Arbitrators say Landis is guilty - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 20 (permalink) Old Sep 20th, 2007, 07:32 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Bette_Midler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: spain
Posts: 4,155
                     
Unhappy Arbitrators say Landis is guilty

PARIS, France (AP) -- Floyd Landis has lost his expensive and explosive doping case. Arbitrators have upheld the results of a test that showed the 2006 Tour de France champion used synthetic testosterone to fuel his spectacular comeback victory in the race.



The decision, handed down nearly four months after a bizarre and bitterly fought hearing, leaves Landis with only one more outlet to possibly salvage his title -- an appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

According to documents obtained by AP, and to be made public later on Thursday, the vote was 2-1 to uphold the results, with lead arbitrator Patrice Brunet and Richard McLaren in the majority, with Christopher Campbell dissenting.

The decision means that Landis, who repeatedly has denied using performance-enhancing drugs, must forfeit his Tour de France title and is subject to a two-year ban, retroactive to January 30, 2007.

If Landis does not appeal, he will be the first person in the 105-year history of the race to lose the title because of a doping offense.

"Today's ruling is a victory for all clean athletes and everyone who values fair and honest competition," U.S. Anti-Doping Agency general counsel Travis Tygart said.

It's a devastating loss for Landis, who has steadfastly insisted that cheating went against everything he was all about and said he was merely a pawn in the anti-doping system's all-consuming effort to find cheaters and keep money flowing to its labs and agencies.

Landis did not hide from the scrutiny -- invited it, in fact -- and now has been found guilty by the closest thing to a fair trial any accused athlete will get.

He had been planning a news conference in Los Angeles the day a decision was reached. Details were not immediately available.

In its 84-page decision, the majority found the initial screening test to measure Landis' testosterone levels -- the testosterone-to-epitestosterone test -- was not done according to World Anti-Doping Agency rules.

But the more precise and expensive carbon-isotope ration analysis (IRMS), performed after a positive T-E test is recorded, was accurate, the arbitrators said, meaning "an anti-doping rule violation is established."

"As has been held in several cases, even where the T-E ratio has been held to be unreliable ... the IRMS analysis may still be applied," the majority wrote. "It has also been held that the IRMS analysis may stand alone as the basis" of a positive test for steroids.

The decision comes more than a year after Landis' stunning comeback in Stage 17 of the 2006 Tour, one that many people said could not be done without some kind of outside help.

Flying to the lead near the start of a grueling Alpine stage, Landis regained nearly eight minutes against the leader, and went on to win the three-week race.

"Well, all I can say is that justice has been done, and that this is what the UCI felt was correct all along," Pat McQuaid, leader of cycling's world governing body, told The Associated Press by telephone.

"We now await and see if he does appeal to CAS.

"It's not a great surprise considering how events have evolved. He got a highly qualified legal team who tried to baffle everybody with science and public relations. And in the end the facts stood up."

Landis insisted on a public hearing not only to prove his innocence, but to shine a spotlight on USADA and the rules it enforces and also establish a pattern of incompetence at the French lab where his urine was tested.

Although the panel rejected Landis' argument of a "conspiracy" at the Chatenay-Malabry lab, it did find areas of concern.

They dealt with chain of command in controlling the urine sample, the way the tests were run on the machine, the way the machine was prepared and the "forensic corrections" done on the lab paperwork.

"... the Panel finds that the practises of the Lab in training its employees appears to lack the vigor the Panel would expect in the circumstances given the enormous consequences to athletes" of an adverse analytical finding, the decision said.

The majority repeatedly wrote that any mistakes made at the lab were not enough to dismiss the positive test, but also sent a warning.

"If such practises continue, it may well be that in the future, an error like this could result in the dismissal" of a positive finding by the lab.

In Campbell's opinion, Landis' case should have been one of those cases.

"In many instances, Mr. Landis sustained his burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt," Campbell wrote. "The documents supplied by LNDD are so filled with errors that they do not support an Adverse Analytical Finding. Mr. Landis should be found innocent."

And in at least one respect, Landis, who spent an estimated $2 million on his defense, was exonerated because the panel dismissed the T-E test. But in the arbitration process, a procedural flaw in the first test does not negate a positive result in follow-up tests.

"An arbitration panel is entitled to rely entirely on the IRMS analysis as an independent and sufficient basis for finding that an anti-doping rule violation has occurred," the decision said.

In his dissent, Campbell latched onto the T-E ratio test, among other things, as proof that the French lab couldn't be trusted.

"Also, the T-E ratio test is acknowledged as a simple test to run. The IRMS test is universally acknowledged as a very complicated test to run, requiring much skill. If the LNDD couldn't get the T-E ratio test right, how can a person have any confidence that LNDD got the much more complicated IRMS test correct?"

It was confusion like this that led to the system receiving the harsh review Landis was hoping for during a nine-day hearing in Malibu in May.

But Landis also took his share of abuse, and ultimately, USADA still improved to 35-0 in cases it has brought before arbitration panels since it was founded in 2000.

This was a nasty contest waged on both sides, with USADA attorneys going after Landis' character and taking liberties in evidence discovery that would not be permitted in a regular court of law.

Landis accused USADA of using a win-at-all-costs strategy and prosecuting him only to get him to turn on seven-time winner Lance Armstrong, who has long fought doping allegations that have never been proven.

Addressing "problematic behavior on the part of both parties," the panel wrote it would not revisit the conduct of either side.

"They are just part of the litigation war games the parties counsel engaged in between themselves," the decision said.

cnn

If sex is such a natural phenomenon, how come there are so many books on how to?
Bette Midler
Bette_Midler is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 20 (permalink) Old Sep 20th, 2007, 07:37 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,810
                     
Re: Arbitrators say Landis is guilty

shocking.
woosey is offline  
post #3 of 20 (permalink) Old Sep 20th, 2007, 08:00 PM
Senior Member
 
TheBoiledEgg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: in Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 180,430
                     
Re: Arbitrators say Landis is guilty

wow, shocking not

everyone knew this last yr

Good luck to my favs

AZARENKA

*Kuznetsova*Sharapova*Kleybanova*Vesnina*Shvedova*Kulichkova*Kasatkina*
Pavlyuchenkova*Makarova*Diatchenko*Pivovarova*Gasparyan*Leykina*Zhuk*Potapova*Pervushina**Govortsova
MINELLA TsurenkoAlize Lim*El Tabakh*Robson*Cirstea
*Juhaszova*Zanevska*Broady*Bouchard*
Cetkovska*Svitolina*
*Bellis*Soylu*Sibille*Uberalova*Eden Silva*
http://www.twitter.com/TheBoiledEgg
TheBoiledEgg is online now  
post #4 of 20 (permalink) Old Sep 20th, 2007, 08:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Scotso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 47,044
                     
Re: Arbitrators say Landis is guilty

What a dick.


Le Poussin! Faithfully ignoring the haters since 1995.

Le Poulailler de Poussin! (Simontarded.)

Ron Paul for President 2012!
Scotso is offline  
post #5 of 20 (permalink) Old Sep 20th, 2007, 08:16 PM
Gone with the Wind fabulous!
 
LoveFifteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 8,457
                     
Re: Arbitrators say Landis is guilty

I can't believe he spent $2 million of his own money when it was obvious that he had doped.

He's should've admitted his guilt, writte a tell-all confessional, and cried on Oprah's couch. He probably would've earned $2 million doing that!
LoveFifteen is offline  
post #6 of 20 (permalink) Old Sep 20th, 2007, 09:39 PM
Guest
 
*JR*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: On the Peace Train
Posts: 34,247
                     
Re: Arbitrators say Landis is guilty

I don't think the CAS has ever ovaturned a guilty verdict for doping, as Sesil could tell Floyd.
*JR* is offline  
post #7 of 20 (permalink) Old Sep 20th, 2007, 10:15 PM
Senior Member
 
gentenaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: land of the incompetent
Posts: 34,743
                     
Re: Arbitrators say Landis is guilty

Quote:
Originally Posted by *JR* View Post
I don't think the CAS has ever ovaturned a guilty verdict for doping, as Sesil could tell Floyd.
I guess they didn't believe Floyd either when he said he'd been pregnant.

Everything you do continues long after you've gone
gentenaire is offline  
post #8 of 20 (permalink) Old Sep 20th, 2007, 10:43 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,810
                     
Re: Arbitrators say Landis is guilty

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBoiledEgg View Post
wow, shocking not

everyone knew this last yr
don't get sarcasm i see.
woosey is offline  
post #9 of 20 (permalink) Old Sep 20th, 2007, 10:57 PM
Original Queen, Majestic V!
 
ico4498's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Roundiway
Posts: 4,899
                     
Re: Arbitrators say Landis is guilty

when caught doping your m.o. must be; lie, arbitrate, litigate ... then lie some more. never say die.

a few years back i remember reading that there was no definitive test for synthetic hormones, they just look for elevated levels.

ico4498 is offline  
post #10 of 20 (permalink) Old Sep 21st, 2007, 03:36 AM
Senior Member
 
Scotso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 47,044
                     
Re: Arbitrators say Landis is guilty

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoveFifteen View Post
I can't believe he spent $2 million of his own money when it was obvious that he had doped.

He's should've admitted his guilt, writte a tell-all confessional, and cried on Oprah's couch. He probably would've earned $2 million doing that!
Where the hell did he get that much money?


Le Poussin! Faithfully ignoring the haters since 1995.

Le Poulailler de Poussin! (Simontarded.)

Ron Paul for President 2012!
Scotso is offline  
post #11 of 20 (permalink) Old Sep 21st, 2007, 04:25 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 16,043
                     
Re: Arbitrators say Landis is guilty

Blaireau.He should've ask some advices to Armstrong before doing all this.At least, Lance was professionnal enough to never get caught.
homogenius is offline  
post #12 of 20 (permalink) Old Sep 21st, 2007, 07:51 AM
Senior Member
 
mandy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 12,263
                     
Re: Arbitrators say Landis is guilty

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoveFifteen View Post
I can't believe he spent $2 million of his own money when it was obvious that he had doped.

He's should've admitted his guilt, writte a tell-all confessional, and cried on Oprah's couch. He probably would've earned $2 million doing that!
he actually didn't just spend his own money, he also spend the money of some of his team mates at the time, the team gave him some money in advance, that was supposed to go to the teammates, but he never gave the money back and now the team doesn't excist anymore, so those other riders have no place to go and ask for the money they've earned
it's about € 80.000,- for some of those riders
mandy7 is offline  
post #13 of 20 (permalink) Old Sep 21st, 2007, 09:15 AM
country flag jrm
Senior Member
 
jrm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Velenje
Posts: 37,006
                     
Re: Arbitrators say Landis is guilty

Hallelujah ... it took them forever!!!

It was obvious ... he lost 9 or 10 minutes on mountain stage and then the next day won time trail with minute ahead of everyone. You don't have to be a genius to figure that one out!

Äre 2007 Downhill and GS GOLD: Aksel LUND SVINDAL (NOR) WC overall champion for 2006/07 and 2008/09; winner of 2 crystal globes in GS and SC
Val d’Isère 2009 SC GOLD and Super-G BRONZE
Vancouver 2010: Super-G GOLD, downhill SILVER, GS bronze
Current crushes: Johannes STRATE Tom BATEMAN Éric BRUNEAU Greyston HOLT David MIESMER Raphaël LENGLET Richard RANKIN Tom LEEB
jrm is offline  
post #14 of 20 (permalink) Old Sep 21st, 2007, 09:19 AM
Senior Member
 
mandy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 12,263
                     
Re: Arbitrators say Landis is guilty

Quote:
Originally Posted by jrm View Post
Hallelujah ... it took them forever!!!

It was obvious ... he lost 9 or 10 minutes on mountain stage and then the next day won time trail with minute ahead of everyone. You don't have to be a genius to figure that one out!
actually, he lost 8 minutes in a mountain stage
then in another mountain stage, he won that back
and in the final time trial he finished 3rd...
mandy7 is offline  
post #15 of 20 (permalink) Old Sep 21st, 2007, 09:48 AM
Donna DOnna DOonnaaa
 
Princeza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,989
                     
Re: Arbitrators say Landis is guilty

Finally

Serbian and Croatian idiots
Princeza is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome