Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: always on the move
I start to completely doubt the official version.
What was the reason to kill them as opposite to capturing them?
Could they escape? According to report, surrounded by 200+ of US troops, they barricaded in the second floor, while the first floor was under control of USA. I assume the risk of them escaping was truly minor.
Just imagine, that you surrounded someone, who, according to your own claims, leads and coordinates the underground resistance, that is responsible for dozen of your soldier's lives. Killing that someon would certainly be a blow for resistance, while capturing that someon would give you the key to dismantling that resistance from inside. What do you prefer?
At the end, why use highpower explosives in the missiles? Why don't you use some non-demolishing neutralizers, a kind of chemicals, sleeping gas, that Russians used again Chechen terrorists in Moscow?
Something just doesn't seem right..