PDA

View Full Version : Oops Britney!


Wendy Williams
May 19th, 2006, 12:42 PM
http://socialitelife.com/images/spfbs051806_04.jpg

:rolleyes:

BritneySpearsIsHot
May 19th, 2006, 12:47 PM
She's not very good is she :lol:

AjdeNate!
May 19th, 2006, 12:59 PM
The new Porn-stache bodyguard was Johnny on the spot, though.

!<blocparty>!
May 19th, 2006, 12:59 PM
Oh please, come on Wendy. I can't believe this deserves its own thread. Every mother slips up... *driving with him in your lap is another thing* but she's just tripped up here. :shrug:

SilK
May 19th, 2006, 01:00 PM
what you guys do not see, is the drink she was holding in her other hand :tape:

Martian KC
May 19th, 2006, 01:07 PM
Maybe she was blinded by a flashbulb from one of the paparazzi.:o

Wendy Williams
May 19th, 2006, 01:07 PM
what you guys do not see, is the drink she was holding in her other hand :tape:

http://socialitelife.com/images/spfbs051806_01.jpg :tape:

Paneru
May 19th, 2006, 01:09 PM
I don't care for brittany but
people need to leave her
the hell alone!

She's a new mother who isn't
exempt from making mistakes
just like all the others.

Andy.
May 19th, 2006, 01:11 PM
She has fully let herself go she just looks like trailer trash (the hair, the bra hanging out, messed up make up) LOL she is just to funny now. :lol: Tripping doent help

rebel_ffighter
May 19th, 2006, 02:54 PM
I saw it today morning,what an idiot!

Rocketta
May 19th, 2006, 03:03 PM
hmm, it's only going to get harder considering she's preggers again. She just needs to stop faking the funk and go out with her Nanny like the rest of the stars.

Ferosh
May 19th, 2006, 03:33 PM
http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/qax21/britney3.jpg
http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/qax21/britney4.jpg
http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/qax21/britney5.jpg
http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/qax21/britney6.jpg
http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/qax21/britney7.jpg
http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/qax21/britney1.jpg
http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/qax21/britney2.jpg

OMFG @ the last two pictures. :help:

Helen Lawson
May 19th, 2006, 03:36 PM
There are few people I dislike more that Britney Spears, but hauling some baby around when the press is chasing you, she's bound to have problems. I don't understand why she goes out in public with it without like a nanny or something to hold it.

Rocketta
May 19th, 2006, 03:37 PM
:awww: she looks overwhelmed. :help:

I don't like her but I hope she get a little better grip on her life. :awww:

Wigglytuff
May 19th, 2006, 04:02 PM
i would feel bad for Britney, but if she is that overwhelmed why does she keep breeding?

SilK
May 19th, 2006, 04:04 PM
There are few people I dislike more that Britney Spears, but hauling some baby around when the press is chasing you, she's bound to have problems. I don't understand why she goes out in public with it without like a nanny or something to hold it.

I think the guy catching on to the kid is Britney's MANNY, no? :confused:

http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/qax21/britney5.jpg
http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/qax21/britney6.jpg

The_Pov
May 19th, 2006, 04:21 PM
I think the guy catching on to the kid is Britney's MANNY, no? :confused:

No this is the manny:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v36/allhailme/blogposts/051606_britnannyflowers.jpg

Who looks a lot like Sean Preston mmmm.

SilK
May 19th, 2006, 04:24 PM
I think I'm going to pursuit a carreer as a 'Manny' as well! :lol:

Malin
May 19th, 2006, 04:48 PM
everyone trips, and if she wasn't carrying sean then everyone would eat her alive for not carrying her own baby.

Helen Lawson
May 19th, 2006, 04:52 PM
What I'm kind of shocked about is, most weathy celebrities try very hard to keep their children from being photographed a lot and out of the public eye, on account of kidnapping fears, psycho fan fears, etc. But Britney just doesn't seem to care. Odd.

hablo
May 19th, 2006, 05:14 PM
Poor Britney, can't get a break :(

hablo
May 19th, 2006, 05:23 PM
What I'm kind of shocked about is, most weathy celebrities try very hard to keep their children from being photographed a lot and out of the public eye, on account of kidnapping fears, psycho fan fears, etc. But Britney just doesn't seem to care. Odd.
I guess Angelina Jolie is another exception to this "rule".

SilK
May 19th, 2006, 05:27 PM
I guess Angelina Jolie is another exception to this "rule".

Who'd wanna hurt Angelina... Maddox, Zahara or the unborn Africa. :awww:

Helen Lawson
May 19th, 2006, 05:32 PM
I guess Angelina Jolie is another exception to this "rule".

It's odd with her, too. You rarely see photos of the Cruise/Kidman children or Julia Roberts' twins. You rarely see the biological or adopted children of Steven Speilberg, the Hanks kids, rarely if ever.

hablo
May 19th, 2006, 05:35 PM
It's odd with her, too. You rarely see photos of the Cruise/Kidman children or Julia Roberts' twins. You rarely see the biological or adopted children of Steven Speilberg, the Hanks kids, rarely if ever.
I've seen pics of them :scratch:
whether it's rarely or not, the pics are out there :shrug:
Some stars show off their kids, other do not...

CoryAnnAvants#1
May 19th, 2006, 06:13 PM
While I agree she may not ever win Parent of the Year, this is just life folks. People trip. She had the baby in her hand this time unfortunately. It doesn't matter whether she had a drink in her hand or a box of diapers or a bag of groceries. People would still be bashing her over this.

I don't like Britney, but I admire her for trying to have a normal life and go out in public with her child like 99.9% of the world can do. She doesn't want a full time nanny because she sees being the mother as HER job. I'm sure she has done a lot of wonderful things with Sean that will never set foot in a paper or front page of any tabloid.

wipeout
May 20th, 2006, 12:41 AM
Not good. That poor kid should have body-armour and a crash-helmet. :tape:

Still, it's better than Michael Jackson dangling his kid off the balcony. :eek:

meggz_star
May 20th, 2006, 12:50 AM
:eek:

Knizzle
May 20th, 2006, 12:54 AM
Notice she doesn't let go of her cup of vodka(okay I'm not sure it's vodka) in favor of catching her own baby. LMAO! :haha:

StarDuvallGrant
May 20th, 2006, 12:57 AM
i would feel bad for Britney, but if she is that overwhelmed why does she keep breeding?

Good question.

Stamp Paid
May 20th, 2006, 01:01 AM
Notice she doesn't let go of her cup of vodka(okay I'm not sure it's vodka) in favor of catching her own baby. LMAO! :haha:

LMAO.

Even if its not vodka, shes so busy trying NOT to spill whatevers in the cup, she damn near drops the baby. Look how shes leaning. I woulda threw the cup down and tried to secure the baby.

http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/qax21/britney5.jpg

Stupid ass. :rolleyes:

Brett.
May 20th, 2006, 01:47 AM
Poor Britnet and i still forgive her.

Denise4925
May 20th, 2006, 02:07 AM
She has fully let herself go she just looks like trailer trash (the hair, the bra hanging out, messed up make up) LOL she is just to funny now. :lol: Tripping doent help
I've been thinking that for a while now. :lol:

No Name Face
May 20th, 2006, 02:09 AM
Not good. That poor kid should have body-armour and a crash-helmet. :tape:



...and an insurance policy

Denise4925
May 20th, 2006, 02:10 AM
http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/qax21/britney3.jpg
http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/qax21/britney4.jpg
http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/qax21/britney5.jpg
http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/qax21/britney6.jpg
http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/qax21/britney7.jpg
http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/qax21/britney1.jpg
http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/qax21/britney2.jpg

OMFG @ the last two pictures. :help:
Was that water or an alcoholic drink? If alcohol, was she drunk and stumbled or did she just misstep and almost fall? Is she crying because she's embarrassed or is she in pain from maybe pulling something to break her fall or is she thinking about almost dropping her baby on his head? :confused:

Denise4925
May 20th, 2006, 02:14 AM
Notice she doesn't let go of her cup of vodka(okay I'm not sure it's vodka) in favor of catching her own baby. LMAO! :haha:
:lol: I'm loving your avatar Knizzle. I'm glad it finally downloaded so we could see it.

No Name Face
May 20th, 2006, 02:18 AM
remember when britney used to be hot? :tape:
and christina is still doing softcore porn.

i remember when those two were like the two biggest things since sliced bread.

Wiggly
May 20th, 2006, 02:20 AM
Was that water or an alcoholic drink? If alcohol, was she drunk and stumbled or did she just misstep and almost fall? Is she crying because she's embarrassed or is she in pain from maybe pulling something to break her fall or is she thinking about almost dropping her baby on his head? :confused:

If she's human, it's because of thinking she could have seriously injuried her son :sad:

If that little boy would have fell, it would have be the biggest newspaper since a LONG time :tape:

meggz_star
May 20th, 2006, 02:21 AM
remember when britney used to be hot? :tape:
and christina is still doing softcore porn.

i remember when those two were like the two biggest things since sliced bread.

Yeah. The good old days :tape:

RatedR Superstar
May 20th, 2006, 02:49 AM
ohh britney :rolleyes:

after showing to the world that your bad being a mom, you decide to make another one..

Boss monkey
May 20th, 2006, 03:14 AM
poor britney, I am sure she was crying because she was overwhelmed by the paparazzi I saw a video of the incident and she actually look graceful in keeping her baby from falling, then latter she went to get some thing to eat and all you could see was the flashes from cameras reflecting off the window. I must say that dealing with the paparazzi is by far the hardest part of being a paparazzi.

p.s. and since when is wanting to mother your child being a bad mother their is alot a lot worse parents the britney

Boss monkey
May 20th, 2006, 03:15 AM
ohh britney :rolleyes:

after showing to the world that your bad being a mom, you decide to make another one..
she sure decide to almost drop her baby just like you would :rolleyes:

Malin
May 20th, 2006, 04:50 AM
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9954/00007ta.jpg (http://imageshack.us/)

I'm sure she's a good mom, she just makes mistake like any first-time mother would do
I feel bad for her, and it cant be easy moving thru a crowd of papparazzi all the time, no wonder she tripped

Malin
May 20th, 2006, 04:58 AM
LMAO.

Even if its not vodka, shes so busy trying NOT to spill whatevers in the cup, she damn near drops the baby. Look how shes leaning. I woulda threw the cup down and tried to secure the baby.

http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/qax21/britney5.jpg

Stupid ass. :rolleyes:

uhh why don't you actually watch the video and see what happened, she was grabbed from the other side by another body gaurd, she wasnt tryin to hold on to her cup

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8-ypdmhqV4&search=sean%20preston

Denise4925
May 20th, 2006, 05:03 AM
uhh why don't you actually watch the video and see what happened, she was grabbed from the other side by another body gaurd, she wasnt tryin to hold on to her cup

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8-ypdmhqV4&search=sean%20preston
Wow, stills tell a whole different story than the actual footage. It wasn't as bad as the stills make it seem. It could have happened to anybody.

Wigglytuff
May 20th, 2006, 05:16 AM
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9954/00007ta.jpg (http://imageshack.us/)

I'm sure she's a good mom, she just makes mistake like any first-time mother would do
I feel bad for her, and it cant be easy moving thru a crowd of papparazzi all the time, no wonder she tripped
:bigcry: saying "its my first baby" is a bad excuse for putting that child in mortal danger like infy times.

Fabunny
May 20th, 2006, 05:50 AM
I've seen pics of them :scratch:
whether it's rarely or not, the pics are out there :shrug:
Some stars show off their kids, other do not...

Sarah Jessica Parker takes her son, James, to Central Park all the time and no one bothers them. She is a regular New Yorker

Rocketta
May 20th, 2006, 05:59 AM
uhh why don't you actually watch the video and see what happened, she was grabbed from the other side by another body gaurd, she wasnt tryin to hold on to her cup

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8-ypdmhqV4&search=sean%20preston

well, two things...

one, it definitely wasn't that bad...the baby wasn't really in mortal danger

and

two, those tears are not about almost dropping the baby because if you blink you miss it.

darrinbaker00
May 20th, 2006, 06:56 AM
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9954/00007ta.jpg (http://imageshack.us/)

I'm sure she's a good mom, she just makes mistake like any first-time mother would do
The thong underwear, for instance... :tape:

bailey
May 20th, 2006, 07:03 AM
Did you hear that in the video: before she gets in the car she says "That's why I need a gun".

Wow, I prefer Britney holding some drink in the other hand than a gun...

But honestly: Sometimes it must suck so very big time to have all this cameras around you all the time

Harju.
May 20th, 2006, 08:20 AM
Dump the prick already, Brit Brit :o

Martian KC
May 20th, 2006, 02:11 PM
Dump the prick already, Brit Brit :o

Even I don't hate babies that much. :p

Poor Britney.

Rub
May 23rd, 2006, 02:51 AM
stupid...

gentenaire
May 23rd, 2006, 06:12 AM
She looked very uncomfortable carrying that baby, she's clearly not used to carrying both a baby and a drink at the same time ;) I don't understand why she didn't give the drink to a bodyguard. When I carry a baby with one arm, I carry it in an entirelly different way, hand in crotch, arm over body, so that the baby is fixed, can't fall out. The way she's carrying that baby, is just too dangerous. You need to have your second hand free if you carry a baby like that. Babies often try to wriggle out of people's arms, you know.

TimBo
May 23rd, 2006, 03:13 PM
What I think is funny is the fact that all these cameras are still on her and she hasnt had a record out in a couple years. Why do they still follow her when it obvious that she is concentrating on her personal life and not so much on the career at the moment? Britney is and will always be a pop culture icon and no matter what she does she'll be under the microscope. You cannot plz all the people allll the time, but u can plz yourself. If she wants to be a "breeder" (which is the most ignorant phrase ive ever heard) then she should be allowed. At least she's not on food stamp and milking the government for all its worth. Instead of worrying about a billionaire who can obviously pay for what ever she wants, why dont we concentrate on women who really shouldnt be "breeding." Now that is trash.

Rocketta
May 23rd, 2006, 03:31 PM
What I think is funny is the fact that all these cameras are still on her and she hasnt had a record out in a couple years. Why do they still follow her when it obvious that she is concentrating on her personal life and not so much on the career at the moment? Britney is and will always be a pop culture icon and no matter what she does she'll be under the microscope. You cannot plz all the people allll the time, but u can plz yourself. If she wants to be a "breeder" (which is the most ignorant phrase ive ever heard) then she should be allowed. At least she's not on food stamp and milking the government for all its worth. Instead of worrying about a billionaire who can obviously pay for what ever she wants, why dont we concentrate on women who really shouldnt be "breeding." Now that is trash.

so let me get this right, poor people shouldn't be breeding because they don't have any money but someone who is rich it's ok to breed. Never mind the poor person might actually be emotionally stable and the rich person may be a drunk ego maniac.....all that matters is that the person have money? :scratch:

I think people object to Britney having multiple kids because it appears her life was definitely out of control with drinking, partying, stealing engaged men before she had her first and now it seems out of control with a bad marriage....some people might feel that type of environment is not right for children despite the amount of money that surrounds it. Is that a fair assessment? I'm sure Brit fans will say no and non-fans will say yes. It's just an opinion and that's what we do here is just give opinions.

I seriously doubt the best defense of Brit's right to have children is her net worth. It's meaningless when talking about the emotional & mental health of a child. :shrug:

TimBo
May 23rd, 2006, 03:39 PM
so let me get this right, poor people shouldn't be breeding because they don't have any money but someone who is rich it's ok to breed. Never mind the poor person might actually be emotionally stable and the rich person may be a drunk ego maniac.....all that matters is that the person have money? :scratch:

I think people object to Britney having multiple kids because it appears her life was definitely out of control with drinking, partying, stealing engaged men before she had her first and now it seems out of control with a bad marriage....some people might feel that type of environment is not right for children despite the amount of money that surrounds it. Is that a fair assessment? I'm sure Brit fans will say no and non-fans will say yes. It's just an opinion and that's what we do here is just give opinions.

I seriously doubt the best defense of Brit's right to have children is her net worth. It's meaningless when talking about the emotional & mental health of a child. :shrug:

I didnt say poor people shouldnt breed. And why call it breeding. That's stupid. Its having children. Breeding, that term is so aminalistic.
I dont think that women, men who ever shouldnt have children that they cant possibly pay for. Im not sure what world u are living in, but hun, love doesnt cure all.
By the way, there is a difference between poor and being on welfare. I was brought up poor. My father and mother both worked, but we were poor. However, they still were able to provide for me.
I DONT want my tax money going to someone that only has a child so that they can get governement assistance. And I know this happens because I work for the government.

but to answer your question.. NO poor people who cant provide for a child either emotionally or financially should not have children.

TimBo
May 23rd, 2006, 03:47 PM
That was a bit cranky.. sorry Rocketta, I didnt mean to go off there. I think ive just been working for the goverment for so long and seen so many people milk the system that it just upsets me. So, u r right, it is just an opinion. As u know, opinions are like ass holes.. every body's got one.

Rocketta
May 23rd, 2006, 04:00 PM
I didnt say poor people shouldnt breed. And why call it breeding. That's stupid. Its having children. Breeding, that term is so aminalistic.
I dont think that women, men who ever shouldnt have children that they cant possibly pay for. Im not sure what world u are living in, but hun, love doesnt cure all.
By the way, there is a difference between poor and being on welfare. I was brought up poor. My father and mother both worked, but we were poor. However, they still were able to provide for me.
I DONT want my tax money going to someone that only has a child so that they can get governement assistance. And I know this happens because I work for the government.

but to answer your question.. NO poor people who cant provide for a child either emotionally or financially should not have children.

Let's clear one thing up though, getting food stamps is getting welfare and frankly until the government is willing to make businesses pay a living wage poor people will always need help.

Also, I rather some poor person get my tax dollars (wether legit or not) than some corporate fat ass bilking his company out of millions of dollars just to have the government then bail the company out....that's the kind of welfare that makes me mad.

I know people cheat the system...that can't be help whether they are rich businessmen or poor welfare moms... my sister worked in food stamp fraud and she use to tell us it wasn't the poor people bilking the system most times. :tape:

When you say people who can't financially support kids??? Um, does that include rich spoiled brats who take money from their parents as well or is it just poor people who have to get their help from the government?

I understand your frustration having worked with it day in and day out.

TimBo
May 23rd, 2006, 04:08 PM
In my opinion, I think that someone who is financially unstable and choices to have a child, that is just as much child abuse than someone who beats a child. Im sorry, but that's how I feel.
Im not speaking of rich people, or spoiled brats. Thats a totally different discussion. My point is, no, I dont want my dollars going to some obese, lazy man or women who has a child to get governement assistance so they dont have to work. There is a difference if a man/women is on welfare and works and tries to make his/her life better. I can tolerate that. There are circumstances in life that we can control and something may happen and we may need assistance. I can totally understand that.
However, I just cant accept lazy people who have children. That is child abuse in my eyes.

Rocketta
May 23rd, 2006, 04:12 PM
In my opinion, I think that someone who is financially unstable and choices to have a child, that is just as much child abuse than someone who beats a child. Im sorry, but that's how I feel.
Im not speaking of rich people, or spoiled brats. Thats a totally different discussion. My point is, no, I dont want my dollars going to some obese, lazy man or women who has a child to get governement assistance so they dont have to work. There is a difference if a man/women is on welfare and works and tries to make his/her life better. I can tolerate that. There are circumstances in life that we can control and something may happen and we may need assistance. I can totally understand that.
However, I just cant accept lazy people who have children. That is child abuse in my eyes.

um but you can accept lazy people who have children....if they have money? You keep attaching character flaws with the amount of money someone has, ie you seperate the fat lazy spoiled brat from the fat lazy welfare cheat? How is either one any more or less fit to raise a child and if it's about the child wouldn't each one get the same amount of hate and criticism from you?

Rocketta
May 23rd, 2006, 04:13 PM
what if someone has kids to activate their inheritance...is it the same thing? :confused:

TimBo
May 23rd, 2006, 04:39 PM
Im not talking about people who have money. I cant speak for anyone that has money because I dont. I can only talk about things I know. Im poor. If I were str8, I wouldnt have children right now because I couldnt provide for them. Part of loving a child is providing for them. Would u have a child if u could barely take care of yourself. Im not speaking of lazy rich people because frankly, I dont know any.

Concerning your question reguarding inheritance, no its wrong.
U r only considering the question of love. While obviously love is a major part of raising a child, in my opinion, providing for a child is just as important. I could live on the streets and be the most sweet loving parent in the world. Does that make it right to have a child and live on the streets? No it doesnt.

Rocketta
May 23rd, 2006, 04:55 PM
Im not talking about people who have money. I cant speak for anyone that has money because I dont. I can only talk about things I know. Im poor. If I were str8, I wouldnt have children right now because I couldnt provide for them. Part of loving a child is providing for them. Would u have a child if u could barely take care of yourself. Im not speaking of lazy rich people because frankly, I dont know any.

Concerning your question reguarding inheritance, no its wrong.
U r only considering the question of love. While obviously love is a major part of raising a child, in my opinion, providing for a child is just as important. I could live on the streets and be the most sweet loving parent in the world. Does that make it right to have a child and live on the streets? No it doesnt.

No I don't think it's all about love....and no it's wrong to have a child and live on the streets...my problem with your position is that it's more wrong to do that then say be rich and totally emotionally neglect/abuse your child. I don't think either is good. I certainly don't think being poor needing assistance is in the same breath as living on the street either but I don't think you mean them to be. My problem with your position is that you seem to imply that having a kid so you don't have to work is worse than having a kid cause you want to keep a man, save your marriage, activate an inheritance, trying to trap a man, etc... I don't think any of those reasons are acceptable but I think they are equal in the badness for the child imho.

It has come across to me that you think somehow having money is a big factor in the neglect/abuse a kid receives, ie if you had them to get a check it's abuse but if you had them because you are trying to keep a husband it's not because you have money to pay the rent? :scratch:

I don't think you think these things...I just think in your effort to defend Britney it's come across this way. Defend Britney because you think she's a good mother who spends adequate time nurturing the kids mind, body and spirit not because she can afford the rent and groceries.

Craigy
May 23rd, 2006, 04:58 PM
whoopsies :lol:

TimBo
May 23rd, 2006, 05:04 PM
No I don't think it's all about love....and no it's wrong to have a child and live on the streets...my problem with your position is that it's more wrong to do that then say be rich and totally emotionally neglect/abuse your child. I don't think either is good. I certainly don't think being poor needing assistance is in the same breath as living on the street either but I don't think you mean them to be. My problem with your position is that you seem to imply that having a kid so you don't have to work is worse than having a kid cause you want to keep a man, save your marriage, activate an inheritance, trying to trap a man, etc... I don't think any of those reasons are acceptable but I think they are equal in the badness for the child imho.

It has come across to me that you think somehow having money is a big factor in the neglect/abuse a kid receives, ie if you had them to get a check it's abuse but if you had them because you are trying to keep a husband it's not because you have money to pay the rent? :scratch:

I don't think you think these things...I just think in your effort to defend Britney it's come across this way. Defend Britney because you think she's a good mother who spends adequate time nurturing the kids mind, body and spirit not because she can afford the rent and groceries.

I totally understand your post, and for the most part I agree with you. And, to be honest, im not really trying to defend Britney because I dont know what kind of mother she is. I dont live with her, we only see what the cameras want to show, which, we all know can be wrong.
I think maybe im not conveying what I want to say in a better way. So maybe ill just say this. I dont think its right to have a child in today's world unless u are mentally and financially prepared. Im not trying to say just because someone has money its ok to have a child. Im not saying that at all. I just think that people should be prepared in every way they can before bringing another human into the world. That's all.
Will this ever happen? No, people have babies every day that they arent prepared for; rich and poor. Either way, its not right. Just my opinion.

Wigglytuff
May 23rd, 2006, 05:07 PM
I didnt say poor people shouldnt breed. And why call it breeding. That's stupid. Its having children. Breeding, that term is so aminalistic.
I dont think that women, men who ever shouldnt have children that they cant possibly pay for. Im not sure what world u are living in, but hun, love doesnt cure all.
By the way, there is a difference between poor and being on welfare. I was brought up poor. My father and mother both worked, but we were poor. However, they still were able to provide for me.
I DONT want my tax money going to someone that only has a child so that they can get governement assistance. And I know this happens because I work for the government.

but to answer your question.. NO poor people who cant provide for a child either emotionally or financially should not have children.

i will ignore your clasist comments about the poor. and answer your question :

its called breeding because that what it is :retard: . do you have a dictionary?

Dictionary
breed |br?d| verb ( past and past part. bred |bred|) [ trans. ]
cause (an animal) to produce offspring

Homo sapiens |?h?m? ?s?p??nz| the primate species to which modern humans belong; humans regarded as a species. See also Homo . • a member of this species. ORIGIN Latin, literally ‘wise man.’

i dont even know what other words you want to look up for you. baby? have? birth? is?

ugh.

TimBo
May 23rd, 2006, 05:14 PM
what is so classless to say that someone that cant take care of themselves need to not bring a child into the world..
Honey, im poor. I dont make alot of money, but Im not going to bring another human into an atmosphere where I cant provide for them. What is wrong with that?

For your information, I do know what breed means. lol.. Im not retarded. But it just doesnt sound right to say.. yeah.. u know Suzie.. she breeds and now she has 2 off spring. lol..

Im not doggin a poor person. Im POOR myself. Im just saying that if u cant provide for a child.. why in the hell would u want to "breed" and bring one in the world.
In the instances I see every day at work, its because they get government assistance. Im not saying every poor person does this. Give me a break. lol
But u cant honestly, with a str8 face, sit there and tell me that it wouldnt matter to you, if someone was poor as dirt, not a pot to piss in, had a baby they cant possibly take care of. Oh.. u know.. we can barely afford food and rent, but by God we love this child and love is allll we need. That is ridiculous, sorry.

Wigglytuff
May 23rd, 2006, 05:36 PM
what is so classless to say that someone that cant take care of themselves need to not bring a child into the world..

here is what i actually said:

i would feel bad for Britney, but if she is that overwhelmed why does she keep breeding?

i dont feel bad for her.
she cant be that overwhelmed because she keeps breeding.


in fact it was YOU who were saying things about what you feel others should and should not be able to do. in fact it was YOU who said all manner of things about "people who cant take care of themselves" should and should not be allowed to do.

i was saying that i dont feel bad for her. she can keep breeding all she likes, i'm just not going to feel bad for her.

now look at all the crazy, classist things you said (being poor doesn't make it ok, it makes it worse).

p.s. thats why i defined "human" because you dont seem to know what is identified as.

Helen Lawson
May 23rd, 2006, 05:40 PM
If people waited to have children until they were mentally and financially ready, most of us wouldn't exist. I know I wouldn't!!

Anyway, maybe to lighten the mood here, this is the true definition of a "breeder."

http://www.amiannoying.com/(nno10vfdln45x0uafqsde0nq)/collection.aspx?collection=4869

TimBo
May 23rd, 2006, 06:04 PM
here is what i actually said:



i dont feel bad for her.
she cant be that overwhelmed because she keeps breeding.


in fact it was YOU who were saying things about what you feel others should and should not be able to do. in fact it was YOU who said all manner of things about "people who cant take care of themselves" should and should not be allowed to do.

i was saying that i dont feel bad for her. she can keep breeding all she likes, i'm just not going to feel bad for her.

now look at all the crazy, classist things you said (being poor doesn't make it ok, it makes it worse).

p.s. thats why i defined "human" because you dont seem to know what is identified as.

ohh.. so harsh. lol
really who cares, opinions are like ASSHOLES we all have one.. right?
Doesnt matter what u call me or say to me. My opinion doesnt change. People, rich or poor shouldnt have kids if you cant take care of them mentally of physically. True, people do have kids when they arent ready, and like Helen Lawson said, most of us probably woudnt be here. But the fact of the matter is, its my opinion and because u call me names doesnt change the way I feel. U obviously arent getting what im trying to say. So, ill leave u with this. Rich, poor, ignorant, smart; doesnt matter. If u cant provide for a child either emotionally and financially, you dont need children. PERIOD. It doesnt matter if u are Britney Spears or the trashy ho down the street.

Rocketta
May 23rd, 2006, 06:53 PM
I totally understand your post, and for the most part I agree with you. And, to be honest, im not really trying to defend Britney because I dont know what kind of mother she is. I dont live with her, we only see what the cameras want to show, which, we all know can be wrong.
I think maybe im not conveying what I want to say in a better way. So maybe ill just say this. I dont think its right to have a child in today's world unless u are mentally and financially prepared. Im not trying to say just because someone has money its ok to have a child. Im not saying that at all. I just think that people should be prepared in every way they can before bringing another human into the world. That's all.
Will this ever happen? No, people have babies every day that they arent prepared for; rich and poor. Either way, its not right. Just my opinion.

ah, see had you said this in the beginning there wouldn't have been any discussion. ;)

and Jiggly called you a classist not classless, but I'm not getting in that. I just wanted to let you know that you read it wrong. :lol:

BritneySpearsIsHot
May 23rd, 2006, 07:01 PM
:rolleyes:

I can't believe people are fighting over this.

Wigglytuff
May 23rd, 2006, 07:19 PM
ah, see had you said this in the beginning there wouldn't have been any discussion. ;)

and Jiggly called you a classist not classless, but I'm not getting in that. I just wanted to let you know that you read it wrong. :lol:
thank you

TimBo
May 24th, 2006, 03:06 PM
my bad.. I apologize I read it wrong Jigglypuff