PDA

View Full Version : * Hall of Fame * (currently players)


MikeJones
Oct 22nd, 2006, 03:23 AM
Dont jump all over me, just playing around today. Im bored. If you have to add someone or EDIT my picks feel free :)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Toolbar: def(=yes)
inbetween(=inbetween no+yes, but as of now NO)
NO(=no, as of now)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Lindsay = def
Serena = def
Venus = def
Hingis = def
JHH = def
Masha = def
Mary = def(is 2 GS's enough?)
Amelie = def
Golovin = def (call me crazy but I think Tati will have VERY good career)
Nicole = def(has game to win a few GS's) :cool:

Jankovic = inbetween(I think she may win a slam)
Clijsters = inbetween
SvetKuz = inbetween
Ivanovic = inbetween(I think she may win a slam)
Peer = inbetween(has game to be VERY GOOD imo, we shall see)
Mirza = inbetween
AnnaChak = inbetween
Safina = inbetween(shes only 20)
Michaella = inbewteen(still very young, raw)
Hantuchova = inbetween(she is very tough call, as of now NO, but still fairly young and has power enough to be a big winner still. She is close to NO though now)
Peng = inbetween( only 20 still and good game imo. As of now NO, but too early to sell her as NO yet)

Myskina = NO :sad:
Lena = NO (hurts to say, but as of now...)
Petrova = NO
Schnyder = NO
Li = NO
Bartoli = NO
Ai = NO
Likhovtseva = NO
Sprem = NO :sad:

RenaSlam.
Oct 22nd, 2006, 03:25 AM
Clijsters= def.

Drake1980
Oct 22nd, 2006, 03:25 AM
Maybe Ruano-Pasqual and Suarez?

MikeJones
Oct 22nd, 2006, 03:33 AM
Clijsters= def.

Yeah both her and Kuzy...but I guess Kuzy is more def than CLijsters. I think both need 1 more though. Not sure. They were tough for me

azmad_88
Oct 22nd, 2006, 03:33 AM
how can mirza be inbetween and at par with sveta and kim

thats just ridiculous

Mother_Marjorie
Oct 22nd, 2006, 03:45 AM
[QUOTE=MikeJones]Dont jump all over me, just playing around today. Im bored. If you have to add someone or EDIT my picks feel free :)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Toolbar: def(=yes)
inbetween(=inbetween no+yes, but as of now NO)
NO(=no, as of now)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Lindsay = def
Serena = def
Venus = def
Hingis = def
JHH = def
Masha = def
Mary = def(is 2 GS's enough?)YES, see Tracy Austin
Amelie = def
Golovin = def (call me crazy but I think Tati will have VERY good career)
Nicole = def(has game to win a few GS's) :cool:

Jankovic = inbetween(I think she may win a slam)
Clijsters = inbetween def
SvetKuz = inbetween def
Ivanovic = inbetween(I think she may win a slam)
Peer = inbetween(has game to be VERY GOOD imo, we shall see)
Mirza = inbetween
AnnaChak = inbetween
Safina = inbetween(shes only 20)
Michaella = inbewteen(still very young, raw)
Hantuchova = inbetween(she is very tough call, as of now NO, but still fairly young and has power enough to be a big winner still. She is close to NO though now)
Peng = inbetween( only 20 still and good game imo. As of now NO, but too early to sell her as NO yet)

Myskina = NO def
Lena = NO (hurts to say, but as of now...)
Petrova = NO
Schnyder = NO
Li = NO
Bartoli = NO
Ai = NO
Likhovtseva = NO
Sprem = NO :sad:

tennisbear7
Oct 22nd, 2006, 04:02 AM
Myskina definitely?

I don't know. She'll need more than around 10 titles and one slam to get into the HOF, imo.

Mother_Marjorie
Oct 22nd, 2006, 04:06 AM
Myskina definitely?

I don't know. She'll need more than around 10 titles and one slam to get into the HOF, imo.

If Pam Shriver can get in without winning a singles Grand Slam title....Myskina can. She was also the first Russian women's tennis professional to win a grand slam title.

tennisbear7
Oct 22nd, 2006, 05:19 AM
Pam Shriver won 21 GS doubles titles, smartie.

darrinbaker00
Oct 22nd, 2006, 05:29 AM
Pam Shriver won 21 GS doubles titles, smartie.
Actually, Shriver won 22 major doubles titles: 20 with Navratilova, one with Natasha Zvereva, and one mixed with Emilio Sanchez. In 1984, Shriver and Navratilova won the first-ever Grand Slam in women's doubles. For all the people who say "doubles don't matter," Pam Shriver's career is proof to the contrary. I can almost forgive Shriver for introducing the oversized racquet to the pro game. ALMOST.
http://www.tennisfame.com/famer.aspx?pgID=867&hof_id=155

njnetswill
Oct 22nd, 2006, 05:35 AM
I think Clijsters is a def. #1 in both singles and doubles. GS winner and multiple time finalist. Also one of the more likeable players.

MikeJones
Oct 22nd, 2006, 05:51 AM
I did not say Myskina was in. :confused:

And Maybe I should have added a "skinny" on Mirza...Shes still young has game and I will not say yet she is NOT HOF.

If she does not improve at all she wont.

Clijsters I already responded to. Shes VERY CLOSE. Maybe in. Sveta same deal. I actually Sveta maybe should be in now. She will probably win another slam so, if she does...my bad on her.

The rest Im comfortable with.

I put alot of youngsters in inbetween becouse jury still out.

Swami...How can you cross out Nicole? You donot think she will win any slams in her career? :rolleyes:

RJWCapriati
Oct 22nd, 2006, 05:55 AM
Capriati - Yes
Pierce - Yes

Sara81
Oct 22nd, 2006, 08:52 AM
Dont jump all over me, just playing around today. Im bored. If you have to add someone or EDIT my picks feel free :)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Toolbar: def(=yes)
inbetween(=inbetween no+yes, but as of now NO)
NO(=no, as of now)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Lindsay = def
Serena = def
Venus = def
Hingis = def
JHH = def
Masha = def
Mary = def(is 2 GS's enough?)
Amelie = def
Golovin = def (call me crazy but I think Tati will have VERY good career)
Nicole = def(has game to win a few GS's) :cool:

Jankovic = inbetween(I think she may win a slam)
Clijsters = inbetween
SvetKuz = inbetween
Ivanovic = inbetween(I think she may win a slam)
Peer = inbetween(has game to be VERY GOOD imo, we shall see)
Mirza = inbetween
AnnaChak = inbetween
Safina = inbetween(shes only 20)
Michaella = inbewteen(still very young, raw)
Hantuchova = inbetween(she is very tough call, as of now NO, but still fairly young and has power enough to be a big winner still. She is close to NO though now)
Peng = inbetween( only 20 still and good game imo. As of now NO, but too early to sell her as NO yet)

Myskina = NO :sad:
Lena = NO (hurts to say, but as of now...)
Petrova = NO
Schnyder = NO
Li = NO
Bartoli = NO
Ai = NO
Likhovtseva = NO
Sprem = NO :sad:
How can Vaidisova and Golovin be a def and Clijsters an inbetween? No matter if you like or dislike Kim you should still give her some credit for beeing number 1 in both singles and doubles, winning the YEC two times, winning the US open in singles and some GS's in doubles + all those singles titles :wavey:
Sveta should be in too ;)

xin_hui
Oct 22nd, 2006, 09:00 AM
well, you're obviously very biased. if you dont want people to jump all over you, then dont make such :weirdo: statements

how can slamless vaidisova and golovin be definites and kim, sveta be "in between", and worse, myskina a definite no :rolleyes:

no matter how much you think they will achieve in the future, as of now, they are nowhere close to the achievements of kim, sveta and myskina

bellascarlett
Oct 22nd, 2006, 09:20 AM
A def (definite/definitely) should be reserved for those who at this point are pretty sure to get in the Hall of Fame based on their results and the history of those who have been inducted to the HOF.

Unless of course you have some unusual criteria.

Sabatini was the last woman inducted. Based on that, you'd think Kim is a pretty good candidate already.

Cp6uja
Oct 22nd, 2006, 09:41 AM
[QUOTE=MikeJones]Dont jump all over me, just playing around today. Im bored. If you have to add someone or EDIT my picks feel free :)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Toolbar: def(=yes)
inbetween(=inbetween no+yes, but as of now NO)
NO(=no, as of now)
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Ivanovic = def :bounce:
Lindsay = def
Serena = def
Venus = def
Hingis = def
JHH = def
Masha = def
Mary = def
Clijsters = def (only 1 GS - but 5 finals & #1 position)
Amelie = def
SvetKuz = def
Nicole = def
Myskina = def (1st RUS slam winner)
Jankovic = def :bounce:


Golovin = inbetween
Peer = inbetween
Mirza = inbetween
AnnaChak = inbetween
Safina = inbetween
Michaella = inbewteen
Li = inbewteen
Peng = inbetween
Lena = inbetween
Petrova = inbetween
Radwanska = inbetween
Pavly...nkova = inbetween
Karantantcheva= inbetween
Rezai = inbetween
Kraicek = inbetween
Zvonareva = inbetween
Bondarenko = inbetween
King = inbetween
Paszek = inbetween


Dokic = NO
Schnyder = NO
Bartoli = NO
Ai = NO
Likhovtseva = NO
Sprem = NO
ALG = NO
Kirilenko = NO
Alexus Jones = NO
Dasha Sharapova = NO

saki
Oct 22nd, 2006, 09:44 AM
These days, Hall of Fame hardly means anything. You used to need to be an alltime great, now I bet all of the one slam wonders of this generation will get in.

Viktymise
Oct 22nd, 2006, 11:05 AM
You cant call anyone without a slam a definate and someone with a slam a no :rolleyes: Myskina will get in because shes a slam champ, plus if lenaD wins a slam her in her career shell be in there too, Clijsters is a definate, LenaD has a much better chance to be in the than 3 quaters of the ppl you put inbetween

Viktymise
Oct 22nd, 2006, 11:09 AM
Plus i think anyone with a slam deserves to be in there, it would show that winning a slam is pretty much the best thing you can do in tennis

Ballbasher
Oct 22nd, 2006, 11:14 AM
How can you call Petrova or Dementieva ano and Vaidisova yes :confused:

olivia100
Oct 22nd, 2006, 01:04 PM
I think Clijsters is a def. #1 in both singles and doubles. GS winner and multiple time finalist. Also one of the more likeable players.

Since when does 'likeable' get you in the HOF? I did not know that was a requirement.

The Daviator
Oct 22nd, 2006, 01:25 PM
Clijsters will definitely get in, in addition to her 1 GS, she's been the runner-up at 4 others, won the Tour Champs twice and has been #1

:spit: at Golovin and Vaidisova being definites :tape:

thrust
Oct 22nd, 2006, 02:01 PM
Anyone with less than 4 Slams should NOT be in the Hall Of Fame! The tennis HOF has become a pathetic joke.