PDA

View Full Version : Karatancheva reportedly has denied the drug claim


genius
Dec 20th, 2005, 12:28 PM
Sesil reportedly shocked and denies any appearance before ITF (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/tennis/4545548.stm)

Well Sesil has issued a denial going by this report quoting a bulgarian agency.

Maryamator
Dec 20th, 2005, 12:31 PM
link or article or sumthing please

genius
Dec 20th, 2005, 12:32 PM
click onthe underlined link

Klurt
Dec 20th, 2005, 12:33 PM
link or article or sumthing please
Press the link in that post :smash:

Penglover
Dec 20th, 2005, 12:33 PM
Sesil reportedly shocked and denies any appearance before ITF (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/tennis/4545548.stm)

Well Sesil has issued a denial going by this report quoting a bulgarian agency.

still trying to deny it :yawn: no clue for her :sad:

auntie janie
Dec 20th, 2005, 12:33 PM
EVERY athlete who has EVER been found with drugs in their system has denied the claims.

Maryamator
Dec 20th, 2005, 12:34 PM
yeah;)

Klurt
Dec 20th, 2005, 12:39 PM
EVERY athlete who has EVER been found with drugs in their system has denied the claims.
Even the ones that didn't take anything!!

miffedmax
Dec 20th, 2005, 02:10 PM
She must have had a cold.

Penglover
Dec 20th, 2005, 02:46 PM
She must have had a cold.

face the truth please :angel:

tennisrox
Dec 20th, 2005, 02:50 PM
So what really happened here?Is L'Equipe fabricating this story?Or is Sesil lying?

Penglover
Dec 20th, 2005, 02:52 PM
So what really happened here?Is L'Equipe fabricating this story?Or is Sesil lying?

ring them up :rolleyes:

LadyLil
Dec 20th, 2005, 02:53 PM
The only way an athlete will admit they were doping is if they're caught with the syringe in their arm or thigh, the pills in their hands, or the suppository, well where suppositories go.

Nothing unexpected here.

DuLeafs
Dec 20th, 2005, 02:53 PM
face the truth please :angel:

Facing the truth: L'Equipe is full of bullsh!t :angel:

DuLeafs
Dec 20th, 2005, 02:54 PM
Sesil reportedly shocked and denies any appearance before ITF (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/tennis/4545548.stm)

Well Sesil has issued a denial going by this report quoting a bulgarian agency.

Finally an article about Sesil u can actually trust! :worship: Viva el BBC :angel:

Penglover
Dec 20th, 2005, 02:54 PM
Facing the truth: L'Equipe is full of bullsh!t :angel:

same as you :rolleyes: :yawn:

DuLeafs
Dec 20th, 2005, 02:58 PM
same as you :rolleyes: :yawn:

Oh, thats very original :rolleyes:

Spunky83
Dec 20th, 2005, 02:59 PM
face the truth please :angel:

mind Miffy´s humour please :angel:

CrossCourt~Rally
Dec 20th, 2005, 02:59 PM
Well ...there track record has been sketchy. Armstrong still has his medals..so i guess they did not have any solid evidence..but they went ahead and published the charges anyways. Everycase is different though...we'll have to wait and see. :eek:

jrm
Dec 20th, 2005, 03:17 PM
Question: why all this doping cases take so long before coming on surface? According to L'Equipe she tested positive at FO and it only came out now??? This is happening in all sports!

saniafan2005
Dec 20th, 2005, 03:20 PM
They will deny it ofcourse, nobody can admit they take dope although almost everybody do it...

griffin
Dec 20th, 2005, 03:21 PM
Well ...there track record has been sketchy. Armstrong still has his medals..so i guess they did not have any solid evidence..but they went ahead and published the charges anyways. Everycase is different though...we'll have to wait and see. :eek:

Armstrong still has his medals because the positive tests were done on - and destroyed - the "b" samples, so confirmation tests couldn't be done. (those tests were part of research on a new test for EPO. The samples themselves were taken before such a test existed) If they'd had enough wee to re-run the tests, he might not be so lucky.

I'm suspicious of L'Equipe and their motives, too, but ths doesn't look good.

jrm
Dec 20th, 2005, 03:24 PM
Something i never understood: if you tested positive A sample, why do everyone says they need to wait for B sample??? Using my head: if you tested positive on A test, B test should be positive as well!

Kimmi
Dec 20th, 2005, 03:27 PM
Something i never understood: if you tested positive A sample, why do everyone says they need to wait for B sample??? Using my head: if you tested positive on A test, B test should be positive as well!

Not necessarily. When doing any kind of experiment it is inevitable that things can go wrong. Contamination and other factors can mean that the first result is wrong. You have to do a B test to back up your results just to prove that they are correct. They have to do this in all areas of science, not just dope tests.

tennisrox
Dec 20th, 2005, 05:00 PM
Sometimes you end up with false positives when running any sort of tests.Thats why they have to rerun the tests on 'B' samples.