George W. Bush--The Worst President in History? - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 20th, 2006, 11:29 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
RunDown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: N.C.
Posts: 658
                     
George W. Bush--The Worst President in History?



The Worst President in History?
One of America's leading historians assesses George W. Bush


George W. Bush's presidency appears headed for colossal historical disgrace. Barring a cataclysmic event on the order of the terrorist attacks of September 11th, after which the public might rally around the White House once again, there seems to be little the administration can do to avoid being ranked on the lowest tier of U.S. presidents. And that may be the best-case scenario. Many historians are now wondering whether Bush, in fact, will be remembered as the very worst president in all of American history.

From time to time, after hours, I kick back with my colleagues at Princeton to argue idly about which president really was the worst of them all. For years, these perennial debates have largely focused on the same handful of chief executives whom national polls of historians, from across the ideological and political spectrum, routinely cite as the bottom of the presidential barrel. Was the lousiest James Buchanan, who, confronted with Southern secession in 1860, dithered to a degree that, as his most recent biographer has said, probably amounted to disloyalty -- and who handed to his successor, Abraham Lincoln, a nation already torn asunder? Was it Lincoln's successor, Andrew Johnson, who actively sided with former Confederates and undermined Reconstruction? What about the amiably incompetent Warren G. Harding, whose administration was fabulously corrupt? Or, though he has his defenders, Herbert Hoover, who tried some reforms but remained imprisoned in his own outmoded individualist ethic and collapsed under the weight of the stock-market crash of 1929 and the Depression's onset? The younger historians always put in a word for Richard M. Nixon, the only American president forced to resign from office.

Now, though, George W. Bush is in serious contention for the title of worst ever. In early 2004, an informal survey of 415 historians conducted by the nonpartisan History News Network found that eighty-one percent considered the Bush administration a "failure." Among those who called Bush a success, many gave the president high marks only for his ability to mobilize public support and get Congress to go along with what one historian called the administration's "pursuit of disastrous policies." In fact, roughly one in ten of those who called Bush a success was being facetious, rating him only as the best president since Bill Clinton -- a category in which Bush is the only contestant.

The lopsided decision of historians should give everyone pause. Contrary to popular stereotypes, historians are generally a cautious bunch. We assess the past from widely divergent points of view and are deeply concerned about being viewed as fair and accurate by our colleagues. When we make historical judgments, we are acting not as voters or even pundits, but as scholars who must evaluate all the evidence, good, bad or indifferent. Separate surveys, conducted by those perceived as conservatives as well as liberals, show remarkable unanimity about who the best and worst presidents have been.

Historians do tend, as a group, to be far more liberal than the citizenry as a whole -- a fact the president's admirers have seized on to dismiss the poll results as transparently biased. One pro-Bush historian said the survey revealed more about "the current crop of history professors" than about Bush or about Bush's eventual standing. But if historians were simply motivated by a strong collective liberal bias, they might be expected to call Bush the worst president since his father, or Ronald Reagan, or Nixon. Instead, more than half of those polled -- and nearly three-fourths of those who gave Bush a negative rating -- reached back before Nixon to find a president they considered as miserable as Bush. The presidents most commonly linked with Bush included Hoover, Andrew Johnson and Buchanan. Twelve percent of the historians polled -- nearly as many as those who rated Bush a success -- flatly called Bush the worst president in American history. And these figures were gathered before the debacles over Hurricane Katrina, Bush's role in the Valerie Plame leak affair and the deterioration of the situation in Iraq. Were the historians polled today, that figure would certainly be higher.

Even worse for the president, the general public, having once given Bush the highest approval ratings ever recorded, now appears to be coming around to the dismal view held by most historians. To be sure, the president retains a considerable base of supporters who believe in and adore him, and who reject all criticism with a mixture of disbelief and fierce contempt -- about one-third of the electorate. (When the columnist Richard Reeves publicized the historians' poll last year and suggested it might have merit, he drew thousands of abusive replies that called him an idiot and that praised Bush as, in one writer's words, "a Christian who actually acts on his deeply held beliefs.") Yet the ranks of the true believers have thinned dramatically. A majority of voters in forty-three states now disapprove of Bush's handling of his job. Since the commencement of reliable polling in the 1940s, only one twice-elected president has seen his ratings fall as low as Bush's in his second term: Richard Nixon, during the months preceding his resignation in 1974. No two-term president since polling began has fallen from such a height of popularity as Bush's (in the neighborhood of ninety percent, during the patriotic upswell following the 2001 attacks) to such a low (now in the midthirties). No president, including Harry Truman (whose ratings sometimes dipped below Nixonian levels), has experienced such a virtually unrelieved decline as Bush has since his high point. Apart from sharp but temporary upticks that followed the commencement of the Iraq war and the capture of Saddam Hussein, and a recovery during the weeks just before and after his re-election, the Bush trend has been a profile in fairly steady disillusionment.

How does any president's reputation sink so low? The reasons are best understood as the reverse of those that produce presidential greatness. In almost every survey of historians dating back to the 1940s, three presidents have emerged as supreme successes: George Washington, Abraham Lincoln and Franklin D. Roosevelt. These were the men who guided the nation through what historians consider its greatest crises: the founding era after the ratification of the Constitution, the Civil War, and the Great Depression and Second World War. Presented with arduous, at times seemingly impossible circumstances, they rallied the nation, governed brilliantly and left the republic more secure than when they entered office.

Calamitous presidents, faced with enormous difficulties -- Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, Hoover and now Bush -- have divided the nation, governed erratically and left the nation worse off. In each case, different factors contributed to the failure: disastrous domestic policies, foreign-policy blunders and military setbacks, executive misconduct, crises of credibility and public trust. Bush, however, is one of the rarities in presidential history: He has not only stumbled badly in every one of these key areas, he has also displayed a weakness common among the greatest presidential failures -- an unswerving adherence to a simplistic ideology that abjures deviation from dogma as heresy, thus preventing any pragmatic adjustment to changing realities.
Rpeatedly, Bush has undone himself, a failing revealed in each major area of presidential performance.



You can read the rest HERE

"Patriotism is supporting your country all of the time, and your government when they deserve it."
Venus Williams



female

Last edited by RunDown; Apr 21st, 2006 at 12:46 AM.
RunDown is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 20th, 2006, 11:35 PM
Senior Member
 
Scotso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 47,044
                     
Yes.
Scotso is offline  
post #3 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 20th, 2006, 11:35 PM
Senior Member
 
Scotso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 47,044
                     
Although Reagan is a close #2.
Scotso is offline  
post #4 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 20th, 2006, 11:40 PM
Senior Member
 
IceHock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: cali
Posts: 9,616
                     
easily!!!
IceHock is offline  
post #5 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 20th, 2006, 11:46 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
RunDown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: N.C.
Posts: 658
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by MelissaTorresFan
Although Reagan is a close #2.
I don't think Reagan is the second worst President in history, but isn't it amazing how the Republicans have managed to talk him up to greatness?? He was nowhere near a "great" President.

"Patriotism is supporting your country all of the time, and your government when they deserve it."
Venus Williams



female
RunDown is offline  
post #6 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 20th, 2006, 11:52 PM
Senior Member
 
tennisboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,753
                     
George W. Bush=Bad President

Lindsay Davenport

98 US Open/99 Wimbledon/00 Australian Open
Atlanta 96 Singles Gold Medallist

Year end world number 1 98/01/04/05
tennisboi is online now  
post #7 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 20th, 2006, 11:52 PM
Senior Member
 
Reckoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 800
                     
George Bush isn't the worst president ever. And this is comming from a left-winger.

See the problem isn't George Bush. He is minipulated by his administration and Neo-Conservatives that run the U.S. He is just the scapegoat for it all. Thus you can blame his father, Karl Roave, Condaleeza Rice, etc.

Plus I thought Rolling Stone was a music magazine.

Patiently waiting for ANA, MISA and DANI to start playing tennis again.
Reckoner is offline  
post #8 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 21st, 2006, 12:03 AM
Senior Member
 
skanky~skanketta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Not paradise thats fo sho
Posts: 15,456
                     
yes.

skanky~skanketta is offline  
post #9 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 21st, 2006, 12:04 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: florida
Posts: 24,512
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_maestro
George Bush isn't the worst president ever. And this is comming from a left-winger.

See the problem isn't George Bush. He is minipulated by his administration and Neo-Conservatives that run the U.S. He is just the scapegoat for it all. Thus you can blame his father, Karl Roave, Condaleeza Rice, etc.

Plus I thought Rolling Stone was a music magazine.
Umm. . .his father, Karl Rove, the neoCons, and Condaleeza Rice aren't the President, though.

-one of those "bad" Williams fans that everyone keeps talking about


OFFICIAL BLACKSMITH OF THE ROYAL COURT

I don't mind straight people as long as they act gay in public!
Pureracket is offline  
post #10 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 21st, 2006, 12:09 AM
#ImWithHer
 
Brooklyn90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 12,805
                     
yes with out a doubt

Brooklyn90 is offline  
post #11 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 21st, 2006, 12:22 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
RunDown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: N.C.
Posts: 658
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pureracket
Umm. . .his father, Karl Rove, the neoCons, and Condaleeza Rice aren't the President, though.
Yep. Like Bush said the other day at his press conference, "I make the final decision....blah, blah, blah...I'm the decider...blah blah."

"Patriotism is supporting your country all of the time, and your government when they deserve it."
Venus Williams



female
RunDown is offline  
post #12 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 21st, 2006, 12:28 AM
Kart & I against the WtaWorld!
 
Rocketta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NC
Posts: 35,918
                     
I'm going with a yes vote.
Rocketta is offline  
post #13 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 21st, 2006, 12:39 AM
Senior Member
 
Demosthenes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Novak Egg
Posts: 44,659
                     
Nope, Dick "The Real President" Cheney, is.

I wouldn't say he is the worst, but he is definitely, definitely on up there.

2016 Title(s):
Suicide: Strasbourg


Quote:
Originally Posted by Vikapower View Post
And to think that Génie is 0-4 against this Kvitova player. Sometimes tennis is just not logical at all.
Demosthenes is offline  
post #14 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 21st, 2006, 01:04 AM
Team WTAworld
 
TF Chipmunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,959
                     
ONE OF the worst but not THE worst, thank god

JUSTINE HENIN
ALLEZ!!!

ANASTASIA MYSKINA
Riding the 3AM Rollercoaster


NADIA PETROVA
ANNA-LENA GROENEFELD
TF Chipmunk is offline  
post #15 of 93 (permalink) Old Apr 21st, 2006, 01:07 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,197
                     
Not the worst, but deffinetly down there somewhere
Xanadu11 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome