PDA

View Full Version : Tiger Woods designs technological breakthrough WATCH for $1,195!!


RVD
Jan 2nd, 2006, 04:18 AM
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/051021/051021_tag_vsml.vsmall.jpg
WEIGHS JUST 2 OUNCES!!! :eek:
I must say, this watch looks quite nice. I might even buy one.
This coming from a guy who never wears a watch. :)

Tiger Woods watch is a technological stroke
Clever design of TAG Heuer Professional Golf timepiece

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9773121/

Kunal
Jan 2nd, 2006, 04:52 AM
maaeh.....doesnt look that great.
what is so advanced abt it??

bw2082
Jan 2nd, 2006, 04:56 AM
I golf a lot and have never had a problem with wearing a watch :shrug:

Erika_Angel
Jan 2nd, 2006, 05:12 AM
it looks like one of those cheap second hand ones. WHy would you buy a $1K that looks like it has a rubber band?

Wigglytuff
Jan 2nd, 2006, 05:42 AM
part of the cost is the fact that its from a limited edition of 8,000

that said, its ugly and i wouldnt want it.

Kunal
Jan 2nd, 2006, 06:16 AM
it looks like one of those cheap second hand ones. WHy would you buy a $1K that looks like it has a rubber band?

im sure the rubber is "technologically advanced" :rolleyes:

and it probably cures cancer...

TF Chipmunk
Jan 2nd, 2006, 06:22 AM
I love Tag Heuer, but I won't be able to afford one until my first paycheck :tape: which is HOW many years away :o

Rtael
Jan 2nd, 2006, 06:42 AM
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/051021/051021_tag_vsml.vsmall.jpg
WEIGHS JUST 2 OUNCES!!! :eek:
I must say, this watch looks quite nice. I might even buy one.
This coming from a guy who never wears a watch. :)

Tiger Woods watch is a technological stroke
Clever design of TAG Heuer Professional Golf timepiece

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9773121/


Why would ANYONE pay that much for a watch? :tape: It better give head or something for those prices...

harloo
Jan 2nd, 2006, 06:43 AM
part of the cost is the fact that its from a limited edition of 8,000

that said, its ugly and i wouldnt want it.

It does look like a piece of crap, but the limited edition of 8,000 will make it very valuable in the future. It might be a great investment in the long run. I bet in a few years it will be worth ten times more than it's actual value.:)

Kunal
Jan 2nd, 2006, 07:55 AM
Why would ANYONE pay that much for a watch? :tape: It better give head or something for those prices...

hahahaha

esquímaux
Jan 2nd, 2006, 02:39 PM
Honestly, it's not very aesthetically pleasing :o:)

Scotso
Jan 3rd, 2006, 07:47 AM
Oh yes, I'm sure he designed it all by himself. :)

Scotso
Jan 3rd, 2006, 07:47 AM
It does look like a piece of crap, but the limited edition of 8,000 will make it very valuable in the future. It might be a great investment in the long run. I bet in a few years it will be worth ten times more than it's actual value.:)

Until people realize they can make one themselves out of a sports watch and a rubber band.

CrossCourt~Rally
Jan 3rd, 2006, 07:49 AM
Until people realize they can make one themselves out of a sports watch and a rubber band.

Same material as your jockstrap :lol: ;)

RVD
Jan 3rd, 2006, 08:11 AM
Same material as your jockstrap :lol: ;):haha: You are on a roll this morning. :lol:
I haven't worn a watch in over 15 years, and rarely wear my wedding ring. :angel: Jewelry actually freaks me out for some reason. :shrug: I just feel bound or chained when wearing any form of jewelry. I can't explain it. :scratch:

CrossCourt~Rally
Jan 3rd, 2006, 08:22 AM
:haha: You are on a roll this morning. :lol:
I haven't worn a watch in over 15 years, and rarely wear my wedding ring. :angel: Jewelry actually freaks me out for some reason. :shrug: I just feel bound or chained when wearing any form of jewelry. I can't explain it. :scratch:

I am! :lol: Gotta go to bed now though...see ya tomorow :wavey: :kiss: >>>> :cat:

ceiling_fan
Jan 3rd, 2006, 08:31 AM
you know what is cooler though? NIKE's watches. $40 for a watch/sweatband! It could be kinda annoying though... like if ur trying to wipe your face and the watch face bangs ur eye or something

Munchen
Jan 3rd, 2006, 09:21 AM
:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: