View Full Version : NEWSWEEK article: An interesting snapshot of public opinions...

Nov 11th, 2006, 09:15 PM
..., who has lowest approval rating, polled voter expectations, possible 2008 presidential contenders, and polled priority issues.

Feeling Blue?
After the Democratic sweep of Congress, President Bush's approval reaches a new low. But voters want Democrats to chart a moderate course.

Can They Work Together? Pelosi has 34 percent approval ratings, slightly better than Bush's 31 percent

By Marcus Mabry
Updated: 8:04 a.m. PT Nov 11, 2006

Nov. 11, 2006 - President George W. Bush’s response was swift and decisive—if a little late. After voters gave Republicans “a thumpin’” at the polls, handing Democrats control of both houses of Congress, Bush banished his contentious defense secretary; invited the presumptive leaders of the new House and Senate to lunch (would-be House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had pasta; the president ate crow, a Bush aide joked); and suffered through two pained photo-ops with Pelosi and Harry Reid, the Nevada Senator expected to become Majority Leader. And what did the president get for listening to the voice of the American people? The worst approval rating of his presidency.

President Bush’s job approval rating has fallen to just 31 percent, according to the new NEWSWEEK Poll. Bill Clinton’s lowest rating during his presidency was 36 percent; Bush’s father’s was 29 percent, and Ronald Reagan’s was 35 percent. Jimmy Carter’s and Richard Nixon’s lows were 28 and 23 percent, respectively. (Just 24 approve of outgoing Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld’s job performance; and 31 percent approve of Vice President Dick Cheney’s.)

Worst of all, most Americans are writing off the rest of Bush’s presidency; two-thirds (66 percent) believe he will be unable to get much done, up from 56 percent in a mid-October poll; only 32 percent believe he can be effective. That’s unfortunate since 63 percent of Americans say they’re dissatisfied with the way things are going in the country; just 29 percent are satisfied, reports the poll of 1,006 adults conducted Thursday and Friday nights.

But the new poll carries sobering news for Democrats, too, still on their post-victory high. Just about everyone believes the Republicans lost the 2006 midterms more than the Democrats won it. Presented with a list of factors that may have contributed to the Democrats’ success, 85 percent of Americans said the “major reason” was disapproval of the administration’s handling of the war in Iraq, 71 percent said disapproval of Bush’s overall job performance, 67 percent cited dissatisfaction with how Republicans have handled government spending and the deficit, 63 percent said disapproval of the overall performance of Republicans in Congress, 61 percent said Democrats’ ideas and proposals for changing course in Iraq. Tellingly, just 27 percent said a major reason the Democrats won was because they had better candidates.

CONTINUED (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15667442/site/newsweek/page/2/)


There's a LOT of work required to undue, and hopefully reverse, 6 years of rampant corruption, mindless missteps, ethics problems and pervasive international disdain.

Nov 11th, 2006, 11:48 PM
My mom emailed that article to me :) .


She also sent one that says in Ohio, Democratic congress candidates got 125,000 more votes than Reps, but because of the way the Districts are drawn, Dems could not win.

The Districts were drawn up by Reps, who have run this state for the last 20 years.

By a popular vote (not a District vote), Ohio got a Democratic Governor. If he can won again 4 years from now, after the next census, the Districts can be changed back, by Democrats.

This is the same thing that was done by Reps in the state of Texas a couple of years ago. It was widely reported that Democratic State congressmembers had to leave the state - and did! - to avoid it happening, but eventually had to return and the Districts were redrawn to aid the Reps in keeping power.