PDA

View Full Version : Global Warming: "We're all going to survive...a joke in five years time"


Mother_Marjorie
May 19th, 2007, 05:15 PM
Global warming debunked

By ANDREW SWALLOW - The Timaru Herald | Saturday, 19 May 2007


Climate change will be considered a joke in five years time, meteorologist Augie Auer told the annual meeting of Mid Canterbury Federated Farmers in Ashburton this week.

Man's contribution to the greenhouse gases was so small we couldn't change the climate if we tried, he maintained.

"We're all going to survive this. It's all going to be a joke in five years," he said.

A combination of misinterpreted and misguided science, media hype, and political spin had created the current hysteria and it was time to put a stop to it.

"It is time to attack the myth of global warming," he said.

Water vapour was responsible for 95 per cent of the greenhouse effect, an effect which was vital to keep the world warm, he explained.

"If we didn't have the greenhouse effect the planet would be at minus 18 deg C but because we do have the greenhouse effect it is plus 15 deg C, all the time."

The other greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen dioxide, and various others including CFCs, contributed only five per cent of the effect, carbon dioxide being by far the greatest contributor at 3.6 per cent.

However, carbon dioxide as a result of man's activities was only 3.2 per cent of that, hence only 0.12 per cent of the greenhouse gases in total. Human-related methane, nitrogen dioxide and CFCs etc made similarly minuscule contributions to the effect: 0.066, 0.047 and 0.046 per cent respectively.

"That ought to be the end of the argument, there and then," he said.

"We couldn't do it (change the climate) even if we wanted to because water vapour dominates."

Yet the Greens continued to use phrases such as "The planet is groaning under the weight of CO2" and Government policies were about to hit industries such as farming, he warned.

"The Greens are really going to go after you because you put out 49 per cent of the countries emissions. Does anybody ask 49 per cent of what? Does anybody know how small that number is?

"It's become a witch-hunt; a Salem witch-hunt," he said.

tennislover
May 19th, 2007, 09:34 PM
I hope they are right.....

gentenaire
May 19th, 2007, 10:24 PM
Even if you don't believe it's man made....it's still there. The climate is still changing and that is no joke.

RJWCapriati
May 19th, 2007, 11:07 PM
:lol: Of course its man made........6 billion people and we are all polluting the earth!!!!

Mother_Marjorie
May 20th, 2007, 12:29 AM
Even if you don't believe it's man made....it's still there. The climate is still changing and that is no joke.
The climate has been changing since Earth's existence. There was an Ice Age, massive flooding, etc.

There is nothing in man's power that can stop Mother Nature.

Diam's
May 20th, 2007, 12:57 AM
If Claude Allegre says so, it must be true!

Timariot
May 20th, 2007, 10:59 AM
Water vapour was responsible for 95 per cent of the greenhouse effect, an effect which was vital to keep the world warm, he explained.


Not true. But even if it was true, it's not relevant. The guy is clueless as he debunks his own argument - see below.


"If we didn't have the greenhouse effect the planet would be at minus 18 deg C but because we do have the greenhouse effect it is plus 15 deg C, all the time."


5% of 33 degrees is still 1.65 degrees; larger than difference between Little Ice Age and Medieval Warm Period.


However, carbon dioxide as a result of man's activities was only 3.2 per cent of that,


The guy continues to demonstrate his cluelessness. CO2 levels have risen some 50% over last 150 years, and humans are responsible from that without any doubt.


"We couldn't do it (change the climate) even if we wanted to because water vapour dominates."


He doesn't even understand how water vapour drives the climate (ie. it doesn't). Did someone say he was a meteorologist?


There is nothing in man's power that can stop Mother Nature.


Yeah, the people also used to think that ocean had inexhaustible fish stocks, 'cause, you know, man can just not do anything to Mother nature, and the idea that whales and fish could be overexploited was just ridiculous...

Sam L
May 20th, 2007, 12:05 PM
There is nothing in man's power that can stop Mother Nature.

No one's trying to STOP "mother nature". Most of us are trying to stop more greenhouse gases entering the atmosphere because they trap unnecessary heat. And most of us who understand basic science understand we need to cut back on these greenhouse gases.

What's this about STOPPING "mother nature"? I don't even know what you're trying to say. So unscientific. :rolleyes: