Mark Fuhrman, O.J. symbols of our time - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 27 (permalink) Old Nov 12th, 2002, 06:33 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,079
     
Mark Fuhrman, O.J. symbols of our time

Posted on Tue, Nov. 12, 2002

Fuhrman, O.J. symbols of our time
BY GLENN GARVIN
ggarvin@herald.com

• O.J.: A Study In Black And White, 10-11 tonight. HBO.

• Dominick Dunne Presents: Murder in Greenwich. 8-10 p.m. Friday. USA.

Seven years later, the Trial of the Century has turned into the Hangover of the Millennium. The O.J. Simpson case still hovers over us like a poisonous mist, a reminder that America's ancient racial hostilities are as toxic as ever.

Tabloid-TV loudmouths still shriek clueless tirades about the verdict. Lawyers and investigators keep flogging it for books, TV appearances, legal business. A Herald story on Simpson's children triggers a tidal wave of angry phone calls. No one, it seems, is ready to let go.

The reason, suggests O.J.: A Study In Black And White, is that the controversy over Simpson's 1995 murder trial, which ended in acquittal, had nothing to do with facts and everything to do with symbols.

''In that painful instant,'' the HBO documentary observes, ``the veil was lifted on the vast gulf that remains between blacks and whites. . . . The story of O.J. Simpson goes to the heart of the racial divide in America.''

This week, two shows -- O.J.: A Study In Black And White (which debuts tonight) and Dominick Dunne Presents: Murder in Greenwich (Friday on USA) -- revisit the Simpson trial from very different perspectives. Black And White uses the case as a springboard for an intelligent, if wrenching, examination of race relations. Murder in Greenwich, meanwhile, proves that infamous perjurer Mark Fuhrman is a bigger liar than ever.

Black And White makes no attempt at all to rehash the evidence from the trial or to argue Simpson's guilt or innocence.

''Most people, white and black, didn't actually know the evidence,'' notes Lawrence Grossberg, a University of North Carolina sociologist.

Instead, it explores Simpson's pioneering role as the first black athlete to achieve broad celebrity status in white society, with television roles and endorsement contracts from Hertz and other high-profile companies. But the hint of racial reconciliation promised by his cross-cultural appeal vanished instantly when Simpson was charged with the murder of his white wife and her friend.

Instead, the trial quickly devolved into a spectacle of mutual race baiting that brought out the worst on both sides. Whites, ignoring the many weaknesses in the case against Simpson (no witness, no murder weapon and no bloody clothing, except for that mysterious glove that didn't fit), claimed that he had won simply by playing the race card to a black jury. Blacks argued that if Simpson were guilty, it was nothing more than payback to a racist legal system -- as if the murder of two young white people in Los Angeles was somehow a fair response to a lynching in Mississippi 30 years before.

How could a quarrel like this have any winners?

Yet, implausibly, there was a winner: Mark Fuhrman, the Los Angeles cop whose perjury helped undercut the prosecution. He repeatedly swore he never used racial epithets, only to be confronted with his own swaggering bigotry on tape.

In the through-the-looking-glass logic of O.J. World, Fuhrman's lies catapulted him into media celebrity. He's the author of several best-selling books, has his own radio show and is a regular contributor to Fox News.

Murder in Greenwich is based on Fuhrman's book about the unsolved 1975 murder of 15-year-old Martha Moxley, beaten to death with a golf club outside her family's Connecticut mansion. Her killer, Michael Skakel -- a nephew of Robert and Ethel Kennedy -- was finally tried and convicted this year.

Murder in Greenwich makes it appear that Fuhrman cracked a 25-year-old cold case that the local cops had long left for dead. In fact, his book was based mostly on a leaked copy of a private detective agency's investigation and had nothing to do with Skakel's indictment and conviction. The real break in the case came before Fuhrman arrived on the scene, when several drug-rehab buddies of Skakel saw a dramatization of the murder on the TV show Unsolved Mysteries and called a tip line to report that Skakel had bragged to them about killing the girl.

The Skakel investigation is only one focus of Murder in Greenwich. Fuhrman, who gets a producer's credit, also uses it to make himself look like the real victim of the Simpson case, which would almost be entertaining if it weren't so infuriating. My favorite moment was his explanation of why he lied on the witness stand about his frequent use of the N word. If he'd told the truth, Fuhrman says, ''the trial would have been all about me.'' Really dodged that bullet, didn't you, detective?
CHOCO is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 27 (permalink) Old Nov 12th, 2002, 06:34 PM
Capriati Fan
 
Barrie_Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Outside Kuillis HOUSE
Posts: 165,424
                     
No wonder I have a headache!

<a href=http://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CAcQjRxqFQoTCK7shNTZu8gCFQw2PgodXisBWg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fatpbackspin.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F12%2Ftop-10-modern-olympic-tennis-moments.html&bvm=bv.104819420,d.cWw&psig=AFQjCNE-uVO0MZr3SfnqI_iaGaeknDLepA&ust=1444696940981736 target=_blank><img src=http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/39938000/jpg/_39938194_capriati203.jpg border=0 alt= /></a>

"Baseball season is here. Baseball is life"!
Barrie_Dude is online now  
post #3 of 27 (permalink) Old Nov 12th, 2002, 09:18 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,079
     
CHOCO is offline  
post #4 of 27 (permalink) Old Nov 12th, 2002, 10:10 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,079
     
I'm looking forward to the OJ special.
CHOCO is offline  
post #5 of 27 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2002, 02:58 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,079
     
Damn!!! What a great show! I just saw half of this special on O.J. Simpson, and I must say, HBO did an increidible job with this project. HBO doesn't take any sides, but it does a superb job with the footage and perspectives from both sides. Kudos HBO.
CHOCO is offline  
post #6 of 27 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2002, 12:07 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,079
     
CHOCO is offline  
post #7 of 27 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2002, 12:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 6,227
                     
O.J should have been testing the big chair already

How do i get?
nasty nick#2 is offline  
post #8 of 27 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2002, 12:15 PM
Capriati Fan
 
Barrie_Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Outside Kuillis HOUSE
Posts: 165,424
                     
Yes, Nasty! The Big Chair! AKA: "Old Sparky"

<a href=http://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CAcQjRxqFQoTCK7shNTZu8gCFQw2PgodXisBWg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fatpbackspin.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F12%2Ftop-10-modern-olympic-tennis-moments.html&bvm=bv.104819420,d.cWw&psig=AFQjCNE-uVO0MZr3SfnqI_iaGaeknDLepA&ust=1444696940981736 target=_blank><img src=http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/39938000/jpg/_39938194_capriati203.jpg border=0 alt= /></a>

"Baseball season is here. Baseball is life"!
Barrie_Dude is online now  
post #9 of 27 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2002, 12:20 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,079
     
Why would you going to kill an innocent man? Two wrongs don't make it right.
CHOCO is offline  
post #10 of 27 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2002, 12:43 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 6,227
                     
Quote:
Originally posted by CHOCO
Why would you going to kill an innocent man? Two wrongs don't make it right.
post of the year man

How do i get?
nasty nick#2 is offline  
post #11 of 27 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2002, 02:55 PM
Senior Member
 
Halardfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Japan
Posts: 5,880
                     
The trial for me, ignored the most obvious evidence, namely OJ's flight from justice/police pursuit...

Manchester City 2011 FA Cup winners! 2012 Premier League Champions! 2014 League Cup winners and Premier League Champions! At last!!!!!
Halardfan is offline  
post #12 of 27 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2002, 04:38 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,079
     
Too many innocent people already have been convicted on flimsy evidence. Obviously the jury examined the evidence and found him innocent. Wow...the lust for blood.
CHOCO is offline  
post #13 of 27 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2002, 04:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 6,227
                     
There's something called reverse racism too. OJ was a celebrity, he was popular and he was black(and many black people have been sent to jail when they actually were innocent in the past). It was a fight between the jury and the media and the jury just didn't have the guts to send him to to jail, there was a black majority in the jury too. I'm quite sure he was guilty, but his celebrity status saved his life.

How do i get?
nasty nick#2 is offline  
post #14 of 27 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2002, 04:50 PM
Senior Member
 
Helen Lawson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Waiting for Shirley
Posts: 19,300
                     
Come on. O.J. did it. But loads of rich white people get away with murder, so, hey, why not O.J.?

Whitney Houston and her receipts:

http://www.tennisforum.com/showthrea...17447&page=324
Helen Lawson is offline  
post #15 of 27 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2002, 04:52 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,079
     
black jurys convict and send to prison black defendants EVERYDAY. That wasn't the problem. The problem, imo, was the prosecuting attorneys did a BAD job in prosecuting the case. Even the legal pundits admit it.

You can't convict someone because some portions of the public want it and have a lust for blood. You have to convict based on the evidence presented and without reasonable doubt.

Sorry, that's the legal system.
CHOCO is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome