WIth so many people in the running,
Clijesters had a 5.3% chance of winning last weekat the Porsche. This was 6th best. Which is probably about right. Just because it is a low probabillity doesn't mean that it was inaccurate. Not one player's probability of winning was abover 25% at the start of the tournament.
So does this mean that whoever won the predictions would be inaccurate? I don't think so.
Tennis Prediction and profitable gambling: