Originally Posted by Volcana
SlazengerUser will try to bait you into a stupid arguement about this words. Ignore it. The quotes speak for themselves. Don't respond to any threads about it. Let the posting of YOUR words in HIS sig be a response.
ONthe debate, I'm AMAZED at the poll numbers. Every now and then, the American people show me they aren't as stupid as they act 99% of the time. Edwards had it on substance, but Satan's personal attacks were devastating.
thank you for the advise and i will take it to heart.
Originally Posted by Jeleno Benesovo
sux in which sense? I've seen it and IMHO it's a good documentary (not as good as "bowling for columbine" though), and the ppl at Cannes thought the same, for some reason it won la "Palme d'Or" (which it's a "real" award unlike others....)
I don't think it will be a bad idea, or will the documentary push the ppl to vote for Bush after they see it? ... I REALLY doubt it
why i think it sucks a late night rant:
1-it's really propaganda.
propaganda i mean:
1- The systematic propagation of a doctrine or cause or of information reflecting the views and interests of those advocating such a doctrine or cause.
2- Material disseminated by the advocates or opponents of a doctrine or cause: wartime propaganda.
that is to say, it sproduced with the desired effect (hate bush) at the front sothat it over shadows the facts. which is really stupid because there are plentyof facts and good reasons to hate bush then to make fun of his golf habit. ok, he golfed forthe first nine months of his time in the office, what else.
2-thisgoes backto the end of the first point.
moore focuses too much on tidbits and leaves out very key facts like the 42$ million that the usa gave al qaeda in may of 2001. even though there was a warning that al qeada was planning an attack on us soil.
3-as adocumentary it sucks.
there is a less documenting and alot more hate bush voice over. an honest look at the word honest shows that really, the documentary sucks, in terms of art and video.