PDA

View Full Version : Why are some people SO jealous of Sharapova?


Matt Clarke
Jul 27th, 2004, 09:03 AM
I mean she's beautiful, talented and the Wimbledon Champion. I've read some previous threads and some weird people have been using words like :

"too thin" - she's not thin, perfect model looks ( people who say she's thin are obviously fat ugly bastards).

"pale" - She has perfect colour skin, if anything she is quite dark. People who say she's pale must be colourblind

"not talented" - best grass court player in the world at the age of 17. Just cos she's beautiful does NOT mean she's not talented.

Harsh words, lay off her. If you wanna say good things about your fav players, then thats fine, but don't dis others!

fifiricci
Jul 27th, 2004, 09:35 AM
Well after shagging, jealousy is the oldest "sin" in the book, so what do you expect?

jrm
Jul 27th, 2004, 10:54 AM
Professional jealousy

bandabou
Jul 27th, 2004, 11:25 AM
Jealous?! Why would anyone be jealous of her?! Apart of Wimbledon she hasnīt done THAT much...and well she worked hard for her wins, so no need to be jealous.

tenn_ace
Jul 27th, 2004, 11:26 AM
Jealous?! Why would anyone be jealous of her?! Apart of Wimbledon she hasnīt done THAT much...and well she worked hard for her wins, so no need to be jealous.


how much have YOU done at the age 17?

bandabou
Jul 27th, 2004, 11:29 AM
how much have YOU done at the age 17?


I had just finished my high-school at started to go college.

In fact I was yet to become 17.

takash
Jul 27th, 2004, 11:30 AM
'cause she is so hyped to be the next siberian pale wta slut a la kounikova'
by the child molesters of the media.

Matt Clarke
Jul 27th, 2004, 11:32 AM
'cause she is so hyped to be the next siberian pale wta slut a la kounikova'
by the child molesters of the media.

"pale", I mean just cos you can't see yourself in the dark doesn't mean you should be jealous of other people's beauty. ;)

tenn_ace
Jul 27th, 2004, 11:37 AM
I had just finished my high-school at started to go college.

In fact I was yet to become 17.

wow that's quite an accomplishment.

Maria is finishing her high school at this age (by self-educating) and doing just a bit more (like becoming one of the best in world in her profession).

takash
Jul 27th, 2004, 11:38 AM
"pale", I mean just cos you can't see yourself in the dark doesn't mean you should be jealous of other people's beauty. ;)

Belileve me I see myself in more light than message board clowns who ataches to winners like ticks because in their real life they're losers.

~RedRose~
Jul 27th, 2004, 11:40 AM
Sharapova isnt that beautiful .... i don't mind the girl but she is overrated in both tennis and looks.

Maybe i wouldn't be so annoyed at her if she wasnt shoved in my face 24/7 by the media and posters on this message board .... i mean realli .... when a new thread entitled "Where are all the maria threads gone" and then the message saying "why isn't anyone talking about Maria anymore yada yada yada" then it has gone too far.

She won a grandslam at 17 ..... wow so did Martina .... therefore Martina outshines Maria, she is nothing new. She is beautiful ...... arguable .... kournikova is better along with many other players. She has a personality ..... lots of players have personalities. She is nothing special.

takash
Jul 27th, 2004, 11:44 AM
Sharapova isnt that beautiful .... i don't mind the girl but she is overrated in both tennis and looks.

Maybe i wouldn't be so annoyed at her if she wasnt shoved in my face 24/7 by the media and posters on this message board .... i mean realli .... when a new thread entitled "Where are all the maria threads gone" and then the message saying "why isn't anyone talking about Maria anymore yada yada yada" then it has gone too far.

She won a grandslam at 17 ..... wow so did Martina .... therefore Martina outshines Maria, she is nothing new. She is beautiful ...... arguable .... kournikova is better along with many other players. She has a personality ..... lots of players have personalities. She is nothing special.

Serena also had a slam at 17 and now she has 6 or so.

Sharapower
Jul 27th, 2004, 11:45 AM
People, if before I was born I was proposed to choose between being what I am or being Maria Sharapova, I think I would probably take the second choice. Wouldn't you ?

SO that certainly explains why people can be jealous.

bandabou
Jul 27th, 2004, 11:57 AM
wow that's quite an accomplishment.

Maria is finishing her high school at this age (by self-educating) and doing just a bit more (like becoming one of the best in world in her profession).


Muy bien....but does that mean I should be jealous of her?!

tenn_ace
Jul 27th, 2004, 11:59 AM
but does that mean I should be jealous of her?!


why are you asking me? you are already...

bandabou
Jul 27th, 2004, 12:11 PM
why are you asking me? you are already...


Hell no I ainīt...please, everybody gets what they deserve and what they work for. Iīm totally happy with what I got.

vutt
Jul 27th, 2004, 12:14 PM
I mean she's beautiful, talented and the Wimbledon Champion. I've read some previous threads and some weird people have been using words like :

"too thin"
"pale"
"not talented" So in your world everybody should love her. :p

She won Wimbledon and hurt in the process a lot of other players fans feelings. You have to be blind if you can't see that. Next time try to think before asking souch questions.

tennnisfannn
Jul 27th, 2004, 12:16 PM
I mean she's beautiful, talented and the Wimbledon Champion. I've read some previous threads and some weird people have been using words like :

"too thin" - she's not thin, perfect model looks ( people who say she's thin are obviously fat ugly bastards).

"pale" - She has perfect colour skin, if anything she is quite dark. People who say she's pale must be colourblind

"not talented" - best grass court player in the world at the age of 17. Just cos she's beautiful does NOT mean she's not talented.

Harsh words, lay off her. If you wanna say good things about your fav players, then thats fine, but don't dis others!Show me a player that hasn't been criticised and I will show you a player that has accomplished squat. If you were to rate the most criticed in terms of looks and talent you would have the list in this order serena, venus, Jen, JHH, Lindsay myskina and now maria and the list could go on. If you were to rank the most successful the list would be the same exact one. if you are a Maria fan, fasten your seatbelt, grow a thick skin coz it is only just beginning. There is no winning for her, if she wins anymore she shall surely be crucified on this board and shortly by the media, if she never wins anything big she shall be forever criticised as a one salm wonder.

Matt Clarke
Jul 27th, 2004, 12:16 PM
So in your world everybody should love her. :p

She won Wimbledon and hurt in the process a lot of other players fans feelings. You have to be blind if you can't see that. Next time try to think before asking souch questions.

but saying things like "too thin", "pale" is wrong becasue its not true. is it?

tenn_ace
Jul 27th, 2004, 12:17 PM
Hell no I ainīt...please, everybody gets what they deserve and what they work for. Iīm totally happy with what I got.

you don't come across like you are... use the mirror more ofthen, will you?

bandabou
Jul 27th, 2004, 12:24 PM
you don't come across like you are... use the mirror more ofthen, will you?


Hmmm...remember when you point on someone, there are three fingers pointing back to you.

tenn_ace
Jul 27th, 2004, 12:26 PM
Hmmm...remember when you point on someone, there are three fingers pointing back to you.

leaving this thread for good... you really are dragging me down to your level. no, thanks.

vutt
Jul 27th, 2004, 12:31 PM
but saying things like "too thin", "pale" is wrong becasue its not true. is it? Nope. It's more to do with people taste I think.

It's little bit unfair from you to call people weird only because they might prefer curvy surfaces. :angel:

So stop bashing them just because they reflecting their opinions about tastes. They have not done anything to you!

Cybelle Darkholme
Jul 27th, 2004, 12:49 PM
I mean she's beautiful, talented and the Wimbledon Champion. I've read some previous threads and some weird people have been using words like :

"too thin" - she's not thin, perfect model looks ( people who say she's thin are obviously fat ugly bastards).

"pale" - She has perfect colour skin, if anything she is quite dark. People who say she's pale must be colourblind

"not talented" - best grass court player in the world at the age of 17. Just cos she's beautiful does NOT mean she's not talented.

Harsh words, lay off her. If you wanna say good things about your fav players, then thats fine, but don't dis others!
thin? she does look thin but not unhealthy thin like daniela used to look.

pale? she looks normal to me.

talented? Of course shes talented she just won wimbledon. Best grass court player? sorry but there are people with better records than her on grass including serena, venus, and davenport. hell conchita has a better record than sharapova.

maybe people cant stand her because her fans hype her up so much and she hasnt accomplished as much as other players like justine.

tenn_ace
Jul 27th, 2004, 01:01 PM
.

talented? Of course shes talented she just won wimbledon. Best grass court player? sorry but there are people with better records than her on grass including serena, venus, and davenport. hell conchita has a better record than sharapova.



and that's based on what?:rolleyes:

apart from that the winning %'s in matches played on grass courts for these players are

V.Williams 82%
S.Williams 87%
L.Davenport 77%
C.Martinez 73%

and M.Sharapova is mere 91%

xan
Jul 27th, 2004, 01:06 PM
and that's based on what?:rolleyes:

apart from that the winning %'s in matches played on grass courts for these players are

V.Williams 82%
S.Williams 87%
L.Davenport 77%
C.Martinez 73%

and M.Sharapova is mere 91%
Great point. :devil:

Frank
Jul 27th, 2004, 01:27 PM
and that's based on what?:rolleyes:

apart from that the winning %'s in matches played on grass courts for these players are

V.Williams 82%
S.Williams 87%
L.Davenport 77%
C.Martinez 73%

and M.Sharapova is mere 91%

The best argument is always a fact... :D Great point man!

Helen Lawson
Jul 27th, 2004, 01:33 PM
They are jealous of her the same reason people are jealous of me: We're both beautiful, talented, and successful.

tennnisfannn
Jul 27th, 2004, 02:47 PM
and that's based on what?:rolleyes:

apart from that the winning %'s in matches played on grass courts for these players are

V.Williams 82%
S.Williams 87%
L.Davenport 77%
C.Martinez 73%

and M.Sharapova is mere 91%Great stats for maria but even stats are to be taken in view of all other circumstances. venus and serena's stats though lower than Maria's are still better. 2 slams are better than one. jen is 100% in slam finals yet that doesn't begin to compare to Serena's 75%. Venus must be way too low but still better than JHH, Jen and Lindsay. No doubt Maria has started extremely well.

bandabou
Jul 27th, 2004, 03:10 PM
and that's based on what?:rolleyes:

apart from that the winning %'s in matches played on grass courts for these players are

V.Williams 82%
S.Williams 87%
L.Davenport 77%
C.Martinez 73%

and M.Sharapova is mere 91%


come back next year.

Ekkekko
Jul 27th, 2004, 03:34 PM
What makes you think that SOME people are SO jealous of Sharapova? Is she the only PLAYER on the WTA? You must be insane to think that SOME people are SO jealous of Maria. Come to think of it, you just come across as rather sensitive. Someone who can't stand the sight of others saying things about your fave.

Frank
Jul 27th, 2004, 04:16 PM
What makes you think that SOME people are SO jealous of Sharapova? Is she the only PLAYER on the WTA? You must be insane to think that SOME people are SO jealous of Maria. Come to think of it, you just come across as rather sensitive. Someone who can't stand the sight of others saying things about your fave.

Your signature is right though...

tenn_ace
Jul 27th, 2004, 06:13 PM
come back next year.

we are talking as of now (in case you can't read:wavey: )...

Dave B
Jul 27th, 2004, 06:16 PM
I am way too busy being jealous of Ms. Stevenson to be jealous of Masha. :wavey:

Cybelle Darkholme
Jul 27th, 2004, 07:11 PM
and that's based on what?:rolleyes:

apart from that the winning %'s in matches played on grass courts for these players are

V.Williams 82%
S.Williams 87%
L.Davenport 77%
C.Martinez 73%

and M.Sharapova is mere 91%
my god this is the most naive post i've seen yet. Come back when you get a clue.

Gonzo Hates Me!
Jul 27th, 2004, 08:05 PM
I dont think people are jealous of her. But I think people kind of resent her--like they dont want her around. She has had this great success at 17 and now she is everywhere, and a huge part of her attention is from her looks. And we all know that Sharapova is no bombshell like Angelina Jolie or anything. But compared to the rest of the WTA, she has been given the role of the bombshell, and people who aren't attracted to the things that make her who she is today don't want to accept that she is the bomshell, 'cause she's not a bombshell--to EVERYONE. But as much as they rightully disagree with it (to each his own), even though it easily makes sense (life is shallow), it bothers people and they have a lot of hostility towards Maria.

But I agree with whoever said that stuff up there about fastening your seat belt. Things will be said about Maria dude. get over it. All that matters is that you love her, she's having success, and best of all, that's killing people.

thelittlestelf
Jul 27th, 2004, 08:16 PM
I am not JEALOUS of her I just get mad at people who take out my faves in tournaments. I have no reason to be jealous of her!

thelittlestelf
Jul 27th, 2004, 08:20 PM
and that's based on what?:rolleyes:

apart from that the winning %'s in matches played on grass courts for these players are

V.Williams 82%
S.Williams 87%
L.Davenport 77%
C.Martinez 73%

and M.Sharapova is mere 91%

A few posts ago you were "officially leaving this thread because you dont want to stoop down to our level" and now you are making mindless posts and rolling your eyes at us!!!

Well I :rolleyes: to YOU ;).

tennisIlove09
Jul 27th, 2004, 08:23 PM
Here's my question? Why is it jealousy every time someone doesn't like a player? News flash: some people just don't like players just because! Jealousy has nothing to do with it. You hear is a lot with Venus/Serena fans. They claim others are "jealous". And now Sharapova. Maybe they just don't like them!?

Tompier
Jul 27th, 2004, 08:41 PM
and that's based on what?:rolleyes:

apart from that the winning %'s in matches played on grass courts for these players are

V.Williams 82%
S.Williams 87%
L.Davenport 77%
C.Martinez 73%

and M.Sharapova is mere 91%

It's stupid and unfair, how can you compare someone who has been apperaing in event for many, many years with someone whose number of Wimbledon appappearances = 2 :shrug: God you need a new material.

And as for me I'm no jealous of her, Lina is :)

tenn_ace
Jul 27th, 2004, 08:45 PM
my god this is the most naive post i've seen yet. Come back when you get a clue.
I would love to explain to you the meaning of % and why it's being used so widely... but again how can I substitute 10 years of education that you have probably missed?

tenn_ace
Jul 27th, 2004, 08:46 PM
A few posts ago you were "officially leaving this thread because you dont want to stoop down to our level" and now you are making mindless posts and rolling your eyes at us!!!

Well I :rolleyes: to YOU ;).

was I talking to you? so don't interrupt, it's impolite. and again :rolleyes:

thelittlestelf
Jul 27th, 2004, 08:48 PM
was I talking to you? so don't interrupt, it's impolite. and again :rolleyes:

How can I interrupt you in a forum?

By posting in a forum, you are talking to EVERYBODY!

tenn_ace
Jul 27th, 2004, 08:48 PM
It's stupid and unfair, how can you compare someone who has been apperaing in event for many, many years with someone whose number of Wimbledon appappearances = 2 :shrug: God you need a new material.

And as for me I'm no jealous of her, Lina is :)

it's a waste of time to argue with you because you hate everything that is remotely Russian... I have my guesses why, but leave it at that.

and again, see my post #41. it's very related to you as well.

tenn_ace
Jul 27th, 2004, 08:49 PM
How can I interrupt you in a forum?

By posting in a forum, you are talking to EVERYBODY!

a particular post, you are referring to, was directed to a particular poster. easy.

thelittlestelf
Jul 27th, 2004, 08:51 PM
a particular post, you are referring to, was directed to a particular poster. easy.

Perhaps you should spend energy speaking with the other people who "interrupted" you.

tenn_ace
Jul 27th, 2004, 08:52 PM
Perhaps you should spend energy speaking with the other people who "interrupted" you.

you are not making any sense. bye.

tterb
Jul 27th, 2004, 09:27 PM
apart from that the winning %'s in matches played on grass courts for these players are

V.Williams 82%
S.Williams 87%
L.Davenport 77%
C.Martinez 73%

and M.Sharapova is mere 91%

:lol: You do realize that winning percentages mean nothing unless the players compared have played for the same amount of time. Maria's percentage will drop unless she wins Wimbledon every year. Even if she gets to the final next year, her winning percentage drops to 89%. Wait until she's played as many Wimbledons as the players you mentioned, then compare them.

As for the thread's question, refer to tennisIlove09's post. Why should everyone like every player? And if they don't like a player, why is it immediately termed 'jealousy'? Many people don't like when a player is shoved in their faces as the savior of tennis. That isn't Maria's fault, of course, but it doesn't make it any less annoying to some people. She's obviously talented - untalented players don't win grand slams - but her game isn't really new or different, IMHO, and I don't like being told that it is. Nor is she indisputably the best, or going to be the best, because of one win. She still has a lot to prove. But she's still young, and I have no doubt she will rise to the occassion... As I said, I believe she's very talented. But time will tell if she will be the best. Until that time, I think that extreme opinions many have formed about Maria (i.e. 'Maria is the BEST EVER' or 'Maria is a fluke winner with NO TALENT') are ungrounded.

Like tennnisfannn said, all successful players are criticized. The media and fans build up rising stars only to knock them down when they start to do too well. That's just the way it is, fair or not. You can't take things too personally. This was all discussed in several threads started right after Wimbledon... There's not much new to be said.

And lastly... looks don't matter, tennis does. That's just my silly point of view, anyway. For the record, I think Maria is attractive, but nothing extraordinary. Should I be ridiculed for my tastes in women because I don't agree with you and the media that she is stunning? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder - it is completely subjective. Completely. Subjective.

Frank
Jul 27th, 2004, 09:30 PM
Wow! A sensible post! Finally!

Doc
Jul 27th, 2004, 09:40 PM
:lol: You do realize that winning percentages mean nothing unless the players compared have played for the same amount of time. Maria's percentage will drop unless she wins Wimbledon every year. Even if she gets to the final next year, her winning percentage drops to 89%. Wait until she's played as many Wimbledons as the players you mentioned, then compare them.

That is a futile suggestion, since on that basis you could never compare anyone unless they'd been playing for an identical amount of time!

What we are interested in, is not who was best Grass Court player 5 years ago, but who is best grass-court player now. You could argue that we should compare the last two years results of Maria with the last two years results of everyone else, but to argue that we can't do any comparisons for another five years is just silly. :confused:

This arose because a poster insisted that players like Serena and Martinez had better records on grass than Maria. This was shown to be false by the figures of actual performance.

tterb
Jul 27th, 2004, 10:00 PM
I see your point, Doc. At this moment in time, I don't think you can deny that Maria is the best grass court player. She won Wimbledon and Birmingham, and nobody else matched those results. She had the best grass season of anyone.

I thought those percentages had been posted to prove Maria is a better grasscourt player overall than those mentioned. Which, in my mind, would be a silly argument. The grass season is so short it's difficult to get an accurate assessment of the players, IMHO... By that I mean it's hard to evaluate with only 3 or so tournaments on the surface. Not much time for the players to adapt. I think that's probably one reason why Wimbledon takes into account the past years' grass results when doing seedings.

That is to say, does anyone believe Anastasia is the best overall clay player simply due to her performance at RG? Obviously she must be one of the best to win the biggest clay tournament, and she was certainly the best clay player for two weeks at RG. But she hadn't done much on the surface up to that point, which makes it difficult to say that she's the best player PERIOD on clay.

Does that make sense?

Frank
Jul 27th, 2004, 10:04 PM
Stupid question: What does IMHO mean?

tterb
Jul 27th, 2004, 10:05 PM
It means "in my humble opinion," Knerf. :)

Frank
Jul 27th, 2004, 10:06 PM
I could've guessed that myself I guess. Thanks!

Leo_DFP
Jul 27th, 2004, 10:08 PM
Sharapova isnt that beautiful .... i don't mind the girl but she is overrated in both tennis and looks.

Maybe i wouldn't be so annoyed at her if she wasnt shoved in my face 24/7 by the media and posters on this message board .... i mean realli .... when a new thread entitled "Where are all the maria threads gone" and then the message saying "why isn't anyone talking about Maria anymore yada yada yada" then it has gone too far.

She won a grandslam at 17 ..... wow so did Martina .... therefore Martina outshines Maria, she is nothing new. She is beautiful ...... arguable .... kournikova is better along with many other players. She has a personality ..... lots of players have personalities. She is nothing special.
:worship:

This thread is laughable.

Frank
Jul 27th, 2004, 10:09 PM
:worship:

This thread is laughable.

At least someone is having fun reading this... :)

tterb
Jul 27th, 2004, 10:12 PM
I'd also like to say that I'm in no way trying to bash Maria. Her win was very impressive. I guess I just have a hard time calling ANYONE the best overall player on any surface unless there is serious domination to back it up. And the grass season is so short that it's hard to call anything domination, especially as close as some of Maria's matches were.

This doesn't take away from the fact that Maria performed the best on grass this season, though. And she was the best player at Wimbledon. That's pretty indisputable. :)

EDIT: I sound so PC, don't I? :p

volta
Jul 27th, 2004, 10:18 PM
Sharapova isnt that beautiful .... i don't mind the girl but she is overrated in both tennis and looks.

Maybe i wouldn't be so annoyed at her if she wasnt shoved in my face 24/7 by the media and posters on this message board .... i mean realli .... when a new thread entitled "Where are all the maria threads gone" and then the message saying "why isn't anyone talking about Maria anymore yada yada yada" then it has gone too far.

She won a grandslam at 17 ..... wow so did Martina .... therefore Martina outshines Maria, she is nothing new. She is beautiful ...... arguable .... kournikova is better along with many other players. She has a personality ..... lots of players have personalities. She is nothing special.
AMEN 2 that :worship: Serena also had a slam at 17 and now she has 6 or so.
Amen 2 that also

Tompier
Jul 27th, 2004, 10:26 PM
it's a waste of time to argue with you because you hate everything that is remotely Russian... I have my guesses why, but leave it at that.

:rolleyes: Is it so hard to admit you were wrong ?


and again, see my post #41. it's very related to you as well.

:lol: I think I'm more educated then you are. As the matter of fact I can see it :)

Andy123
Jul 27th, 2004, 10:31 PM
Beating Serena Williams in the Wimbledon final aged 17 is enough to justify that Maria is already a great tennis player. not many people will be able to say they have done that in their tennis career. She will have many grand slams left to come, i think.

Doc
Jul 27th, 2004, 10:33 PM
I see your point, Doc. At this moment in time, I don't think you can deny that Maria is the best grass court player. She won Wimbledon and Birmingham, and nobody else matched those results. She had the best grass season of anyone.

I thought those percentages had been posted to prove Maria is a better grasscourt player overall than those mentioned. Which, in my mind, would be a silly argument. The grass season is so short it's difficult to get an accurate assessment of the players, IMHO... By that I mean it's hard to evaluate with only 3 or so tournaments on the surface. Not much time for the players to adapt. I think that's probably one reason why Wimbledon takes into account the past years' grass results when doing seedings.

Indeed, tt. It's a short season (too short), yet it is still important and deserves to be evaluated somehow - since results on grass are significantly different to those on clay - or even hard courts. If the grass season was six weeks instead of four, would we get very different results? Maybe a few more players would adapt to the surface, maybe not, but its up to them.

So we have to work with what we've got, and recent results are quite decisive.

The winning %'s in matches played on grass courts over the past two yearsfor these players are

M.Sharapova 91%

V.Williams 78%
S.Williams 93%
L.Davenport 77%
C.Martinez 64%

This puts Serena marginally ahead of Sharapova over the two years, but Venus and Serena's averages come from just two singles appearances each, while those for Sharapova come from four singles tournaments.

The winning %'s in matches played on grass courts this year for these players are

M.Sharapova 100%

V.Williams 50%
S.Williams 86%
L.Davenport 83%
C.Martinez 75%

That is to say, does anyone believe Anastasia is the best overall clay player simply due to her performance at RG? Obviously she must be one of the best to win the biggest clay tournament, and she was certainly the best clay player for two weeks at RG. But she hadn't done much on the surface up to that point, which makes it difficult to say that she's the best player PERIOD on clay.

Does that make sense?

But the figures used for grass cover the whole grass season, not just Wimbledon. For some players (the Williams), their grass season WAS Wimbledon, so that is all that there is to measure their performance on. But for others, there are other tournaments to include. So this is not the same as measuring clay performance ONLY on Roland Garros as you suggest. Clay performance needs to be measured over the entire season, not just RG. So I would not rate Myskina as top clay court player just because she won RG. Doing the sums for clay would take a lot longer due to the greater number of tournaments, but it can be done.

Crazy_Fool
Jul 27th, 2004, 10:43 PM
Its difficult to measure a grass court season though, as there is only Wimby and a bunch of 3rd rate tournaments that no-one cares about, and most of the top players don't play.

Clay is played over a considerable period of time, and has some major non-slam tournaments(Berlin, Rome), where there is tougher competition. Its too difficult to judge a player on one season of grass alone imo.

tterb
Jul 27th, 2004, 10:48 PM
That's exactly what I was trying to say, Crazy. :D

The grass season is just too short :fiery:. For many players, it just takes just one bad match and the season's done. There's only one big tournament on which to base everyone's play.

Harju.
Jul 28th, 2004, 12:11 AM
Next time, when Momo wins US Open, we Momo fans, would assure you that there won't be such thread around :haha:

Ekkekko
Jul 28th, 2004, 02:09 AM
Next time, when Momo wins US Open, we Momo fans, would assure you that there won't be such thread around :haha:
HoOvErPhOnIc is right on this one...Spot on, mate! :lick: