If an election was held now, Bush would carry California - TennisForum.com
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 14 (permalink) Old Apr 16th, 2003, 09:15 PM Thread Starter
Car Key Boi is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 14 (permalink) Old Apr 16th, 2003, 09:34 PM
Senior Member
 
Carolina Girl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: it's 5 o'clock somewhere
Posts: 7,406
                     
did u make that urself?


rawr.
Carolina Girl is offline  
post #3 of 14 (permalink) Old Apr 16th, 2003, 09:37 PM
country flag ys
Adrenaline junkie
 
ys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: always on the move
Posts: 21,550
                     
If an election were held in April 1991, Bush would carry California too..

"..just knowing that as long as i choose life, there is hope."

Je ne suis pas charlie

PLAY TENNIS!
ys is offline  
post #4 of 14 (permalink) Old Apr 17th, 2003, 12:18 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: a parking lot near yuo
Posts: 4,910
                     
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...6/MN298819.DTL

Californians favor Bush, poll shows
President scores higher than any Democrat in race

While California is a must-win state for Democrats in the 2004 presidential derby, incumbent Republican George W. Bush holds an early lead over a largely unknown field of Democratic hopefuls, a new Field Poll shows.

If the 2004 election was held now, state voters would back the president, 45 percent to 40 percent, over an unnamed Democratic candidate.

It's anyone-but-Bush in the Bay Area, however, where 55 percent of those surveyed said they'd pick any Democrat over the president, compared with 31 percent who backed Bush.

With 11 months to go before California's March 2004 primary and better than 1 1/2 years until the November general election, the numbers likely will see plenty of changes, said Mark DiCamillo, director of the Field Poll.

"This is really the first look anyone's had at the 2004 presidential race in California," he said. "We'll do it again in the summer and the fall and see what changes."

Things can only get better for most of those looking to replace Bush. Of the nine potential candidates listed, more than half the Democrats surveyed had no opinion about five of them.

Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman led the pack in California, with 22 percent of those surveyed listing him as their top choice in the 2004 Democratic primary. Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry was the first choice at 16 percent, and Missouri Rep. Dick Gephardt was the only other candidate to break double digits, with 12 percent.

The rankings this early are more a measure of name identification than potential strength, DiCamillo said, with Lieberman, the Democrats' choice for vice president in 2000, a likely front-runner.

"This is a very early measure, and the candidates are not all on equal footing," he said. "There are a lot of these candidates who still aren't well known."

Early or not, the survey is still bad news for North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, who raised more money nationally than any other Democratic candidate in the first three months of the year.

Edwards, who has been nearly invisible in California, was the top choice of just 3 percent of the Democrats surveyed, running behind former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, former Illinois Sen. Carol Mosley-Braun and the Rev. Al Sharpton. Only 18 percent of those surveyed planned to vote for him, 27 percent were disinclined and 55 percent had no opinion.

When those Democratic voters were asked who they were inclined to support, Kerry led the way with 43 percent, compared to Lieberman with 42 percent and Gephardt with 35 percent. But only 21 percent said they weren't inclined to back Kerry, compared to 36 percent for Lieberman and 31 percent for Gephardt.

While Bush's 5-point advantage is good news for Republicans, California GOP officials are a long way from breaking out the party hats. A Zogby poll released earlier this week gave Bush an 11-point lead nationally, 47 percent to 36 percent, over that same generic Democrat. California remains a stronghold for Democratic opposition.

Bush himself hasn't been seen in California since he made a daylong swing through Stockton and Orange County for GOP gubernatorial candidate Bill Simon last August.

"We are a territory -- we're Guam (to the Bush administration)," Walnut Creek Rep. Ellen Tauscher told The Chronicle editorial board Tuesday. "He knows he can't get on the scorecard here."

The poll did provide California Republicans with some hope for the future, however. While Latino voters preferred a Democratic nominee over Bush by a 42 percent to 36 percent margin, that's a strong showing for Republicans.

"It's been a Republican priority to do better among the fast-growing Latino population," DiCamillo said. "This poll suggests that Bush is not doing too badly, since Republicans have typically had a hard time breaking out of the mid-20s."

The poll is based on a telephone survey of 695 registered voters, including 292 Democrats, taken between April 1 and 6. Sampling error for the entire poll is plus or minus 3.8 percentage points and plus or minus 5.8 percentage points for the questions asked only to Democrats.
Car Key Boi is offline  
post #5 of 14 (permalink) Old Apr 17th, 2003, 12:36 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: this celluloid dream
Posts: 4,078
                     
"The poll is based on a telephone survey of 695 registered voters, including 292 Democrats, taken between April 1 and 6. Sampling error for the entire poll is plus or minus 3.8 percentage points and plus or minus 5.8 percentage points for the questions asked only to Democrats."

Heh, i don't buy this poll. bush will not carry California.
King Lindsay is offline  
post #6 of 14 (permalink) Old Apr 17th, 2003, 12:45 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: a parking lot near yuo
Posts: 4,910
                     
Car Key Boi is offline  
post #7 of 14 (permalink) Old Apr 17th, 2003, 12:47 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: this celluloid dream
Posts: 4,078
                     
They do need to get rid of davis yes ..... but it won't matter. They can't lose California. Too many crusading actors.
King Lindsay is offline  
post #8 of 14 (permalink) Old Apr 17th, 2003, 01:20 AM
Keeper of Venus & Serena
 
VSFan1 aka Joshua L.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Posts: 26,693
                     
If Bush carries California......I will be sick.

I count on Calif, NY, and DC to give us Dems about 80 of our electorate votes.

I'm 99% sure that when a clear democrat leader is there, he (or she, in case it's Carol) will definitely win California.


Loves of my life....
Venus Ebone Starr Williams
Serena Jamica Williams
a lifelong and devoted fan since 1996

Official Life Coach of the Royal Court
VSFan1 aka Joshua L. is offline  
post #9 of 14 (permalink) Old Apr 17th, 2003, 01:54 AM
Sunset, Moonrise, Winter
 
Sam L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Eurasian Steppe
Posts: 34,227
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Lindsay
They can't lose California. Too many crusading actors.
Hopefully! LOL
Sam L is offline  
post #10 of 14 (permalink) Old Apr 17th, 2003, 02:23 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,315
                     
Bush is likely to lose not only California, but the election overall. He learned one lesson from his father's mistakes, finish Saddam off. The lesson he didn't learn is that US Presidents get re-elected on the economy.

You have to answer for Santino, Carlo.
disposablehero is offline  
post #11 of 14 (permalink) Old Apr 17th, 2003, 03:02 AM
Moderator - BFTP
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,680
                     
LOL@King Lindsay

If Bush wins California in 2004 pigs will fly. (That's your cue to find flying pigs CKB


DH-if the economy is good and the Dems are idiots (read: Kerry or a Northern liberal) Bush will massacre them and could even carry Cali. Bush might win even with a bad economy though. 911 changed our country for good folks. Democrats need to move to the center nationally or get pushed off center stage.
Rollo is offline  
post #12 of 14 (permalink) Old Apr 17th, 2003, 04:58 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,566
                     
Gray Davis' popularity should have no effect on the 2004 race, IMO. His poll numbers are at an all-time low but the recall effort is equally unpopular with voters.

California's junior Senator, Barbara Boxer, is up for re-election next year. While Sen. Boxer is not as popular statewide as her compatriot, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, she will do a good job in getting her liberal base to the polls. This will bode well for whoever the Democratic presidential nominee will be.
Zummi is offline  
post #13 of 14 (permalink) Old Apr 17th, 2003, 07:43 PM
Keeper of Venus & Serena
 
VSFan1 aka Joshua L.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Posts: 26,693
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rollo
LOL@King Lindsay

If Bush wins California in 2004 pigs will fly. (That's your cue to find flying pigs CKB


DH-if the economy is good and the Dems are idiots (read: Kerry or a Northern liberal) Bush will massacre them and could even carry Cali. Bush might win even with a bad economy though. 911 changed our country for good folks. Democrats need to move to the center nationally or get pushed off center stage.
I respect you a lot Rollo, but I would prefer that the major democratic "theme" stay where it is, even if it means losing elections, etc. I know I will always fight for what I believe is right, and I think Bush has lead the country into a false fervor of being justified about "sticking to our roots"

How can a country grow when it chooses not to expand it's ideas? Right now, Bush has done a below average job as president, but it doesn't really matter because he's got a lot of voters thinking, "Me good. Rich good. Poor bad. Make rich best."

Bush is doing ok at keeping the nation secure, but at what costs? You know, I'm not so willing to give up half of my civil liberties (which are limited anyways, because I'm gay) just to remain secure. There are viable alternatives that can create a secure environment while at the same time ensuring actual freedom of the population.


Loves of my life....
Venus Ebone Starr Williams
Serena Jamica Williams
a lifelong and devoted fan since 1996

Official Life Coach of the Royal Court
VSFan1 aka Joshua L. is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome