GOP Voter Suppression in Ohio - TennisForum.com
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 4 (permalink) Old Nov 1st, 2004, 03:15 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,050
                     
GOP Voter Suppression in Ohio

http://www.mydd.com/story/2004/10/28/192844/76



GOP Voter Suppression in Ohio
by Jerome Armstrong

The details about "Caging" and what the Republicans have planned to do are coming into view. The Republicans have been compiling lists (probably in the tens of thousands) of voters whom they have culled from lists of those newly registered, mailing registered mail to them, preparing lists of those who did not accept the Republican Party mailing, and then challenging their right to vote.

Here's one such incident that's been exposed in Ohio: ELECTION BOARD THROWS OUT 976 CHALLENGES BY REPUBLICAN PARTY



GOP Challenger Barbara Miller Could be Indicted on Felony Charges




AKRON, Ohio - The Summit County Board of Elections abruptly threw out 976 challenges of voter eligibility by the Republican Party today after Barbara Miller, the challenger, revealed that she did not have any personal information about the eligibility of any of the challenged voters.


Instead, Miller said that her challenges were based on a list of "undeliverable mail" given to her by the Republican Party. The list was based on a GOP mailing sent to registered voters throughout the state of Ohio.


After Miller presented this as her evidence, Russell Pry, Summit County Election Board member, told her that she could be indicted for signing a sworn challenge without any personal knowledge about the eligibility of the voters. Miller's reaction was to plead the Fifth Amendment.


Catherine Herold, the first voter challenged at the hearing, told the board that she believes that she was on the undeliverable list because she "refused the letter when she saw that it came from the Republican Party." She and many others expressed anger that their eligibility had been challenged - which could force them to vote by provisional ballot on Nov. 2.


"This is an outrage," Herold said. "I feel as if I am being called a liar for claiming to live at my address."


The Summit County Board of Elections has indicated that they plan to call in the Department of Justice to conduct a criminal investigation of the challenges.
Following is an excerpt from a transcript of today's hearing (for email copies contact Emilie Karrick). Catherine Herold and Neil Klingshirn, attorney for several of the challenged voters, are available for interviews.





Click on the extended entry to read the
EXCERPT FROM TODAY'S SUMMIT COUNTY ELECTION BOARD HEARING:

General 2004 :: Thu Oct 28th, 2004 at 07:28:44 PM EST



Mr. PRY: Ms. Miller, you filed a challenge to the voting residence of

Catherine Ann Herold, who lives at 238 30th Street Northwest, Barberton, Summit County, Ohio; is that correct?

MS. MILLER: I did.

MR. PRY: And have you ever been to that residence?

MS. MILLER: No.

MR. PRY: Do you know Catherine Ann Herrold?

MS. MILLER: No, I don't.

MR. PRY: You have indicated in this challenge form that the person - that you believe that she does not live at that residence; is that correct?

MS. MILLER: That's correct.

MR. PRY: And what is the basis for you making this challenge?

MS. MILLER: That was my impression that these items that I signed were for people whose mail had been undeliverable for several times, and that they did not live at the residence.

MR. PRY: Did you personally send any mail to Ms. Herrold?

MS. MILLER: No, I did not.

MR. PRY: Have you seen any mail that was returned to Ms. Herrold?

MS. MILLER: No, I have not.

MR. PRY: Do you have any personal knowledge as we stand here today that Ms. Herrold does not live at the address at 238 30th Street Northwest?

MS. MILLER: Only that which was my impression; that their mail had not been able to be delivered.

MR. PRY: And who gave you that impression?

MS. MILLER: Attorney Jim Simon.

MR. PRY: And what did --

MS. MILLER: He's an officer of the party.

MR. PRY: An officer of which party?

MS. MILLER: Republican party.

MR. PRY: Where did you complete this challenge form at?

MS. MILLER: My home.

MR. PRY: What did Mr. Simon tell you with respect to Ms. Herrold's residence?

MS. MILLER: That the mail had come back undeliverable several times from that residence.

MR. PRY: And you never saw the returned mail?

MS. MILLER: No, I did not.

MR. PRY: Now, you've indicated that you signed this based on some personal knowledge.

MR. HUTCHINSON: (Joseph F. Hutchinson, Jr. Summit County Board of Elections) No

MR. ARSHINKOFF: (Alex R. Arshinkoff, Summit County Board of Elections) Reason to believe. It says, "I have reason to believe." It says it on the form.

MR. JONES: It says, "I hereby declare under penalty of election falsification, that the statements above are true as I verily believe."

MR. ARSHINKOFF: It says here, "I have reason to believe."

MR. HUTCHINSON: It says what it says.

MR. ARSHINKOFF: You want her indicted, get her indicted.

MR. PRY: That may be where it goes next.

MR. HUTCHINSON: Yeah, give it a try.

MR. MORRISON: I'm going to enter an objection.

MR. JONES: Can we have you name?

MR. MORRISON: Yes. Jack Morrison. I've just been informed by Mr. Pry that an indictment may flow out of this, and therefore I'm instructing Ms. Miller to exercise her privilege against self-incrimination. She will not answer any further questions.

MR. PRY: There's no basis for this challenge.

MR. JONES: Since she's here, we're going to allow Ms. Herrold share with us -- thank you, Ms. Miller. MS. MILLER: May I sit down? MR. JONES: Yes.

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 4 (permalink) Old Nov 1st, 2004, 03:17 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,050
                     
http://www.jerryforohio.com/story/2004/11/1/75825/6664

Quote:
Challengers Gone?
by Jesse Taylor
Mon Nov 1st, 2004 at 07:58:25 AM EST


A federal judge has barred vote challengers from Ohio polls.

A federal judge issued an order early Monday barring political party challengers from polling places throughout Ohio during Tuesday's election.

U.S. District Judge Susan Dlott found that the application of Ohio's statute allowing challengers at polling places is unconstitutional.

She said the presence of challengers inexperienced in the electoral process questioning voters about their eligibility would impede voting. Dlott ruled on a lawsuit by a black Cincinnati couple who said Republican plans to deploy challengers to largely black precincts in Hamilton County was meant to intimidate and block black voters.
This ruling is being appealed

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
post #3 of 4 (permalink) Old Nov 1st, 2004, 05:43 PM
Senior Member
 
jacobruiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,992
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volcana
OMG< YYYYEEESSSS!!!! (The ruling, not the appealing)

This is SO important for Ohio and the nation! These brave judges (there are two) have declared the Ohio law allowing challengers in the polling places to be unconstitutional!! They say, rightfully so, that the official pollsters are capable of determining who can cast a ballot and the presence of untrained or poorly trained challengers trying to stop certain people from voting will result in delays, confusion, and general disruption of the voting process.

And now our Secretary of the Treasury, Kenneth Blackwell, (a Black republican ) has finally gone against his party's wished and has ruled that NO CHALLENGERS WILL BE ALLOWED IN OHIO!!!! Alright, Blackwell, finally a decent ruling!

This is being appealed but if it is appealed successfully and challengers ARE allowed, things will REALLY heat up.
jacobruiz is offline  
post #4 of 4 (permalink) Old Nov 1st, 2004, 05:44 PM
Senior Member
 
jacobruiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,992
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volcana
OMG< YYYYEEESSSS!!!! (The ruling, not the appealing)

This is SO important for Ohio and the nation! These brave judges (there are two) have declared the Ohio law allowing challengers in the polling places to be unconstitutional!! They say, rightfully so, that the official pollsters are capable of determining who can cast a ballot and the presence of untrained or poorly trained challengers trying to stop certain people from voting will result in delays, confusion, and general disruption of the voting process.

And now our Secretary of the Treasury, Kenneth Blackwell, (a Black republican ) has finally gone against his party's wished and has ruled that NO CHALLENGERS WILL BE ALLOWED IN OHIO!!!! Alright, Blackwell, finally a decent ruling!

This is being appealed but if it is appealed successfully and challengers ARE allowed, things will REALLY heat up.
jacobruiz is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome