Lithuanian Ice dancing Protest Tersely Denied.. - TennisForum.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 17 (permalink) Old Feb 21st, 2002, 11:36 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,511
                     
Lithuanian Ice dancing Protest Tersely Denied..

I posted this in another thread, but figured more people would see it this way...



http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/winter...ews?id=1337676


Wednesday, February 20, 2002

Denial comes with terse letter from ISU

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Associated Press


SALT LAKE CITY -- The International Skating Union, already facing enough problems with judging controversies, denied it had another one by rejecting Wednesday a protest of the ice dancing results filed by Lithuania.


Margarita Drobiazko and Povilas Vanagas questioned how they could finish fifth in the free dance program when the two teams that finished ahead of them fell, and they didn't. They insist their complaint wasn't to get a medal, only to expose judging inconsistencies.

John Domanskis, a spokesman for the Lithuanian Olympic team, said the ISU's response "was very terse, one sentence. It said, `The judging was fair."'

"Maybe we made our point in some way," he said. "I don't think we're going to pursue it any further. Hopefully we've made a difference for future athletes."

Domanskis said the ice dancers, who are married, accepted the ruling.

"They're fine," he said. "They weren't expecting miracles, but they were hoping for something better than this."

The ISU is already investigating the scandal last week that resulted in the suspension of a French judge and a second set of gold medals for Canadian pairs skaters Jamie Sale and David Pelletier.
Crazy Canuck is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 17 (permalink) Old Feb 21st, 2002, 11:39 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,511
                     
Now I'm a little dissapointed to see they didn't even take into account the fact that some of the judges did not even deduct the required deductions from teh Italians or Canadians scores after there respective falls.

I was under the impression that this requires a .2 deduction for the one man fall - and .3 deduction for both pairs falling?

And the presentation marks should obviously be effected by the skaters falling -

But didn't appear to be.

I don't really see how they cant' examine an obvious flaw on the judges part.
Crazy Canuck is offline  
post #3 of 17 (permalink) Old Feb 21st, 2002, 11:40 AM
Senior Member
 
TheBoiledEgg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: in Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 180,137
                     
not suprised theirs got rejected after all who cares about a"little country"

double standards pffffff

Plus Irina Slutskaya should protest as well as she should have won short program but that will be of little significance if she doesnt finish ahead of Kwan in long program.

Good luck to my favs

AZARENKA

*Kuznetsova*Sharapova*Kleybanova*Vesnina*Shvedova*Kulichkova*Kasatkina*
Pavlyuchenkova*Makarova*Diatchenko*Pivovarova*Gasparyan*Leykina*Zhuk*Potapova*Pervushina**Govortsova
MINELLA TsurenkoAlize Lim*El Tabakh*Robson*Cirstea
*Juhaszova*Zanevska*Broady*Bouchard*
Cetkovska*Svitolina*
*Bellis*Soylu*Sibille*Uberalova*Eden Silva*
http://www.twitter.com/TheBoiledEgg
TheBoiledEgg is offline  
post #4 of 17 (permalink) Old Feb 21st, 2002, 11:44 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,511
                     
Egg- if its any concellation I thought Irina's program was far superior techincally to Kwan's - and while Kwans artistic impression was better in my eyes - it wasn't like Irina's was so bad it should have bumped her into second.

So I agree with u - Irina had the better short program. Too bad I'm not a judge, eh?

But like you said - if makes little difference, as she who wins the long program will take the gold.

The only defense I have for the little attention Lithuania is getting for this - is that it wasn't over the Gold medal, which is obiously held with higher prestige.

But it shouldn't matter- that isn't an excuse at all.
Crazy Canuck is offline  
post #5 of 17 (permalink) Old Feb 21st, 2002, 11:45 AM
Senior Member
 
gentenaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: land of the incompetent
Posts: 34,743
                     
The technical marks for Kwan were too high.

Everything you do continues long after you've gone
gentenaire is offline  
post #6 of 17 (permalink) Old Feb 21st, 2002, 11:47 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,511
                     
I've heard that Tine...
Vivalaseles said that she should have gotten a 0.2 deduction, yet still recieved a 5.9 for technical merit?

sigh
Crazy Canuck is offline  
post #7 of 17 (permalink) Old Feb 21st, 2002, 11:49 AM
Sunset, Moonrise, Winter
 
Sam L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Shangri-La
Posts: 35,179
                     
"it wasn't over the Gold medal, which is obiously held with higher prestige" ---> I agree. I think they felt it would've made little difference to the final positions (medals). And they probably want to avoid further controversies these games.

A little off topic... but um do any of you know the draw for the Ladies' Free program?
Sam L is offline  
post #8 of 17 (permalink) Old Feb 21st, 2002, 11:51 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,511
                     
SamL - check here http://www.wtaworld.com/showthread.p...threadid=10619

There lists the order for the freeskate.

btw - I don't think that wanting to avoid a controversy is exactly a fair way of deciding to ignore judging flaws. But they did, so what can we do...
Crazy Canuck is offline  
post #9 of 17 (permalink) Old Feb 21st, 2002, 11:53 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,511
                     
Though I think your right...

Turning over the results in one skating competition was bad enough..

But if they go on to do it in two? Yikes!

With half the competitions original results overturned, the few people who actually stil take the judging of this sport seriously, will no longer be able to do that!
Crazy Canuck is offline  
post #10 of 17 (permalink) Old Feb 21st, 2002, 11:59 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,511
                     
Vivalaseles - we agree on something?

Seriously - I've actually learned a lot through all my arguing with you Thanks!
Crazy Canuck is offline  
post #11 of 17 (permalink) Old Feb 21st, 2002, 12:03 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,511
                     
And here is another -


http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/oly...S47/index.html


Lithuanians ice dance protest thrown out


SALT LAKE CITY, Utah, Feb 20 (AFP) - The protest of Lithuanian ice dancers Margarita Drobiazko and Povilas Vanagas against their fifth placing in the Olympic figure skating final has been rejected by the Internatonal Skating Union (ISU), a spokesperson for the Lithuanian delegation confirmed Wednesday.

The duo lodged their protest Tuesday, the day after they were dumped into fifth place following the free skating final despite the third and fourth placed couples falling.

The spokesperson said that the Lithuanian delegation had received a letter from Alexandr Gorshkov, the ISU referee of Monday's free skating final, rejecting their claim that they had been unfairly judged.

The four-time Olympians hit back at what they claimed were "dirty games" by the judges which resulted in no change in placement among the top eight couples throughout the three rounds of competition.

The husband-and-wife team slammed finishing behind third-placed Barbara Fusar Poli and Maurizio Margaglio of Italy and fourth-placed Canadians Shae-Lynn Bourne and Victor Kraatz, even though both couples had falls.

"We feel very much that we've been dumped down," said 31-year-old Vanagas.

The 10-time national champions said they had been encouraged in their bid by the awarding of a joint gold medal to Canadians Jamie Sale and David Pelletier after it was found that pressure had been brought to bear on one of the judges in the pairs final.

ea/bb
Crazy Canuck is offline  
post #12 of 17 (permalink) Old Feb 21st, 2002, 12:10 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,511
                     
awwww...thanks
Crazy Canuck is offline  
post #13 of 17 (permalink) Old Feb 21st, 2002, 12:14 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,511
                     
GRRROOOOUUUUUPPP HUUUUGGG!!!
Crazy Canuck is offline  
post #14 of 17 (permalink) Old Feb 21st, 2002, 12:27 PM
Sunset, Moonrise, Winter
 
Sam L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Shangri-La
Posts: 35,179
                     
Quote:
Originally posted by Becca
SamL - check here http://www.wtaworld.com/showthread.p...threadid=10619

There lists the order for the freeskate.

btw - I don't think that wanting to avoid a controversy is exactly a fair way of deciding to ignore judging flaws. But they did, so what can we do...
Thanx Becca!

I've been looking for it everywhere. I can't believe it's Kwan and then Slutskaya last! Come on Michelle!
Sam L is offline  
post #15 of 17 (permalink) Old Feb 21st, 2002, 03:08 PM
Senior Member
 
Scotso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 47,044
                     
I like the Lithuanians... and I certainly think they deserved to be on the podium.


Le Poussin! Faithfully ignoring the haters since 1995.

Le Poulailler de Poussin! (Simontarded.)

Ron Paul for President 2012!
Scotso is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome