Anyone Watching 10.5? - TennisForum.com
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 12 (permalink) Old May 4th, 2004, 03:07 AM Thread Starter
Rican In The Burgh
 
charmedRic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Yinzer Land
Posts: 36,617
                     
Anyone Watching 10.5?

Greetings Fellow WTAWorld Posters,

...just wondering if anyone was watching the 10.5 mini series?

...so far is has its GREAT attributes, but don't even get me started on the Scientific flaws.

So if anyone is watching, stop by let me know what you think. I would like to see what you all thought about it.

TT Singles: 2014 SF: Bogota, New Braunfels. 2013 F: Las Vegas, SF: Orlando, Sibenik.
TT Doubles: 2014 W: Trnava w PinkTape. 2013 W: St Martin, Orlando, Sibenik, Charlottesville, Nantes-YEC all w Soliloque; Lexington w DJDVD.
charmedRic is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 12 (permalink) Old May 4th, 2004, 04:11 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 5,793
                     
It was a little too typical for me. I'm a sucker for disaster movies but I didn't really care for the characters in this one.

Venus Williams-Ana Ivanovic-Serena Williams-Vika Azarenka-Caroline Wozniacki

McHale-Stephens-Watson-Robson-Townsend

Brodsky-Muhammad-Hampton-Keys-Crawford-Andrews-Hardebeck
ptkten is offline  
post #3 of 12 (permalink) Old May 4th, 2004, 04:12 AM
Senior Member
 
bw2082's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: right here
Posts: 6,753
                     
I'm a friggin geologist. The movie was appauling scientifically but still entertaining as a disaster movie.
bw2082 is offline  
post #4 of 12 (permalink) Old May 4th, 2004, 04:23 AM
 
Tratree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Posts: 2,310
                     
No freaking way am I watching that movie as a West Coaster who has felt quite a few big shakers. I don't need any help in the fear of earthquakes department.
Tratree is offline  
post #5 of 12 (permalink) Old May 4th, 2004, 04:27 AM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
esquímaux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 釜を掘&
Posts: 15,244
                     
It was cheeky.

"誰も私を止める停が出来なかったか"
- Jinpachi Mishima
- Jedah Douma
"恐れてはいけない. 私は最初であり, 最後である"
esquímaux is offline  
post #6 of 12 (permalink) Old May 4th, 2004, 04:29 AM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
KoOlMaNsEaN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 49,270
                     
i watched it. It was okay. i would cut out the part where everyone is running for 5 straight minutes.

My Forever Fav: Jelena Dokic

Serena Williams, Ana Ivanovic

KoOlMaNsEaN is offline  
post #7 of 12 (permalink) Old May 4th, 2004, 04:30 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,330
                     
That movie was horrible! On a scale of 1-10, I would give it a 2 and that is only for the limited destructive scenes. I agree, too typical. How the hell was a nuclear bomb supposed to fuse two tectonic plates along one of the most active fault line and for the bomb to be a couple of hundred feet (400) below the ground. There would be enough thermal energy in hell, yet a couple of nuclear bomb to fuse two plates permanently together. Im still confused. Was the 10.5 earthquake the result of the fault line splitting because if the fault line split and filled with pacific ocean water, wouldn't earthquake damage be limited? Im not even going to mention the rest, just a horrible movie. I cant believe I spent two hours yesterday and today watching this pathetic movie.
jbone_0307 is offline  
post #8 of 12 (permalink) Old May 4th, 2004, 04:34 AM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
esquímaux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 釜を掘&
Posts: 15,244
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbone_0307
That movie was horrible! On a scale of 1-10, I would give it a 2 and that is only for the limited destructive scenes. I agree, too typical. How the hell was a nuclear bomb supposed to fuse two tectonic plates along one of the most active fault line and for the bomb to be a couple of hundred feet (400) below the ground. There would be enough thermal energy in hell, yet a couple of nuclear bomb to fuse two plates permanently together. Im still confused. Was the 10.5 earthquake the result of the fault line splitting because if the fault line split and filled with pacific ocean water, wouldn't earthquake damage be limited? Im not even going to mention the rest, just a horrible movie. I cant believe I spent two hours yesterday and today watching this pathetic movie.
LOL! It actually was rated 2 stars on the preview guide

"誰も私を止める停が出来なかったか"
- Jinpachi Mishima
- Jedah Douma
"恐れてはいけない. 私は最初であり, 最後である"
esquímaux is offline  
post #9 of 12 (permalink) Old May 4th, 2004, 04:36 AM
Senior Member
 
bw2082's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: right here
Posts: 6,753
                     
I too am confused about what they were trying to do with the nuclear bombs. The whole idea is perposterous. It even goes against the woman's own theory that there was a massive superfault deep below where they could not detect it. Were they just putting a bandaid on the surface faults? at 300-400 feet? wtf. The whole fusing thing was just stupid anyway. I'm not even sure what the hell was going on at the end with the ground shooting up and this whole giant chasm opening and splitting california. that just doesn't happen. The ground does not open up and swallow things. Was that earthquake happening along the san andreas? if so why was the thing starting in the pacific ocean and working eastward? The san andreas is a north south system.
bw2082 is offline  
post #10 of 12 (permalink) Old May 4th, 2004, 05:07 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,330
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by bw2082
I too am confused about what they were trying to do with the nuclear bombs. The whole idea is perposterous. It even goes against the woman's own theory that there was a massive superfault deep below where they could not detect it. Were they just putting a bandaid on the surface faults? at 300-400 feet? wtf. The whole fusing thing was just stupid anyway. I'm not even sure what the hell was going on at the end with the ground shooting up and this whole giant chasm opening and splitting california. that just doesn't happen. The ground does not open up and swallow things. Was that earthquake happening along the san andreas? if so why was the thing starting in the pacific ocean and working eastward? The san andreas is a north south system.
The ground splitting open (weathering) process does happen, it just tends to happen over lets say over eons and centuries, but the way they depicted it was that it happened in 5 minutes which is perposterous. I dont want to say the ground doesn't open up, it just occurs over hundreds of years. As for the swallowing, really lost me. Im assuming it did happen on one of the San Andreas' branch faults. I always thought that most Los Angeles was to the right of the San Andreas fault and that San Francisco was to the left of it, so I dont know why the split went east, north, and then west.

For the person who said they didn't watch it because they live on the west coast, WELL MOVE j/k. You know its going to happen, more likely sooner than later, but you dont know when. That is the only reason why Im scared to go to California because unlike a tornado, hurricane, and other phenomenons, you have atleast some type of warning to when they happen and you often time have some sort of shelter like a storm cellar in case it does happen. You could be at a baseball game or on the interstate, anywhere. This is what is keepig me in the South and/or Midwest region.
jbone_0307 is offline  
post #11 of 12 (permalink) Old May 4th, 2004, 05:41 AM
Senior Member
 
bw2082's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: right here
Posts: 6,753
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbone_0307
The ground splitting open (weathering) process does happen, it just tends to happen over lets say over eons and centuries, but the way they depicted it was that it happened in 5 minutes which is perposterous. I dont want to say the ground doesn't open up, it just occurs over hundreds of years. As for the swallowing, really lost me. Im assuming it did happen on one of the San Andreas' branch faults. I always thought that most Los Angeles was to the right of the San Andreas fault and that San Francisco was to the left of it, so I dont know why the split went east, north, and then west.
weathering and faulting are two different things. If there is an earthquake you will not see the fault open up a huge hole in the earth and swallow things up. Movement on a fault happens along the fault plane. IN the case of the san andreas it's a right lateral fault that runs north/south. If the earth did open up along the fault there would be no earthquake since there would be no friction happening when the plates move against one another. I'd have to check a map but I'm pretty sure that San Fransico is on the right side of the fault and Los Angels is on the left side since the pacific plate is moving north in this region and it's been said that LA and SF will eventually be adjacent to one another.
bw2082 is offline  
post #12 of 12 (permalink) Old May 4th, 2004, 11:33 AM Thread Starter
Rican In The Burgh
 
charmedRic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Yinzer Land
Posts: 36,617
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by bw2082
weathering and faulting are two different things. If there is an earthquake you will not see the fault open up a huge hole in the earth and swallow things up. Movement on a fault happens along the fault plane. IN the case of the san andreas it's a right lateral fault that runs north/south. If the earth did open up along the fault there would be no earthquake since there would be no friction happening when the plates move against one another. I'd have to check a map but I'm pretty sure that San Fransico is on the right side of the fault and Los Angels is on the left side since the pacific plate is moving north in this region and it's been said that LA and SF will eventually be adjacent to one another.
Correct, it is expected that SF will be come a surburb for LA. Or viceversa depending on which side of the fault line you are on.

In the movie they managed to fuse the plates at strategic points (not the whole thing), so that the Big Fault wouldn't go from Washington to Baja. Since the Southern CA bomb didn't work, the deep fault @ 700KM made the upper fault a.k.a San Andreas pretty much split open.

Now for movie purposes, the entire this was GREAT, and I personally liked it except for some of the cheesiness.

Geology wise....a 10.5 is almost implausible. Ritcher Scale only goes to 9, and since it's exponential a 10.0 would be 30K times stronger than an 8.0. 30,000 stronger than an 8.0.....what's that? Ok to put it in reference in Anchorage they said the Earth moved like water in waves of 25 feet from an 8.2 earthquake. So LADS & GENTS ... a 10.0 in geological terms means the Continental North America.... becomes an Archipelago.

Sure we have all the faults for this to happen at a lesser scale......but heck I'd be more scared of the deep hidden faults from previous geological periods...if you like this subject....do a lil research on The New Madrid Fault...now that is scary business.

TT Singles: 2014 SF: Bogota, New Braunfels. 2013 F: Las Vegas, SF: Orlando, Sibenik.
TT Doubles: 2014 W: Trnava w PinkTape. 2013 W: St Martin, Orlando, Sibenik, Charlottesville, Nantes-YEC all w Soliloque; Lexington w DJDVD.
charmedRic is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome