PDA

View Full Version : Recent success of Emilie Loit? are you surprised?


rhz
Apr 25th, 2004, 01:05 AM
I'm not. We got a chance to see her vs Serena at last year OZ Open and almost sending Serena packing. She has a natural talent. and being a left helped her to trouble her opponent. Nice lefty serve and big forehand. Her problem was her fitness level, and she has been a lot more fitter than a couple years back.

Excellent doubles player, and it's about time she has great results in singles too.

What do you think about her?

Volcana
Apr 25th, 2004, 03:48 AM
Surprised? No.

Impressed. No.

In the April 19th rankings, Loit is #27. Look at the rankings of who she beat in the April 19th rankings.

Casablanca MAR
WT 05 Apr 2004 - 11 Apr 2004 Clay (O)
Entry: DA Seed: 1
32 W #408 MIRZA...... (IND) 5-7 6-4 6-2
16 W #104 TALAJA..... (CRO) 6-2 5-7 6-4
QF W # 80 MARRERO.... (ESP) 7-5 6-4
SF W # 88 GRANDE..... (ITA) 7-6 6-3
FR W # 72 CERVANOVA.. (SVK) 6-2 6-2

Estoril POR

WT 12 Apr 2004 - 18 Apr 2004 Clay (O)
Entry: DA Seed: 3
32 W # 84 CALLENS.... (BEL) 6-2 6-2
16 W # 72 CERVANOVA.. (SVK) 6-2 6-0
QF W # 74 KOUKALOVA.. (CZE) 6-3 2-6 6-4
SF W # 80 MARRERO.... (ESP) 6-4 6-4
FR W # 57 BENESOVA... (CZE) 7-5 7-6

The problem with that victory near-victory over Serena is she didn't follow it up with more play on that level. I eventually decided that match had more to do with Serena being off than Loit being good.
Having said that, I have to concede that most WTA players never win ONE tournament in their careers, let alone two. But she IS ranked #27. Maybe it's time to step up withthe big girls and find out where she's at.

Is she playing J&S?

faboozadoo15
Apr 25th, 2004, 03:53 AM
The problem with that victory over Serena is she didn't follow it up with more play on that level.
the problem with that "victory" is that she lost the match. seemed like a victory to her though i guess and maybe it's taken a while for her to follow that up nicely.

Volcana
Apr 25th, 2004, 04:01 AM
the problem with that "victory" is that she lost the match. seemed like a victory to her though i guess and maybe it's taken a while for her to follow that up nicely.
Oops! Corrected above.

Mr_Molik
Apr 25th, 2004, 04:03 AM
i agree, her victories werent very impressive.
shes proven she can beat the lower ranked players, she now has to step it up and beat some top 30 players

alextreiber04
Apr 25th, 2004, 04:05 AM
The fact is some people like Anna Kournikova can beat tons of Top 10 players and not win a title and still be critizied for it. While Emilie Loit has won two titles and only losers like you (Volcana) will actually look at the rankings of some of the players.

CanadianGuy
Apr 25th, 2004, 04:05 AM
No, there are players who win title later in their lives than Emelie, not to mention she is good, tho blooms later than many.

brunof
Apr 25th, 2004, 04:22 AM
I remember seeing her a few years ago, maybe 2000 when she faced and lost to Venus Williams in the third round of the French Open. You could see the talent (even Mac said it) of Loit, but then she really not in that great of tennis shape at all. I am amazed at some of the angles she produces, they are quite nice -- she is a talented player indeed.

A look at a few other players she has beaten, higher ranked ones at least ;)


Took Conchita to 3 at Roland Garros 97.
Beat Magdalena in 98 when Magdalena wasn't Magdalena.
Narrowly lost to Tauziat in the next round.
Had her best result at a grand slam (still stands) by reaching the fourth round of the Australian Open, beating Lucic, then Smashnova and upset 9th seeded Conchita Martinez. No notable wins after that. :confused: :o
A dead year in 00.
Pushed Farina-Elia to 3 in 02. Beat Likhovtseva.
Improved her record against Conchita Martinez to 2-1 upsetting her in Acapulco.
ITF - Won 50K Dinan, and Cagnes-Sur-Mer in 02.
Pushed Serena to three in Australia.
Beat Chanda Rubin (then top 10?) in Rome as LL.
Beat Elena Dementieva in Strasbourg.
Beat then top near top 30 Alexandra Stevenson 2 times in 02.
Sent Maria Sharapova packing at the US Open 03, losing to Capriati in three sets.
When ya look at it, she has had a good career, but 04 has been really good to her. She pushed Davenport in Australia before injuring herself and hobbled off the court in the third set losing it 0-6. The highest ranked player she has faced is Davenport. The highest ranked player she has beaten this year is Tanasugarn, who sits at a sad 56. :eek: :o

sunnysideup
Apr 25th, 2004, 05:32 AM
She's a very talented player. Her game could give tremendous problems to the top players; she just needs to believe in herself more.;)

Jakeev
Apr 25th, 2004, 05:39 AM
Perhap winning back to back lower Tier events, and in 10 matches the highest ranked opponent was ranked 57 may not be that impressive, but is still important to Emilie regardless.

Will she do better against higher ranked players? Who knows but you have to admit when you win titles, regardless of how prestigous or not, it does well for our confidence.

Perhaps now Emilie will become a consistent performer. And then again, maybe not. But she is a tournament champion so just give her props were it is due and for now leave it at that.

switz
Apr 25th, 2004, 05:49 AM
she has been playing low tier tournaments this year to get her ranking up. winning 2 tournaments back to back is a great achievement and it something lefties love doing on clay eg serna last year and patty in 98.

emile has a lethal forehand, a strong net game, a decent backhand and effective serve. i think her size (or lack there of) and absence of coetzer like speed to compensate will prevent her from reaching the very top echelons of the game, but she has shown she can stand toe to toe with the biggest power hitters in the game (easily winning sets of serena, davenport and capriati) and now that she appears to have gained a lot more consistantcy i really do believe she could reach the top 15 or maybe even sneak into the top ten at some stage in her career (maybe the end of it like many french women seem to eg testud, tauziat, halard-decugis)

azza
Apr 25th, 2004, 07:02 AM
hey impressed u should be beating 10 people in a row in way impressive

Mateo Mathieu
Apr 25th, 2004, 07:06 AM
Is she playing J&S?
No, she commited Budapest in the same week! :)

esquímaux
Apr 25th, 2004, 07:37 AM
Surprised? No (I was bound to happen, but two tournies in a row :eek: )
Impressed? Very! (After wining her first tourney, she didn't let success derail her momentum)

SpikeyAidanm
Apr 25th, 2004, 07:38 AM
Every year someone performs real well on clay, last year it was Serna, now it's Emilie :p

KingA
Apr 25th, 2004, 07:50 AM
I actually think that Loit is under-achieving... Her game is so tricky and nice to watch.... I hope she will do well in French Open....

*JR*
Apr 25th, 2004, 10:37 PM
I guess Loo-WAH has given a ray of hope to Forgotten French Femmes Foretz and Razzano.

rhz
Apr 26th, 2004, 06:43 AM
she is now seeded first for Budapest... can she win her 3rd this year?

Jane
Apr 26th, 2004, 03:41 PM
I am not at all surprised. I first noticed Emilie when she played Monica at OZ, 2001. Even though Monica won in straight sets, Emilie was giving her good fight. She is starting to reap the benefits of her improved fitness and I am sure two titles will lift her confidence. I find it annoying when people denigrate a tournament win as only a minor title. There are only 60 tournaments a year on the tour, winning any one of them is hard: Winning two back to back is impressive.

Knizzle
Apr 26th, 2004, 03:48 PM
I'm not surprised. The girl has game. She just needs consistency if she wants to beat the top players. She played brilliantly for most of the match against Capriati at the US Open 2003 third round, but she couldn't sustain it.

apoet29
Apr 26th, 2004, 03:55 PM
I think everyone has their time, and for Emilie, these wins have been a long time coming. Yes, Anna has probably beaten more top ten players, and that is certainly commendable, but she was never able to go to the next step even in the lower tiered tournaments that she started playing a couple of years ago. A tournament win is a win and as Jane put it, out of 60 tournaments played in a year, it is difficult to get one win much less two back-to-back, so I think Emilie deserves credit for her wins and should be congratulated, especially for getting them at this point in her career.

esquímaux
Apr 26th, 2004, 03:56 PM
I guess Loo-WAH has given a ray of hope to Forgotten French Femmes Foretz and Razzano.

I hope so! Stephanie :help: :sad:

Volcana
Apr 26th, 2004, 07:09 PM
The fact is some people like Anna Kournikova can beat tons of Top 10 players and not win a title and still be critizied for it. While Emilie Loit has won two titles and only losers like you (Volcana) will actually look at the rankings of some of the players.Only an idiot like you would expect that being to bring your best game once every couple of months should shield you from criticism.

...

Winning two tournaments means a lot less if you don't beat one top fifty player doing it. If you had the intelligence of a rock, that would be obvious to you.

Hagar
Apr 26th, 2004, 10:17 PM
Not surprised at all. The kind of player you can't have enough of. Talented, crafty, intelligent. Always giving top players a run for their money.
Not making a lot of noise when talking (do you hear me, Alexandra Stevenson) but making a fuss with her racket.