Wildcards Accusation - TennisForum.com
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 6th, 2004, 12:28 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
MARIANO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 1,248
                     
Arrow Wildcards Accusation

I want to express my anger by the way in which the wildcards are given nowadays.

I believe that wildcards should be offered fairly among all the countries independently of the country organizer of the tournament.

Through the present system, only are benefited the players of developed countries; giving the possibility to their juniors of playing tournaments to shorter age, facilitating its professional development.

In this manner, tennis players from countries with less development are being DISCRIMINATED. They should fight by themselves, without any type of aid.

I believe this is WRONG, while members of the WTA are looking to another side.

I am really going to appreciate other opinions, contrary or not.

Thanx
MARIANO is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 6th, 2004, 11:44 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria
Posts: 5,622
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGUSTIN
I want to express my anger by the way in which the wildcards are given nowadays.

I believe that wildcards should be offered fairly among all the countries independently of the country organizer of the tournament.

Through the present system, only are benefited the players of developed countries; giving the possibility to their juniors of playing tournaments to shorter age, facilitating its professional development.

In this manner, tennis players from countries with less development are being DISCRIMINATED. They should fight by themselves, without any type of aid.

I believe this is WRONG, while members of the WTA are looking to another side.

I am really going to appreciate other opinions, contrary or not.

Thanx
With many Australian businesses contributing either thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars to this event I think they have every expectation that their contribution would be going to help local talents and not some 3rd world no name!

Their is also ticket sales that need to be considered. Locals are more likely to come to the Open if they get the chance to support local players rather than foreign no names. Also sponsorship is also going to be easier to get if companies know that they are also helping local up and coming talents.

I sympathise with players brought up in non-tennis regions and that it is harder for them, but if they really do have the talent and motivation they can make it. All they need to do is find sponsorship and learn to market themselves!

Look at players like Dally Randrientefy(Madagascar), Selima Sfar(Tunisia), Cara Black (Zimbabwe), Bahia Mouhtassine(Morocco), all from non-tennis playing countries. They have made it, sure its been a rough road for some of them but wildcards aren't the be all and end all of things.
AUSBOY is offline  
post #3 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 6th, 2004, 11:55 PM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
St.Sebastian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NORTH EAST
Posts: 6,887
                     
Well, you are both right, I'd say. However, I'd rather support your opinion AUSBOY.
The thing is different with Grand Slams. If there are 8 wildcards, more of them should be given to prospective players who don't make the cut-off, not only to the host country players.
St.Sebastian is offline  
post #4 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 7th, 2004, 12:10 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria
Posts: 5,622
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by St.Sebastian
Well, you are both right, I'd say. However, I'd rather support your opinion AUSBOY.
The thing is different with Grand Slams. If there are 8 wildcards, more of them should be given to prospective players who don't make the cut-off, not only to the host country players.
I think the Australian Open is the fairest of the Slams. We have an Asian wildcard in men and womens singles and doubles, we have the French Exchange wildcards. We have also had British womens main draw and qualifying exchanges before as well as a US Open womens main draw exchange. The Australian Open at least does give some hope to up and comers, particularly in Asia to get a wildcard.
AUSBOY is offline  
post #5 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 7th, 2004, 12:46 PM
Senior Member
 
ozfan44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Australia
Posts: 15,751
                     
yeah if u wanna whinge about anyone have a go at the us open all they do is usa usa usa usa usa
ozfan44 is offline  
post #6 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 14th, 2004, 07:06 PM
Guest
 
*JR*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: On the Peace Train
Posts: 34,247
                     
Ultimately, the ITF (which ovasees the Slams) probably needs to adjust to changing geographic realities. 3 of the 4 Slams are now held in countries where the main language is English, the other in one just ova a narrow waterway from one of those. Russia has more ppl than all of those but the US, and more Promising Players than any other.

The native lands of the main candidates for "best woman of the Open Era" (pending the what the W/S and MAYBE Belgians do the next few years, of course) are all "non-Slam" countries. (Martina I, Monica, and Steffi, I think most would agree, in whatever order one prefers). Perhaps they could add a couple?
*JR* is offline  
post #7 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 18th, 2004, 11:36 AM
Senior Member
 
Melly Flew Us's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: i love mike
Posts: 2,090
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by AUSBOY
With many Australian businesses contributing either thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars to this event I think they have every expectation that their contribution would ... not some 3rd world no name!
as opposed to some local no name?

i cogratulate TA on it's wildcard selection this yr, 'specially for young olivia. bravo.

however there is more scope for fairer distribution. In fact TA are in the forefront: they have an agreement with the fft, hence some french wildcards, and also TA also wants 2 encourage regional following, hence a WC to UZB in men's and TPE in women's.

Quote:
Originally Posted by it-girl View Post
Let's just put it like this, there is Justine Bieber (I just threw up a little) who ... is hyped far beyond his talent.

Then you have Michael Jackson & that name speaks for itself, no hype needed at all.
Melly Flew Us is offline  
post #8 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 18th, 2004, 12:56 PM
The hottest straight, goth rocker on the board
Admin Emeritus
 
The Crow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Belgium
Posts: 34,116
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by AUSBOY
I think the Australian Open is the fairest of the Slams. We have an Asian wildcard in men and womens singles and doubles, we have the French Exchange wildcards. We have also had British womens main draw and qualifying exchanges before as well as a US Open womens main draw exchange. The Australian Open at least does give some hope to up and comers, particularly in Asia to get a wildcard.
That's not fair at all. I can understand they want to give WC's to their own young players for their own event, but that exchange thing, what's that all about? Basically, this bottles down to wanting their own players (who aren't good enough to enter main or qualifying draw) to enter a GS on the other side of the world. For what? Not to lure more spectators, that's for sure. No, it's to give their own youth more chances, chances that players of other countries don't get!

If only I was sure that my head on the door was a dream
The Crow is offline  
post #9 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 18th, 2004, 01:02 PM
country flag New
Senior Member
 
New's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Singapore!
Posts: 23,209
                     
Thumbs up

Well...there is no exchange in terms of asia...cos there's no grand slam for asia! ...so i guess the aus open is pretty fair.

Don't be deceived by the rankings!! Coria, Mirnyi, Schuettler, Fish, Safin, Henman, Tursunov, Wawrinka, Federer, Serena, Bovina, Li Na, Dementieva, Zvonareva, Sugiyama, Coetzer, Tanasugarn, Kumkhum, Zheng, Dokic and Kournikova are the world's best tennis players!!!


S'PORE'S ONLY JUNIOR, LEE WEI PING
New is offline  
post #10 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 18th, 2004, 10:50 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Israel
Posts: 3,895
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by AUSBOY
With many Australian businesses contributing either thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars to this event I think they have every expectation that their contribution would be going to help local talents and not some 3rd world no name!
mmm... Kia and Heineken are owned by Australians? that's news to me...

PAW Record
Career high ranking: 6 (16/10/2005)
Current Ranking: 40, 789 pts, 35 tournaments
2007 race to the championship: 26, 293 pts, 8 tournaments
Year-end Ranking: 2006 - 46, 2005 - 8, 2004 - 63, 2003 - 146

Career Highlights:
Winner: 2006 - Beijing, 2005 - Sydney, Budapest, Hasselt
Runner-up: 2006 - Prague, 2005 - Hyderabad, Forest Hills, Los Angeles YEC
Semifinal: 2006 - Paris, Bogota, 2004 - Sopot
Quarterfinal: 2005 - Prague, Modena, 2004 - Indian Wells, Stockholm, Seoul, Filderstadt
nitsansh is offline  
post #11 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 19th, 2004, 02:10 PM
Jem
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,285
                     
One point that may be missing in this debate is the fact that the four Grand Slams help fund all of the development/junior tournaments in the world. For example, when you have a South American challenger/satellite circuit, at least half if not more of the money comes from the profits generated by the Grand Slams. I think the current wildcard selections are fine -- seems to me the host countries should be able to pick the players they want. I thought the USTA did a good job last year with its wildcards. They went to a lot of up-and-coming players. I think Australia is going to great lengths to give Asian players a chance. And I like the way that Great Britain has tweaked its wildcard system to make the British players fight a little harder for the glory.
Jem is offline  
post #12 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 26th, 2004, 03:40 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
MARIANO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 1,248
                     
so?
MARIANO is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome