PDA

View Full Version : Luxemburg...was it really worthy the upgrade?


spiceboy
Sep 24th, 2005, 10:59 PM
I can immagine how big the effort has been to promote the tournament from $170K to $585K

But looking at the 4 first seeds (Clijsters, Petrova, Schnyder & Dechy) makes me wonder how happy the organisers will be now as this kind of upgrade is meant to attract big names as players outside the top 20 would compete here anyway. And knowing that Kim would have played it even as a Tier III same as the 90% of the field means that the huge upgrade has been made to make Petrova play here. Not a huge boost for the tournament IMO...

ptkten
Sep 24th, 2005, 11:19 PM
There are too many big tournaments in this part of the year and events that have a lot more history and prestige than this event. There's no way there should be a Tier II event or higher for seven straight weeks followed by the YEC.

Mattographer
Sep 25th, 2005, 01:53 AM
The field still look like Tier III :cuckoo:

Mercredi
Sep 25th, 2005, 02:22 AM
The field still look like Tier III :cuckoo:
3 Top ten players looks fine to me (Kim is the tour winning leader).

Mattographer
Sep 25th, 2005, 02:39 AM
3 Top ten players looks fine to me (Kim is the tour winning leader).
Kim Clijsters always play Luxembourg every year! :lol:

xin_hui
Sep 25th, 2005, 02:54 AM
And knowing that Kim would have played it even as a Tier III same as the 90% of the field means that the huge upgrade has been made to make Petrova play here. Not a huge boost for the tournament IMO...

i dont think kim would have played if if it were still a tier 3, due to the new WTA ruling. now, she can only play 1 tier 3 tourney, and that is hasselt

-Sonic-
Sep 25th, 2005, 03:00 AM
Kim Clijsters always play Luxembourg every year! :lol:

whats your point? If top players consistently play at a low event, maybe it needs promoting.

~|Naomi|~
Sep 25th, 2005, 04:23 AM
Kim wouldn't have played Luxembourg unless it had been upgraded so the argument that she plays every year doesn't work, under the GE rules (Kim was added to the GE list after the season as she asked for time to get back on tour) she can only play one tier III event a year and she chooses Hasselt. Last year when it was a tier III she didn't commit but ofcourse it didn't matter as she was injured in Hasselt. Kim did go to do a kids clinic there though.

If you look at the original commitment list then it looks like a tier II field they had Kuznetsova, JHH, Ana, Bovina but they all withdrew with injury had that field turned up it would have been a good tier II draw.

TennisHack
Sep 25th, 2005, 04:33 AM
The original commitments list was much stronger. LUX is just on the bad end of the injuries, which is too bad because it seems like it's a pretty good little event. I was happy it was upgraded, very prestigious for the little country :p

Can someone please explain this new rule about not playing below Tier III's for some players? Why have Venus and Myskina been haunting the weak events so much this year?

~|Naomi|~
Sep 25th, 2005, 12:38 PM
Don't know the exact rule but it depends on what band you are on the GE list.

TheBoiledEgg
Sep 25th, 2005, 03:24 PM
had they kept the same place in Calendar it would have been alot, lot stronger