Serenidad.
Sep 9th, 2007, 01:32 AM
Kuznetsova. I'm with Carillo and Johnny Mac. Bring back Quality Points or change the ranking system. It is clear Kuznetsova and Jankovic is not equivalent to their ranking.
All Hail Our New Number 2 (Skill of Rank 200)Serenidad. Sep 9th, 2007, 01:32 AM Kuznetsova. I'm with Carillo and Johnny Mac. Bring back Quality Points or change the ranking system. It is clear Kuznetsova and Jankovic is not equivalent to their ranking. A Magicman Sep 9th, 2007, 01:34 AM Quality points and the old system of average points - and counting ALL tournaments. That will make a better ranking. @Sweet Cleopatra Sep 9th, 2007, 01:45 AM or may be the players _ all of them _ as they know the ranking system should play well all time , not as Williams who leave themselves in bad form all year and then want to enter the grand slams with 1 and 2 ranking . the players know the ranking system very well . and what's the quality points ? Serenidad. Sep 9th, 2007, 01:46 AM If you don't know what quality points are don't comment on this thread. You clearly know nothing. Clearly, a Sharapova fan. SvetaPleaseWin. Sep 9th, 2007, 01:52 AM Kuznetsova. I'm with Carillo and Johnny Mac. Bring back Quality Points or change the ranking system. It is clear Kuznetsova and Jankovic is not equivalent to their ranking. have you any more kuznetsova bashing threads to post :rolleyes: of course venus and serena should be ranked higher but they are always injured-unless they change the ranking system to how many tournys you pull out of, the only way things will change is if they play more. sharapova, jankovic and ivanovic dont deserve no.2-as ive said a million times, aside from henin everyone is pretty close and sadly none of them are playing consistently great tennis and most of them lack belief sveta is no.2 deal with it goldenlox Sep 9th, 2007, 01:54 AM Who deserves #2? Sveta beat Venus this year. She beat Justine on clay. This is her 6th final of 2007. Nicolás89 Sep 9th, 2007, 01:57 AM Who deserves #2? Sveta beat Venus this year. She beat Justine on clay. This is her 6th final of 2007. and she sucked on all the finals except the one when the other player retired. @Sweet Cleopatra Sep 9th, 2007, 02:00 AM you want Williams to be rank 1 and 2 even if they played grand slams only , no , you must deal with idea that ranking is your hard work all over the year , but not morre than 17 tournement , cause this'll lead to injuries to females . and I'm honest I don't know the quality points , I could lie and say I know , but I don't and I want to know it . cellophane Sep 9th, 2007, 02:03 AM Rankings aren't the problem. It's rather that Justine is head and shoulders above the rest right now. A lot of the top 10 are mediocre compared to her. Expat Sep 9th, 2007, 02:06 AM Rankings aren't the problem. It's rather that Justine is head and shoulders above the rest right now. A lot of the top 10 are mediocre compared to her.at least some of them are competitive ie the williams sisters and jelena SvetaPleaseWin. Sep 9th, 2007, 02:07 AM and she sucked on all the finals except the one when the other player retired. at least shes got to 6 finals this year-better than most of the top 10 cellophane Sep 9th, 2007, 02:09 AM at least some of them are competitive ie the williams sisters and jelena Well, the Williams Sisters would be ranked higher if they played more.... so it's not really the fault of the system that they are ranked lower than where they should be. SvetaPleaseWin. Sep 9th, 2007, 02:10 AM Well, the Williams Sisters would be ranked higher if they played more.... so it's not really the fault of the system that they are ranked lower than where they should be. exactly :worship: venus and serena dont really care about rankings, they know if they play their best they can beat everybody the system is not to blame Yonexforever Sep 9th, 2007, 02:11 AM AN over simplification of Qaulity Points as i remember, basically is awarding MORE points for the higher ranked players you beat no? Correct as you like... SvetaPleaseWin. Sep 9th, 2007, 02:12 AM Kuznetsova. I'm with Carillo and Johnny Mac. Bring back Quality Points or change the ranking system. It is clear Kuznetsova and Jankovic is not equivalent to their ranking. so going by the title of this thread, you think that sveta has the same skill level as sophie ferguson? and you expect people to take you seriously... BK4ever Sep 9th, 2007, 02:12 AM Leave Sveta alone. She earned the points. Now if you want to rank by mental capacity, then clearly Sveta would not even make top ten sadly :banghead: goldenlox Sep 9th, 2007, 02:20 AM Quality points wouldn't change anything. Sveta beat a lot of high ranked players. Like Justine, Anna, Venus, Dementieva, Petrova. She would still be 2. eck Sep 9th, 2007, 02:38 AM How would quality points look like now anyways? Marcus1979 Sep 9th, 2007, 02:40 AM these are Kuzzies top 20 wins this year prior to US Open Dubai - Schnyder (13) Doha - Hantuchova (19) Indian Wells - Vaidisova (10) Berlin - Petrova (9) - Henin (1) Rome - Safina (9) - Hantuchova (14) Roland Garros - Peer (17) New Haven - Dementieva (15) Expat Sep 9th, 2007, 02:42 AM these are Kuzzies top 20 wins this year prior to US Open Dubai - Schnyder (13) Doha - Hantuchova (19) Indian Wells - Vaidisova (10) Berlin - Petrova (9) - Henin (1) Rome - Safina (9) - Hantuchova (14) Roland Garros - Peer (17) New Haven - Dementieva (15) so basically except justine once none of the top real players SvetaPleaseWin. Sep 9th, 2007, 02:45 AM these are Kuzzies top 20 wins this year prior to US Open Dubai - Schnyder (13) Doha - Hantuchova (19) Indian Wells - Vaidisova (10) Berlin - Petrova (9) - Henin (1) Rome - Safina (9) - Hantuchova (14) Roland Garros - Peer (17) New Haven - Dementieva (15) ok so as everyone was so happy with maria-lets look at her top 20 wins AO -Chakvetadze (13) -Clijsters (5) FO -Schnyder (15) -Chakvetadze (9) Birmingham -Bartoli (20) San Diego -Golovin (19) -Chakvetadze (6) LA -Dementieva (13) ummm impressive, thank fuck for chakvetadze hey? canuckfan Sep 9th, 2007, 02:47 AM You should all be happy. If Sveta's that bad, it means an easy draw for all your faves who end up in her part of the draw in the next few months. Marcus1979 Sep 9th, 2007, 02:48 AM I am not hating on Sveta I was more like responding to goldenlox who said even with Quality pts she would be still be #2 SvetaPleaseWin. Sep 9th, 2007, 02:51 AM I am not hating on Sveta I was more like responding to goldenlox who said even with Quality pts she would be still be #2 i know-im just getting annoyed at people laying into sveta when shes had a better or similar year to the other players in line for the #2 spot skanky~skanketta Sep 9th, 2007, 02:54 AM You know what, leave them alone. Sveta beat who was put in front of her. True, she SUCKS in finals, but give the girl a break! She's got game and we all know it. And she's made the same amount of slam finals as sharapova. You're all dissing her simply cuz she's more understated than most other player.That's not her fault. oh, and i just realized, she's made the doubles finals of ALL the Slams. VivalaSeles Sep 9th, 2007, 03:48 AM at least some of them are competitive ie the williams sisters and jelena Jelena???? She has NEVER beaten Juju, a feat Sveta has already carried out. pkilli Sep 9th, 2007, 03:49 AM Sveta deserved to be no.2 period. Leave her alone...Another pointless thread :o matty Sep 9th, 2007, 04:24 AM Sveta has the sweetest personality! Experimentee Sep 9th, 2007, 05:33 AM Based on form this year I think Jankovic or even Ivanovic should be #2 instead of Sveta. I like Sveta but she just hasnt played that well this year at all. Taking away quality points was a big mistake. I think Jankovic and Ivanovic have had better wins than Sveta this year. KoOlMaNsEaN Sep 9th, 2007, 05:38 AM Quality points and the old system of average points - and counting ALL tournaments. Couldn't have said it better northern lad Sep 9th, 2007, 08:13 AM I like Sveta but she just hasnt played that well this year at all. because making it to 6 finals isn't playing well... svetaisthebest Sep 9th, 2007, 08:14 AM Sveta does deserve to be number 2 in the world .The only other players who could possibly deserve to take this spot are the Williams sisters but Sveta was better than the rest of the top ten this year and deseves to be number 2 FrOzon Sep 9th, 2007, 08:37 AM Quality points wouldn't change anything. Sveta beat a lot of high ranked players. Like Justine, Anna, Venus, Dementieva, Petrova. She would still be 2. That's it! Quality points are just making the rankings more complicated but they don't change too much... it's nothing but excuses, Sveta is a deserved No. 2! Jenny.C.Fan Sep 9th, 2007, 09:08 AM Sveta has worked hard to reach number two, and has had a great year, so lay off her and cut her some slack, she deserves this ranking. mankind Sep 9th, 2007, 09:11 AM Making the finals of Doha, Indian Wells, Berlin, Rome and the US Open grants her the No.2 rank. One of the main factors that eludes the top ranking for her is the fact that she has lost all 5 finals. :help: Her ranking will drop soon enough unless she starts pulling herself together mentally. jazzfuzion Sep 9th, 2007, 09:17 AM if reaching six finals(mostly tier1s at that) is equivalent to the skills of a player ranked 200 then i highly suspect that you have a single shred of logic at all,up in that puny weeny little piece of shit that you call a brain,clearly something that is far beyond your reach since you were born without one. Kart Sep 9th, 2007, 09:22 AM I could have sworn I saw Sveta contesting the US open final last night against the world no.1. I can think of worse results to have in the week you achieve the second highest ranking. gmak Sep 9th, 2007, 09:41 AM sure 5 finals, 1 slam final... what a disgrace for a world no2! :rolleyes: :o why do i bother replying to troll threads? | |