Study: Playboy models losing hourglass figures -
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 2 (permalink) Old Dec 20th, 2002, 08:26 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: florida
Posts: 24,742
Study: Playboy models losing hourglass figures

Standard of beauty: Serena vs. Anna

LONDON, England -- A study of almost 50 years of Playboy centrefolds has revealed that the characteristic differences between men and women are becoming less pronounced.

Researchers at universities in Canada and Austria compared height, weight, bust, waist and hip measurements of 577 models from issues of the adult magazine dating from 1953 to 2001 and found they had become less shapely and more androgynous.

The findings, published in the latest edition of the British Medical Journal (BMJ), conclude that the trends were at odds with claims that centrefolds' body shapes were still more "hourglass" than "stick insects."

In the 1950s, for example, Marilyn Monroe epitomised the ideal woman with a voluptuous hourglass figure of 37-23-36.

Yet by the 1960s, models like Twiggy had already slimmed down to 32-22-32.

In the 1970s, the ideal body was typified by Jerry Hall, and in the 1980s by Cindy Crawford.

Yet by the 1990s the controversial emaciated look of "heroin chic" made Kate Moss (33-23-35) famous.

A BMJ spokesman said: "All measures except weight showed significant temporal change.

"Over time, bust size and hip size decreased, while waist size increased. Measures of body shape followed the same trends: body mass index and bust:hip ratio decreased, while waist:hip ratio, waist:bust ratio, and androgyny index increased."

Martin Voracek, a research resident at the University of Vienna Medical School, in Austria, was part of the team that measured every curve and contour of hundreds of Playboy models.

He told The Associated Press: "It's difficult to disentangle cause from effect. All I can say is that attractiveness is not that simple and is not constant over time.

"If Playboy didn't reflect ideals of attractiveness, they wouldn't still be around, so it must be that many men find this shape attractive."

In 2000, a British Medical Association report found that in 1950 the average woman weighed about eight-and-a-half stone and had a 24-inch waist. Now, she is more than 10 stone, with a 32-inch waist.

Adrian Furnham, a professor of psychology at London University who has conducted research on judgments of female attractiveness, told AP: "Some years ago Playboy was the touchstone, but there are now dozens of these things around.

"You'd need a whole range of magazines from different countries which showed a consistent pattern.

"Then, I think, you could start worrying about an explanation, but until then it's just a bit of fun."

Playboy spokesman Bill Farley said: "As time has gone on and women have become more athletic, more in the business world and more inclined to put themselves through fitness regimes, their bodies have changed, and we reflect that as well.

"But I would think that no one with eyes to see would consider playmates to be androgynous."

-one of those "bad" Williams fans that everyone keeps talking about


I don't mind straight people as long as they act gay in public!
Pureracket is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 2 (permalink) Old Dec 21st, 2002, 05:26 AM
Senior Member
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,584
NO! You mean the popular look these days, isn't to look female and have lots of curves?

Imagine my surprise!
Crazy Canuck is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome