"Save Marriage from Homosexuals and Feminists" - are YOU doing your part? - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 31 (permalink) Old Oct 16th, 2003, 05:32 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
alexusjonesfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: inside
Posts: 7,837
                     
"Save Marriage from Homosexuals and Feminists" - are YOU doing your part?

America's largest online prayer effort, the Presidential Prayer Team, has this week asked its members to make marriage their top prayer priority.

Supporters are being encouraged to write to their local representative
For it is Marriage Protection Week in the United States, proclaimed by President George W Bush "to focus our efforts on preserving the sanctity of marriage", with the support of 30 conservative groups.

Many of these organisations believe that marriage - which they see as the bedrock of American society - has been placed in grave danger both by homosexual activists who are calling for same-sex unions, and feminists who in recent decades have placed great emphasis on women's independence and sexual liberation.

"Society has long been telling women they don't need men and they don't need marriage. But they do - sexual freedom is not a substitute. With this trend we have allowed men to become irresponsible playboys," says Janice Shaw Crouse, a senior fellow at a think-tank within Concerned Women For America, which is sponsoring the week.

"Meanwhile marriage is also under immense threat from same-sex unions, which are widely known to be promiscuous and unstable, no matter how much they say they are not."

Homosexual pressure groups say they are furious that President Bush appears to have associated himself with these conservative groups and are outraged that his proclamation inaugurating the week made clear that he sees marriage solely as a union between a man and a woman, and the best environment in which to raise children.

"President Bush has endorsed an organised agenda of bigotry, discrimination, exclusion and tolerance," declared Joan Garry, executive director of Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (Glaad). "Such attempts to deny protections to some American families are in fact an attack on all American families."

Groups like Glaad want to see homosexual men and women granted the same right to unite as heterosexuals, and with it the same social and economic entitlements - including the right to adopt children, whom they stress need to be raised by loving parents, not necessarily married, heterosexual ones.

'Election matter'

Those who believe homosexuality is wrong are alarmed by many of the recent advances by the gay community.

This summer, the US Supreme Court overturned a ban on sodomy in Texas, essentially making it illegal for any state legislature to outlaw gay sex. Two months later, the country's first openly gay bishop was elected.

State courts have also been examining the issue of gay marriage.

Vermont is the only state to have enacted a law which gives same-sex couples the rights of traditional marriages, but the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court is currently considering whether to grant marriage licences to homosexuals.

In preparation for such a ruling in Massachusetts and elsewhere, conservative groups and politicians are pressing for a constitutional amendment that would ban same-sex marriages outright.

The bill, which has 96 sponsors in the House of Representatives, seeks to enshrine marriage as a union exclusively between one man and one woman, and would make same-sex unions a legal impossibility.

Groups such as Concerned Women For America, and the larger Focus on the Family, say if it comes to it, they will launch a campaign to encourage voters not to elect a politician who does not support the bill.

"We want this to be an election matter. It is a monumental issue that all politicians should be forced to take a stand on," says Glenn Stanton, director of social research at Focus on the Family.

Middle ground

Mr Stanton says he is much encouraged by Mr Bush's proclamation of Marriage Protection Week, and, should the Massachusetts court rule in favour of gay marriage, believes the White House would throw its weight behind a constitutional amendment.

Mr Bush - while endorsing marriage as a heterosexual union - has not yet committed himself to anything.

"It's not surprising at all that he's backed the movement - it's popular within his own party, while opinion polls tend to show that many people are not that happy with the idea of gay marriage," says John Samples, director of the Center for Representative Government at the libertarian Cato Institute.

"But I would be surprised if it became an election issue. Both Bush and his father, when he was president, have tried to walk a more liberal line than other Republicans for fear of alienating the middle ground.

"At the same time, I don't think any of the Democrat candidates would find it worth their while to fight the gay corner."

But while some observers see the week as a sop to the campaigners further on the right, many Democrats, gay rights campaigners stress, have also proved hostile to gay marriage.

Mr Bush's predecessor, Democrat President Bill Clinton, signed the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act which defined marriage as the union of heterosexuals, although it did not prevent states from passing their own laws.

However, that has not made Marriage Protection Week any more palatable to homosexual pressure groups.

"The bottom line is that - in a land that prides itself on freedom and equality - a substantial group of people are being denied access to the same rights as heterosexuals," says Alice Leeds, spokeswoman for Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG).

"The anti-gay industry hides behind the idea of family values. What they don't seem to realise is that families these days come in all sorts of configurations, shapes and sizes. And that's something to be embraced, not condemned."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3195336.stm

Oh, the perks of being Canadian

future 25+ gs champ alexus "don't you get in mah back seat" jones

Last edited by caelestia; Oct 16th, 2003 at 07:28 PM.
alexusjonesfan is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 31 (permalink) Old Oct 16th, 2003, 05:40 PM
Senior Member
 
G-Ha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 1,593
                     
"Meanwhile marriage is also under immense threat from same-sex unions, which are widely known to be promiscuous and unstable, no matter how much they say they are not." lol!

Yes, because we all know that all marriages are monogamous and stable...

Perhaps some of these conservative groups should focus their prayer efforts on all the adultery and divorces we see effecting straight unions before they try to prevent homosexuals from participating in unions.
G-Ha is offline  
post #3 of 31 (permalink) Old Oct 16th, 2003, 06:08 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: jealousville
Posts: 5,330
 
But it is homosexuals and feminists who are solely responsible for adultery and divorces among straight unions, no? Because overybody except them stick to the family values
vaiva is offline  
post #4 of 31 (permalink) Old Oct 16th, 2003, 06:09 PM
Senior Member
 
decemberlove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: My sin, my soul.
Posts: 10,491
                     
marriage is an outdated practice anyway.

i dont need a ring or piece of paper to tell me someone loves me. the only good thing about it is the taxes


....This is fucked up, fucked up....

This is your blind spot, blind spot.
It should be obvious, but it's not.

You cannot kickstart a dead horse
You just crush yourself and walk away
I don't care what the future holds
Cause I'm right here in your arms today
With your fingers you can touch me

I'll be your black swan, black swan
I'm for spare parts, broken up.




decemberlove is offline  
post #5 of 31 (permalink) Old Oct 16th, 2003, 06:12 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
alexusjonesfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: inside
Posts: 7,837
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrsTheBoiledEgg
But it is homosexuals and feminists who are solely responsible for adultery and divorces among straight unions, no? Because overybody except them stick to the family values
obviously! We don't need your equality bullshit here. The country was founded on the principles of protecting the rights of rich-white-land owning-men and that's how it'll remain

future 25+ gs champ alexus "don't you get in mah back seat" jones
alexusjonesfan is offline  
post #6 of 31 (permalink) Old Oct 16th, 2003, 06:16 PM
double-dog daredevil
 
griffin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: self-imposed exile
Posts: 12,053
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by decemberlove
marriage is an outdated practice anyway.

i dont need a ring or piece of paper to tell me someone loves me. the only good thing about it is the taxes
and the inheritance, and the protection of your other assets, and being able to make decisions about care in medical emergencies....and presents

Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go wreck a few more marriages...

Reason is poor propaganda when opposed by the yammering, unceasing lies of shrewd and evil and self-serving men.
--Robert Heinlein
griffin is offline  
post #7 of 31 (permalink) Old Oct 16th, 2003, 06:17 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
alexusjonesfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: inside
Posts: 7,837
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by griffin
and the inheritance, and the protection of your other assets, and being able to make decisions about care in medical emergencies....and presents

Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go wreck a few more marriages...
you're not both a feminist and a homosexual are you?

*tells children in the vicinity to look away*

future 25+ gs champ alexus "don't you get in mah back seat" jones
alexusjonesfan is offline  
post #8 of 31 (permalink) Old Oct 16th, 2003, 06:22 PM
double-dog daredevil
 
griffin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: self-imposed exile
Posts: 12,053
                     
Indeed, and my partner and I have been together for 13 years - so you can imagine how many heterosexual marriages we've managed to undermine!

Reason is poor propaganda when opposed by the yammering, unceasing lies of shrewd and evil and self-serving men.
--Robert Heinlein
griffin is offline  
post #9 of 31 (permalink) Old Oct 16th, 2003, 06:23 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: jealousville
Posts: 5,330
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by griffin
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go wreck a few more marriages...
See! Proof #1
vaiva is offline  
post #10 of 31 (permalink) Old Oct 16th, 2003, 06:38 PM
Senior Member
 
CondiLicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In bed.
Posts: 6,854
                     
I'm not to fussed about ever getting married. I don't need a piece of paper to make me feel secure about my relationship with the person I love. However, I do know why it is so important to many same-sex couples. It gives them more rights should the unthinkable happen and one of them was to die (anyone seen If These Walls Could Talk 2??? soooooo sad when the old lady dies and her partner is left with nothing) and also for those who are from different countries and have no hope of being together cause of immigration laws.

And what's so wrong with a civil marriage? Just a formal ceremony to go through to confirm your love as being official. Where does God come into it????

Seems to me that some people... too many people... Are insecure about their own lives and relationships and have deep-seated problems of their own that compel them to go shitting on and blaming perfectly happy people. Why don't they just GET LIVES!
CondiLicious is offline  
post #11 of 31 (permalink) Old Oct 16th, 2003, 06:43 PM
Senior Member
 
decemberlove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: My sin, my soul.
Posts: 10,491
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by griffin
13 years
*dies


....This is fucked up, fucked up....

This is your blind spot, blind spot.
It should be obvious, but it's not.

You cannot kickstart a dead horse
You just crush yourself and walk away
I don't care what the future holds
Cause I'm right here in your arms today
With your fingers you can touch me

I'll be your black swan, black swan
I'm for spare parts, broken up.




decemberlove is offline  
post #12 of 31 (permalink) Old Oct 16th, 2003, 06:52 PM
double-dog daredevil
 
griffin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: self-imposed exile
Posts: 12,053
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by decemberlove
*dies

See? See how powerful we are?

Reason is poor propaganda when opposed by the yammering, unceasing lies of shrewd and evil and self-serving men.
--Robert Heinlein
griffin is offline  
post #13 of 31 (permalink) Old Oct 16th, 2003, 07:20 PM
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
 
Couver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 17,138
                     
Jeez. I bet if we opened up the closets of people in these prayer groups enough skeletons would be found to keep archaeologists busy for centuries to come.

Couver is offline  
post #14 of 31 (permalink) Old Oct 16th, 2003, 07:51 PM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Martian Willow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Below the stars.
Posts: 6,695
                     
...13 years...?...you're doing it all wrong...you're supposed to be promiscuous and unstable...how many times do we have to tell you...?

Martian Willow is offline  
post #15 of 31 (permalink) Old Oct 16th, 2003, 08:00 PM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Martian Willow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Below the stars.
Posts: 6,695
                     
...I wish I was primiscuous and unstable...
Martian Willow is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome