PDA

View Full Version : players that should not be inside the top 100


GreatMate
Mar 22nd, 2007, 11:48 AM
milagros sequera
yuliana fedak
anastassia rodionova
vavaria lepchenko
zuzana ondraskova
alberta brianti
camille pin
eva birnerova
lourdes domigues lino

Tenis Srbija
Mar 22nd, 2007, 11:51 AM
And who should replace them, by yours respectfully opinion :rolleyes:

jrm
Mar 22nd, 2007, 11:55 AM
Birnerova :help:

Dementinator
Mar 22nd, 2007, 11:56 AM
this sort of thread pisses me off and shows how ignorant some dudes here are ,if a player is IN the Top fucking 100 then they deserve to be in the Top fucking 100 ,they wouldnt assholing be there if they were not good enough to reach that level ,thats why there is a ranking system...

For those of us to thick to understand it ,heres how it works..

Play reasonably well and win some matches and gain some points = climb the rankings.

Play shit and lose all the time = go down the rankings.

its that simple really.

All those players upstairs deserve to be in top 100 cos THEY ARE IN THE FUCKING TOP 100!

A'DAM
Mar 22nd, 2007, 11:58 AM
Camille Pin plays very good lately!!!!!

GreatMate
Mar 22nd, 2007, 11:58 AM
just cos ur top british player is raked like 160 in the world

Slumpsova
Mar 22nd, 2007, 11:59 AM
why them?

Dementinator
Mar 22nd, 2007, 11:59 AM
eh?

Mattographer
Mar 22nd, 2007, 11:59 AM
All of those players deserved in Top 100 because they're better than other players below Top 100 :)

Kim.C.Fan
Mar 22nd, 2007, 12:01 PM
How can you say Camille Pin doesn't deserve to be top 100 when she is ranked 70 or so? :rolleyes:

Tenis Srbija
Mar 22nd, 2007, 12:02 PM
this sort of thread pisses me off and shows how ignorant some dudes here are ,if a player is IN the Top fucking 100 then they deserve to be in the Top fucking 100 ,they wouldnt assholing be there if they were not good enough to reach that level ,thats why there is a ranking system...

For those of us to thick to understand it ,heres how it works..

Play reasonably well and win some matches and gain some points = climb the rankings.

Play shit and lose all the time = go down the rankings.

its that simple really.

All those players upstairs deserve to be in top 100 cos THEY ARE IN THE FUCKING TOP 100!

:worship: :worship: :worship:

Tenis Srbija
Mar 22nd, 2007, 12:03 PM
How can you say Camille Pin doesn't deserve to be top 100 when she is ranked 70 or so? :rolleyes:

Cuz he knows about tennis as much as I know about rock climing... :rolleyes:

Kim.C.Fan
Mar 22nd, 2007, 12:09 PM
You must know a lot about rock climbing then. Are there any good rock climbing places in Serbia?

Cuz he knows about tennis as much as I know about rock climing... :rolleyes:

Shvedbarilescu
Mar 22nd, 2007, 12:09 PM
this sort of thread pisses me off and shows how ignorant some dudes here are ,if a player is IN the Top fucking 100 then they deserve to be in the Top fucking 100 ,they wouldnt assholing be there if they were not good enough to reach that level ,thats why there is a ranking system...

For those of us to thick to understand it ,heres how it works..

Play reasonably well and win some matches and gain some points = climb the rankings.

Play shit and lose all the time = go down the rankings.

its that simple really.

All those players upstairs deserve to be in top 100 cos THEY ARE IN THE FUCKING TOP 100!

Yup, couldn't have put it better. I might have said it without the colorful language :lol: but hey it gets the point across :worship:

Farina Elia Fan
Mar 22nd, 2007, 12:12 PM
this sort of thread pisses me off and shows how ignorant some dudes here are ,if a player is IN the Top fucking 100 then they deserve to be in the Top fucking 100 ,they wouldnt assholing be there if they were not good enough to reach that level ,thats why there is a ranking system...

For those of us to thick to understand it ,heres how it works..

Play reasonably well and win some matches and gain some points = climb the rankings.

Play shit and lose all the time = go down the rankings.

its that simple really.

All those players upstairs deserve to be in top 100 cos THEY ARE IN THE FUCKING TOP 100!


:worship:

aussie12
Mar 22nd, 2007, 12:13 PM
yeh camille pin doesnt deserve to be in the top 100, whatever. did you see the way she pushed sharapova in the first round of AO.

Tenis Srbija
Mar 22nd, 2007, 12:13 PM
You must know a lot about rock climbing then. Are there any good rock climbing places in Serbia?

No and I dunno :)

Hashim.
Mar 22nd, 2007, 12:15 PM
this sort of thread pisses me off and shows how ignorant some dudes here are ,if a player is IN the Top fucking 100 then they deserve to be in the Top fucking 100 ,they wouldnt assholing be there if they were not good enough to reach that level ,thats why there is a ranking system...

For those of us to thick to understand it ,heres how it works..

Play reasonably well and win some matches and gain some points = climb the rankings.

Play shit and lose all the time = go down the rankings.

its that simple really.

All those players upstairs deserve to be in top 100 cos THEY ARE IN THE FUCKING TOP 100!

:worship: :yeah:

Alberto
Mar 22nd, 2007, 12:20 PM
lol such a stupid thread :lol:

Monica_Rules
Mar 22nd, 2007, 12:29 PM
Yes i'm sure if you say so:rolleyes:

A few years ago i did think Sequera was a little waste of a top 100 place but then i saw her play Raymond at Birmingham and destroyed her with her perfect match

Gowza
Mar 22nd, 2007, 12:31 PM
to be fair to the original poster they didn't say anything about deserving to be in the top 100. they could just be talking talent wise....everyone in the top 100 has earned their place so they all deserve it. but there could be a few ranked outside the top 100 who are more talented than some players in the top 100.

Corswandt
Apr 4th, 2007, 01:54 AM
WTAW dogma is that everyone "deserves" their current ranking, and there's absolutely no point in discussing the worthiness of, say, some of our current top 35 (Garbin? Müller? :help: ).

But then everyone who believes in that dogma must be consistent and stop using the rankings (as in "player X is better than player Y because player X is ranked higher") as a yardstick to measure the relative quality of tennis players.

Because rankings sometimes have very little to do with talent. Ranking rewards not only talent but (perhaps even more) clever scheduling and being lucky with draws.

There were a number of players who climbed up the rankings, sometimes deep into the top 100, in 2006 merely by playing lots of (often depleted) challengers. And now some of them decided to try out WTA events, sometimes upper tier ones, often with disastrous results. You can find a few of them on the initial post of this thread - but there's more.

Ravsieg
Apr 4th, 2007, 02:18 AM
Gotta love playa hating threads. Too bad they're so many they're getting tiring.

njnetswill
Apr 4th, 2007, 02:49 AM
I sort of have to agree slightly with the thread starter. A lot of players generate points, and thus deserve their ranking, but never seem to either

a) challenge players ranked above them
b) string a few wins together
c) play top level events (ITF whores)
d) have any memorable results
e) notable weapons game-wise

It isn't that some players dont deserve their ranking, it is the fact that the rankings dont necessarily reflect the best matchplay or quality of tennis produced on the tour.