Tennis Forum banner

TCG: Feedback & Suggestions

21K views 439 replies 39 participants last post by  Mary Cherry. 
#1 ·


Feedback & Suggestions

A couple of users have posted their ideas on how to improve/change TCG :) Some of these ideas have been really good, and I'm always open to suggestions if it will help improve the game.

So if you have any questions, ideas or feedback you would like to give, please post it in this thread :)
 
See less See more
1
#2 ·
Good Thread-Idea :) First of all the game and especially the design of the cards are awesome, so every critism is critism on a very high level :) I personally think it's a bit too easy to collect points. For example I have lots of good cards and could buy Gold Packs with good players all week. I would prefer if every member would choose 5 cards, let's say 1 Top 10, 2 Top 20 and 2 Top 50 and then plays with them for a half year. Then the member who has chosen the best team will be ranked first. After a half year there will be a big trade and everyone will have the opportunity to trade cards. Of course you could still buy the surface cards which would reduce your ranking.

For example a player who would have choosen this team at the start of the year would be ranked very high now:

1 Top 10: Caroline Wozniacki
2 Top 20: Li Na, Maria Sharapova
2 Top 50: Andrea Petkovic, Petra Kvitova

I know it's not really entertaining thorough the year and the system isn't fully developped yet but something like this would be cool :)
 
#3 ·
I have a little idea. Maybe would do well - on first or last post - to put the results from the week, with possible squads. Then we will know who has the best eye in selecting the squads ;)

Maybe a little gift for the best on a week? (Bonus Points, Extra Surface Card?) ;)
 
#4 ·
Someone else suggested something like this before and I agree, it's a good idea :)

Would people like to see this introduced after Roland Garros? The winner of each week could get the IF player card of whoever won the tournament, or would a surface card be better?
 
#5 ·
I just thinking about change the points using in ITF... I mean - is it possible to give more points for players who play in ITF... For example - not 50 points for winning 25, but more. Playing ITF is more difficult than playing in ITF :scratch:
 
#7 · (Edited)
What about creating achievement challenges with rewards to the first person who completes them? :)

Examples:
1. Own the Top 50 ranked players in that week
2. Have 100 surface cards in your squad, etc. :p
 
#8 ·
What about creating achievement challenges with reqards to the first person who completes them? :)

Examples:
1. Own the Top 50 ranked players in that week
2. Have 100 surface cards in your squad, etc. :p
Not that one - there's not enough room :lol:

I was thinking of introducing collections later on though - but I was thinking of something like Fed Cup teams, but I could do both :scratch:
 
#17 ·
We should burn all the packs at the end of the year and start anew next year. :devil:

Blame the Great Fire of London for erasing the Database of the packs, and then say that some mad Iranians got ahold of your computer's backup. :tape:

I dunno, There are times when I feel like it's too easy to get top players...but what distances the good from the great are those who pick the right players during the week.
 
#18 ·
We should burn all the packs at the end of the year and start anew next year. :devil:

Blame the Great Fire of London for erasing the Database of the packs, and then say that some mad Iranians got ahold of your computer's backup. :tape:

I dunno, There are times when I feel like it's too easy to get top players...but what distances the good from the great are those who pick the right players during the week.
Agree with the bit in bold. That's the main aim of the game :p

And hardly any of the "top" players are consistent anyways :lol:



As for player packs, maybe I could change it from two top 20 cards to two top 30 and two top 50s to two top 75/100s? It would make it a bit more diverse.
 
#22 ·
I was planning on introducing the 'weekly winner' after RG but I can do it for RG as well if people want?

Although I was thinking only one winner per week (slam or otherwise) - any more than 1 and I'd be giving out too many prizes, and it's already a little easy for some of you to get cards as it is :tape:

grand slam runner-ups should also have 20%-25% in-form cards dont you think?:p
That can be one of the prizes for the 'weekly winner' :cheer:
 
#21 ·
Yeh I think start fresh at the beginning of next season and make it tougher to accumulate such a good squad. But as already said, it really depends on who you pick and how they perform so it shouldn't matter too much.

I think the Top 3 scorers for RG is a good idea too, to incorporate the newer players.

And the 20/25% in-form card for RU could be a good idea too!
 
#24 ·
So I was thinking whoever earns the most points at RG gets the IF card of the winner and two +50% grass bonuses for the upcoming grass season

Whoever gets the 2nd most points at RG (I will only give prizes to runners-up at the slams) gets the IF card of the runner up (+20%) and two +20% grass bonuses




Sound fair? :)
 
#29 ·
IF cards shouldnt be applied with surface cards. players get +70% alone with a 20% IF card & a 50% surface card. imagine if players with 50% IF card get a hand of 50% surface card :help:
 
This post has been deleted
#49 ·
Good idea! Some sort of a locker room where we could talk about TCG and whatever we want :)
 
#57 ·
I have a small suggestion. In Gold pack we have 3 Top20 players and IF card. In Player pack we have 2 Top20 and ONLY 2 players between 20-50 place in the ranking. I think, it's not enough. We excess of players from Top20 (some players have even the same 4-5 cards... :lol:) You can create a new package of Card - all 4 players between 20-50 ranks, or make a correction in the Player pack - maybe only 1 Top20 player and 3 Top20-50 rank players... What can you say? ;)
 
#58 ·
I agree it's a bit too easy to get Top 20 players (although not all top 20 players guarantee results :tape:). I think I will change the player packs to 1 top 20 and 3 top 50s, because if people want top 20 players they always go for the gold packs anyway :)

The thread containing details about all the new changes should be up in a few hours :)
 
#59 ·
Also, what if there was a different chance of getting different top 20 players or top 50 players? IMO, it's to easy to get a bunch of Caroline Wozniacki and other top players.
So you would have a better chance of getting Peng that you would of getting Wozniacki. (So she would invade the gold packs even more ;)) Then you could do the same with normal player packs. Maybe even with surface packs so there would be fewer 50% cards.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top