Tennis Forum banner

SHOWDOWN

  • Lindsay, the power house

    Votes: 25 62.5%
  • Patty, the spin specialist

    Votes: 15 37.5%

QF Davenport bt Schnyder 6-1 6-1.......what a blowout.......

2K views 15 replies 14 participants last post by  Dokic#1 
#1 · (Edited)
(2) Lindsay Davenport (USA) vs. (8) Patty Schnyder (SUI)
1997-05-26 Roland Garros Clay R32 Lindsay Davenport (USA) 4-6 6-3 9-7
1997-08-18 Atlanta Hardcourt R16 Lindsay Davenport (USA) 6-3 6-2
1997-08-25 U.S. Open Hardcourt R32 Lindsay Davenport (USA) 1-6 6-1 6-4
1999-01-11 Sydney Hardcourt QF Lindsay Davenport (USA) 6-2 6-3
2001-06-25 Wimbledon Grass R32 Lindsay Davenport (USA) 6-2 6-3
2002-10-14 Zurich Indoor Hardcourt F Patty Schnyder (SUI) 6-7(5) 7-6(8) 6-3

ROAD TO QF
(2) Lindsay Davenport (USA)
R32 Nicole Pratt (AUS) W 6-1 6-0
R16 Marlene Weingartner (GER) [LL] W 6-1 6-1

(8) Patty Schnyder (SUI)
R32 Maja Matevzic (SLO) W 6-1 4-1 ret
R16 Meghann Shaughnessy (USA) W 6-2 4-6 6-2

Will Patty make all possible shots to tourble Lindsay enough to win,
or will Lindsay come out firing Patty away from victory?
 
See less See more
#3 ·
Patty in three!!:bounce:
 
#5 ·
Probably Lindsay in 3, but hope Patty can pull it off :)
 
#10 ·
Davenport def. Schnyder 6-2 6-4
 
#12 ·
not many people would have given patty much of a chance to beat lindsay on indoors in zurich last year and we all know what happened then. i don't expect patty to win, but i know she can, and i feel that it will be a score like 6-0, 6-0 or maybe a little closer
 
#14 ·
oh yes she was so lazy that she beat clijsters and henin in the same tournament! give me a break. i don't think you can take too much from beating pratt on clay and lucky loser from qualifying weingartner. i don't doubt that lindsay is an amazing player, but lindsay lost in straight sets to serena in charlseton last week, and what did patty do the year before? oh that's right she beat serena and then no.1 capriati, which would lead me to believe she can do a little more than hit a few good shots!
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top