Originally posted by TheBoiledEgg
16 seeds are alot better........ why not go the whole way and seed all 128
and draw it automatically 1 vs 128, 2 vs 127 and so on until 64 vs 65
i hope to live long enough to see that.....
but with the depth of WTA nowadays,
32 seeding is more suitable,
for example, Bovina has been doing great,
and with 16 seeding, she wont be seeded,
would you want to see her facing Venus/Serena
is 1R and lose in straight sets?
32 seedings at least give better players
better draws to go to 2nd week,
they only have to win 1 match against higher ranked
players to be playingin 2nd week,
also the TOP 8 seeds are usually well known,
so by letting them avoid being upset by #17 ranked players,
like last time Schett taking out Venus,
at least the QF will be more likely to be quality matches.....