2011 Wildcards - Page 8 - TennisForum.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #106 of 186 (permalink) Old Aug 6th, 2010, 10:54 PM
Senior Member
 
Srodgers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 20,971
                     
Re: 2010 Wildcards

QWC's for Cincinatti:
Su-Wei Hsieh
Cara Black
Danielle Mills
Ashley Harkleroad
Julia Boserup
Chelsey Gullickson

Serena (22) & Venus (7)
Srodgers is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #107 of 186 (permalink) Old Aug 6th, 2010, 10:57 PM
Senior Member
 
simonsaystennis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 11,426
                     
Re: 2010 Wildcards

Good choices Mills got one

Serena Williams ~ Maria Sharapova ~ Venus Williams ~ Jelena Dokic ~ Melanie Oudin ~ Christina McHale

Vandeweghe ~ Mattek-Sands ~ King ~ Hampton ~ Riske ~ Glatch ~ Brengle ~ Rogers ~ Stephens ~ Boserup ~ Davis ~ Keys ~ Lepchenko ~ Falconi ~ Chirico ~ Crawford ~ Gibbs ~ Pegula ~ Min ~ Townsend ~ Duval ~ Vickery ~ Bellis ~ Ahn
simonsaystennis is offline  
post #108 of 186 (permalink) Old Aug 6th, 2010, 11:05 PM
Chip 'n Charge
 
ArturoAce.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: LA
Posts: 14,084
                     
Re: 2010 Wildcards

I'm happy they gave Hsieh an opportunity.
ArturoAce. is offline  
post #109 of 186 (permalink) Old Aug 6th, 2010, 11:09 PM
Senior Member
 
Srodgers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 20,971
                     
Re: 2010 Wildcards

I wonder if Cara Black is just playing for fun

Serena (22) & Venus (7)
Srodgers is offline  
post #110 of 186 (permalink) Old Aug 7th, 2010, 12:26 AM
College Tennis/Team USA expert
 
tennisbuddy12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,031
                     
Re: 2010 Wildcards

There are no alternates, so whoever signed in, got in.

Tennis Tipping
Singles: Won ITF Contrexeville '10, ITF Yakima '12, ITF Medellin '14, ITF Monterrey '14, ITF Asuncion '14, ITF CH-YEC '14, WTA Dubai '16
Doubles: Won WTA Bad Gastein '10 (as Q), WTA Quebec City '10 (as Q),Wimbledon '11, ITF Kansas City '11, ITF Nassau '12, ITF Yakima '12, WTA 125 Hua Hin '15

tennisbuddy12 is offline  
post #111 of 186 (permalink) Old Aug 7th, 2010, 03:44 AM
Senior Member
 
simonsaystennis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 11,426
                     
Re: 2010 Wildcards

More college players should have tried.

Serena Williams ~ Maria Sharapova ~ Venus Williams ~ Jelena Dokic ~ Melanie Oudin ~ Christina McHale

Vandeweghe ~ Mattek-Sands ~ King ~ Hampton ~ Riske ~ Glatch ~ Brengle ~ Rogers ~ Stephens ~ Boserup ~ Davis ~ Keys ~ Lepchenko ~ Falconi ~ Chirico ~ Crawford ~ Gibbs ~ Pegula ~ Min ~ Townsend ~ Duval ~ Vickery ~ Bellis ~ Ahn
simonsaystennis is offline  
post #112 of 186 (permalink) Old Aug 14th, 2010, 10:55 PM
Senior Member
 
Srodgers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 20,971
                     
Re: 2010 Wildcards

New Haven MDWC's:
Dementieva
Ivanovic
Stosur

Why cant they enter on time?????

13/38 MDWCs to Americans this year(excluding US Open)
Thats pathetic if you ask me considering we actually have some good talent coming up.

Serena (22) & Venus (7)
Srodgers is offline  
post #113 of 186 (permalink) Old Aug 14th, 2010, 11:11 PM
Dubai Love
 
Uranium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 52,611
                     
Re: 2010 Wildcards

Well Stosur because she didn't plan playing here, but she withdrew from Cincy and Montreal due to injury, so still wants match play before the Open, so she got one. Dementieva just came back from injury and needs all the matches she can get too. Ivanovic, I don't know why


Uranium is offline  
post #114 of 186 (permalink) Old Aug 17th, 2010, 12:36 AM
Senior Member
 
Amalgamate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,853
                     
Re: 2010 Wildcards

Wildcards for Us Open

1. Australian (Ferguson)
2. French
3. Girls 18's (Rogers)
4. US Wildcard Playoff (Julia Boserup, Madison Brengle, Beatrice Capra, Irina Falconi, Krista Hardebeck, Nicole Gibbs, Alison Riske)
5.
6.
7.
8.

So the remaining 4 WC's will likely be distributed between: NCCA Champ Gullickson, Vandeweghe, McHale, Stephens, and Hampton.

One of those 5 won't get a MDWC...I'm 100% sure that the USTA already knows which girl isn't getting one though, and I'm sure she knows as well.

Serena Williams
Victoria Azarenka Venus Williams
Sloane Stephens Christina McHale
Amalgamate is offline  
post #115 of 186 (permalink) Old Aug 17th, 2010, 12:54 AM
Dubai Love
 
Uranium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 52,611
                     
Re: 2010 Wildcards

I don't get why they wouldn't include that one girl in the play off though. It's most likely Gullickson, which sucks that she doesn't even get a chance at one.


Uranium is offline  
post #116 of 186 (permalink) Old Aug 17th, 2010, 07:56 AM
Senior Member
 
Amalgamate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,853
                     
Re: 2010 Wildcards

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uranium View Post
I don't get why they wouldn't include that one girl in the play off though. It's most likely Gullickson, which sucks that she doesn't even get a chance at one.

Truth USTA

Serena Williams
Victoria Azarenka Venus Williams
Sloane Stephens Christina McHale
Amalgamate is offline  
post #117 of 186 (permalink) Old Aug 17th, 2010, 09:29 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,864
                     
Re: 2010 Wildcards

Poor Gullickson, she's very talented!
shoparound is offline  
post #118 of 186 (permalink) Old Aug 17th, 2010, 03:45 PM
Dubai Love
 
Uranium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 52,611
                     
Re: 2010 Wildcards

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amalgamate View Post
Truth USTA
It is. Coco, Jamie and Christina have all proven they deserve MD WCs and IMO earned them on the WTA tour.
Sloane is up in the air, she has shown she can handle the WTA tour, but she had her big chance to earn her WC at the 18s, but lost.
Then you have all these girls 18s playing again for a chance at a Main Draw WC along with Riske, who IMO should get it and this WC playoff is stupid since Riske should get it she made a WTA event SF and took a set off Sharapova. But it gives her a chance to earn her spot.

Which brings us to Chelsey who has been given no opportunity to earn one, while all these other girls are getting chances left and right. Whether because she already has one guaranteed, maybe, but I doubt it.


Uranium is offline  
post #119 of 186 (permalink) Old Aug 18th, 2010, 03:46 AM
Senior Member
 
Amalgamate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,853
                     
Re: 2010 Wildcards

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uranium View Post
It is. Coco, Jamie and Christina have all proven they deserve MD WCs and IMO earned them on the WTA tour.
Sloane is up in the air, she has shown she can handle the WTA tour, but she had her big chance to earn her WC at the 18s, but lost.
Then you have all these girls 18s playing again for a chance at a Main Draw WC along with Riske, who IMO should get it and this WC playoff is stupid since Riske should get it she made a WTA event SF and took a set off Sharapova. But it gives her a chance to earn her spot.

Which brings us to Chelsey who has been given no opportunity to earn one, while all these other girls are getting chances left and right. Whether because she already has one guaranteed, maybe, but I doubt it.
I completely echo your sentiments. I don't know why 5 of the girls who played the 18s are getting another chance for a wildcard. It devalues winning Nationals. And therein lies where I think USTA needs to make some changes.

I've been thinking about the US Open Wildcards a lot, so I'll just ramble on the few things I have come up with.

So, you have 8 wildcards to give to the main draw of the Open. It feels to me as though the novelty of earning a MDWC into the Open has completely worn off on these girls. They expect to get one, and if they don't get it the first time they expect another shot at it. A lot of these girls are fed with a golden spoon by the USTA. Here's what I would do:

1. French

2. Australian
3. Girls 18's Champion
*Here is where I would make some changes
*I would require all age-eligible girls who are interested in receiving a wild card into the US Open (either MD or Qualifying) to play this event.
*You need to get the strongest field possible for this tournament, and I think one way to do it is to say "Hey look, if you want to get a WC into the open, you play your nation's championships. If you choose to bypass it for whatever reason, know that it can and will be used against you when it comes to wild card deliberation.
*Obviously there are going to be some exceptions (i.e. an age-eligible girl is playing in a WTA tournament). Of course this would be taken into account.
4. College Player
*I think awarding one American college player a year a MDWC really gives the collegiate athletes something to work and strive for.
*I say you first award it to the NCAA Singles winner if she is American.
*If the NCAA tourney winner is not American, then I award the MDWC to the season ending highest ranked American.
5. Another Girls 18's participant
*While she may not have won the tournament, assuming all of our best juniors did play Nationals, I presume there will be at least one or two other girls who did not win who the USTA still thinks is deserving of a wild card.
*I think this girl should have had a very strong showing at Nationals, as well as a strong summer professional record.
6. Non-age eligible
*This type of wild card would be for someone like Jamie Hampton who could not play Nationals due to her age.
*However, strong professional results over the season indicate she would be competitive in the MD of the Open
7. Non-age eligible
*This type of wild card would be for someone like Alison Riske who could not play Nationals due to her age.
*However, strong professional results over the season indicate she would be competitive in the MD of the Open
8. Playoff
*This could be reserved for 8 women who have no other avenue of obtaining a MDWC
*This WC would most likely not go to a young girl but perhaps some "older" girls who are still capable of competing at the highest level but just need some help to get into the main draw

Serena Williams
Victoria Azarenka Venus Williams
Sloane Stephens Christina McHale
Amalgamate is offline  
post #120 of 186 (permalink) Old Aug 18th, 2010, 04:45 PM
Senior Member
 
simonsaystennis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 11,426
                     
Re: 2010 Wildcards

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amalgamate View Post
I completely echo your sentiments. I don't know why 5 of the girls who played the 18s are getting another chance for a wildcard. It devalues winning Nationals. And therein lies where I think USTA needs to make some changes.

I've been thinking about the US Open Wildcards a lot, so I'll just ramble on the few things I have come up with.

So, you have 8 wildcards to give to the main draw of the Open. It feels to me as though the novelty of earning a MDWC into the Open has completely worn off on these girls. They expect to get one, and if they don't get it the first time they expect another shot at it. A lot of these girls are fed with a golden spoon by the USTA. Here's what I would do:

1. French

2. Australian
3. Girls 18's Champion
*Here is where I would make some changes
*I would require all age-eligible girls who are interested in receiving a wild card into the US Open (either MD or Qualifying) to play this event.
*You need to get the strongest field possible for this tournament, and I think one way to do it is to say "Hey look, if you want to get a WC into the open, you play your nation's championships. If you choose to bypass it for whatever reason, know that it can and will be used against you when it comes to wild card deliberation.
*Obviously there are going to be some exceptions (i.e. an age-eligible girl is playing in a WTA tournament). Of course this would be taken into account.
4. College Player
*I think awarding one American college player a year a MDWC really gives the collegiate athletes something to work and strive for.
*I say you first award it to the NCAA Singles winner if she is American.
*If the NCAA tourney winner is not American, then I award the MDWC to the season ending highest ranked American.
5. Another Girls 18's participant
*While she may not have won the tournament, assuming all of our best juniors did play Nationals, I presume there will be at least one or two other girls who did not win who the USTA still thinks is deserving of a wild card.
*I think this girl should have had a very strong showing at Nationals, as well as a strong summer professional record.
6. Non-age eligible
*This type of wild card would be for someone like Jamie Hampton who could not play Nationals due to her age.
*However, strong professional results over the season indicate she would be competitive in the MD of the Open
7. Non-age eligible
*This type of wild card would be for someone like Alison Riske who could not play Nationals due to her age.
*However, strong professional results over the season indicate she would be competitive in the MD of the Open
8. Playoff
*This could be reserved for 8 women who have no other avenue of obtaining a MDWC
*This WC would most likely not go to a young girl but perhaps some "older" girls who are still capable of competing at the highest level but just need some help to get into the main draw
This analysis We should petition to make this the formula for WCs. It's the perfect mix of youth, experience, college, international ties, and keeping the US Open "open."

Serena Williams ~ Maria Sharapova ~ Venus Williams ~ Jelena Dokic ~ Melanie Oudin ~ Christina McHale

Vandeweghe ~ Mattek-Sands ~ King ~ Hampton ~ Riske ~ Glatch ~ Brengle ~ Rogers ~ Stephens ~ Boserup ~ Davis ~ Keys ~ Lepchenko ~ Falconi ~ Chirico ~ Crawford ~ Gibbs ~ Pegula ~ Min ~ Townsend ~ Duval ~ Vickery ~ Bellis ~ Ahn
simonsaystennis is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome