TennisForum.com - View Single Post - Peak Kournikova v. Peak Vaidisova?

View Single Post
post #53 of (permalink) Old Nov 18th, 2012, 08:36 PM
country flag Halepsova
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,942
                     
Re: Peak Kournikova v. Peak Vaidisova?

Quote:
Originally Posted by KournikovaFan91 View Post


Using the title argument surely Smashnova with her 19 is one of the greatest players to never win a slam

Apart from Smashnova Kournikova lost her finals to Venus and Hingis whereas Nicole beat Granville, Razzano, Peng and Tati (by retirement) plus when Kournikova was losing in Tier I and II she was losing in QF and SF to people like Hingis, Venus, Seles, Graf, Davenport, and Pierce all slam winners.

Maybe this thread should be WWW: Peak Stacey Tan vs Peak Bruna Colosio. No way would Anna lose 6-2, 6-1 to Stacey Tan who never even made Top 500. When you take their most embarrassing losses at least Colosio was a Top 300 player.

I personally like Nicole but to say she is immensely better than Kournikova is ridiculous, had Anna played in the same era she would have had a similar if not better career than Nicole, Anna's years on tour were possibly the toughest, whereas Nicole was peaking 2006-2008 a pretty weak time for the WTA.
Your opinion is dismissed because of your username. Total bias.
Come back when you are someone else's fan.
Halepsova is offline  
 
 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome