Iran May be the Greatest Crisis of Modern Times - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 18th, 2007, 07:27 PM Thread Starter
chaky yo booty
 
BUBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,479
                     
Iran May be the Greatest Crisis of Modern Times

Iran May be the Greatest Crisis of Modern Times

by John Pilger

The Israeli journalist Amira Hass describes the moment her mother, Hannah, was marched from a cattle train to the Nazi concentration camp at Bergen-Belsen. "They were sick and some were dying," she says. "Then my mother saw these German women looking at the prisoners, just looking. This image became very formative in my upbringing, this despicable ‘looking from the side'."

It is time we in Britain and other Western countries stopped looking from the side. We are being led towards perhaps the most serious crisis in modern history as the Bush-Cheney-Blair "long war" edges closer to Iran for no reason other than that nation's independence from rapacious America. The safe delivery of the 15 British sailors into the hands of Rupert Murdoch and his rivals (with tales of their "ordeal" almost certainly authored by the Ministry of Defense – until it got the wind up) is both a farce and a distraction. The Bush administration, in secret connivance with Blair, has spent four years preparing for "Operation Iranian Freedom." Forty-five cruise missiles are primed to strike. According to Russia's leading strategic thinker General Leonid Ivashov: "Nuclear facilities will be secondary targets... at least 20 such facilities need to be destroyed. [B]Combat nuclear weapons may be used. This will result in the radioactive contamination of all the Iranian territory, and beyond."

One million Iraqis fill the streets of Najaf demanding that Bush and Blair get out of their homeland – that is the real news: not our nabbed sailor-spies, nor the political danse macabre of the pretenders to Blair's Duce delusions. Whether it is treasurer Gordon Brown, the paymaster of the Iraq bloodbath, or John Reid, who sent British troops to pointless deaths in Afghanistan, or any of the others who sat through cabinet meetings knowing that Blair and his acolytes were lying through their teeth, only mutual distrust separates them now. They knew about Blair's plotting with Bush. They knew about the fake 45-minute "warning." They knew about the fitting up of Iran as the next "enemy."

Declared Brown to the Daily Mail: "The days of Britain having to apologize for its colonial history are over. We should celebrate much of our past rather than apologize for it." In Late Victorian Holocausts, the historian Mike Davis documents that as many as 21 million Indians died unnecessarily in famines criminally imposed by British colonial policies. Moreover, since the formal demise of that glorious imperium, declassified files make it clear that British governments have borne "significant responsibility" for the direct or indirect deaths of between 8.6 million and 13.5 million people throughout the world from military interventions and at the hands of regimes strongly supported by Britain. The historian Mark Curtis calls these victims "unpeople." Rejoice! said Margaret Thatcher. Celebrate! says Brown. Spot the difference.

Brown is no different from Hillary Clinton, John Edwards and the other warmongering Democrats he admires and who support an unprovoked attack on Iran and the subjugation of the Middle East to "our interests" – and Israel's, of course. Nothing has changed since the US and Britain destroyed Iran's democratic government in 1953 and installed Reza Shah Pahlavi, whose regime had "the highest rate of death penalties in the world, no valid system of civilian courts and a history of torture" that was "beyond belief" (Amnesty).

Look behind the one-way moral screen and you will distinguish the Blairite elite by its loathing of the humane principles that mark a real democracy. They used to be discreet about this, but no more. Two examples spring to mind. In 2004, Blair used the secretive "royal prerogative" to overturn a high court judgment that had restored the very principle of human rights set out in Magna Carta to the people of the Chagos Islands, a British colony in the Indian Ocean. There was no debate. As ruthless as any dictator, Blair dealt his coup de grâce with the lawless expulsion of the islanders from their homeland, now a US military base, from which Bush has bombed Iraq and Afghanistan and will bomb Iran.

In the second example, only the degree of suffering is different. Last October, the Lancet published research by Johns Hopkins University in the US and al-Mustansiriya University in Baghdad which calculated that 655,000 Iraqis had died as a direct result of the Anglo-American invasion. Downing Street officials derided the study as "flawed." They were lying. They knew that the chief scientific adviser to the Ministry of Defense, Sir Roy Anderson, had backed the survey, describing its methods as "robust" and "close to best practice," and other government officials had secretly approved the "tried and tested way of measuring mortality in conflict zones." The figure for Iraqi deaths is now estimated at close to a million – carnage equivalent to that caused by the Anglo-American economic siege of Iraq in the 1990s, which produced the deaths of half a million infants under the age of five, verified by Unicef. That, too, was dismissed contemptuously by Blair.

"This Labour government, which includes Gordon Brown as much as it does Tony Blair," wrote Richard Horton, editor of the Lancet, "is party to a war crime of monstrous proportions. Yet our political consensus prevents any judicial or civil society response. Britain is paralyzed by its own indifference."

Such is the scale of the crime and of our "looking from the side." According to the Observer of 8 April, the voters' "damning verdict" on the Blair regime is expressed by a majority who have "lost faith" in their government. No surprise there. Polls have long shown a widespread revulsion to Blair, demonstrated at the last general election, which produced the second lowest turnout since the franchise. No mention was made of the Observer's own contribution to this national loss of faith. Once celebrated as a bastion of liberalism that stood against Anthony Eden's lawless attack on Egypt in 1956, the new right-wing, lifestyle Observer enthusiastically backed Blair's lawless attack on Iraq, having helped lay the ground with major articles falsely linking Iraq with the 9/11 attacks – claims now regarded even by the Pentagon as fake.

As hysteria is again fabricated, for Iraq, read Iran. According to the former US Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill, the Bush cabal decided to attack Iraq on "day one" of Bush's administration, long before 11 September 2001. The main reason was oil. O'Neill was shown a Pentagon document entitled "Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield Contracts," which outlined the carve-up of Iraq's oil wealth among the major Anglo-American companies. Under a law written by US and British officials, the Iraqi puppet regime is about to hand over the extraction of the largest concentration of oil on earth to Anglo-American companies.

Nothing like this piracy has happened before in the modern Middle East, where OPEC has ensured that oil business is conducted between states. Across the Shatt al-Arab waterway is another prize: Iran's vast oilfields. Just as nonexistent weapons of mass destruction or facile concerns for democracy had nothing to do with the invasion of Iraq, so nonexistent nuclear weapons have nothing to do with the coming American onslaught on Iran. Unlike Israel and the United States, Iran has abided by the rules of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, of which it was an original signatory, and has allowed routine inspections under its legal obligations. The International Atomic Energy Agency has never cited Iran for diverting its civilian program to military use. For the past three years, IAEA inspectors have said they have been allowed to "go anywhere." The recent UN Security Council sanctions against Iran are the result of Washington's bribery.

Until recently, the British were unaware that their government was one of the world's most consistent abusers of human rights and backers of state terrorism. Few Britons knew that the Muslim Brotherhood, the forerunner of al-Qaeda, was sponsored by British intelligence as a means of systematically destroying secular Arab nationalism, or that MI6 recruited young British Muslims in the 1980s as part of a $4bn Anglo-American-backed jihad against the Soviet Union known as "Operation Cyclone." In 2001, few Britons knew that 3,000 innocent Afghan civilians were bombed to death as revenge for the attacks of 11 September. No Afghans brought down the twin towers. Thanks to Bush and Blair, awareness in Britain and all over the world has risen as never before. When homegrown terrorists struck London in July 2005, few doubted that the attack on Iraq had provoked the atrocity and that the bombs which killed 52 Londoners were, in effect, Blair's bombs.

In my experience, most people do not indulge the absurdity and cruelty of the "rules" of rampant power. They do not contort their morality and intellect to comply with double standards and the notion of approved evil, of worthy and unworthy victims. They would, if they knew, grieve for all the lives, families, careers, hopes and dreams destroyed by Blair and Bush. The sure evidence is the British public's wholehearted response to the 2004 tsunami, shaming that of the government.

Certainly, they would agree wholeheartedly with Robert H. Jackson, chief of counsel for the United States at the Nuremberg trials of Nazi leaders at the end of the Second World War. "Crimes are crimes," he said, "whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them, and we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct which we would not be willing to have invoked against us."

As with Henry Kissinger and Donald Rumsfeld, who dare not travel to certain countries for fear of being prosecuted as war criminals, Blair as a private citizen may no longer be untouchable. On 20 March, Baltasar Garzón, the tenacious Spanish judge who pursued Augusto Pinochet, called for indictments against those responsible for "one of the most sordid and unjustifiable episodes in recent human history" – Iraq. Five days later, the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, to which Britain is a signatory, said that Blair could one day face war-crimes charges.

These are critical changes in the way the sane world thinks – again, thanks to the Reich of Blair and Bush. However, we live in the most dangerous of times. On 6 April, Blair accused "elements of the Iranian regime" of "backing, financing, arming and supporting terrorism in Iraq." He offered no evidence, and the Ministry of Defense has none. This is the same Goebbels-like refrain with which he and his coterie, Gordon Brown included, brought an epic bloodletting to Iraq. How long will the rest of us continue looking from the side?


http://www.antiwar.com/pilger/?articleid=10812
BUBI is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 19th, 2007, 12:22 AM
Sunset, Moonrise, Winter
 
Sam L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: North, South & Third Pole
Posts: 35,986
                     
Re: Iran May be the Greatest Crisis of Modern Times

It's time that we stop looking from the side when Islamic radicalism threatens to tear ourselves apart with terrorism and other hate messages.

Light of the Seven: Himalayas, Gobi, Baikal, Taiga, Steppe, Reef, Aurora

Dancing and Skating through Life
Sam L is offline  
post #3 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 19th, 2007, 12:35 AM
Sunset, Moonrise, Winter
 
Sam L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: North, South & Third Pole
Posts: 35,986
                     
Re: Iran May be the Greatest Crisis of Modern Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie12 View Post
if america doing anything to iran than that is the final straw for me
Why? Are you Iranian? Do you have relatives that are Iranian? Is the Iranian government trading with your government? Is Iran giving your country's people's jobs?

Light of the Seven: Himalayas, Gobi, Baikal, Taiga, Steppe, Reef, Aurora

Dancing and Skating through Life
Sam L is offline  
post #4 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 19th, 2007, 12:37 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 955
                     
Re: Iran May be the Greatest Crisis of Modern Times

no but why invade a country when there is absolutely no need to. isnt iraq a big enough lesson
aussie12 is offline  
post #5 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 19th, 2007, 12:44 AM
Sunset, Moonrise, Winter
 
Sam L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: North, South & Third Pole
Posts: 35,986
                     
Re: Iran May be the Greatest Crisis of Modern Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie12 View Post
no but why invade a country when there is absolutely no need to. isnt iraq a big enough lesson
Because they are a threat to global security and it's not just America that's recognized this. And there's no need for an invasion, we could just bomb them.

Light of the Seven: Himalayas, Gobi, Baikal, Taiga, Steppe, Reef, Aurora

Dancing and Skating through Life
Sam L is offline  
post #6 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 19th, 2007, 12:50 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 955
                     
Re: Iran May be the Greatest Crisis of Modern Times

someone has been watching fox news too much. why doesnt america bomb china, india heck why not bomb every country that isnt america . i dont know why america thinks they are the world police.
aussie12 is offline  
post #7 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 19th, 2007, 01:03 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,089
                     
Re: Iran May be the Greatest Crisis of Modern Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam L View Post
Because they are a threat to global security and it's not just America that's recognized this. And there's no need for an invasion, we could just bomb them.
Israel is a threat to global security why haven't the US invaded them What they do to the Palestinian people is truely mind boggling and disturbing
CCCP1 is offline  
post #8 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 19th, 2007, 01:03 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,089
                     
Re: Iran May be the Greatest Crisis of Modern Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie12 View Post
someone has been watching fox news too much. why doesnt america bomb china, india heck why not bomb every country that isnt america . i dont know why america thinks they are the world police.

Agreed
CCCP1 is offline  
post #9 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 19th, 2007, 05:44 AM Thread Starter
chaky yo booty
 
BUBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,479
                     
Re: Iran May be the Greatest Crisis of Modern Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam L View Post
It's time that we stop looking from the side when Islamic radicalism threatens to tear ourselves apart with terrorism and other hate messages.
And bomb a country that has nothing to do with it? It's Al Qaida you're talking about, it's a sunni muslim organization and is an enemy of Iran.
BUBI is offline  
post #10 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 19th, 2007, 05:48 AM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
!!!--Duiz™--!!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 13,057
                     
Re: Iran May be the Greatest Crisis of Modern Times

Alas... the Double Standard that my country has is unnacceptable... the hegemony will consume the world, unless we change things from the inside out...

Thanks to stupid Republicans and Democrats.. it won't be happening soon...

The World's best player...

Supernova Sharapova


0009..Eternal Follower of Golden Girl
The Official Violin Player in Kirlenko's Orchestra
!!!--Duiz™--!!! is offline  
post #11 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 19th, 2007, 06:36 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: sydney
Posts: 6,145
                     
Re: Iran May be the Greatest Crisis of Modern Times

I think that article is being over dramatic. I think the USA/UK/Australia and the rest of the Coalition have used up whatever public support there may have been for invading Iran with the Iraq debacle.

We no longer trust our governments to only go to war under dire circumstances where no other option is available. George Bush, Donald Rumself, Paul Wolfowitz etc ensured that, supported by Tony Blair and John Howard etc..

We were told there were WMD's (there wasnt), we were told there was a link between Iraq and Al Queda (there wasnt) then we were expected to just be ok with the fact that it was all about bringing democracy to Iraq..

How do they expect us to believe that Iran has Nuclear weapons based on their 'intelligence'? They've used up their mandate.
Philbo is offline  
post #12 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 19th, 2007, 06:55 AM Thread Starter
chaky yo booty
 
BUBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,479
                     
Re: Iran May be the Greatest Crisis of Modern Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by Czechfan View Post
I think that article is being over dramatic. I think the USA/UK/Australia and the rest of the Coalition have used up whatever public support there may have been for invading Iran with the Iraq debacle.

We no longer trust our governments to only go to war under dire circumstances where no other option is available. George Bush, Donald Rumself, Paul Wolfowitz etc ensured that, supported by Tony Blair and John Howard etc..

We were told there were WMD's (there wasnt), we were told there was a link between Iraq and Al Queda (there wasnt) then we were expected to just be ok with the fact that it was all about bringing democracy to Iraq..

How do they expect us to believe that Iran has Nuclear weapons based on their 'intelligence'? They've used up their mandate.
I hope you're right but they have already created a unit in Pentagon to make a case of bombing of Iran. Just like they did with Iraq.
BUBI is offline  
post #13 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 19th, 2007, 07:00 AM
Senior Member
 
MistyGrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,296
                     
Re: Iran May be the Greatest Crisis of Modern Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam L View Post
Why? Are you Iranian? Do you have relatives that are Iranian? Is the Iranian government trading with your government? Is Iran giving your country's people's jobs?
Load of crap! So one cant care about another country's rights if one doesnt have relatives/material profits attached to that country! You're worse than these so called Islamic threats!

Graf-Pierce-Henin
MistyGrey is offline  
post #14 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 19th, 2007, 08:33 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,813
                     
Re: Iran May be the Greatest Crisis of Modern Times

Sam L. - what u said is discusting, just bomb them?

I have worked with many Iranians enterning into Australia to study and eventually live.... They are wonderful people, freindly and kind... to kill so many innocent people just to destroy certain branches of islamic extremists is ridiculous. Persian people are good people. Extremist Muslims are not... see the difference.
V.Melb is offline  
post #15 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 19th, 2007, 08:46 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,149
                     
Re: Iran May be the Greatest Crisis of Modern Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by V.Melb View Post
Sam L. - what u said is discusting, just bomb them?

I have worked with many Iranians enterning into Australia to study and eventually live.... They are wonderful people, freindly and kind... to kill so many innocent people just to destroy certain branches of islamic extremists is ridiculous. Persian people are good people. Extremist Muslims are not... see the difference.
Quite repulsive, no? He once suggested that 'we should destroy their cities and infrastracture and wreck their economy.' I just wish that Sam_L and the likes can someday be under the mercy of people who'll say "just bomb them."
Apoleb is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome