TA and their decisions - TennisForum.com
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 4 (permalink) Old Nov 25th, 2003, 08:28 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,585
Question TA and their decisions

WCs for Mt Gambier were Daniella Dominikovic, Cindy Watson and Sophie Ferguson. Now this is where I get really annoyed with TA and their decisions.

Cindy Watson I can say was well deserved.

As for Sophie Ferguson and Daniella Dominkovic getting one ahead of Bryanne Stewart who is still in the running for the AO wildcard, I just don't get it. Bryanne did qualify for the MD but for me that is not the point.

I think it will be grossly unfair if any juniors get the AO MD wcs ahead of the seniors who while they may have not been stars at this round of challengers, they have done better than any of the juniors.
Vicky88 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 4 (permalink) Old Nov 26th, 2003, 12:21 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria
Posts: 5,657
Im not against Sophie Ferguson getting one, nor am I against Bryanne having to qualify!

To give one to Daniela though is a joke. The girl hasnt even bothered to play all the singles qualifying in these challengers.

Id rather they gave the third wildcard to Sewell or Van Elden. Bryanne had 2 wildcards already so she had her fair share already. With her ability qualifying shouldnt be a problem anyhow
AUSBOY is offline  
post #3 of 4 (permalink) Old Nov 26th, 2003, 03:00 AM
Senior Member
louloubelle's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,861
These are the tournies the juniors can get a leg up in... so the likes of Sophie (who is playing well), Olivia, Cupak deserve some help along the line. All in all there's 18 wildcards over 6 tournies so some do need to go to the young ones.

This year some of the senior gals have stepped up - bryanne, trudi, hewitt and some returning from layoffs Kriz, Christina H, therefore I would expect TA to be a bit more lenient towards them.

Last summer most girls were in poor form and TA had the decision to way up either giving an handout to someone playing badly or an untried junior. In most cases they'll head in the junior direction.

The answer is simple: the opportunities are there for the senior girls... they just have to get the wins on the board. This year some have!!

There's more to life than just being happy.
louloubelle is offline  
post #4 of 4 (permalink) Old Nov 26th, 2003, 04:01 AM
country flag TS
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 20,627
Lets not forget both Lara Giltinan and Natalie Tanevska got a WC (Rockhampton), so I guess I could think of worse juniors than Daniela to receive one...she's got lots of promise, but if only she would actually COMMIT to tournaments

I'm sure Bryanne didn't mind going through qualies...after all more points. But the only negative is that she won a couple tight 3 setters so that has to take it's toll in the South Aussie sun...hope she can at least get a couple wins in the MD (let's be honest she had no chance of winning this thing, so the AO WC was always going to be Trudi's)

As for Watson...I think she was better off in qualies. A 6-2 6-1 loss in the first round shows she NEEDS match practice and just can't compete at this level for the time being. A few more months though and she can be right (if she wants it though).

Last year all WC's at these challengers went to young kids...this year we've seen Trudi, Bryanne, Kristen, Jaslyn, Beti and Cindy get them. I think that TA learnt from their mistake this year of ignoring the seniors and putting their eggs into the junior basket (Adriana who?)...it looks to be more of a fairer playing field this time around.
TS is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome