Court to Decide Johnnie Cochran Protester Case -
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 1 (permalink) Old Sep 28th, 2004, 09:26 PM Thread Starter
Kart & I against the WtaWorld!
Rocketta's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NC
Posts: 35,967
Court to Decide Johnnie Cochran Protester Case

Court to Decide Johnnie Cochran Protester Case

Tue Sep 28, 1:41 PM ET
Entertainment - Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites) said on Tuesday that it would decide whether barring a dissatisfied former client of high-profile attorney Johnnie Cochran from picketing at his law firm or making any statements about him violated the man's constitutional free-speech rights.

The high court agreed to hear an appeal by Ulysses Tory, who had hired Cochran to represent him in a civil rights lawsuit in the early 1980s. This was before Cochran became famous for his successful defense in the 1995 murder trial of former football star and actor O.J. Simpson.

Tory became dissatisfied with Cochran's services and began picketing with others in the late 1990s outside Cochran's law office in Los Angeles and outside the Superior Court building.

Tory criticized how Cochran handled his case and questioned his abilities as an attorney. The placards included the following statement: "You've been a BAD BAD boy, Johnnie L. Cochran." Another one stated, "Johnnie is a crook, a liar and a Thief. Can a lawyer go to HEAVEN? Luke 11:46."

Cochran sued for libel in 2000. Tory represented himself at trial and asserted his free-speech rights under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

A Superior Court judge ruled for Cochran, but did not award any money damages.

The judge instead issued a permanent injunction in 2002 that barred Tory from the picketing and from displaying signs, placards or other written or printed material about Cochran and his law firm.

The injunction also barred Tory from "orally uttering statements about Cochran and/or Cochran's law firm." Although Tory's wife, Ruth Craft, was not named in the lawsuit, the injunction also covered her too.

Tory and Craft appealed and argued the injunction was too broad and a restraint in advance on future speech that violated their rights. A California appeals court upheld the injunction.

Duke University law professor Erwin Chemerinsky represented Tory and Craft in appealing to the Supreme Court.

He said Cochran was an admitted public figure, and urged the justices to decide the significant question concerning when a court order preventing speech was impermissibly broad.

The justices will hear arguments in the case early next year, with a decision due by the end of June.

Rocketta is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome