL

mediter
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:07 PM
How would you describe a 'bagel' then??

6060, 6161....7676 ARE DOUBLE BAGELS.

606060,616161....767676 are triple bagels.

The complex mathematical equations was posted by me a few days ago but deleted by overzealous admins!

Lunaris
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:08 PM
In MTF the term double bagel is used for any win in straight sets with the same scoreline in both sets, I think. I don't know whether it came from another place.

homogenius
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:09 PM
6060, 6161....7676 ARE DOUBLE BAGELS.

606060,616161....767676 are triple bagels.

The complex mathematical equations was posted by me a few days ago but deleted by overzealous admins!

What is a single bagel ?

bie
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:11 PM
Bagel – winning (or losing) a set 6-0

mediter
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:15 PM
In MTF the term double bagel is used for any win in straight sets with the same scoreline in both sets, I think. I don't know whether it came from another place.

It came from me. Only a few other friends of mine on BBC know this , as we are all of scholarly disposition.

TheBoiledEgg
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:16 PM
we should direct him to this thread

http://www.menstennisforums.com/showthread.php?t=78615

micah63
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:20 PM
Justine herself got double bagelled by screamapova in last year's USO and has a dubious reputation of losing crucial matches outside RG.


Huh?:rolleyes:

Yasmine
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:20 PM
Why do you still bother following tennis and come to post in a tennis related board then? if it's that pathetic... :shrug:

BuTtErFrEnA
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:21 PM
because tennis is like a drug :banana:

mediter
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:30 PM
Why do you still bother following tennis and come to post in a tennis related board then? if it's that pathetic... :shrug:

My irrefutable analysis can be a panacea for all evils.

fufuqifuqishahah
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:36 PM
My irrefutable analysis can be a panacea for all evils.

how?

Yasmine
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:36 PM
My irrefutable analysis can be a panacea for all evils.
post of the year.:lol:

micah63
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:39 PM
6060, 6161....7676 ARE DOUBLE BAGELS.
....

Definitely wrong.
6-0 6-0 is a "double bagel". Nothing else.

thrust
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:43 PM
Was watching the first set of last years YEC final with Justine and Amelie. The quality of all court tennis was as good, if not better, than any Graf-Seles, Serena- Capriati, or Davenport-Venus match. The same is true of this years USO semi between Jusine and Venus.Great serving, net play, backhands, forehands and court coverage. Eelen D, except for her serve, has been an outstanding player with awsome ground strokes and court movement. Mentally she could be weak at times but there were several matches, coming from behind, she could be tough and fearless enough to beat top players. With better coaching, she would have won a couple Slams as well as more other tournaments.

thrust
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:46 PM
because tennis is like a drug :banana:

It sure is!

TheBoiledEgg
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:47 PM
the 6-4 6-4 double bagel is now an inside-joke at MTF now
now every score with same set result is now posted as a DB :lol: cos of some plonker who didnt know the meaning of a DB

taddict
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:50 PM
the 6-4 6-4 double bagel is now an inside-joke at MTF now
now every score with same set result is now posted as a DB :lol: cos of some plonker who didnt know the meaning of a DB

and that plonker was ................... ? :confused:

bie
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:54 PM
The origin of the 'DOUBLE BAGEL':

http://www.barrypopik.com/index.php/new_york_city/entry/tennis_bagel/

;)

KennyChante4ever
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:55 PM
Weak era? You must be new to following tennis. There's always been a wide array of talent but when it came to the Grand Slams, only a handful of players won them. This current generation is no different. Davenport and Pierce were on the rise in the mid-90's but Steffi still dominated the Grand Slams just like today with Justine, Serena, Venus and Maria winning most of them while Ivanovic and Jankovic are trying to break through.

Conor
Oct 14th, 2007, 02:55 PM
64 64 is clearly a double bagel.

What is wrong with you? I dont know how many times you've been told that 6/4 6/4 is NOT a double bagel :o

Sefo
Oct 14th, 2007, 03:02 PM
Dude, you must have a copyright for the transitional champion term. Never heard anybody use that term, only you a half-dozen time.
Or it's me not reading enough ATP forums?

Helaena
Oct 14th, 2007, 03:20 PM
My irrefutable analysis can be a panacea for all evils.

omg....toink toink toink...get a life....:devil:

Yasmine
Oct 14th, 2007, 03:21 PM
What is wrong with you? I dont know how many times you've been told that 6/4 6/4 is NOT a double bagel :o
didn't your mum tell you that you shouldn't listen to people you don't know? :awww:


:lol:

Slutiana
Oct 14th, 2007, 03:40 PM
mediter you are so winning TWAT next year!

38 posts :spit: :haha:

gentenaire
Oct 14th, 2007, 05:40 PM
They are irrefutable , substantiated by extensive evidence,flawless analysis and an impressive array of facts and figures.

Then why are you contradicting yourself?

By your definition, a double bagel isn't necessarily a bad thing. A 7-6 7-6 loss is by your definition a double bagel, but there's absolutely not shame in losing 7-6 7-6. So using your definition, a double bagel isn't a derogaty phrase.

Then why do you use the term double bagel as a sign of a weak era in tennis?

thenj
Oct 14th, 2007, 06:05 PM
ridiculous:help:
please go to MTF

meyerpl
Oct 14th, 2007, 06:12 PM
What a load of crap.

scoobsuk
Oct 14th, 2007, 06:23 PM
ridiculous:help:
please go to MTF

We already have to put up with his "irrefutable logic" backed by "an array of incontrovertible facts and flawless analyses" on MTF.

I'm just sorry he found his way over here as well.

You'll get one of these threads every two weeks on average.

Good luck.

friendsita
Oct 14th, 2007, 06:52 PM
plop

mediter
Oct 15th, 2007, 08:32 AM
cos of some plonker who didnt know the meaning of a DB

I am a scholar who educates less informed people. get it?

mediter
Oct 15th, 2007, 08:34 AM
What is wrong with you? I dont know how many times you've been told that 6/4 6/4 is NOT a double bagel :o

It is. facts are facts.

micah63
Oct 15th, 2007, 08:38 AM
It is. facts are facts.



Then these wikipedia idiots got it wrong again ....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennis_terminology


"Double Bagel – two sets won to love: see Bagel"

mediter
Oct 15th, 2007, 08:40 AM
We already have to put up with his "irrefutable logic" backed by "an array of incontrovertible facts and flawless analyses" on MTF.

I'm just sorry he found his way over here as well.


My hearfelt efforts to benefit uninformed people of this world with my extraordinary knowledge and irrefutable analytical methods should be appreciated.

mediter
Oct 15th, 2007, 08:42 AM
Wikipedia is an entirely unreliable source for people of scholarly level.

Boreas
Oct 15th, 2007, 08:49 AM
Weak era is confirmed only for your brains and knowledge

Junex
Oct 15th, 2007, 08:50 AM
Wow you sound like that "Brain" on Teen Titans!!!

micah63
Oct 15th, 2007, 09:08 AM
Wikipedia is an entirely unreliable source for people of scholarly level.



Would you believe it!
Those morons from tennisticker.com don't know it either!!

http://tennisticker.onthebaseline.com/2007/10/02/serena-williams-opens-with-double-bagel-in-stuttgart/

Serena Williams Opens With Double Bagel in Stuttgart
October 2nd, 2007 | 4:05 pm
Serena Williams kicked off her fall season with a 6-0, 6-0 win over lucky loser Zuzana Ondraskova today at the Porsche Tennis Grand Prix. :eek:

mediter
Oct 15th, 2007, 09:23 AM
6060 is a double bagel. so are 6161,6262....7676.

Boreas
Oct 15th, 2007, 09:26 AM
And what is breadstick?

Petersmiler
Oct 15th, 2007, 09:26 AM
It came from me. Only a few other friends of mine on BBC know this , as we are all of scholarly disposition.

So hang on, you're using some obscure mathematical rule to define what a bagel is? You do know that tennis is not maths don't you? You do know a bagel is round, don't you? You realise a bagel is the same shape as a zero don't you?

The tennis term for winning a bagel is to win the set 6-0. A double bagel will therefore be 6-0 6-0. Whether you agree with it or not, and whether this obscure mathematical theory exists, the tennis term means 6-0.

If you want to keep calling your version of a bagel a bagel, feel free. Just accept the fact that you will have to explain it everytime you use it and will probably also have to put up with people telling you you're wrong.

I'm sure if you and your group of intellectuals want to keep using it, you will all understand each other. Here, some of us are a little simpler. We prefer to use terms that we understand.

mediter
Oct 15th, 2007, 09:43 AM
And what is breadstick?

6061,6162...7576

mediter
Oct 15th, 2007, 09:48 AM
I'm sure if you and your group of intellectuals want to keep using it, you will all understand each other. Here, some of us are a little simpler. We prefer to use terms that we understand.

That's what i am saying. Intellectuals live and die on facts. They don't care what language or symbol is simpler.

Petersmiler
Oct 15th, 2007, 09:52 AM
That's what i am saying. Intellectuals live and die on facts. They don't care what language or symbol is simpler.

And the better intellectuals tend to learn a little humility. That way they can persuade others to think the same way.

thomas.chung
Oct 15th, 2007, 09:54 AM
My irrefutable analysis can be a panacea for all evils.

Just because you use fancy vocabulary does not guarantee that you have analytical superiority over any poster on this board. The best analytical person can take a complicated idea, analyze it and explain it to a 3 year old. So far, I understand nothing about your logic. Your argument is just weak with no premise supporting your conclusion.

In layman term, your argument sucks. I don't care if you use Shakespearean vocab or fancy vocab, you just can't hide the fact that your so called "facts" have no basis. Give me a proof that Federer's game is one-dimensional. What is your basis for that, do you have a rubric for assessing a player's potential? Do you have a quantitative way of assessing the "dimension" of players? If you, please include this in your argument because without it, the whole "fact" is just BS.

mankind
Oct 15th, 2007, 10:10 AM
I say we let this thread die. Starting from....now.

Onyxangel
Oct 15th, 2007, 01:31 PM
Troll much?

pepsi
Oct 15th, 2007, 09:38 PM
Impeccable analysis. No doubt it's the clown era in the WTA and the ATP.

moby
Oct 16th, 2007, 03:42 AM
Definitely a weak era in WTAworld history.
Trolls have reached a new low.

Dawn Marie
Oct 16th, 2007, 04:58 AM
I am stunned. :O

mediter
Oct 16th, 2007, 07:22 AM
Just because you use fancy vocabulary does not guarantee that you have analytical superiority over any poster on this board..

My irrefutable analytical methods do.

Your argument is just weak with no premise supporting your conclusion.

you have no clue ,don't you?

Give me a proof that Federer's game is one-dimensional.

OVER RELIANCE on the forehand. Take him away from that and onto the horrible backhand, he is a sitting duck. Three consecutive RG losses and other losses to Nadal!

what more evidence you require?

mediter
Oct 16th, 2007, 07:23 AM
Definitely a weak era in WTAworld history.
Trolls have reached a new low.

I strongly condemn trolls and trolling. They can't healthy for the board at all!

thomas.chung
Oct 16th, 2007, 11:19 AM
My irrefutable analytical methods do.



you have no clue ,don't you?



OVER RELIANCE on the forehand. Take him away from that and onto the horrible backhand, he is a sitting duck. Three consecutive RG losses and other losses to Nadal!

what more evidence you require?

I strongly condemn trolls and trolling. They can't healthy for the board at all!

There is no point in explaining something to some people who never understand. Because after all, isn't that what all analytical thinker's goal, take something, analyze it and report? If you just going to analyze it and not report, then what different are you from a mentally disabled person? Because some mentally disabled person don't talk, and therefore we cannot tell whether they are thinking or not. But just as important is that some of these mentally disabled people do talk, but makes no common sense whatsoever.

I know that they have this saying that ingeniousness and craziness are very close and is often confused. But clearly the most ingenious people out there use their logic and at least try hard to explain it in simple terms to other not so ingenious people.

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein

It doesn't matter what other intellects think, what really matters at the end of the day is what other people think. If you are so much as to just come on this board and explain things and attempt to make people feel sad about their "analytical proficiency", then you have utterly failed on two grounds:

1.) People take you as a joke, as a result people just don't care
2.) People here are never serious (assuming that they are not crazy fans like you)

Maybe the other posters are right... don't feed Mediter The Troll. Which by the way, are you trying hard to make it to the top of the "Troll of 2007" list?

gentenaire
Oct 16th, 2007, 12:18 PM
My irrefutable analytical methods do.

I noticed you ignored my post where I pointed out the contradiction in your 'irrefutable' arguments. Next time you decide to troll this board, make sure your arguments really are irrefutable, because right now, they're not.

And no, we shouldn't let this thread die, it's too much fun. Turn up the thermostat, people, and see what players lose ;)

TheBoiledEgg
Oct 16th, 2007, 01:02 PM
I am stunned. :O

so is everyone else
there is someone even more :cuckoo: here

volta
Oct 16th, 2007, 01:16 PM
My irrefutable analysis can be a panacea for all evils.

lmao :haha:

ZeroSOFInfinity
Oct 16th, 2007, 01:58 PM
I wonder who puts him on the "Green List"?

mediter
Oct 16th, 2007, 02:29 PM
I have condemned all forms of trolling. so little use of accusing me of the same.

None of my irrefutable arguments have faced any worthy counter. they stand tall.

Usually i am all red to start with as haters show their rash impulsive tendencies. once my irrefutable logic is recognised, i tend to build a fan folowing. That's why i am turning green and didn't i predict that a week ago? choke on that haters!

thrust
Oct 16th, 2007, 03:09 PM
mdditer is obviously someone in desperate need of attention. Otherwise why would anyone make such ridiculos statements? anyone who says Federer^s game is one dimensional, or the losing 6-4,7-5 is being double bageled is just looking for attention as both statements are totally incorrect.

Nicolás89
Oct 16th, 2007, 05:11 PM
I have condemned all forms of trolling. so little use of accusing me of the same.

None of my irrefutable arguments have faced any worthy counter. they stand tall.

Usually i am all red to start with as haters show their rash impulsive tendencies. once my irrefutable logic is recognised, i tend to build a fan folowing. That's why i am turning green and didn't i predict that a week ago? choke on that haters!

god, you think you are the messiahs or something? :o :help:

mediter
Nov 12th, 2007, 07:05 PM
Three double bagels in once YEC? (henin over jankovic and bartoli,screamapova over chuck). What a farce it is turning out to be!

This is what happens when you hold a YEC in a weak era!
I told you so!

PS- Screamapova is back to do more damage to my ears

SIN DIOS NI LEY
Nov 12th, 2007, 07:15 PM
This mediter is good

Days ago he announced the end of the Federer era and today is reality . Good call mate :yeah:

mediter
Nov 12th, 2007, 07:21 PM
I knew it all the time. But these tennis boards are infested with fed worshippers who malign me as a troll,clown and what not. Hence they do not appreciate my noble efforts to educate people.

shap_half
Nov 12th, 2007, 07:38 PM
what is this double bagel talk?

misael
Nov 12th, 2007, 07:49 PM
The manhandling of the William sisters confirms that it has always been a weak era where the best of the least talented won. They never had me jumping up and down with their shots. They were beasts plain and simple.

Screamapova tried to play them at their own game and got creamed. But against the more subtle skills of justine, they have come a cropper. Justine herself got double bagelled by screamapova in last year's USO and has a dubious reputation of losing crucial matches outside RG.

After painstaking research and flawless analysis, i can only come to the irrefutable fact this is an undeniably weak era of chokers and transitional champions.

Even in the men's game , the arrogant man from Switzerland just has to turn up on court and other players are willing to give him a salute at the first opportunity. His horrible backhand ,one dimensional talent and an inflexible wessrn grip does not prevent
GS wins. The epidemic of choking pioneered by Nalbandian and Ljubicic affects everyone and he wins sets he should have lost because of his name.

What a pathetic scene on both tours! Do you even know anything about Tennis ,your insistant that 6-4 6-4 is a double bagel is bodering on the insane.I can only come up with the irrefutable fact that you're an idiot!

perseus2006
Nov 12th, 2007, 08:22 PM
Oh, no! Mediter isn't an idiot. He is simply English.

To me, he represents the perfect human toilet: crap in, crap out.

mediter
Nov 12th, 2007, 08:26 PM
what is this double bagel talk?

These are the double bagels in the YEC

Henin d Jankovic 62,62

Henin d Bartoli 60,60

Screamapova d anna 6262

mediter
Nov 12th, 2007, 08:27 PM
Do you even know anything about Tennis ,your insistant that 6-4 6-4 is a double bagel is bodering on the insane.

NO .Its based on uncontestable facts!

misael
Nov 12th, 2007, 08:32 PM
You're a retard.plain and simple ,give us proof that you're so smart or whatever,you probably finished the 5th grade and that's it,living in the basement of your mamas house.

SIN DIOS NI LEY
Nov 12th, 2007, 08:36 PM
This mediter is good

He owns George W Hitler on MTF :D

mediter
Nov 12th, 2007, 08:50 PM
give us proof that you're so smart or whatever,you probably finished the 5th grade and that's it,living in the basement of your mamas house.

Only a guy of top notch intellect could have written the first post in this thread. There is the proof my dear.

mediter
Nov 12th, 2007, 08:51 PM
Yes. Hitler fan of MTF is no match for me. I am still peeved he caused my loss in the ACC contest.

goldenlox
Nov 12th, 2007, 08:58 PM
This mediter is good

Days ago he announced the end of the Federer era and today is reality . Good call mate :yeah:He won 3 majors this year.

misael
Nov 12th, 2007, 08:59 PM
YOU're insane.Only a top notch idiot could have written the first post in this thread.You know if you jump out the window of a famous building you can be the headline in tommorrows paper.Come on ,Jump!! JUMP!!! JUMP!!!!!

SIN DIOS NI LEY
Nov 12th, 2007, 09:03 PM
He won 3 majors this year.

He is losing to mugs like Gonzalez , Volandri and Cañas nowadays :shrug:

Ego King days are numbered :bounce:

goldenlox
Nov 12th, 2007, 09:06 PM
Gonzalez played good today. Best I've ever seen him.

SIN DIOS NI LEY
Nov 12th, 2007, 09:12 PM
Are you a Fedtard , goldie ? :confused:

mediter
Nov 12th, 2007, 09:13 PM
Its a pity that "missile" can't appreciate scholars of precocious gifts and the high quality material they post.

misael
Nov 12th, 2007, 09:17 PM
If you were such a scholar(yeah right) you would get the spelling of my name right,now when are you going to jump,or slit your wrist,I'am not picky.

goldenlox
Nov 12th, 2007, 09:17 PM
Are you a Fedtard , goldie ? :confused:Not a fan, but he's good.
It's like Justine. She's good. Sharapova had won 6 straight sets 62 62 61 62 62 62 before the final.
Justine is really good. So is Federer.
People like to deny how good someone is if the don't like them.
Fed has 5 Wimbledons in a row and 4 USO's. That's alltime great.

mediter
Nov 12th, 2007, 09:28 PM
If you were such a scholar(yeah right) you would get the spelling of my name right,now when are you going to jump,or slit your wrist,I'am not picky.

watching too much HBO/cinemax? they are bad on impressionable minds like yours. For good advice
and influence, always consult me.

misael
Nov 12th, 2007, 09:34 PM
watching too much HBO/cinemax? they are bad on impressionable minds like yours. For good advice
and influence, always consult me.
You wish I was impressionable,if I was I would believe all your stupid ,retarded, trash ,that comes out of your pea size brain....Does it hurt when you think?

mediter
Nov 12th, 2007, 09:38 PM
If such bad influence didn't adulterate your mind, you would have hung my portrait in front of your bed for daily inspiration.

Aaron.
Nov 12th, 2007, 09:41 PM
mediter dont bother making threads no one listens to your attention seeking retarted self.

And your opinion is coming from a dumbass please dont make such foolish comments you are wasting your time :kiss:

Try again :weirdo:

mediter
Nov 12th, 2007, 09:45 PM
you wish that people won't listen to me. but people will always pay attention :) i got 10 reps in the last hour alone

Aaron.
Nov 12th, 2007, 09:46 PM
you wish that people won't listen to me. but people will always pay attention :) i got 10 reps in the last hour alone Yeah im sure people take your posts seriously.

hey everyone Justine double bageled Serena 6-7 7-6 7-6!!! :worship:

:weirdo:

mediter
Nov 12th, 2007, 09:48 PM
76 76 is a double bagel you twit!

jenny161185
Nov 12th, 2007, 09:49 PM
lol what era are you comparing this too then? Because that tennis match I watched yesterday was one of the best filled with high drama and high quality tennis from trwo great,totally different characters!!!

Aaron.
Nov 12th, 2007, 09:50 PM
76 76 is a double bagel you twit! Your just making a fool of yourself

get off the board while you can :tape: :help: :haha:

either that or just troll more so the mods can ban your retarted ass.

:wavey:

mediter
Nov 12th, 2007, 09:54 PM
I watched yesterday was one of the best filled with high drama and high quality tennis from trwo great,totally different characters!!!

Yeah right. putting a hand up and screams that does aural damage are examples of two different great characters i guess! :lol:

misael
Nov 12th, 2007, 09:55 PM
Yeah and spit at it.

eck
Nov 12th, 2007, 09:56 PM
So what isn't a double bagel?

misael
Nov 12th, 2007, 09:57 PM
This mediter guy is really an ass.If you don't appreciate womens tennis ,then get the hell out of here.What a &%$#** turd.

mediter
Nov 12th, 2007, 10:06 PM
My painstaking analysis and research are bound to benefit and change people's lives. Its my duty to stay here missile.

misael
Nov 12th, 2007, 10:18 PM
meshiter are you retarded ,are you writing from a mental hospital,then never mind what I said,and get better soon...Love,missile xo.

mediter
Nov 12th, 2007, 10:22 PM
I love you missile baby. No worries :)

RJWCapriati
Nov 12th, 2007, 10:32 PM
amazing feet! :p

Sean.
Nov 12th, 2007, 10:42 PM
My goodness is this argument still going on?

All, but one, of us are agreed that a bagel is a 6-0 set. You may be a scholar, but it doesn't make you right.

I have to ask myself, given that you hate this era of tennis so much, why you choose to watch it? Nobody forces you

And then I also ask myself why you try to force your views upon us. Surely as a scholar you have more important matters on your hands!

Intellectuals create problems
Geniuses solve them

I am in no doubt as to which category you come under!

thomas.chung
Nov 13th, 2007, 01:21 AM
A scholar can be stupid. They are not mutually exclusive.

Onyxangel
Nov 13th, 2007, 01:40 AM
Troll era confirmed yet again:

The idiocy of mediter's posting confirms that it has always been a troll era where the most moronic trolls are allowed to post freely and rampantly. They never had me jumping up and down with their posts. They are stupid beasts plain and simple.

After painstaking research and flawless analysis, i can only come to the irrefutable fact this is an undeniably annoying era of trolls and brainless posters.

Even on a simple tennis board, the troll named mediter just has to turn up on the board and other posters are willing to shoot him at the first opportunity. His horribly inaccurate posts, one-dimensional thought process, and undeniable ability to make people want to puke does not prevent him from continuing to spew ridiculous vitriol all over the board. The epidemic of trolling pioneered by mediter and others like him affects everyone and he posts despite the fact that he should have been banned simply because of his name.

What a pathetic scene on this board!

Mikey.
Nov 13th, 2007, 05:31 AM
76 76 is a double bagel you twit!

:haha: OMG! Are you serious? You can't be... come on! Seriously?

A Bagel is when a player wins a set 6-0. Hence a double bagel is when someone wins a match 6-0 6-0.

7-6 7-6 is just winning in straight sets. A straight sets win is where a player wins their match without losing a set. 7-6 7-6 is nothing even close to a double bagel!

We have an example of a double bagel in the YEC. Henin defeated Bartoli 6-0 6-0.

We also have an example of a straight sets win in the YEC. Sharapova defeated Ivanovic 6-1 6-2.


Please don't go calling people twits when you clearly have no idea, what so ever, what you are talking about!

égalité
Nov 13th, 2007, 05:37 AM
76 76 is a double bagel you twit!

Double bagel? 6-Serena 6-Serena? Who will win? :eek: