Here is an interesting Lindsay article regarding Larry Scott - TennisForum.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 22 (permalink) Old Sep 12th, 2006, 11:41 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Lindsayfan32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,612
                     
Here is an interesting Lindsay article regarding Larry Scott

Here is an article that was written after Lindsay's Monday press conference in Bali its from the Jakarta post and it seems sueing Mr Scott and the tour might be back on. Here is the article. Links on the bottom if you want to read the orginal and in case anyone is intersted Lindsay won her 1st round 7-5 6-1

Davenport glad to be back in Bali




Bruce Emond, The Jakarta Post, Nusa Dua, Bali

Lindsay Davenport is in a very different place today from this time last year.

Then, she was coming off a strong summer, despite having lost an achingly close Wimbledon final to Venus Williams. She went on to take the Wismilak International title here, a tournament experience she called the best of her career.

Now, the 30-year-old Californian is on the comeback trail. The former world number one is only seeded three, her ranking falling to 12th after injury and a freak accident -- she blacked out and hit her head at home -- limited her to 13 tournaments this season.

Although she says she is happy to be back playing again, she is still smarting from a dispute with the WTA Tour administration. She talked at length in an Aug. 22 New York Times article about the row over special wildcard exemptions, but said she would not sue, because "it's just not my style".

Speaking to The Jakarta Post on Monday at the tournament's opening, Davenport said it might take court proceedings to settle the matter.

She gave up US$500,000 in bonus money in order not to have to commit a year ahead to 2006's demanding schedule. But she believed she had clarified with WTA Tour CEO Larry Scott that she would be able to receive wildcards for direct entry to tournaments; he was not forthcoming when she did came back from injury in August.

"It's a very long and complicated story," she told the Post. "It's unfortunate. It's about a lot of rules, and about discussions I had with the CEO, and the agreements that I thought we had and he did not follow through with."

Pointedly, Davenport never refers to Scott, a former men's player and ATP Tour executive, by name. She stressed she was not asking for special treatment.

"It was a rule I felt I was eligible for. He then chose not to give it to me. As for his reasons, I will never know. I didn't want any special favors, I was adamant that I don't believe in that anyway...

"And I think now it will probably be a matter for a court of law to decide."

Scott could not be reached for comment Monday; he told the Times that while he felt bad about Davenport's reaction, "... I'm sending a signal that we have to toughen up our entry and commitment rules".

During her time away, Davenport enjoyed a rare period of domesticity with her husband of three years, Jon Leach. She did not watch any women's tennis: "It's hard to watch a tournament that you are not part of..."

With 51 titles, including three grand slams, and more than $22 million in prize money in her 13-year professional career, Davenport could have easily settled into a quiet retirement. Instead, she found she missed competing, and even the tough practice required to return. "I've come back to enjoy it," she said.

Although Davenport is in Bali along with top seed and world number seven Svetlana Kuznetsova, the event, as with so many tournaments recently, has been hit by withdrawals.

She attributes the problem to the packed tournament calendar, with little letup for players to recuperate from the grind.

"The people who are running our sport could do a much better job of putting together a calendar that makes more sense, for players, for fans... Sooner or later, they will listen to us."

But she is not quite ready to say good-bye, despite speculation since her 2004 Wimbledon semifinal loss to Maria Sharapova.

"It's a week by week, month by month decision," she said. "Part of the dispute with the Tour is that they wanted me to enter tournaments eight months in advance, and at my age and with my health, that's not possible."

As for her legacy to the game, she is magnanimous.

"... I'm not the greatest player who ever played. But I feel that I've done things a bit differently... I've shown that you can act with a certain level of class and respect for other players."

http://www.thejakartapost.com/detail...912.B08&irec=7
Lindsayfan32 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 22 (permalink) Old Sep 12th, 2006, 01:21 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: PimPim's Place
Posts: 4,866
                     
If she goes to court, she's going to lose. The WTA treating her that way after years on tour isn't nice, but it's not illegal.
Andrew.. is offline  
post #3 of 22 (permalink) Old Sep 12th, 2006, 01:24 PM
Senior Member
 
mike/topgun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,937
                     
So will she ger her GEE status if she's not gonna commit till next years July?

THE COMEBACK of Lindsay Davenport
the purest striker of the ball

Aga&Ula Marta Masha Vee&Ree Ana Nastya Eleni Patty Mary
mike/topgun is offline  
post #4 of 22 (permalink) Old Sep 12th, 2006, 01:32 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: PimPim's Place
Posts: 4,866
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew..
If she goes to court, she's going to lose. The WTA treating her that way after years on tour isn't nice, but it's not illegal.
Rereading it...

"It's unfortunate. It's about a lot of rules, and about discussions I had with the CEO, and the agreements that I thought we had and he did not follow through with."

It looks like she had a verbal agreement with him. If so, then she does have grounds to sue, but it's hard to prove.
Andrew.. is offline  
post #5 of 22 (permalink) Old Sep 12th, 2006, 03:39 PM
Senior Member
 
mike/topgun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,937
                     
Quote:
It looks like she had a verbal agreement with him. If so, then she does have grounds to sue, but it's hard to prove.
she can't prove that, I'm afraid
it's a bona fideis obligation...it's all between Lindsay and Larry to get along, go out have a drink and have a nice conversation. What he did was not right, but it's perfectly within the rules...The main concern is that she hasn't decided yet. Maybe she should commit and then withdraw like the others...She won't change their politics towards players by fighting with them alone herself. She won't get the 500.000$ prize anyway she's to wealthy to count the money she earns. It's gonna be her last months/years on tour. Just get along with it, as long she's healthy. Sign the list Lindsay!

THE COMEBACK of Lindsay Davenport
the purest striker of the ball

Aga&Ula Marta Masha Vee&Ree Ana Nastya Eleni Patty Mary
mike/topgun is offline  
post #6 of 22 (permalink) Old Sep 12th, 2006, 07:55 PM
Senior Member
 
hurricanejeanne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 10,232
                     
It probably was a verbal agreement. And where she'd have the grounds to sue, she wouldn't be able to prove that there was an agreement.

But, what exactly is the rule she is trying to get her entries in under. I haven't heard the name of it or it's description? And have they stripped her of her Gold/Silver Exempt status?

Also, I really can't see her going to court unless she knows pretty damn sure she's going to win. She's too smart for that, and it would ruin her final months of being a pro. Not to mention be incredibly embarassing. Yeah, she's been fucked over and back stabbed but...
Andrew, Mike, and anyone else do you guys think she'll actually sue the tour over this?
hurricanejeanne is offline  
post #7 of 22 (permalink) Old Sep 12th, 2006, 09:44 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Lindsayfan32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,612
                     
I'm no legal expert but I don't think Lindsay going to go the tour and Larry Scott over a verbal agreement. I think she will go the tour and Larry Scott over the rules as they stand now. She might go restict of trade as the rules inhibit Lindsay work as a pro tennis player. I've seen ot done before a long time ago but it's possiable. Also Lindsay is not dumb she will only do it if she knows/thinks she can win and she can hire a top legal team to do it.
Lindsayfan32 is offline  
post #8 of 22 (permalink) Old Sep 12th, 2006, 10:00 PM
Senior Member
 
MH0861's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,349
                     
Well, like some have said -- she probably has some sort of evidence/basis for the lawsuit, which she's probably not talking about. I wonder if Zurich put her over the edge back to suing.

However, I think she's also doing this to make change -- win or lose, she's getting word and awareness about what Larry Scott and the WTA are doing, and maybe this can get the ball rolling to make some changes.
MH0861 is offline  
post #9 of 22 (permalink) Old Sep 12th, 2006, 10:21 PM
Senior Member
 
hurricanejeanne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 10,232
                     
Well I found the said Rule they keep refering to:
(from another article, in another thread...also posted in same thread in GM)

Rule II. A. 2. allows the tour to confer Gold Exempt Emeritus Status on a player who has won a minimum of three slams or titles, has been ranked number one at least once in her career and has “demonstrated an exceptional level of commitment and excellence on the Tour over an extended period of time.” Such a player can receive unlimited wild cards.

Davenport satisfies all of those conditions and more, so what’s the problem? I left one condition out: “The player has provided at least 14 years of service to the Tour.” According to Liz Robbins’ interview with Davenport in the NY Times earlier this week, that rule was put in so that a semi-retired Monica Seles could play on the tour.

She has the three grand slams, she's been number one for 98 weeks, and she has always throughout her career made good on her commitments.
14 years...
Lindsay played her first professional events in 1991 (that makes 15 years).
Lindsay turned professional on February 22, 1993 (that's 13 years and some odd months).
Gray area...when she began playing professional or when she turned professional?

Also me thinks, after looking at this rule, that Larry Scott probably said to her that she was indeed eligible for this rule, and upon her return she was told that she wasn't. It's an angle no one thought of. Throwing it out there.
hurricanejeanne is offline  
post #10 of 22 (permalink) Old Sep 12th, 2006, 10:26 PM
Senior Member
 
hurricanejeanne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 10,232
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by MH0861
Well, like some have said -- she probably has some sort of evidence/basis for the lawsuit, which she's probably not talking about. I wonder if Zurich put her over the edge back to suing.

However, I think she's also doing this to make change -- win or lose, she's getting word and awareness about what Larry Scott and the WTA are doing, and maybe this can get the ball rolling to make some changes.
I agree with everything, I do think Zurich pissed her off. She can go on to the next in list, but she shouldn't have to.

I am all for her getting the ball rolling for change and all, but I just don't want this to be hurtful to her tennis as a career and I don't want this to be the reason she walks away.
It's selfish as hell, but I am more concerned about Lindsay, her tennis and her mentality, right now.
hurricanejeanne is offline  
post #11 of 22 (permalink) Old Sep 13th, 2006, 02:21 AM
Senior Member
 
hurricanejeanne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 10,232
                     
Gold Exempt Emeritus Status

a. In addition to those named on the gold exempt list, the tour and the worldwide tournament may, in their discretion, in consultation with the player board of representatives agree to confer GEE to the tour year for one or more players who satisfy the following critiera:

i. the player has won three grand slam singles and/or Tour championships.
ii. the player has provide the tour with at least 14 years of service.
iii. the player has been number one in the tour rankings at anytime during her career.
iv. the player has demostrated an exceptional level of commitment and excellence to the tour over an extended period of time.

b. a player that has been confered to being GEE is entitled to the following for one tour year:

i. unlimited wild cards in both singles and doubles.
ii. the gold/silver exempt wildcard spot at tournaments an unlimited number of times reguardless of her ranking.

iii. late entry into tournament (according to Gold expemt status procedures). according to her ranking at entry deadline

iv. an exemption from the minimum commitment requirements of the tour.

c. a player that has been conferred for GEE shall not be eligible to enter a player commitment contract with the tour and her participation at tournaments shall not be used for the purposes of determining if a tournaments player commitment formula has been satisfied

And the plot thickens. Well the rule doesn't say when the fourteen years of service begins and stuff, and reading it straight from the rule book itself...I do believe Lindsay is indeed eligible for the exemption.

Therefore, she deserves to have the tour grant her GEE. I see no reason for them to not grant her this exemption. I now officially understand why she is pissed. At the tour's "discretion"....is the only loop hole.
hurricanejeanne is offline  
post #12 of 22 (permalink) Old Sep 13th, 2006, 08:55 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Lindsayfan32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,612
                     
Lindsay 15 years includes 1991 & 1992 were as a part time ameteur if they are talking about service as a pro its only 13 years and a few months. She turned pro in Febuary 1993. I hate to brust the bubble here but she might not quite fit the criteria.
Lindsayfan32 is offline  
post #13 of 22 (permalink) Old Sep 13th, 2006, 09:39 AM
Senior Member
 
mike/topgun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,937
                     
LF32
Lindsay must commit til July next year (before Oct 8th). Then she'll get her GEE Status in Feb'07. That's my guess.

THE COMEBACK of Lindsay Davenport
the purest striker of the ball

Aga&Ula Marta Masha Vee&Ree Ana Nastya Eleni Patty Mary
mike/topgun is offline  
post #14 of 22 (permalink) Old Sep 13th, 2006, 10:27 AM
Senior Member
 
hurricanejeanne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 10,232
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lindsayfan32
Lindsay 15 years includes 1991 & 1992 were as a part time ameteur if they are talking about service as a pro its only 13 years and a few months. She turned pro in Febuary 1993. I hate to brust the bubble here but she might not quite fit the criteria.
Yeah, that's the gray area, the rule doesn't state when the fourteen years of service must begin. I'm sure Lindsay feels that it begins when she played her first pro event in 1991.
With the rule not specifically stating about when the fourteen year starts, it leaves it open to interpretation. Which is probably why there's so much crap going on at the moment. But, reading it straight from the rulebook, I can see where there is confusion and I do believe she is eligible.

Also she isn't technically stripped of her G/SE status. She still has the obligations to the tour for being under said status, but she has none of the benefits of it (ie. that late entries via wildcard into tournaments).

It's sad, she may be playing one of her last tournaments ever and all she wants is to be granted GEE. It's not that hard.
I really hope she plays next year, even if that means committing to the contracts until the end of Feb. when she knows for sure she's eligible for GEE.
This whole thing is confusing and worrisome. I said it before, I am more worried about Lindsay than the tour right now.
hurricanejeanne is offline  
post #15 of 22 (permalink) Old Sep 13th, 2006, 10:45 AM
Senior Member
 
lindsayno1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 5,227
                     
at the end of the day lindsays just a number to the WTA. They still have sharapova, christine and all that malarky...

LINDSAY DAVENPORT!
Say what you like about Davenport, but shes achieved what most others could only dream of!

Jelena Jankovic
Mary Pierce MARTINA HINGIS! Kim Clijsters Ana Ivanovic
lindsayno1 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome