TennisForum.com - View Single Post - Who is better: Mauresmo or Sabatini?
View Single Post
post #12 of (permalink) Old Oct 8th, 2012, 07:09 PM
country flag Patrick345
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 30,040
                     
Re: Who is better: Mauresmo or Sabatini?

I donīt know whether I would say the stats back up that Mauresmo had a better career. Itīs virtually equal.

77% Winning percentage vs. 70% Winning Percentage
0 weeks as #1 vs. 39 weeks as #1
27 vs. 25 titles singles
13 vs. 3 titles doubles
1 Slam vs. 2 Slams
2 Slam finals vs. 1 Slam final
15 Slam semifinals vs. 5 Slam semifinals
10 Slam quarters vs. 9 Slam quarters

Basically one had to contend in a top heavier era with a harder ranking system, while the other had to contest in a deeper era with a softer ranking system. It is reflected in their results. Sabatini has more titles, a higher winning percentage and the more consistent Slam results. Mauremso has more Slams and more weeks as #1. Personally I think either could have achieved what the other did, if you switch their time in history.

I am not a fan of the direction a lot of Maria threads have taken over the last 12 months.
The undertone is very disappointing, aggressive and the comments are sometimes rude to a player just trying to earn a living, playing her hardest and having a good amount of success given her god given, natural talents.
You made the list: NEW President Bouchard, Cibulkova, Mladenovic, Wozniacki, Kerber, Cornet, Watson, Broady.
Please note this is a signature about Tatjana Maria
Patrick345 is offline  
 
 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome