Army discharges 6 gay foreign language students - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 28 (permalink) Old Nov 15th, 2002, 04:27 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,079
     
Army discharges 6 gay foreign language students




Army linguists Alastair Gamble, left, and Robert Hicks, at their home in Beltsville, Md. Gamble says his discharge from the Army is not a gay-rights issue. Associated Press photo by Marie P. Marzi


Army discharges 6 gay foreign language students
Monterey institute follows Pentagon policy despite shortage of speakers of Arabic

Christopher Heredia, Chronicle Staff Writer Friday, November 15, 2002

The Army has discharged six gay Arabic linguists studying at the Defense Language Institute in Monterey, even as the military is clamoring to fill a critical shortage of fluent speakers of Middle Eastern languages.

The soldiers were dismissed after they disclosed their homosexuality, a violation of the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy that says gay or lesbian soldiers may serve as long as they keep their sexual orientation private.

But the Washington, D.C.-based Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, an advocacy group for gays in the military, hopes that by bringing attention to the discharges, the military will reconsider its policy.

"The most pertinent issue is that (six) linguists trained in the language the U.S. government, the military and intelligence all readily admit they are in dire need of have been fired unjustly," Ralls said. "The military shot themselves in the foot."

The group represented all six soldiers, who received honorable discharges. Ralls said the soldiers were not going to challenge the discharges.

The group also represented a seventh Arabic language specialist who was trained at the institute but fired at a different base, and two Korean linguists at Monterey who were also discharged. The group learned Wednesday that a Mandarin linguist had been discharged.

"The shortage of Arabic speakers in the intelligence community is well established," said Donald Hamilton, who was a senior adviser to the National Commission on Terrorism in 2000, which identified a very serious shortage of Arabic language speakers. "The loss of talent is a cost of it (don't ask, don't tell)."

Defense Language Institute spokesman Harvey Perritt said all the Army had done was carry out the Department of Defense policy, which clearly states soldiers who declare they are gay must be discharged.

Perritt declined to go into details of the soldiers' cases, citing their right to privacy. He said that in the fiscal year that ended in September 365 soldiers had completed language training at the institute out of 516 enrolled.

SLDN reported in March that the military had discharged 1,271 men and women under "don't ask, don't tell" last year.

One of the fired soldiers, PFC Patricia Ramirez, 21 of Phoenix, claimed she had been asked by a supervisor to continue to serve after telling a supervisor she was lesbian, claiming her statement wasn't credible, then later told she was being discharged.

"Joining the Army was something I always wanted to do, to serve my country, " Ramirez said. "I thought it was so noble."

She said she had realized she couldn't do that without being honest about her sexual orientation.

"It was a pivotal point in our relationship to make a choice the military was not going to make, to acknowledge us and our relation," she said.

As a result of her dismissal, Ramirez lost many of her benefits, including a bonus to repay her student loans and her Montgomery GI bill, and she was forced to disclose her homosexuality to her family.

Linguist Specialist Alastair Gamble, 24 of Beltsville, Md., said he had been fired from the institute after his superiors learned his boyfriend was spending the night in his bedroom, a violation of curfew. An investigation ensued, which turned up love notes between the two, and the Army began the discharge process.

"This is not a gay rights issue," said Gamble, who had hoped to focus on the Iraqi dialect as a Army career and now is working in the private sector. "What is inappropriate is for the military to insist the policy is right when there is no tangible evidence to support that. Society has progressed. Even people in the military are not sufficiently affected by serving next to openly gay personnel."
CHOCO is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 28 (permalink) Old Nov 15th, 2002, 04:44 PM
Senior Member
 
Scotso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 47,044
                     
Not a gay rights issue? Uhm hello?

It is a major gay rights issue, I would have discharged this guy for being a dumbass. Just because you're gay doesn't mean you should be able to be fired. That's blatent discrimination.


Le Poussin! Faithfully ignoring the haters since 1995.

Le Poulailler de Poussin! (Simontarded.)

Ron Paul for President 2012!
Scotso is offline  
post #3 of 28 (permalink) Old Nov 15th, 2002, 05:19 PM
Senior Member
 
Helen Lawson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Waiting for Shirley
Posts: 19,301
                     
I was at first outraged, though not surprised. Then I read it a second time and read another article on yahoo. Whether or not you agree with "don't ask, don't tell" they basically got caught screwing/spending the night together in the barracks. Someone walked in on them, so to speak, during a bed check. That is not responsible if you ask me.

Whitney Houston and her receipts:

http://www.tennisforum.com/showthrea...17447&page=324
Helen Lawson is offline  
post #4 of 28 (permalink) Old Nov 15th, 2002, 05:39 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 306
     
Seems like a great way to get out of the military
iluvtrent is offline  
post #5 of 28 (permalink) Old Nov 15th, 2002, 06:18 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 121
                     
I think that it is clear that you are not supposed to tell about your sexuality. It is a good idea to cause less controversy and create less enemies for right now. I think it is kinda sad, but clearly had they just not told the world, nothing would have happened.

Don't Be Fooled By The Bombs That I got
I'm Still; I'm still Saddam from Iraq
Used to have a little now I have alot,
No matter where they are I know where they came from.

(So Damn Insane's theme song; Why we need to attack Iraq)
lmoon1 is offline  
post #6 of 28 (permalink) Old Nov 15th, 2002, 06:35 PM
Senior Member
 
G-Ha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 1,593
                     
I do think Clinton's "don't ask, don't tell" policy is lame, and not really much different than the "don't tell" policy the military had all along. However, those enlisted are well aware of that policy, and they chose to violate it. This result shouldn't really be a surprise.

Bringing these latest discharges to the media does, however, highlight the absurdity of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy. The military is obviously more concerned with one's sexuality, than one's ability to speak an Iraqi dialect. Given the dearth of Arabic speakers and an immenent war with Iraq, the military's focus seems misplaced to say the least.
G-Ha is offline  
post #7 of 28 (permalink) Old Nov 15th, 2002, 06:44 PM
country flag CC
Senior Member
 
CC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Still Point
Posts: 8,726
                     
There would be a double standard if they (foreign lang students)were not discharged. Others who are less "essential" and are dismissed would protest.
CC is offline  
post #8 of 28 (permalink) Old Nov 15th, 2002, 06:51 PM
Senior Member
 
G-Ha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 1,593
                     
Oh, I agree...language students shouldn't be treated any differently. They violated the current policy and should have been discharged just like anyone else. My point is that the policy is bad, and the military's focus should not be on one's sexuality. How does one's sexuality affect the ability to be a soldier or speak a foreign language?
G-Ha is offline  
post #9 of 28 (permalink) Old Nov 15th, 2002, 08:25 PM
Senior Member
 
Scotso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 47,044
                     
The real issue is if they were straight foreign language students they wouldn't have been discharged.

Therefore, it's descrimination.


Le Poussin! Faithfully ignoring the haters since 1995.

Le Poulailler de Poussin! (Simontarded.)

Ron Paul for President 2012!
Scotso is offline  
post #10 of 28 (permalink) Old Nov 15th, 2002, 08:32 PM
Senior Member
 
Helen Lawson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Waiting for Shirley
Posts: 19,301
                     
I think if they caught a man and woman cadets in bed or spending the night together after curfew in the barracks, they would have been discharged. That is serious, for the military. This was not a case of off-base private housing. They were doing it under the military's roof, literally. I do not want to offend anyone, but in a way at least that one story feeds the silly stereotype that gay men are sex crazed and will engage in sex on the job when in training and all. Maybe I got the story wrong, but they were doing bed checks. Would you shack up with a guy (or woman) in bed when they had bed checks?

Whitney Houston and her receipts:

http://www.tennisforum.com/showthrea...17447&page=324
Helen Lawson is offline  
post #11 of 28 (permalink) Old Nov 15th, 2002, 10:02 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,079
     
Military has been and always will be separate from civilian life. It has it own rules and laws that govern its soldiers. So I'm not surprise by this.
CHOCO is offline  
post #12 of 28 (permalink) Old Nov 16th, 2002, 03:31 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,079
     
I wonder if the policy is the same for the other branches of the military (Air Force, Navy, and Marines).
CHOCO is offline  
post #13 of 28 (permalink) Old Nov 16th, 2002, 03:36 AM
Senior Member
 
DutchieGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: my own Dutchie world
Posts: 152,959
                     
Quote:
Originally posted by lmoon1
I think that it is clear that you are not supposed to tell about your sexuality. It is a good idea to cause less controversy and create less enemies for right now. I think it is kinda sad, but clearly had they just not told the world, nothing would have happened.
So now gays or lesbians should not be allowed to identify as such? WHy should they always have to lie about their partners or life just to please some stupid "outdated" rule? Straight people can talk about their partners, so why shouldn't gays/lesbians be allowed to as well? That's called discrimination!

http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/i...10/sheadam.jpg

She & Him @ Melkweg "The Max", Amsterdam 6th May 2010
DutchieGirl is offline  
post #14 of 28 (permalink) Old Nov 16th, 2002, 03:39 AM
Senior Member
 
DutchieGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: my own Dutchie world
Posts: 152,959
                     
Quote:
Originally posted by Helen Lawson
I think if they caught a man and woman cadets in bed or spending the night together after curfew in the barracks, they would have been discharged. That is serious, for the military. This was not a case of off-base private housing. They were doing it under the military's roof, literally. I do not want to offend anyone, but in a way at least that one story feeds the silly stereotype that gay men are sex crazed and will engage in sex on the job when in training and all. Maybe I got the story wrong, but they were doing bed checks. Would you shack up with a guy (or woman) in bed when they had bed checks?
and what about the lesbian lady "Ramirez" who was discharged... in the article it didn't say she was caught with another female in her bed... she was discharged coz she told someone about being gay... THAT is dizscrimination.

Granted, the guy who got caught with someone in his bed should have been discharged... and I'm sure if a straight person had been caught the same thing would have happened.

http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/i...10/sheadam.jpg

She & Him @ Melkweg "The Max", Amsterdam 6th May 2010
DutchieGirl is offline  
post #15 of 28 (permalink) Old Nov 16th, 2002, 03:54 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 428
                     
I would bet that if a man and woman got caught it would not even be reported. Even though you can be discharged for that, if it is not reported, then you will not be discharged. I believe it was reported because they are 2 males. I certainly am embarrassed to be straight at times when we treat members of a different sexual family this way. About time the world took a live and let live policy, we will be better people for it.

Most people do not even deserve my wit....Let alone understand it
Picol is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome