PDA

View Full Version : The 2001 women's final remains the last exciting final of Roland Garros.


Hagar
Jun 4th, 2005, 06:33 PM
Congrats to Justine but we did not really see a match today. Justine was just too good for Mary.
Last year's final was weak and the year before the match was over before Kim woke up.
Year before it was the sisters, the first time they met in a Slam final, I think.

So the last time I was on the edge of my seat was that final against Jen and Kim. I really hope we get a good final next year with a real fight, tragedy and a load of matchpoints. We got that this year but it was in the 1/8 final between Justine and Svetlana.

creep
Jun 4th, 2005, 06:37 PM
I suppose if it's your favourite playing, you want them to win first, then hope it's a good match.

Mary is one of my all time favourites, but I never ever thought she could beat Justine. But sometimes you just never know.

If the match was a barnstormer the crowd would probably have booed anyway. ;)

manu32
Jun 4th, 2005, 06:40 PM
you are right she deserves to win without contest but the adversity (just kusnetsova was at her level) was out for different reasons .....and 2001 was the last good final with emotion,suspense and uncertitude...and before 1999.....for the same reasons...

Jenny.C.Fan
Jun 4th, 2005, 06:41 PM
2001 was the last good french final which is sad for the fans really.It was a great final though so exciting with jenny and kim.

creep
Jun 4th, 2005, 06:42 PM
Congrats to Justine but we did not really see a match today. Justine was just too good for Mary.
Last year's final was weak and the year before the match was over before Kim woke up.
Year before it was the sisters, the first time they met in a Slam final, I think.

So the last time I was on the edge of my seat was that final against Jen and Kim. I really hope we get a good final next year with a real fight, tragedy and a load of matchpoints. We got that this year but it was in the 1/8 final between Justine and Svetlana.

Maybe it's just as well the finals are not too exciting or else you would be back on the cigarettes again! ;) hehe

Hagar
Jun 4th, 2005, 06:43 PM
you are right she deserves to win without contest but the adversity (just kusnetsova was at her level) was out for different reasons .....and 2001 was the last good final with emotion,suspense and uncertitude...and before 1999.....for the same reasons...

Oh, I did not so much start this thread to say that Justines did not have a lot of adversity. It's just that I always like it when a match is not too one-sided, and the last women's finals in Paris have been disappointing in that respect.

turt
Jun 4th, 2005, 06:44 PM
Well I enjoyed 2001 final, but 2003 and 2005 are just fine for me ;)

Hagar
Jun 4th, 2005, 06:45 PM
Maybe it's just as well the finals are not too exciting or else you would be back on the cigarettes again! ;) hehe

That's right!!!
Have you seen that movy called "Wild at heart". At some point Nicholas Cage lights up two cigarettes because his girlfriend tells him she's pregnant.
Well, when Kim played Jen in the final, at some point I forgot that I had a cigarette in the ash tray and lit up a second one!

creep
Jun 4th, 2005, 06:50 PM
That's right!!!
Have you seen that movy called "Wild at heart". At some point Nicholas Cage lights up two cigarettes because his girlfriend tells him she's pregnant.
Well, when Kim played Jen in the final, at some point I forgot that I had a cigarette in the ash tray and lit up a second one!

Hehe This is interesting. Now I am picturing Hagar as Lula Pace! ;)

RenaSlam.
Jun 4th, 2005, 07:22 PM
Agreed.