But lets see, Amelie just won 2 slams, it could change her outlook.
Very interesting quarter match up!
Aug 23rd, 2006, 09:40 PM
I voted for Mauresmo in 3, even if Davenport won 10 last meetings she's far from her best while Amelie is having a great season and probably her best season
Aug 23rd, 2006, 09:42 PM
Aug 23rd, 2006, 09:49 PM
Or, who will serve better?
Lindsay has a patent for winning with Amelie on hard, but Mauresmo just won Wimbledon....
Go Lindsay, in str8:yeah:...or Amelie in 3:scared:
Aug 23rd, 2006, 09:58 PM
Big big clash - I would pay good money to watch this!
Lindsey always fancied her chances against Amelie: just stay tough - grind the Frenchwoman down to error-ridden submission. Amelie is a slightly different creature these days; tougher, more solid and winning big matches.
Mauresmo in two (or three).
Aug 23rd, 2006, 10:07 PM
Aug 23rd, 2006, 10:12 PM
Davenort 5-7, 6-4, 6-2
Aug 23rd, 2006, 10:16 PM
Lindsey always fancied her chances against Amelie: just stay tough - grind the Frenchwoman down to error-ridden submission. .
Exactly, and I see no reason why that won't happen again esp. after watching her play today. Lindsay 6-4 6-3
Aug 23rd, 2006, 10:23 PM
Davenport in straight sets.
Aug 23rd, 2006, 10:25 PM
For me, this is an awesome match up. Lindsay owns Amelie, hasn't lost to her in forever. If Lindsay plays well, she always beats her. But Amelie is obviously a different player now. And even though Lindsay won her first 2 matches easily, to me she looks SLOWER than ever. So there are a lot of questions to be answered. GO LINDSAY
Aug 23rd, 2006, 10:26 PM
I changed my mind after actually seeing Lindsay play.
She moved like a snail. She has no defense. There were really no strategy used.
Her balls aren't hit as hard or as clean.
This is Mauresmo's best chance in 6 years.