PDA

View Full Version : Which is the most important factor in judging a poster's reputation?


Doraemon
Oct 4th, 2004, 10:58 AM
1. When he/she joined the board
2. The number of posts he/she has written
3. Simply their reputation points
4. Where they come from
5. What their sigs say

OUT!
Oct 4th, 2004, 11:08 AM
None of the above - is that you Jigglypuff?

Whether they have posted ignorant posts before, and whether they continue to act like a fool or not imo. I guess in a way that related to no.2 but not quite

esquímaux
Oct 4th, 2004, 11:53 AM
Oh you're forgetting option #6 dear: Don't take rep serious :D

Andy T
Oct 4th, 2004, 12:13 PM
Take each post as it stands - it doesn't matter who wrote it.

Truthwillout
Oct 4th, 2004, 03:21 PM
1. When he/she joined the board
2. The number of posts he/she has written
3. Simply their reputation points
4. Where they come from
5. What their sigs say

How witty, unprejudiced and relevant their posts are :bounce: :bounce:

!<blocparty>!
Oct 4th, 2004, 03:32 PM
black dot -
1)generally respectable,
2)But may be troll that turned reps off
3)Rep game drop-out :tape:
Red -
1)TROLL! :rolleyes:
2)ULTRA cool rebel :cool:
Lots of green(small amount of posts) - Rep whore :angel:
Lots of green (large amount of posts) - Respected, may be rep whore :)

Truthwillout
Oct 4th, 2004, 03:36 PM
black dot -
1)generally respectable,
2)But may be troll that turned reps off
3)Rep game drop-out :tape:
Red -
1)TROLL! :rolleyes:
2)ULTRA cool rebel :cool:
Lots of green(small amount of posts) - Rep whore :angel:
Lots of green (large amount of posts) - Respected, may be rep whore :)

Bang to rights :worship: :worship: (since I'm no rep whore, you won't even have to goodrep me forthis)

!<blocparty>!
Oct 4th, 2004, 03:45 PM
Bang to rights :worship: :worship: (since I'm no rep whore, you won't even have to goodrep me forthis)

:shrug:

Hulet
Oct 4th, 2004, 03:47 PM
How much s/he agrees with me. :p

Volcana
Oct 4th, 2004, 08:51 PM
1. When he/she joined the board
2. The number of posts he/she has written
3. Simply their reputation points
4. Where they come from
5. What their sigs sayThe content of their posts is usually good.

Kart
Oct 4th, 2004, 08:56 PM
The content of their posts is usually good.
That's what I was going to say.

Failing that, any positive comments about Gaby Sabatini usually win me over :tape:.

Kart
Oct 4th, 2004, 08:57 PM
I'm not shallow though just in case you thought that.

Helen Lawson
Oct 4th, 2004, 08:59 PM
If they've won an Oscar like me, then I really hold them in high regard. Then come other acting awards. So Neely is the most respected (apart from myself) and then Sally, and then Joan.

Jakeev
Oct 4th, 2004, 09:01 PM
It's just all up to the individua. I hate to name names but I guess I have to. Take Miranda and lizchris for instance.

Miranda rarely posts anymore, but she is genuinely one of the nicest posters I have met since I have been posting. Than you have a poster like lizchris who though maybe in her real life is a great person, comes of as one-sided, defensive and annoying in practically everything she posts.

I mean as far as I know, either of those two could be completely different in what I think I know about them, but based on their posts, I have one perception of them.

sabandborg
Oct 5th, 2004, 02:04 AM
Look at the posters name. If its Saint Seiya, aka Aint Saying anything. Its safe to conclude its pure bs.

Jakeev
Oct 6th, 2004, 08:49 PM
Look at the posters name. If its Saint Seiya, aka Aint Saying anything. Its safe to conclude its pure bs.

:tape:

Jakeev
Oct 6th, 2004, 08:51 PM
Look at the posters name. If its Saint Seiya, aka Aint Saying anything. Its safe to conclude its pure bs.
:tape: