Re: 2010-11 recruiting - verbals & high interest
So it passed but hasn't passed? That is confusing but then again, it's the NCAA.
I could be wrong, but the way I understand this is: the issue is sent to a committee. The committee voted for the six month rule with an one year delay for tennis. But before the new rule becomes effective, the big boss, i.e. the Board of Directors gets a chance to veto it. If the Board of Directors does nothing about this issue at its next meeting, then the rule is passed. But if the Board of Directors takes it up, and says that they don't agree with what the committee did, then it could still be changed.